South Dakota
Educators still question proposed social studies standards after revisions
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota Information Now) – Two conferences have already been held on the newest spherical of proposed social research requirements in South Dakota, and two extra are scheduled for later this 12 months. However that doesn’t imply the proposed requirements would be the similar by the tip of the method.
The a whole bunch of fogeys, educators, and neighborhood members that turned out to the primary two conferences in Aberdeen and Sioux Falls appear to have made an impression. Revisions made to the proposals embody many grammatical adjustments. Some adjustments to geography requirements for sixth grade, in addition to highschool college students have been included as effectively.
However for some educators, these adjustments aren’t sufficient. The South Dakota Training Affiliation acknowledged in a launch that the adjustments fail to revisit lots of the areas they mentioned the proposals initially failed at. That features the method from the place the requirements got here from.
“The revisions made to the proposed social research requirements fall brief in addressing the issues raised by South Dakota’s educators and fogeys. A majority of revisions are grammatical and whereas a number of the new language consists of the phrase geography, the present proposal nonetheless fails to incorporate content-rich geography requirements. If these adjustments have been really important, the SD. Dept. of Training ought to think about restarting the listening to course of to offer these dwelling within the Aberdeen and Sioux Falls areas an opportunity to weigh in on the brand new proposal.
We proceed to induce the Board of Training Requirements to deal with the problems with the age appropriateness of the requirements, keep South Dakota Historical past within the fourth grade and embody the related Native American Historical past that’s recognized in session with the 9 tribes of South Dakota. That is what our college students deserve and what mother and father and educators will proceed to battle for.”
MORE: South Dakota educators elevate issues with proposed social research requirements course of
The Faculty Directors of South Dakota agree, and Govt Director Rob Monson mentioned the revisions present that there’s room for additional adjustments to be made to the requirements.
“What it does inform me is that there’s in reality a course of for revisions. That’s sort of what everybody who’s been testifying and individuals who have been writing in are saying, that these requirements which are on the market proper now aren’t excellent,” Monson mentioned. “So let’s take a pause, let’s check out them. Let’s deliver a few committee’s again collectively, and let’s perhaps repair a number of the issues that must be mounted.”
Monson mentioned despite the fact that two assembly have already been held earlier than adjustments have been made, he’s glad there are nonetheless extra alternatives for folks to return ahead and react to the revisions.
“I do consider that’s why there definitely are 4 conferences held. As a result of if one thing’s recognized on the first assembly or the second assembly, you’ve got time in between the second and third, and third and fourth to deliver these adjustments and put them in entrance of the general public.” Monson mentioned.
The popular repair although for Monson, the SASD and the SDEA, is that they’d wish to see is to start out the method again over or a minimum of deliver again the proposed requirements from 2021. These requirements, they argue, have been supported by extra educators throughout the state, even when they weren’t excellent.
“Ideally, we want to return to the primary set of requirements that have been introduced ahead by practitioners from South Dakota, that appeared like a majority of individuals agreed on and thought could be good requirements transferring ahead. Once more, if we had the chance, return and produce these requirements ahead. Possibly take a few of these which are being proposed for the present requirements and meld the 2 collectively.” Monson mentioned.
The Board of Training Requirements’ subsequent assembly on the proposed social research requirements is February 10 on the Rushmore Resort in Speedy Metropolis. That date is a day earlier that initially scheduled. The deadline to register to talk on the assembly has already handed, however there’s nonetheless time to submit on-line feedback on the requirements right here. A gathering in Pierre in April can also be deliberate.
Copyright 2023 KSFY. All rights reserved.
South Dakota
5 North Dakota stories to watch in 2025 • North Dakota Monitor
North Dakota will ring in the new year with a lot of unfinished business from 2024.
Many of the state’s biggest stories from last year — including those related to taxation, abortion and incarceration — remain unsettled. State leaders could reignite public discussion of these issues as early as the 69th legislative session, which starts Tuesday.
Here are five state government stories we’ll be watching this year:
Property taxes
The ballot measure to eliminate property taxes based on assessed value put a spotlight on the property tax issue in 2024. Although it failed in the statewide vote, Measure 4 got the attention of legislators.
Expect several bill drafts related to property taxes in the 2025 legislative session that starts Tuesday. In November, Legislative Council reported it had already received dozens of requests to prepare bill drafts related to property taxes. Gov. Kelly Armstrong has also repeatedly said that property tax reform will be one of his administration’s top priorities.
The state is already taking applications for the second year of the primary residence property tax credit even though a bill authorizing the credit will need to be passed by the Legislature. The program, created by the Legislature in 2023, allowed most North Dakota homeowners to apply for $500 off their 2024 property tax bill.
Abortion
A judge last year struck down North Dakota’s law banning most abortions, declaring it unconstitutional.
In a September order, South Central Judicial District Court Judge Bruce Romanick found that women in North Dakota have a right to seek abortions until the point of fetal viability.
State Sen. Janne Myrdal, R-Edinburg, who sponsored the 2023 bill that created the ban, said after Romanick’s order that the focus should be on defending the law that the judge said was too vague.
The ban made abortion illegal in all cases except rape or incest if the mother has been pregnant for less than six weeks, or when the pregnancy poses a serious physical health threat.
Rep. Eric Murphy, R-Grand Forks, has said he plans to bring a bill this session to allow women to receive abortions for any reason through week 15 of pregnancy in North Dakota. The bill would place restrictions on requests for later-term abortions, including review from committees of doctors.
The state is appealing Romanick’s decision to the North Dakota Supreme Court. The high court has yet to make a final decision on the case.
Summit pipeline
In 2024, Summit Carbon Solutions successfully obtained permits for the portion of its carbon dioxide pipeline and storage area planned for North Dakota. But the Iowa-based company still faces appeals from two North Dakota counties and a group of landowners.
The state’s rules governing underground storage areas, also known as pore space, also are being challenged.
Summit has also received pipeline route permits in Iowa and for a small section in Minnesota, but was denied a permit from South Dakota where the main trunk of the 2,500-mile pipeline network is planned to run. Summit is trying again for a permit in South Dakota, so pipeline opponents and supporters will be watching the state closely this year. If built, the pipeline would connect 57 ethanol plants in five states to the underground storage area in western North Dakota.
Summit calls the nearly $9 billion pipeline the world’s largest carbon capture and storage projects.
Supporters say it will benefit the ethanol industry and the farmers who sell corn to the ethanol plants. Some opponents call it a taxpayer-funded climate change boondoggle and some landowner see it as an assault on property rights.
A portion of property owners along the path of the proposed pipeline oppose the project, and refuse to provide easements to Summit. If Summit and the property owners are unable to reach an agreement, Summit may take the matter to court to seek eminent domain.
Higher education
Bismarck State College, Dickinson State University and Lake Region State College will all be looking for new presidents in 2025, and the North Dakota University System also will be looking for a new leader.
Chancellor Mark Hagerott, who oversees the 11 colleges and their presidents, is stepping down at the end of 2025.
Bismarck State’s Doug Jensen is done Thursday; Dickinson State has been using an acting president since Stephen Easton quit in July; and Lake Region’s Doug Darling will retire at the end of June.
Inmate population
North Dakota’s prison system has been over its capacity for men since July 1, 2023, resorting to using county jails and a waiting list for some prisoners to get into a state facility.
The state Legislature will be asked to address the North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation problem in the 2025 session.
Former Gov. Doug Burgum’s budget proposal included $6.5 million into pay equity for corrections employees, $127.3 million for a new 600-resident facility for the Missouri River Correctional Center, and $36.5 million to finish a building project for the Heart River Women’s Correctional Center in Mandan.
Donnell Preskey, a government and public affairs specialist with the North Dakota Association of Counties, said counties are struggling to keep up, too, with several local jail expansions planned.
She said the issue is related to high incarceration costs and property taxes,since property taxes are the primary funding source for jails.
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
South Dakota
South Dakota State hires Jackson as head coach
BROOKINGS, S.D. — Former South Dakota State player and assistant Dan Jackson has been hired as the Jackrabbits’ new head coach, the school announced Tuesday night.
Jackson takes over for Jimmy Rogers, who left for Washington State after leading the Jackrabbits to the Football Championship Subdivision semifinals.
Jackson was Idaho coach Jason Eck’s defensive coordinator this season and had been set to move to New Mexico for the same position under Eck before the SDSU job opened.
Jackson played for the Jackrabbits from 2003 to 2005 and became a graduate assistant at SDSU in 2012, when the program began its current streak of 13 straight FCS playoff appearances.
He was elevated to cornerbacks coach in 2014 and also served as recruiting and special teams coordinator and assistant head coach under John Stiegelmeier before moving on to Northern Illinois following the 2019 season. Jackson coached two seasons at Northern Illinois, then was hired at Vanderbilt, where he coached defensive backs during the 2022 and 2023 seasons.
The Jackrabbits, who won national titles in 2022 and 2023, finished this season 12-3 overall and as co-champions in the Missouri Valley Football Conference.
South Dakota
Obituary for Henry William Bamberg at Will Funeral Chapel
-
Technology1 week ago
There’s a reason Metaphor: ReFantanzio’s battle music sounds as cool as it does
-
News1 week ago
France’s new premier selects Eric Lombard as finance minister
-
Business7 days ago
On a quest for global domination, Chinese EV makers are upending Thailand's auto industry
-
Health4 days ago
New Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
Technology4 days ago
Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
World1 week ago
Passenger plane crashes in Kazakhstan: Emergencies ministry
-
Politics1 week ago
It's official: Biden signs new law, designates bald eagle as 'national bird'
-
Politics5 days ago
'Politics is bad for business.' Why Disney's Bob Iger is trying to avoid hot buttons