Connect with us

South Dakota

New landscape confronts South Dakota Republicans after political earthquake shakes incumbents • South Dakota Searchlight

Published

on

New landscape confronts South Dakota Republicans after political earthquake shakes incumbents • South Dakota Searchlight


A literal 3.7-magnitude earthquake shook the state Capitol in Pierre last week. State Rep. Scott Odenbach, R-Spearfish, said a political earthquake shook the Capitol on Tuesday night.

“The people are waking up,” Odenbach said. 

He and others within a faction of the South Dakota Republican Party say it’s being run by politicians who are not as conservative as the party’s base of supporters. Their efforts to change that contributed to 14 losses by incumbent Republican legislators in Tuesday’s primary election. Odenbach’s political action committee spent $58,000 ahead of the primary in support of some winning candidates.

Current Republican House Majority Leader Will Mortenson, R-Fort Pierre — who is unopposed for reelection — said new legislators are always welcome, but losing 14 incumbents comes with a cost. 

Advertisement

“It’s an opportunity for new ideas, but it does mean we lost a lot of institutional knowledge,” he said.

Those losses include Sen. Jean Hunhoff, R-Yankton, who’s served 24 years in the Legislature, and Sen. Ryan Maher, R-Isabel, who has served 16 years, among others.

House Majority Leader Will Mortenson, R-Fort Pierre, speaks on the state House floor in January 2024. (Joshua Haiar/South Dakota Searchlight)

Mortenson’s political action committee spent $48,271 to help some of the incumbents and other candidates that Odenbach opposed.   

Mortenson blamed the incumbent losses mostly on historically low voter turnout of 17%, which he said creates an environment in which a motivated faction can turn out enough voters to swing a primary race.

Pipelines and property taxes

Odenbach said challengers won because of quality candidate recruitment, a good ground game and the right messaging. 

Advertisement

Much of that messaging, especially in eastern South Dakota, capitalized on opposition to Summit Carbon Solutions’ proposed multibillion-dollar pipeline project. It would collect carbon dioxide produced by ethanol plants in South Dakota and other states and move it through an underground pipeline for sequestration in North Dakota, passing through farms, ranches and other private property along the way. 

Incumbent Republican legislators suffer losses as pipelines and property rights surge to the fore

The project has caused more than two years of legal and legislative wrangling over landowner rights and eminent domain, the legal maneuver through which a company can seize property for projects in the public interest.

“A lot of candidates have been saying South Dakota is open for business, but not for sale, and that was proven last night,” Odenbach said.

Mortenson and some other Republican leaders passed a bill during the last legislative session to preserve a regulatory path forward for the pipeline while ensuring landowners receive additional protections. That put them at odds with some in their own party who sought stricter measures such as a ban on eminent domain for carbon pipelines. Some members of that faction are gathering petition signatures to refer the bill passed last session to a public vote in November.

Advertisement

Odenbach said the pipeline debate is not over. 

“We’re going to be back next session to better define public use and who gets to use eminent domain in South Dakota, like I tried to do during the recent session,” he said. 

Incumbent Rep. Aaron Aylward, R-Harrisburg, won his primary. He’s the president of the South Dakota Freedom Caucus, which has butted heads with Republican leadership. On the topic of pipelines, he said, “It’s not looking good for the carbon ones, that’s for sure.”

Aylward said incumbents lost Tuesday because “people are tired of the same type of bureaucratic garbage they’ve been fed for the last number of years.”

Meanwhile, in the Black Hills, rising property taxes animated many Republican voters. Former legislator Tim Goodwin, of Rapid City, earned one of District 30’s two Republican House nominations Tuesday. He and incumbent Rep. Trish Ladner, of Hot Springs, will face one Democrat in the November race for two House seats.

Advertisement

“Out here, property rights isn’t even on the radar,” Goodwin said. “It’s property taxes.”

Greasing the open primaries wheel 

Some Republicans think the inner-party friction is self-defeating. Pat Powers, writer of the Dakota War College political blog, said Tuesday’s primary results offer Democrats an opportunity to win some general election races if they run to the middle of the political spectrum. Democrats currently hold only 11 of the Legislature’s 105 seats. 

“It could very well mark a shift in the Republican party’s fortunes,” Powers said.

Advertisement

Powers said Republican infighting also gives an open primaries ballot measure a better chance of passing during the November general election. The measure would change some primaries to include all the candidates for an office, rather than splitting the candidates into party-specific primaries.

Tuesday’s low turnout and poor showing by incumbents gives ammunition to open primaries supporters, Powers said.

“They can say, ‘Look at what happens when we don’t have open primaries,’ and they have the money to get the message across.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement

Drey Samuelson, who worked as Democratic former U.S. Sen. Tim Johnson’s chief of staff for many years, is involved in the open primaries effort. He’s already making that argument. 

“The closed primary system does not work very well. It nominates people who are to the extremes of the parties,” Samuelson said. “We can look at these primary results to see that.”

Advertisement

Samuelson said turnout would have been better if Democrats and independents had more to vote on than the Democratic presidential primary, in which President Joe Biden was already all but guaranteed a victory. There was only one Democratic legislative primary Tuesday in South Dakota, and 44 Republican legislative primaries.

Seeking change ‘for the average person’ 

Joy Hohn, a vocal opponent of eminent domain for carbon dioxide pipelines, bested former legislator Mark Willadsen for the Republican nomination for Sioux Falls District 9’s Senate seat. There is no Democratic or independent candidate running in the general election.

Hohn received a donation from Odenbach’s political action committee.

“I think that the citizens of South Dakota are seeing the need for a bigger focus on ‘we the people,’” Hohn said. “We don’t really need this pipeline.”

Hohn said the results of the election move the state in the right direction, “toward true conservative values and our country’s founding principles.”

Advertisement

Republican factions fighting for control of the party in Tuesday’s primary election

Incumbent Sen. Erin Tobin, R-Winner, fell by 48 votes (which is within the possible recount margin) to a political newcomer from Bonesteel named Mykala Voita, who also campaigned on the primacy of landowner rights. 

“The people of South Dakota drew a line and they are speaking,” Voita said. “I think the people are sending a clear message that we don’t want to be trampled on, and if they’re going to come into our state, they’re going to play by our rules.” 

In a four-way District 13 House of Representatives primary, incumbent Republican Tony Venhuizen, of Sioux Falls, advanced to the general election as one of the top two finishers. But he received fewer votes than newcomer John Hughes. There is no Democrat or independent on the ballot in November. 

Hughes plans to push for change. 

Advertisement

“Government just isn’t working for the average person in South Dakota, especially in terms of economic development,” Hughes said. “It’s helping large corporate interests that are not paying their fair share when they come into South Dakota and take advantage of our business climate, and it’s at the expense of the taxpayer.”

Ousted Republican legislators

Republican legislators who lost their primary races Tuesday, according to unofficial results from the Secretary of State’s Office (results are not official until the election is canvassed):

  • Sen. Erin Tobin, R-Winner
  • Sen. Jean Hunhoff, R-Yankton
  • Rep. Byron Callies, R-Watertown
  • Rep. Tyler Tordsen, R-Sioux Falls
  • Rep. Tamara St. John, R-Sisseton
  • Rep. James Wangsness, R-Miller
  • Rep. Fred Deutsch, R-Florence
  • Sen. Ryan Maher, R-Isabel
  • Rep. Becky Drury, R-Rapid City
  • Sen. Mike Walsh, R-Rapid City
  • Sen. David Johnson, R-Rapid City
  • Rep. Gary Cammack, R-Union Center
  • Rep. Kirk Chaffee, R-Whitewood
  • Sen. Julie Frye-Mueller, R-Rapid City

 

Advertisement



Source link

South Dakota

Portland State wins 77-71 over South Dakota

Published

on

Portland State wins 77-71 over South Dakota


Associated Press

VERMILLION, S.D. (AP) — Terri Miller Jr. scored 26 points and grabbed 11 rebounds as Portland State beat South Dakota 77-71 on Wednesday.

Advertisement

Keyon Kensie scored 22 points and added 10 rebounds for the Vikings (5-2). Jaylin Henderson finished with 11 points.

Isaac Bruns led the Coyotes (5-4) with 28 points, nine rebounds and four steals. Cameron Fens added 15 points, six rebounds, two steals and two blocks for South Dakota. Uzziah Buntyn finished with 11 points and two steals.

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

What did you think of this story?

Advertisement




Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

South Dakota State University launches interdisciplinary Ph.D. in social science

Published

on

South Dakota State University launches interdisciplinary Ph.D. in social science


South Dakota State University is expanding its graduate offerings with the launch of a new social science Ph.D. program, an interdisciplinary program designed to address complex challenges facing rural communities and society at large.

Approved by the South Dakota Board of Regents in April 2025 and the Higher Learning Commission shortly after, the program will welcome its first cohort of students in fall 2026.

The program is housed in the School of Psychology, Sociology and Rural Studies within the College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. Rather than focusing on a single discipline such as sociology or psychology, the new Ph.D. brings together faculty expertise from across SDSU’s colleges — including nursing, natural sciences, agriculture, pharmacy and allied health professions — to train scholars equipped to tackle today’s “wicked problems.”

Paul Markel

“The world’s complex issues require interdisciplinary teams,” said Paul Markel, professor and director of the School of Psychology, Sociology and Rural Studies.

Advertisement

The launch of the social science Ph.D. program also marks a new chapter for SDSU’s historic tradition in graduate social science education. The university’s sociology program dates back to 1925, once producing nearly a quarter of all doctorates on campus during its peak. Admissions to the previous sociology Ph.D. were suspended in 2020 due in part to faculty staffing and shifting academic focus.

Rather than simply reviving the former program, faculty and administrators chose to reimagine it. The resulting social science Ph.D. program addresses the current, complex research needs of the university in alignment with Pathway to Premier 2030 and the “R1 Our Way” initiative — SDSU’s commitment to reaching high research activity designation. The program not only advances interdisciplinary research but also increases the number of research doctorates SDSU produces, a key benchmark in the journey toward R1 status.

“The interdisciplinary approach allows complex problems to be taken seriously and explored in depth, so that you can come up with real practical solutions in a way that no single discipline could do alone,” Markel emphasized.

The program’s creation involved a working group of faculty representing multiple disciplines and colleges, including:

  • Abigail Tobias-Lauerman, School of Psychology, Sociology and Rural Studies
  • George Tsakiridis, School of American and Global Studies
  • Heidi Mennenga, College of Nursing
  • James Amell, College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions
  • Jason Zimmerman, College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences
  • Jennifer Zavaleta Cheek, Department of Natural Resource Management
  • Kimberly Johnson Maier, Department of Geography and Geospatial Sciences
  • Londa Nwadike, College of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences
  • Shola Aromona, School of Communication and Journalism
  • Stephanie Hanson, College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions
  • Tyler Miller, School of Psychology, Sociology and Rural Studies

Members met regularly to design curriculum, define core requirements and develop the program’s first two proposed specializations: 1) environmental and rural development and 2) rural well-being.

“At one point we had rural sociology on our campus,” Markel said. “So even with this program, both specializations represent a rural theme, specifically rural development and rural well-being. It’s honoring and rejuvenating our rural studies roots.”

Advertisement

The program’s structure allows students to ground themselves in social science theory while applying research methods to practical challenges like sustainable land management or rural health disparities. It also aims to revive SDSU’s historic partnership with SDSU Extension through renewed attention to rural vitality, echoing SDSU’s land-grant mission.

“The rural environment is very complex, and there are incredible challenges in the rural space,” Markel explained. “When we identify a problem in a rural community, whether it’s health care, access to food, education or workforce development, it’s not enough for any one discipline to focus on the problem because we really need to bring in teams and have multiple disciplines looking at the same problem to make a difference.”


From concept to approval, the Ph.D. in social science moved with rare speed in higher education. The initial proposal, written by Markel in collaboration with faculty such as School of Communication and Journalism Director Josh Westwick, School of American and Global Studies Director Christi Garst-Santos and MaryJo Benton Lee, adjunct faculty member and evaluation specialist, was submitted to Dean David Earnest of the College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences in September 2024. By December, the curricular paperwork was complete, and the program received final Board of Regents approval by April 2025.

The program is now included in SDSU’s Graduate Catalog, with recruitment and marketing underway for the first cohort’s admission in fall 2026. An advisory council composed of faculty from across participating colleges will oversee program evolution and ensure continued interdisciplinary collaboration.

The social science Ph.D. program positions South Dakota State University as one of the few institutions in the nation — alongside models like Syracuse University and Johns Hopkins — to offer an interdisciplinary social science doctorate.

Advertisement
Dennis Hedge

“I am excited about the impact that the social science Ph.D. program will have on our local communities and university,” SDSU Provost and Vice President of Academic Affairs Dennis Hedge said. “While providing a significant boost to our university’s Carnegie R1 designation pursuit, this interdisciplinary Ph.D. program will importantly provide graduating students with a solid foundation of perspectives and methods in the social sciences that will serve as a framework for addressing complex issues faced by communities in our state and region. By doing such work, our communities will ultimately be stronger.”

Markel summarized the program’s aim this way: the doctoral training will ground students in social science theory and research methods while requiring them to work with interdisciplinary advisory committees and teams so their research and solutions are applied and relevant to an ever-changing, complex world.

“We want to be able to take the research that comes out of this program and apply it in meaningful ways to the people of South Dakota and the region who are living in rural environments,” Markel said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

Abelman and Northern Arizona host South Dakota State

Published

on

Portland State wins 77-71 over South Dakota


Associated Press

South Dakota State Jackrabbits (4-4) at Northern Arizona Lumberjacks (4-2)

Advertisement

Flagstaff, Arizona; Wednesday, 8 p.m. EST

BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Jackrabbits -2.5; over/under is 149.5

BOTTOM LINE: Northern Arizona faces South Dakota State after Ryan Abelman scored 20 points in Northern Arizona’s 79-72 victory over the Southeast Missouri State Redhawks.

The Lumberjacks have gone 4-0 at home. Northern Arizona scores 81.2 points and has outscored opponents by 5.5 points per game.

The Jackrabbits are 0-2 in road games. South Dakota State ranks seventh in the Summit League shooting 30.9% from 3-point range.

Advertisement

Northern Arizona makes 47.9% of its shots from the field this season, which is 7.5 percentage points higher than South Dakota State has allowed to its opponents (40.4%). South Dakota State averages 71.6 points per game, 4.1 fewer than the 75.7 Northern Arizona allows.

TOP PERFORMERS: Zack Davidson is shooting 62.1% and averaging 16.8 points for the Lumberjacks. Abelman is averaging 2.5 made 3-pointers.

Jaden Jackson is averaging 12.1 points and 1.5 steals for the Jackrabbits. Joe Sayler is averaging 11.1 points.

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Advertisement

What did you think of this story?




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending