Connect with us

South Dakota

Summit Carbon would need written consent to perform land surveys under new SD bill

Published

on

Summit Carbon would need written consent to perform land surveys under new SD bill


A bill changing one of South Dakota’s property access laws could shift power toward landowners affected by Summit Carbon Solutions’ proposed multi-state pipeline network.Rep. Scott Moore and Rep. Karla Lems introduced House Bill 1079 on Thursday. The bill, if passed, would mandate that those proposed pipeline and similar projects would also need to obtain written consent from property owners for surveyors to enter their lands.

It’s one of the first bills introduced this session that was created in response to Summit Carbon Solutions’ controversial carbon dioxide sequestration project in South Dakota.

Currently, persons or organizations with eminent domain authority are able to access private property to conduct land surveys or examinations with or without permission if certain criteria are met.

This includes:

Advertisement
  • having an active siting application with the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission;
  • providing 30-day written notice, including the filing and expected dates of entry, to the owner and any tenant in possession of the private property;
  • and making a payment to the property owner, or provide sufficient security for the payment, for any actual damage done to the property by the entry.

But, under the proposed amendment, energy groups would also need to obtain written consent from landowners permitting access to their property at the scheduled date and time.

If all four criteria are not met, the PUC would have to approve the energy project’s permit application for surveys to take place.

This bill would directly affect companies like Summit Carbon, an Iowa company proposing to build a 2,000-mile, $5.5 billion pipeline through South Dakota and four other states. More than 400 miles of the pipeline would run through eastern and northeastern South Dakota if the project is completed.

Pipeline and similar companies use the results from surveys and examinations to determine whether the lands along their transmission project’s route can safely and adequately host new infrastructure.

HB 1079 was spurred by lawsuits filed by landowners in Brown, Edmunds, McPherson and Spink counties in 2022. The landowners sued Summit Carbon to prevent the Iowa company from accessing their property to conduct surveys to route their pipeline.

Advertisement

However, a South Dakota judge ruled in Summit Carbon’s favor in April and granted the company the right to access the property owners’ lands without permission. The company later followed through on those land surveys, sparking criticism from property rights advocates, affected landowners and some legislators.

More: Senator Mike Rounds: Summit Carbon gave itself a ‘black eye’ after controversial land surveys

Landowners have since appealed the decision to the South Dakota Supreme Court. It remains to be decided whether the judicial tribunal will pick up the case, as Summit Carbon initiated a motion in December to have the case dismissed.

Bruce Rastetter, CEO of Summit Ag Group, Summit Carbon’s parent company, told Bloomberg in October the project would be delayed until early 2026. This news came a little more than a month after the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission unanimously denied the company’s permit application for their Midwest Carbon Express pipeline.

Lems, Moore and Rep. Jon Hansen also teased two other pieces of pipeline-related legislation Monday, ahead of the 99th South Dakota Legislative Session that started Tuesday.

Advertisement

One of those is a bill which would prevent “condemnation of property owners before a permit is granted by the PUC.”

Condemnation actions are among the “sting[s] of eminent domain abuse,” as Lems described Monday, that have threatened South Dakota property owners.

In April, Summit Carbon filed more than 80 condemnation lawsuits against property owners who refused to sign easement agreements to acquire their land through eminent domain, as the Argus Leader first reported. Another 80 were brought at a later date, but the company later vowed to dismiss all 160 proceedings against the landowners.

More: South Dakota legislators aiming to find ‘compromise’ in CO2 pipeline bills

Based on previous Argus Leader reporting, lawmakers are anticipating the introduction of similar bills with likely lighter restrictions on carbon dioxide sequestration and other projects than those drafted by Moore and Lems. However, they have yet to be introduced this session.

Advertisement

House Bill 1079 has yet to be heard before the state House of Representatives.

Summit Carbon Solutions declined to comment for this article.



Source link

South Dakota

How to watch South Dakota State vs. Arizona State baseball today, time

Published

on

How to watch South Dakota State vs. Arizona State baseball today, time


The South Dakota State baseball team is fighting for its season today against Arizona State in the Lincoln Regional. The game is set for 2 p.m.

The No. 4 Jackrabbits (24-32) lost 4-1 to No. 1 Nebraska in the opening game. No. 3 Arizona State lost a 706 heartbreaker to No. 2 Ole Miss in the opening round in 14 innings. The game took nearly 5.5 hours and ended around 1:20 a.m.

Here’s how to watch South Dakota State’s win-or-go-home game.

Watch South Dakota State baseball vs … on ESPN+

Advertisement

South Dakota State vs. Arizona State baseball stream, radio

Stream: ESPN+

Radio: KJJQ 910 AM

South Dakota State vs. Arizona State time today

  • Date: Saturday, May 30
  • Time: 2 p.m. CT
  • Location: Haymarket Park in Lincoln, Nebraska

South Dakota State vs. Arizona State prediction

Paul Cifonelli, Argus Leader: This was always a tough draw for South Dakota State, as I thought this was the toughest regional in the country. At worst it’s the third toughest, with Chapel Hill and College Station in contention.

The Jackrabbits do have an advantage since Arizona State and Ole Miss went at it until after 1 a.m. Both teams stressed their pitching staffs, and every at bat required intense focus. The problem is South Dakota State doesn’t have the same top-end pitching these other teams do.

If Drew McDowell pitches, the Jacks might have a shot here. Otherwise they’ll have to win a slugfest, and I just don’t like those odds.

Prediction: Arizona State 8, South Dakota State 3

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Maternity care deserts: Where they are and how to improve

Published

on

Maternity care deserts: Where they are and how to improve


MISSION, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – In rural South Dakota, miles often separate expectant mothers from healthcare.

“A lot of women out here are left without any maternity care options,” said Rachel Kocak.

In Mission, moms mark their due dates and calculate miles to the nearest delivery location. Rachel Kocak, expecting her third child, said one option just closed.

“We used to have a birthing unit, I think up until a couple of months ago, and they lost their OB. So, Winner is no longer delivering babies,” Rachel said.

Advertisement

Some mothers remember when they could reach the hospital within a five-minute drive.

“IHS, for tribal members, they don’t deliver babies out here or provide prenatal care,” Rachel explained.

Families hope to reach the hospital before the baby arrives.

“So women either have to drive to Valentine, which is about 30 to 35 minutes from Mission, they can go to Wanblee, which is on the Pine Ridge Reservation, or they have to go to Pierre, Rapid City, or Sioux Falls,” Rachel said.

And if the roads are bad.

Advertisement

“I think there are a lot of babies who are unintentionally born at home. So it’s a tough place, I think, for mothers,” Rachel said.

The March of Dimes breaks down government data, showing a large portion of rural South Dakota as a maternity care desert, requiring travel of 38 or more minutes to reach an appointment or delivery room. The infant mortality rate is higher among native American babies born, compared to other races.

Health Department maps show counties in medium blue have 56 infant deaths per 100,000 births. Dark blue counties have three times as many. Grants aim to increase the number of healthcare workers, and funding supports a doula workforce program.

Kocak would like to see doulas and midwives available.

“Great opportunity for anyone who wants to become a home-birth midwife out here. The birth rate is still, I’m not sure what it is, but it’s high. There’s still a growing young population, and just not enough people to help deliver the babies,” Rachel said.

Advertisement

If care were closer, the outcomes could be brighter.

“You know, having the support network can make a huge change in the lives of these young, you know, these babies and young mothers who are building new families,” Rachel said.

The South Dakota Department of Health released a statement to Dakota News Now, which can be read in full below.

The South Dakota Maternal and Infant Health Task Force was created in 2025 to bring partners together to help improve the health and wellbeing of mothers and infants across the state. Their 5-year strategic plan was recently released, which has three priority areas: postpartum care to improve maternal health; safe sleep education and prevention strategies to protect infant health; and systems of care work that improves access, coordination, and quality of care statewide. One of the strategic plan activities that is supported by Rural Health Transformation is the creation of Regional Maternal and Infant Health Hubs, which will create a hub-and-spoke network connecting hospitals, clinics, tribal health services, and community organizations. These hubs will improve care coordination, strengthen referral pathways, and expand access to services for families in rural and tribal communities.

Copyright 2026 Dakota News Now. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

South Dakota GOP primary preview: US Senate

Published

on

South Dakota GOP primary preview: US Senate


While the race to secure the nomination for governor has dominated the headlines ahead of the June 2 primary, Republican voters will also choose a candidate for one of South Dakota’s two U.S. Senate seats.

Incumbent U.S. Sen. Mike Rounds, who is seeking a third, six-year term, holds a comfortable lead over his GOP primary challenger, Justin McNeal, a Navy veteran and business owner from Rapid City, according to the latest poll from News Watch and the Chiesman Center for Democracy.

Here is a recap of the two candidates along with their thoughts heading into the June 2 election. The winner of the Republican primary will meet Democrat Julian Beaudion and Independent Brian Bengs in the Nov. 3 general election.

Advertisement

Hometown: Fort PierreAge: 71Occupation: Insurance broker; businessman; former governor (2003-2011); U.S. senator since 2015In their own words:

Rounds provided the following statement to News Watch:

“Working in the U.S. Senate, I’ve stayed focused on results that matter for our kids and grandkids. That means keeping the government off your back and out of your business and wallet. That means keeping our communities safe and creating a business climate that encourages job growth to keep our kids in South Dakota. And that means safety through a commitment to our men and women in uniform.

This past summer, we worked with President Trump to pass the Republicans’ Working Families Tax Cuts legislation. Without Congressional action, the average South Dakota family would have seen a $2,500 tax hike this year. Our legislation not only prevented the largest tax increase in American history, but it also provided additional tax relief for hard-working South Dakota families. That includes no tax on tips, no tax on overtime and no tax on Social Security for nearly 9 out of 10 seniors.

Advertisement

We’ve accomplished some great things, but our work is not done. I am running for reelection to continue bringing results back home to South Dakota.”

Hometown: Rapid City (born in Illinois and raised in Texas)Age: 42Occupation: Business owner (Dakota BioChar); Navy veteran (2001-2007)In their own words:

“I’m feeling the people in South Dakota are ready for a change. The challenge we are running into is that not enough people know who we are, but as soon as they know who we are, it’s an easy decision for them,” McNeal told News Watch in a phone interview. “I don’t have millions and millions of dollars. I’ve been largely self-funding this race up to this point.”

McNeal, who is a licensed pilot, said he has flown his small plane to events throughout the state in an attempt to get his name out.

“I talk to people about the issues that matter and I tell them the biggest thing you can do to help me is tell 10 people about me and to go vote June 2. We need about 50,000 votes to win the primary,” he said.

Advertisement

McNeal is not critical of Rounds and conceded “he is very popular” but said Rounds has not done enough to tackle the country’s growing fiscal deficit.

“I don’t think Mike is doing a bad job. I’m just concerned with the federal debt and the people that got us into that mess are not going to be the ones to get us out of it,” McNeal said.

“This is going to cripple the country. It just seems like politicians are focused on what they can bring to their home district or home state. And the problem with that is every member of Congress is doing the same thing, so everyone is taking and taking without making sure we can pay for it.”

South Dakota News Watch is an independent nonprofit. Read, donate and subscribe for free at sdnewswatch.orgContact politics and statehouse reporter Alexander Rifaat: 605-736-4396/alexander.rifaat@sdnewswatch.org.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending