Connect with us

California

Woman berates wealthy California tech workers for moving to her city and inflating its housing market: ‘Real estate is cooked’

Published

on

Woman berates wealthy California tech workers for moving to her city and inflating its housing market: ‘Real estate is cooked’


A TikTok user lambasted California tech workers for invading her city, leading to inflated prices and a low supply of homes.

In a clip that has racked up over half a million views, Austin native Dani berated those who fled to Texas during the pandemic and bought up cheap homes, which they later demolished, turned into pricey Airbnbs or flipped for a profit.

She placed most of the blame on people who fled the Golden State, lured in by the low cost of living and absence of a state income tax.

‘They’re trying to sell houses for crazy, crazy inflated prices, and that’s not going to work,’ Dani said.

Advertisement

The housing market, she lamented, was ‘cooked’. 

She placed the blame on those who fled to Texas during the pandemic and bought up cheap homes to rent as Airbnbs or flip for a profit

Austin native Dani berated California tech workers for ‘cooking’ the housing market in her home city. She placed the blame on those who fled to Texas during the pandemic and bought up cheap homes to rent as Airbnbs or flip for a profit

Last June, Austin's rentals ranked among the most expensive in the country (pictured: an Airbnb listed in May 2024 for $3,942 per night)

Last June, Austin’s rentals ranked among the most expensive in the country (pictured: an Airbnb listed in May 2024 for $3,942 per night)

Dani said many new arrivals were leaving amid sweeping tech layoffs, without much of a return on their housing investments (Pictured: an Airbnb listed in May 2024 for $3,920 per night)

Dani said many new arrivals were leaving amid sweeping tech layoffs, without much of a return on their housing investments (Pictured: an Airbnb listed in May 2024 for $3,920 per night)

Austin had the highest net inflow of tech workers of any major city in the United States from May 2020 to April 2021, according to LinkedIn user data.

And while it is debated whether there was a significant ‘exodus’ of Californians into Texas – studies from the University of California determined otherwise – San Francisco saw a sharp increase in people leaving.

A March 2021 policy brief from the California Policy Lab concluded that departures from the city in the second through fourth quarters of 2020 were 31 percent higher than during the same period in 2019.

And data from the U.S. Census Bureau shows that California lost 75,423 residents in 2023, following a steady pattern that began during the pandemic.

Advertisement

Dani’s claim about skyrocketing Airbnb prices holds some weight as well. Last June, Austin’s rentals ranked among the most expensive in the country.

A study by ChamberofCommerce.org found that rentals in the city boasted an average daily rate of $373 across all property sizes. An average one-bedroom rental in Austin cost $127 per night, while two-bedroom properties averaged $203.

In her viral TikTok, Dani also pointed out that residents, including those who arrived during the pandemic, are now leaving the city amid a turbulent tech job market.

‘We’re having a ton of tech layoffs – this city’s economy is based in tech, so a lot of people are moving away,’ she said.

Tech companies have historically maintained a foothold in the Texas capital (Pictured: the original Apple campus at 5501 West Parmer Lane in Austin)

Tech companies have historically maintained a foothold in the Texas capital (Pictured: the original Apple campus at 5501 West Parmer Lane in Austin) 

Tesla opened its 'Giga Texas' factory east of the city in April 2022, but now plans to lay off 2,688 workers beginning in June

Tesla opened its ‘Giga Texas’ factory east of the city in April 2022, but now plans to lay off 2,688 workers beginning in June

Austin has long been hailed as a pioneer of innovation, beginning with the genesis of IBM and Texas Instruments in the 1960s. It is the birthplace of Dell, which went on to become one of the largest computer manufacturers.

Advertisement

Despite concentrating in Silicon Valley and the Bay Area, tech giants have also maintained a foothold in the Texas state capital.

Google leased Block 185, a sail-shaped skyscraper on the bank of the Colorado River, in 2019. The company was supposed to move in sometime this year, but the timeline hangs in the balance amid sweeping layoffs.

Apple, meanwhile, shows no signs of slowing down after quietly leasing an entire office building in the Westlake neighborhood. This followed a $240 million investment in its North Austin campus, which is set to open in March of next year.

Auto manufacturer Tesla opened its ‘Giga Texas’ factory east of Austin in April 2022, but now plans to lay off 2,688 workers beginning in June.

Companies including Apple and Tesla were offered packages worth tens of millions of dollars in property and payroll tax reimbursements as an incentive from the city. However, that may not be enough to get them to stay.

Advertisement

After relocating its corporate headquarters from the Bay Area to Austin, business software and services company Oracle has plans to move out.

As tech companies leave the city, so do their workers – and few are seeing much of a return on their housing investments. 

Home prices in the city increased 60 percent from 2020 to 2022, and despite seeing an 11 percent drop in 2024, the prices remain near record-high levels.

The initial influx of newcomers during the pandemic also sparked the construction of apartments. There has been so much of it that rental rates decreased in Austin by 7.4 percent since last year.

These conditions make it even more difficult to sell property, Dani pointed out, as many would rather rent an apartment than shell out considerably more to buy or lease a home.

Advertisement

‘This is what you get for trying to take advantage of people who are just trying to buy in their city or their state that they’ve lived in their whole life,’ she declared.



Source link

California

California gets Bruce Lee Day in a first for US state’s Chinese Americans

Published

on

California gets Bruce Lee Day in a first for US state’s Chinese Americans


Bruce Lee Day aims to honour the San Francisco-born martial arts legend as a cultural bridge and Asian-American icon.

Martial arts icon Bruce Lee will become the first Chinese American in California history to be honoured with an annual namesake day.

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a law on Tuesday afternoon, officially designating May 17 as Bruce Lee Day.

Advertisement

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Lee was born in San Francisco in 1940 and returned to the city on May 17, 1959, aged 18, after spending his childhood in Hong Kong.

His daughter, Shannon Lee, CEO of the Bruce Lee Foundation, said the honour reflects her father’s enduring legacy as a bridge between cultures.

“From young people who found confidence and possibility in his philosophy, to families who finally saw themselves represented on screen, to athletes who still draw on his teachings of discipline and inner strength, his reach is profound,” she said in a statement.

State Assembly member Matt Haney, who represents San Francisco, called Lee the “epitome of the best of California”.

“At a time when Asian Americans were too often absent from or stereotyped on screen, Bruce Lee helped generations see themselves represented with strength and dignity,” he said.

Advertisement

The Bruce Lee Foundation and Asian-American groups hope Bruce Lee will be celebrated each year with voluntary activities, including cultural exhibits, public events and classroom lessons.

Born to Chinese parents touring the US with an opera, Lee held birthright citizenship. He moved to Hong Kong as an infant, became a child actor, and studied Chinese kung fu before returning to the US in 1959.

He enrolled at the University of Washington in Seattle in 1961, but dropped out to teach martial arts.

In the 1960s, Lee appeared in Hollywood, most notably as Kato in the TV series The Green Hornet, but said studios typecast him in racist roles and paid him less than white actors.

He returned to Hong Kong and starred in martial arts films, including The Big Boss and Fist of Fury.

Advertisement

Lee died tragically in 1973 at the age of 32 after an allergic reaction to pain medication.

His name and likeness remain widely popular.

Fans gather on his birthday, and a treatment he wrote for a television series inspired the HBO Max show “Warrior”.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

As fireworks pop off for July 4, which are legal to use in California?

Published

on

As fireworks pop off for July 4, which are legal to use in California?


play

Each year, fireworks light up the sky across the United States for the nation’s Independence Day. With 2026 marking the nation’s 250th birthday, fireworks shows may be a bigger draw.

With California being so fire-prone, the state has strict fireworks laws, but does that mean that people won’t enjoy fireworks without risking jail time on July 4?

Advertisement

Are fireworks illegal in California?

The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or CalFire, is the agency in charge of managing fireworks and classifying which ones are safe to light.

The California Fireworks Law was passed in 1938 and designated the Office of the State Fire Marshal as the only fireworks classification authority in the state, according to CalFire.

The fire marshal’s office classifies fireworks through lab analysis and field testing. It also requires that all parties dealing in fireworks, such as pyrotechnic operators, manufacturers, and retailers, have licensing.

Along with the aforementioned law, the State’s Explosive Law authorizes the fire marshal to “adopt regulations for the safe use, handling, storage and transportation of explosives,” CalFire says.

Advertisement

“Safe and Sane” fireworks are less likely to cause injury and generally mean that the fireworks do not explode or fly, according to the City of Fontana.

There are almost 300 communities in the state that allow “Safe and Sane” fireworks.

It is illegal in the state to sell, transport, or use fireworks that don’t carry the “Safe and Sane” seal or use any in a nonpermitted community. If convicted, you can face a fine up to $50,000, a year in jail or both, according to CalFire.

All other fireworks are considered illegal in the state and are prohibited from being operated by unauthorized parties in most jurisdictions.

Some illegal fireworks include:

Advertisement
  • Wire Core Sparklers
  • Sky rockets
  • Bottle rockets
  • Roman candles
  • Aerial shells
  • Firecrackers
  • Other fireworks that explode, go into the air, or move on the ground in an “uncontrollable manner.”

How to safely use fireworks

CalFire has put out a list of safety tips to avoid injury when handling fireworks.

CalFire recommends:

  • Use only State Fire Marshal-approved fireworks
  • Verify local ordinances before purchasing or using fireworks.
  • Always read the directions on labels.
  • Children should always have an adult present.
  • Only use fireworks outdoors.
  • Avoid using fireworks near dry grass or other flammable materials.
  • Only light one firework at a time.
  • Have a bucket of water and a hose nearby in case of fire.
  • During a drought, it is recommended that you use a bucket of reused water to submerge your firework after use to ensure it’s completely extinguished.
  • Never place any part of your body directly over a fireworks device when lighting the fuse.
  • Back up several feet immediately after lighting a firework.
  • Never point or throw fireworks at another person.
  • Never attempt to relight or fix fireworks.
  • Never experiment with fireworks.
  • Do not wear loose-fitting clothing while lighting fireworks.
  • Never carry fireworks in your pockets.

Ernesto Centeno Araujo covers breaking news for the Ventura County Star. He can be reached at ecentenoaraujo@vcstar.com, 805-437-0224 or @ecentenoaraujo on Instagram and X.





Source link

Continue Reading

California

California bill to block registered sex offenders from local office rejected by Senate committee

Published

on

California bill to block registered sex offenders from local office rejected by Senate committee


FRESNO, Calif. (KFSN) — California bill aimed at preventing registered sex offenders from holding local elected office was halted Tuesday after a Senate committee declined to advance the measure without changes opposed by its author.

Assembly Bill 2753, introduced by Assemblywoman Esmeralda Soria in February, would have prohibited anyone who is or has been required to register as a sex offender from running for local elective office.

“This issue is critical. We have heard loud and clear from the community that we must do something,” Soria said.

The proposal came to a stop in the Senate Elections Committee, where lawmakers argued the bill’s restrictions were too broad.

Advertisement

California’s sex offender registration system is divided into three tiers. Tier 1 offenders are generally required to register for 10 years, Tier 2 offenders for 20 years and Tier 3 offenders for life.

According to Soria, committee members proposed limiting the bill to Tier 3 offenders. She rejected those amendments, arguing that the legislation should apply more broadly.

“For this not to be the law today, where we’re banning people that have committed some of the most horrific crimes against children, against other people, you know, and we have survivors out there, I think it’s a disservice,” Soria said.

The bill had attracted significant support before reaching the Senate. It was backed by the Fresno City Council and passed the Assembly floor in April.

Fresno City Council President Nelson Esparza traveled to Sacramento to testify in favor of the measure and said he was disappointed by the outcome.

Advertisement

“I call it really a gut punch for our community, and what we had experienced here, and sort of the upheaval… I don’t think we want that to happen again here at Fresno,” Esparza said.

Esparza referenced controversy earlier this year involving registered sex offender Rene Campos, who sought a seat on the Fresno City Council but ultimately did not qualify for the ballot.

Opponents of the bill argued that candidacies should be decided by voters rather than restricted by law.

“It should be a decision made by the voters, so a person should not be barred from running for office and let the voters make the decision that makes the most sense for them,” said civil rights attorney Janice Bellucci.

With the committee declining to move the bill forward under its current language, efforts to enact the proposed restrictions have stalled for now.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 KFSN-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending