Connect with us

South Dakota

Gov. Larry Rhoden outlines policy priorities as early voting approaches in South Dakota

Published

on

Gov. Larry Rhoden outlines policy priorities as early voting approaches in South Dakota


Gov. Larry Rhoden began his political career as a school board member. He then served as a state legislator and as Lieutenant Governor in the Kristi Noem administration.

Rhoden is one of four Republicans vying for the state’s top elected office. He stopped by the SDPB studios in Sioux Falls to lay out his policy priorities. He spoke to SDPB’s Lori Walsh.

Rhoden is one of four Republicans on the primary ballot. Early voting begins on April 17. The primary election is June 2.

Watch the full Republican primary debate online.

Advertisement

A transcript of the interview follows:

LARRY RHODEN

It’s pretty simple. You know, I’ve said that my goals, my priorities, my pillars are to keep South Dakota strong, safe, free and open for opportunity. That’s more than just soundbites. That’s how we work.

I’ve got a great team around me. I’ve got the lieutenant governor in the studio with me right now. That’s a big part of my administration — putting the right people on the bus with me.

We’ve accomplished a great deal in the last 15 months. If people choose to give me another four years, it will be more of that.

Advertisement

We will just work to get things done. Bring businesses to South Dakota, strengthen the businesses we have, remain a low regulation state. The first seven months after session last year, I was on my Open for Opportunities tour, and learned a great deal about what we’ve got going for us. We learned a great deal on how to expand on what we’ve already accomplished in the state. And we will continue to follow that track.

LORI WALSH

You were lieutenant governor When Kristi Noem was governor during the pandemic. So when you’re on the Open for Opportunties tour post-pandemic, when you’re governor, you’re getting to see some business leaders who have also been through the pandemic and are not only reflecting on what happened in their business during that time, but looking to the future.

What did you learn about the crisis leadership during the pandemic from those business owners a few years later?

LARRY RHODEN

Advertisement

Yeah, that’s a fascinating question, and it was really interesting to me because we were touring businesses that had moved here post-pandemic. And because of the way South Dakota — the Noem/Rhoden administration —handled keeping our state open, that was the incentive for a lot of new business to move here.

So there was a mix of (new businesses) and a mix of old businesses that have been here for generations. It really gave me a kind of a new perspective on how much we have going for the state and also how much we take for granted.

I learned a great deal just by listening to the people. I told a few stories of policies that we learned about during that those tours that we went on to address at the federal level and found relief for businesses just by bringing them to … the Trump administration was just taking, control, and so we found that pretty valuable … to take things we learned from the business owners and actually implement change because of it.

LORI WALSH

It was an unprecedented time. Was there anything that you look back on five or six years later that you think, “We should have done that too. Or, we should have done that instead.”

Advertisement

LARRY RHODEN

You know, not really. When I look back on that, I mean, when we were going through it, it’s hard, it’s really hard to describe what it was like. And Tony (Venhuizen) was chief of staff for Kristi Noem at that time. So he was a big part of that. And, I think he would agree, just the unknown going through that.

What I’ve said, looking back, was that there were 49 governors who were making decisions based in fear, and one governor that was making decisions based on fact and then standing her ground.

But that wasn’t easy. Because some of the talking heads were trying to convince us that we were going to kill half our population if we made the wrong decisions. You kind of lay awake at night wondering if you were making the right decisions and, in history, looking back, she made the right decisions.

We made the right decisions.

Advertisement

LORI WALSH

And lot of people did die, thousands of South Dakotans died. And that’s something to reflect on too. How do you think about those lives today?

LARRY RHODEN

Well, obviously every life is precious. And you can never make light or discount the loss of life. But the statistics prove that we weren’t any worse off than we would have (been) if we would have closed our state down like other states had.

So I think the statistics bear out that we made the right decisions. We came through Covid in a lot better shape from the education perspective and from the disruption in our children’s lives. You know, our kids got back into the class or got back on track with their education a lot faster than they did in many other states.

Advertisement

LORI WALSH

One of the things I think I’m getting at is the weight of leadership. The role of governor can be a place to have big ideas and think about legacy and even power and influence. But it is also very consequential.

And you’ve been through that. And if people elect you, you’ll have another natural disaster, for example, or another crisis for South Dakotans.

How do you show up for your neighbors as governor?

LARRY RHODEN

Advertisement

Well, you know, for me, I’ve lived it. I grew up on a ranch in western South Dakota, and that’s just the way we live our lives.

When we had winter storm Atlas, we showed up for the neighbors and we took on the responsibility for others and helped our neighbors, looked out for them. And we learned that through Covid.

I’ve learned even last year as governor that there is a lot of weight on your shoulders. I surrounded myself with people that are like-minded, that are people of integrity and they’re wise and they give good counsel.

But the decision’s mine.

I think growing up on a ranch and running a ranch or running your own business also provides the background for making those decisions and a foundation for making decisions.

Advertisement

And we’ve accomplished some pretty significant things in the last year, especially with the legislature that we had acquired. There were a lot of, like I’ve said, a lot of new members and a lot of, you know, just disarray.

But, one of the cornerstones of my administration was civility. And I think that more than anything probably gives me a leg up on the other candidates, because I’ve had a lot of experience at dealing with legislators and people in different leadership positions all the way back to my military career.

My wife reminded me that when I was in basic training, I was the chosen trainee leader of my basic company in basic training. And, all that is part of who I am as far as learning about leadership.

And one of the primary advantages of being a good leader is knowing how to work with people and build relationships.

I think that’s what we saw in our legislature. I was a lot more hands on and a lot more proactive than other governors. I was on the third floor talking to legislators having them to my office to visit about their concerns. I think that’s what we need in the state is a leader that will lead by example and promote civility.

Advertisement

LORI WALSH

You mentioned surrounding yourself with like-minded people who can give you wise counsel.

In what ways do you surround yourself with people who don’t think like you, who might have a different idea about what freedom or safety means than you?

In what ways do you listen to them?

LARRY RHODEN

Advertisement

Well, you know, that’s also an interesting question. And, you know, in my team, there are a lot of, a lot of differing views, and they come at it from different perspectives based on their life experience.

When I say like-minded, I’m talking about people with the core values that are like mine, you know, people of integrity and, and people that are focused on policy.

And I’ve said this many times to my team that we were going to focus on policy. Policy. Good policy makes good politics for the most part, and good politics does not necessarily make good policy.

And so, you know, that’s, that’s primary to the decisions we make is focusing on the policy of the issues.

That gets to be a lot more difficult, especially when even in the last few weeks and months, every decision I make is held under that microscope of whether or not it’s political or not.

Advertisement

That’s come up in just the last few days and some of the events I went to. I’ve been challenged by some of the other candidates whether it was politically motivated.

That’s rather irritating to me because it’s not true. I know in my heart of hearts that it’s not true, that that I am focused on doing my job.

And just because three other guys want my job doesn’t mean I’m going to stop doing mine. I’m going to continue with what I just said — focusing on policy and making wise decisions for the betterment of South Dakota. Dealing with the politics is secondary to that.

LORI WALSH

So for people who don’t know, one of those things is your use of the Future Fund and $2 million to Western Dakota Tech to bring a gunsmithing program. Some of your competitors …

Advertisement

LARRY RHODEN
It was actually 4 million.

LORI WALSH
Four million. Thank you. Four million dollars for a gunsmithing program. Help separate that because they’re saying that’s politics. You were using your platform to say: Look at me. I’m doing this thing.

You’re saying that’s good policy. Tell us why that’s a good policy to use the Future Fund in that way, to bring this program to Western Dakota Tech.

LARRY RHODEN

Certainly. Well, I said this the other day when that first came up: I can’t think of anything more sound than using Future Fund dollars to bring an industry like that, a gunsmithing school, to Western Dakota Tech.

Advertisement

We’re using that to pay for the equipment and other things to get that class from Colorado into South Dakota in Rapid City, where we have a statewide … the gun industry, firearms industry, has gotten bigger and bigger.

And so it’s a perfect fit for South Dakota, and it’s a perfect fit for Future Funds. Because that’s what they’re designed to do so we can help bolster our economic future for our state.

And so if you’re planting those kind of seeds in an industry that’s already blooming in South Dakota, that’s, I think, just common sense.

LORI WALSH

Is there a demand for gunsmiths? Like there’s a demand for plumbers, electricians, for example?

Advertisement

LARRY RHODEN

Absolutely. And, especially out in in the Rapid City area, in Sturgis. in Sturgis, the entire industrial part, I think, is probably, three fourths of the businesses in their industrial park are gun-related. They have the old Dakota Arms. It’s now … I can’t think of the name offhand. There are a number of gun businesses in the Sturgis area, ammunition producers in the Rapid City area. So, absolutely.

Not to mention the fact that we opened the Pete Lien and Sons shooting complex just a few months ago, and we’ve already had over 30,000, visits to that gun range so far. And that’s just in the last few months. And that’s more than we expected in the first year.

So, that was created, that part of that shooting complex because of our Second Amendment … you know, we’re the most Second Amendment friendly state in the nation. And we have a lot of gun enthusiasts. And by all means, I think there’s a huge demand for gunsmiths in South Dakota.

LORI WALSH

Advertisement

After July 1st, new legislation from this legislative session will change how the governor can use Future Fund dollars. With the decisions that you’ve made, with the Rapid City National Defense Area and with the gunsmithing program, will those match the requirements that you’ll be under on August 1st for example?

You see what I’m asking?

LARRY RHODEN

I do. I understand thoroughly. And the (answer) is absolutely.

But let’s be clear, after July 1st, they won’t change. What that statute did, you know, there was concern over some of the ways that Future Funds were used in the past, prior to my administration. And, so we wanted to clear that air early on in session.

Advertisement

And so I issued an executive order, basically saying this is my view and what my blueprint is going to look like for determining the appropriate uses for Future Funds. I issued that and the legislators looked at that, said, well, would you support this if this was in statute?

Well, absolutely. Yeah. If it’s the same criteria that I spelled out as what I’m going to self-regulate with as far as appropriate uses for Future Funds. And so that’s what they basically put in statute. And so there was no change, practically speaking, from the way I was already doing business and the way I’d committed to do business with the use of the Future Funds.

LORI WALSH

What’s your vision for South Dakota in the future? I know “strong, safe and free.” But say more about what we’ll look like 50 years from now. What are you laying the groundwork for?

LARRY RHODEN

Advertisement

You know, we have we’ve already taken steps that indicate what my vision for the state is.
Ag will always be king in South Dakota. We have such a vast amount of ground. And so we’ve developed that, but beyond that, we’ve also focused on value-added agriculture, and we’ve gained leaps and bounds in that. And we’ve gained leaps and bounds in expanding our economic potential through trade, foreign trade in the last three years.

And I’ve been a big part of that. And Tony’s been a big part of that. He’s now leading trade missions. And I was as lieutenant governor. We just laid out in the last State of the State address that the next big industry in South Dakota would be national defense. And that’s an extension of that vision.

And if you’re looking at big picture, big ideas, big ideas that fit South Dakota, well, nothing fills a bill, I think, better than national defense being our next big industry in South Dakota.

Food security is national security. So as a starting point, we own the bone on food security in South Dakota.

And, beyond that — industry. Ellsworth Air Force Base and the addition of the B-21 bombers that are coming, we already have that industry. That’s starting to blossom on its own, but we’re going to be a lot more coordinated in that. I just announced the South Dakota Defense Institute. And that’s another part of that vision. To get that going and to jumpstart that.

Advertisement

LORI WALSH

Connecting with that — and I don’t think I’m going out on a limb here — we’ve also seen a lot of South Dakotans say they didn’t want a pipeline cutting through their land. They didn’t want their kids to see their data centers as far as the eye can see from the bus window on the way to school in Deuel County, in Piedmont and in Meade County, they don’t want their kids breathing air from limestone mines.

This is also a state where people want to walk the land, swim in the rivers and lakes, breathe the clean air. What are you doing to protect the land, the scenery of South Dakota?

LARRY RHODEN

I think we’ve struck a great balance there. I look at what the Black Hills looked like when I was a kid and Whitewood Creek, think how far we’ve come in protecting our natural resources and, and even in the way we’ve applied government.

Advertisement

You know, there was some concern about combining the Department of Ag with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. But what we’ve seen, and what I’ve said all along — and I think I’ve been vindicated on that — is that our ag producers, especially these generationally owned farms and ranches, which are 90 plus percent of our ag operations, nobody has a more vested interest in protecting our natural resources than the generational farmers and ranchers that have taken care of that land forever.

We continue to be vigilant about guarding our natural resources, but I think we’ve struck a pretty good balance.

LORI WALSH

As we wrap up here, I’m wondering if there’s an issue you wanted to talk about yet, or if you just wanted to address voters who maybe still don’t know your name about who you are?

LARRY RHODEN

Advertisement

Well, I’m. I’m Larry Roden, born and raised on a ranch in western South Dakota. I think if I talked about things that people might not know about me, that maybe set me apart, there’s a few things that set me apart.

I’m the only candidate that’s served the nation in the armed forces. I was in the National Guard for six years.

And I have a long history of military service in my family. That makes a difference. I think I look at things differently, and even the service to my nation, I think, set me up for a better perspective on running a state. I’m the only candidate that’s made my living off the land in agriculture.

And I think that’s also important. And I’m a generational South Dakotan. My grandparents on both sides of my family were homesteaders out in the area that I live now. And so I’ve grown up with a heart of service. And I’ve served the state, I’ve served my community, I’ve served the nation.

I think that sets me up better than most of the other candidates. And I’ve done the job and I’ve proven by results. Everybody else has plans. I’ve demonstrated the results of building coalitions and getting the job done.

Advertisement





Source link

South Dakota

SD Lottery Millionaire for Life winning numbers for May 10, 2026

Published

on


The South Dakota Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at May 10, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from May 10 drawing

01-03-20-35-46, Bonus: 05

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize

  • Prizes of $100 or less: Can be claimed at any South Dakota Lottery retailer.
  • Prizes of $101 or more: Must be claimed from the Lottery. By mail, send a claim form and a signed winning ticket to the Lottery at 711 E. Wells Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501.
  • Any jackpot-winning ticket for Dakota Cash or Lotto America, top prize-winning ticket for Lucky for Life, or for the second prizes for Powerball and Mega Millions must be presented in person at a Lottery office. A jackpot-winning Powerball or Mega Millions ticket must be presented in person at the Lottery office in Pierre.

When are the South Dakota Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
  • Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Dakota Cash: 9 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 10:15 p.m. CT daily.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Dakota editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

After Standing Rock, could a canceled mine project offer a roadmap for opponents of a new oil pipeline in South Dakota?

Published

on

After Standing Rock, could a canceled mine project offer a roadmap for opponents of a new oil pipeline in South Dakota?


Almost exactly a decade since the start of the Standing Rock protests against the Dakota Access pipeline gained national and international attention, new disputes are simmering over tribal rights in the Black Hills of South Dakota.

Earlier this month, an environmental organization and a Native American advocacy group sued the US Forest Service, claiming that an exploratory graphite drilling project on national forest land threatened a recognized ceremonial site on mountain meadows known as Pe’ Sla, or Reynolds Prairie.

But on Friday, Pete Lien and Sons, the company behind the project, abruptly withdrew, saying it would perform reclamation on the site and would not seek to file another plan. The decision came as a striking victory for Native American tribes and environmental groups that had opposed it – but other projects in the works may not meet the same conclusion.

The project, claimed nine groups within the Sioux Nation, including the Standing Rock Sioux, would “directly and significantly” affect the use of Pe’ Sla, which sits within Ȟe Sápa, the Lakota name for the sacred Black Hills of South Dakota, itself the locus of Lakota creation myths.

Advertisement

A second exploratory project by a Canadian company looking to mine uranium on state-owned land could affect Craven Canyon, an area that contains 7,000-year-old sites of importance to Indigenous tribes, historians and archaeologists.

Opposition to the twin projects – backed by Pete Lien, of Rapid City, and by Clean Nuclear Energy Corp – comes as a proposed Alberta-to-Wyoming pipeline for carrying Canadian crude oil to ⁠the US is close to securing commitments from oil ⁠companies after Donald Trump granted permitting through an executive order.

All the projects have at their heart issues of extraction, water safety and sacred sites, much as the Standing Rock dispute of 2016 that saw “water protesters” gather in a standoff with law enforcement over concerns regarding water safety and sacred sites.

That case began when the Standing Rock Sioux passed a resolution stating that “the Dakota Access Pipeline poses a serious risk to the very survival of our Tribe and … would destroy valuable cultural resources” and was a violation of the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty guaranteeing the “undisturbed use and occupation” of reservation lands surrounding the pipeline.

In the aftermath, the environmental group Greenpeace was ordered to pay damages of $345m by a North Dakota judge to pipeline company Energy Transfer and subsidiary Dakota Access in connection with the protests, an order that is set to go to appeal. Greenpeace claims the legal action is designed to silence activists.

Advertisement

Most of the current disputes relate to energy, reflecting the Trump administration’s drive toward US energy independence and away from dependence on foreign sources, particularly China. Graphite, used in electric vehicle batteries, is almost exclusively imported. Roughly 95%–99% of uranium is purchased from foreign sources, including Russia and Kazakhstan.

The pipeline deal, meanwhile, is expected to help increase oil output from Canada, the world’s fourth-largest producer, to around 6.1m barrels a day, up from 5.5m now. Bridger, the company behind the Alberta-to-Wyoming pipeline, has said the project was being developed in response to identified market interest.

Wizipan “Little Elk” Garriott, a member of NDN Collective, an Indigenous rights group opposing the mining at Pe’ Sla, says the entire process of approval for the planned mine “happened in the dark”.

“There was no notice that they were proceeding provided to us, nor to the sovereign tribal nations,” he says, in violation of environmental and cultural impact study requirements and consultations with the tribes.

Lilias Jarding, director of the Black Hills Clean Water Alliance, one of the parties in the victorious Pe’ Sla action, says the decade since Standing Rock has seen a huge growth in projects attempting to mine tribal lands and areas of ceremonial significance.

Advertisement

Since the start of the second Trump administration, the push for both minerals extraction and energy has dramatically increased. “They’re being more aggressive,” Jarding says. In the case of Pe’ Sla, he adds, the company didn’t stop drilling when the lawsuits was filed: “They started drilling 24 hours a day.”

The alliance, along with tribes, claim the graphite project violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and that the US Forest Service improperly used a process known as a “categorical exclusion” to bypass reviews.

Oglala Sioux president Frank Star Comes Out said in a statement that the Sioux tribes never ceded to the US the lands in the Black Hills, which, he said, “remain the spiritual center of the Great Sioux Nation and they are not for sale, lease or exploitation” and that the lawsuit is a “united tribal response to protect a sacred site from those who continue to desecrate our ancestral lands”.

Oglala activist Taylor Gunhammer said that drilling at Pe’ Sla was akin to “drilling under the Vatican or at a sacred site in Jerusalem”.

A representative of Clean Nuclear Energy Corp, Mike Blady, said the company was “aware of the cultural significance and are doing everything in our power to ensure that there is no collateral damage”.

Advertisement

Will this amount to a populist action similar to Standing Rock?

The Pe’ Sla dispute did not provoke the kind of Indigenous-led, grassroots resistance to fossil-fuel infrastructure projects that accompanied the Dakota Access pipeline, which in some ways became a template for contemporary protests, powered by social media, celebrities and politicians.

The tribes were not in favor of following in that direction, Jarding says: “It’s a deeply sacred spiritual and ceremonial site, and elders have made it clear that it’s not a good place for another Standing Rock with thousands of people. They say this is not the place.”

Under the Biden administration, the tribal groups felt they were entering into a period of co-management policy over federal lands that in many cases lie within treaty agreements. But under the Trump administration, that sense of co-operation has diminished.

“We’ve seen a ramp-up of opening up federal lands for mineral and gas exploration, but as a planet we need to be moving away from fossil fuels and toward policies that are sustainable into the future,” says NDN’s Garriott.

Advertisement

What was planned for Pe’ Sla now, or was happening at Standing Rock a decade ago, or has indeed happened over a long history of disputes between sovereign tribal groups and the US government, he says, is “protecting our land and protecting our water, not only for ourselves but for the planet. We’re not random protesters out there – we’re protecting our own land”.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

SD Lottery Powerball, Lotto America winning numbers for May 9, 2026

Published

on


The South Dakota Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at May 9, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from May 9 drawing

15-41-46-47-56, Powerball: 22, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Lotto America numbers from May 9 drawing

08-12-13-27-42, Star Ball: 04, ASB: 04

Check Lotto America payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Dakota Cash numbers from May 9 drawing

01-02-04-08-18

Check Dakota Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from May 9 drawing

08-11-17-29-49, Bonus: 02

Advertisement

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize

  • Prizes of $100 or less: Can be claimed at any South Dakota Lottery retailer.
  • Prizes of $101 or more: Must be claimed from the Lottery. By mail, send a claim form and a signed winning ticket to the Lottery at 711 E. Wells Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501.
  • Any jackpot-winning ticket for Dakota Cash or Lotto America, top prize-winning ticket for Lucky for Life, or for the second prizes for Powerball and Mega Millions must be presented in person at a Lottery office. A jackpot-winning Powerball or Mega Millions ticket must be presented in person at the Lottery office in Pierre.

When are the South Dakota Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
  • Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Dakota Cash: 9 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 10:15 p.m. CT daily.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Dakota editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending