Connect with us

Movie Reviews

TIGER Review

Published

on

TIGER Review
TIGER is a new documentary on Disney+. The movie is about a tigress named Ambar who struggles to keep her unusually large brood of cubs alive. Her four cubs grow up slowly in the harsh Indian jungle. However, many things make Ambar’s job difficult. These things include her cubs’ own unique quirks, monsoons, hunting difficulties, and a very powerful alpha male tiger named Shankar. Shankar scared away the cubs’ father, so Ambar needs to keep her cubs hidden from him.

TIGER is both engaging and educational. The narrator does a good job at educational storytelling, balancing humor and drama at just the right moments. On top of that, although the story is about one of nature’s greatest predators, there is never any on screen killing. However, there is still some animal violence. After all, tigers are predatory creatures, and the movie shows other dangerous animals such as crocodiles and a python. So, some caution and discretion for younger children is still advised. Ultimately, however, TIGER is grand tale about one of nature’s big cats. It’s a happy addition to the Disney Nature documentaries.

(BB, VV, S):

Dominant Worldview and Other Worldview Content/Elements:

This movie has a moral, educational worldview embracing motherhood, the movie’s entire point is to educate viewers about how tiger families survive in the Indian jungle, the tigers aren’t put up on pedestals and humans are not shamed nor mentioned, the sole purpose seems to be to showcase and highlight how a tigress goes about raising such a big brood of cubs, there is a line that compares a tiger to a “spirit,” in the fact that when a tiger is hiding they are “everywhere and nowhere,” but the line has no religious context to speak of;

Advertisement

Foul Language:

No foul language;

Violence:

There are a few moments of animal violence, including a male tiger and female tiger attack each other, there are many times when the cubs are all play fighting amongst themselves, one whole scene is dedicated to frogs kicking each other off of rocks during their mating season, the aftermath of successful hunts are shown where one tiger manages to catch a deer offscreen and another tiger manages to catch a sloth off screen, two crocodiles manage to drown a deer, and a group of vultures feast on a bear cub who doesn’t make it;

Sex:

Advertisement

There is an implied mating between a female and male tiger where the female tiger doesn’t intend to bear cubs, but the female tiger plans to mate with the alpha tiger as his new and permanent mate after her cubs from another tiger are grown old enough to survive on their own;

Nudity:

No nudity;

Alcohol Use:

No alcohol use;

Advertisement

Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse:

No smoking or drugs; and,

Miscellaneous Immorality:

Nothing else objectionable.

TIGER is one of newest documentaries to arrive on Disney+. As the name implies it follows the story of a tiger, or rather a tigress, as she teaches her new cubs to hunt. The main characters of this show include five tigers in particular. Ambar, the mother of the brood, is the main focus for most of the film. She has a grand total of four cubs who are identified by both their unique stripe patterns and their personalities. The biggest and bravest male is called Ravi, the clumsy younger male is called Golu, the older female is called Ivy because she loves to climb, and the smallest female is called Charm, who likes her solitude.

Advertisement

Taking place in a jungle forest of India, Ambar is set to raise her unusually large brood of tiger cubs. However, it doesn’t prove to be easy.

The first big obstacle is the fact that anytime a tiger is spotted by any animal, a large warning is spread throughout, which frequently makes it hard for Ambar to hunt. Normally, when tigresses have cubs, the male tiger is usually assisting in some way. However, Ambar’s original mate was fought and scared away by the new alpha male, Shankar. So, on top of having to raise and feed her cubs, she needs to do it in secret because Shankar would kill her cubs if he caught them. The third major issue for Ambar is each of the cubs’ personalities leads to difficulties in her teaching them due to their quirks.

Despite all these obstacles, Ambar and her cubs seem to thrive and grow.

[SPOILERS FOLLOW] Ravi manages to grow into a big and strong alpha male in his own right, although almost gets himself killed when he becomes the tiger equivalent of a teenager and tried to fight Shankar. Luckily, his mother was able to save him. Ivy’s love of climbing ends up serving her well when she grows up and becomes a powerful and clever hunter. Charm at one point during the rainy season is separated from her mother and siblings but manages to survive and becomes more confident and a better hunter than all the rest. Only Golu doesn’t survive to adulthood when he’s eaten by a crocodile and vultures during a time when his mother left the cubs defenseless. After her cubs are grown and leave, Ambar joins Shankar as his new mate to start a new family. As she does that, Charm also mates and produces cubs, continuing the circle of life.

All well-made documentaries should seek to do two things: impart knowledge and tell a compelling narrative. This documentary is successful at both. The narrator is excellent at describing what is going on in an engaging way, making moments either humorous or dramatic when they need to be. On top of that the camera work for some of the shots is excellent, accurately portraying the mood of the movie. Also, TIGER not only teaches viewers about tigers, it also teaches them about other creatures in the Indian jungle, including sloth bears, frogs, mugger crocodiles, Indian pythons, and monkeys.

Advertisement

The one thing that is both good and surprising about TIGER is this documentary about one of the planet’s most dangerous predators to be more bloody and ruthless than this was. There is killing and death in TIGER, but the killing is all done off screen. So, the movie contains less violence than expected. This isn’t to say that no violence or blood is shown.

Overall, TIGER is engaging and educational, well worth its 90-minute viewing time. Disney has done a very good job giving a glimpse into the daily lives of one of nature’s most ferocious and largest wild cats. Children can watch TIGER with some adult discretion. MOVIEGUIDE® advises caution for younger children.

Now more than ever we’re bombarded by darkness in media, movies, and TV. Movieguide® has fought back for almost 40 years, working within Hollywood to propel uplifting and positive content. We’re proud to say we’ve collaborated with some of the top industry players to influence and redeem entertainment for Jesus. Still, the most influential person in Hollywood is you. The viewer.

What you listen to, watch, and read has power. Movieguide® wants to give you the resources to empower the good and the beautiful. But we can’t do it alone. We need your support.

You can make a difference with as little as $7. It takes only a moment. If you can, consider supporting our ministry with a monthly gift. Thank you.

Advertisement

Movieguide® is a 501c3 and all donations are tax deductible.

Now more than ever we’re bombarded by darkness in media, movies, and TV. Movieguide® has fought back for almost 40 years, working within Hollywood to propel uplifting and positive content. We’re proud to say we’ve collaborated with some of the top industry players to influence and redeem entertainment for Jesus. Still, the most influential person in Hollywood is you. The viewer.

What you listen to, watch, and read has power. Movieguide® wants to give you the resources to empower the good and the beautiful. But we can’t do it alone. We need your support.

You can make a difference with as little as $7. It takes only a moment. If you can, consider supporting our ministry with a monthly gift. Thank you.

Advertisement

Movieguide® is a 501c3 and all donations are tax deductible.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Hokum’ movie review: Damian McCarthy’s nasty little ghost story is undone by its own explanations 

Published

on

‘Hokum’ movie review: Damian McCarthy’s nasty little ghost story is undone by its own explanations 

A stil from ‘Hokum’
| Photo Credit: NEON

For those of you already familiar with Damian McCarthy’s work, the Irish filmmaker has spent the past few years turning cramped Irish spaces into elaborate, nerve-racking machines for dread. His 2020 debut, Caveat, trapped us inside a decaying rural house with a chained protagonist and a grotesque toy rabbit, while 2024’s Oddity transformed an isolated farmhouse into a relay system for jump scares built from negative space and the sound of somebody knocking at the wrong moment. His latest, Hokum, pushes that approach into a larger setting without sacrificing the intimate unpleasantness that makes his work so effective. 

The film takes place almost entirely inside the Bilberry Woods Hotel, a fading property buried in the Irish countryside where the final few guests arrive for a Halloween celebration. At the same time, staff members quietly prepare to shut the building down for winter. Into this atmosphere walks Ohm Bauman, played by Adam Scott, an American novelist carrying two urns containing his parents’ ashes and a personality abrasive enough to make even the resident ghouls feel hospitable.

Hokum (English)

Director: Damian McCarthy

Cast: Adam Scott, Peter Coonan, David Wilmot, Florence Ordesh, Michael Patric, Will O’Connell, Brendan Conroy, Austin Amelio

Runtime: 107 minutes

Advertisement

Storyline: When novelist Ohm Bauman retreats to a remote inn to scatter his parents’ ashes, he’s consumed by tales of a witch that haunts the honeymoon suite

McCarthy introduces Ohm through his work. The opening sequence shows him writing the conclusion to a historical adventure novel about a conquistador stranded in the desert with a dying child, and the scene initially appears disconnected from the main story until the camera pulls back to reveal that the entire episode exists inside Ohm’s manuscript.

This intro establishes the emotional logic driving the film. Ohm writes stories where people wander toward death because he has spent most of his adult life emotionally entombed inside the loss of his parents, who died shortly after honeymooning at the same Irish hotel he now visits. McCarthy avoids turning this into a tidy psychological diagnosis and attempts to reveal the damage through behaviour — Ohm humiliates a bellhop named Alby by heating a spoon over an open flame and pressing it against the young man’s hand after Alby asks him to read an aspiring manuscript.

That ugliness becomes central to Scott’s performance. Hokum strips away the comic cushioning that often softens his cynicism, especially in his recent Severance escapades. Scott keeps Ohm emotionally rigid even as the character begins to unravel inside the hotel’s sealed honeymoon suite, and the refusal to chase sympathy lends the film a sourness that works in its favour. When Ohm eventually risks himself to search for the hotel bartender Fiona, the motivation grows from guilt and loneliness over his botched suicide attempt. Fiona disappears after warning him about the suite’s resident witch, a local legend the hotel staff accepts with weary practicality, and her absence pushes Ohm deeper into the building’s sinister secrets.

A stil from ‘Hokum’

A stil from ‘Hokum’
| Photo Credit:
NEON

Cinematographer Colm Hogan lights the hotel with weak lamps, muddy greens, and heavy shadows that preserve spatial clarity even when characters crawl through near-total darkness. Production designer Til Frohlich fills the honeymoon suite with damp wallpaper, antique furniture, and cramped architectural dead ends that make it feel physically hostile before anything malicious even appears. McCarthy then uses sound with vicious precision, as ringing bells ring, creaking floorboards, and a mutated, uncanny-valley children’s TV program begin flooding the ominous silence.

The film loses some momentum once McCarthy begins unpacking the mystery behind Fiona’s disappearance and the crimes attached to the hotel’s past. Several supporting characters remain thinly drawn, particularly the hotel management, and the screenplay occasionally mistakes withholding information for complexity. The final stretch also leans too heavily on explanatory reveals and heightened confrontations, with the climactic encounter involving the witch pushing the film toward bluntness when the earlier sections had earned their power through suggestion alone.

Advertisement

Even so, Hokum succeeds because McCarthy understands the mechanical pleasures of horror filmmaking at a level many contemporary prestige directors seem embarrassed by. Though the scares land with diminishing returns this time, McCarthy still stages them with the acute understanding of just how long we will stare into a dark hallway before resenting ourselves for it. His folklore imagery still carries the grubby charm of an R.L. Stine paperback pulled from a damp school library shelf, which gives the film a pulpy nastiness that suits it well. McCarthy never fully organises many of these elements into a clean mythology. What he does create is a horror film with texture and personality, even if it barely holds up against the mastery of its predecessors.

Hokum is currently running in theatres

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Jordan Firstman’s ‘Club Kid’ Sparks Eight-Figure Offers: Cannes

Published

on

Jordan Firstman’s ‘Club Kid’ Sparks Eight-Figure Offers: Cannes

Jordan Firstman‘s buzzy Cannes UCR title Club Kid has been the talk of the festival and market this past 24 hours.

Multiple suitors are in for the movie and what’s interesting is the size of those suitors. Multiple major studios have kicked the tyres on the project. Contrary to reports, the offers are already in the eight-figure range. They were there last night, we heard at the time.

Many have assumed this will be an A24 title come the final reckoning but there is strong competition for a movie one studio buyer just told me at an event is “the most commercial movie at the festival by far: it works on a number of different levels to different age groups”. Another festival regular I spoke to said they see it as an awards movie “for sure”. The domestic credentials are certainly strong. Some international buyers we’ve spoken to were a little cooler but ultimately who doesn’t want a heartfelt good-vibe movie.

UTA Independent Film Group is in the middle of the deal. Charades handles international.

Advertisement

Club Kid follows a washed-up party promoter who is forced to turn his life around when an unexpected visitor arrives. Reviews have been strong.

During the film’s seven-minute Cannes ovation yesterday, lead actress Cara Delevingne teared up. Firstman, who also wrote and stars, picked up costar Reggie Absolom (who plays the son of Firstman’s character in the film) and started a chant in his honor. It was a continuation of the hijinks the two got up to at the film’s photocall earlier in the day. 

There are multiple projects in the market also drawing good offers. Things should become clearer in next 48 hours.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Karuppu (Veerabhadrudu) Movie Review – Gulte

Published

on

Karuppu (Veerabhadrudu) Movie Review – Gulte

2.5/5


02 Hrs 30 Mins   |   Action Fantasy Comedy   |   15-05-2026


Cast – Suriya, Trisha Krishnan, RJ Balaji, Indrans, Anagha Maaya Ravi, Natty Subramaniam, Swasika, Sshivada, Mansoor Ali Khan, Supreeth Reddy, George Maryan, Deepa Shankar, Namo Narayana and others

Director – RJ Balaji

Advertisement

Producer – S. R. Prabhu & S. R. Prakash Babu

Banner – Dream Warrior Pictures

Music – Sai Abhyankkar

Advertisement

It’s been a very long time since Suriya scored a unanimous theatrical hit. Soorarai Pottru and Jai Bhim were good films and received very good appreciation, but both skipped theatrical release and were released directly on Prime Video. Interestingly, the director, R. J. Balaji’s directorial debut, Mookuthi Amman, was also released directly on OTT. At a time when both of them need a theatrical hit, the hero and the director duo, teamed up for, Karuppu (Veerabhadrudu in Telugu ) a fantasy action drama film. The addition of Trisha, as female lead and Sai Abhyankkar, as music director, helped the film to generate good hype among fans and audience. After resolving the last-minute financial hurdles, the makers released the film today (i.e. a day later than the scheduled date). Did Suriya finally score a hit at the box office? Did R. J. Balaji utilise the opportunity to direct a star hero and deliver an engaging film? Did Sai Abhyankkar come up with chartbuster music yet again after, Dude? Let’s figure it out with a detailed analysis.

What is it about?

Baby Kannan(R. J. Balaji), a cunning and corrupt lawyer, runs a mafia and controls the Metropolitan Magistrate court in Chennai. He and his team intentionally extend the court hearings, to get fees from clients for a long time. They even turn judgments in their favour by bribing the Magistrate. What happens when a father(Indrans) and his daughter(Anagha Maaya Ravi), travel to Chennai from Kerala, with a bag full of gold? Why did the father carry a lot of gold in his bag? How did the deity(Suriya), Karuppuswamy, help the father and daughter, when they lost their gold? What challenges did the deity face while dealing with corrupt public officials? Forms the rest of the story.

Advertisement

Performances:

It’s good to see Suriya in an out-and-out commercial film after a long time. It looked like he thoroughly enjoyed playing the role of Karuppuswamy in the film. His screen presence and performance were top-notch as always. Trisha Krishnan in the role of Preethi, an honest and young lawyer did a good job with her performance. And yes, the age is catching up with her and it was very evident on screen.

Indrans and Anagha Maaya Ravi, in the roles of a helpless father and daughter, did an excellent job with their performance throughout the first half. The scenes on them in the first half are one of the major positives of the film. R. J. Balaji in the role of a corrupt lawyer did a good job with his performance but it would have been better if they had gone for an actor who has enough experience in doing antagonist roles. Interestingly, he had more slow-motion shots in the film than the hero, Suriya.

Natty Subramaniam in the role of Magistrate did well too. Especially, his performance was very good during his sequence in the film. The film had many notable actors and bearing one or two, most of them delivered good performances.

Technicalities:

Advertisement

Sai Abhyankkar’s work as a music director is a huge letdown. He failed to come out with good songs and apart from a couple of BGMs, his background score for the film was very loud, especially in the second half. G. K. Vishnu’s cinematography is good as always. Particularly during the fantasy episodes, the colour palettes and the frames he used, deserve appreciation. R. Kalaivanan’s editing was very tight and engaging in the first half but he should have done a better job in the second half. Production values by, Dream Warrior Pictures, were adequate. Let’s discuss the writer and director, R. J. Balaji’s work in detail in the analysis section.

Positives:

1.⁠ ⁠First Half
2.⁠ ⁠Suriya’s Screen Presence

Negatives:

1.⁠ ⁠Second Half
2.⁠ ⁠Loud Background Score
3.⁠ ⁠Over The Top Action Sequences

Advertisement

Analysis:

The directors, Shankar Shanmugam and Atlee in Tamil and Koratala Siva in Telugu, are a few of the directors in India, who are known for making socially relevant commercial entertainers, engagingly and entertainingly. These three directors along with a few other directors, made many commercially viable social drama films with different backdrops in the past. Just like the aforementioned dire tie, the director, R. J. Balaji, chose a socially relevant storyline and blended it well with socio-fantasy, with ‘God Vs Corrupt Public Official’, as a conflict point. Sounds existing, isn’t it? It indeed is exciting and up until the end of the first half, everything seemed to be working very well.

The emotional drama in the first half is the major highlight of the film. Unfortunately, after finishing the first half on a very good note, the director and his writing team, lost the track completely in the name of fan service and commercial mass moments. Right from the word go in the second half, everything appeared too loud and over the top.

It takes a good thirty to forty minutes for the protagonist to appear on screen but we as the audience never miss the protagonist during this period because of the gripping emotional drama. Right from the very first sequence, the director pulls us into getting connected with the father and daughter duo, their struggle and helplessness.

The director deserves appreciation for making the audience feel the pain of the father and daughter and we eagerly wait for someone to come and help them. And, when the protagonist, finally enters the screen and takes charge of the proceedings to help the father and daughter, every sequence was appreciated with loud cheers by the audience. The emotional drama, the initial conversation between God & the corrupt lawyer, the subsequent courtroom drama and the pre-interval sequence, made the first half end on a good note and raised the expectations further in the second half.

Advertisement

Unfortunately, for some reason, the director decided to take a different route in the second half and relied completely on mass commercial moments. It is where the film completely lost track. After letting God win, although on a sad note, at the end of the first half, the director seemed to have run out of ideas to come up with gripping drama further. Is it really possible for a corrupt human being to win against a powerful God? No way, right? The antagonist character appeared so small and insignificant in front of a ferocious God. It appeared like the director too is aware of it and included the dialogue – ‘Is it really required to use the powers of so many Gods’, just to stop a small-time corrupt lawyer’. That’s exactly what we as the audience feel while watching the second half. Since there’s no story or ideas to drive the film further, the director filled the second half of the film with commercial high moments one after the other. But, most of them appeared over the top, including the forced appearance of Suriya in his crowd favourite, Durai Singham getup. Another drawback of the film is that R. J. Balaji, took the role he played in the film too seriously and ended up giving a lot of screen space to his character with unnecessary slow-motion shots, punch dialogues, etc. It would have been better had he concentrated on writing, particularly in the second half.

Overall, interesting backdrop, socially relevant storyline and engaging emotional drama, in the first half worked out well but the film lost its track in the second half with a not-so-engaging screenplay and over the top action sequences. However, Karuppu, is a much better film among Suriya’s theatrical releases in the recent past. You may give it a try watching but keep your expectations low, particularly in the second half.

Bottomline – ‘God’s Magic’ Worked Partially

Rating – 2.5/5

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending