Ohio
Ohio State can’t take a ‘joke,’ Michigan bar says in response to lawsuit
Bodycam: New video shows postgame fight, officers arresting players
Chaotic scenes of the postgame altercation between football players after the Ohio State University’s loss to the University of Michigan.
The owners of a bar in Michigan that serves up Buckeye Tears for $7 a pint have answered Ohio State University’s claim that their beer violates federal trademark protections.
OSU’s overreaction to a bit of good-natured ribbing just adds more Buckeye tears to the keg, they claim in papers filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Oct. 6. It’s their lawyer’s response to Ohio State’s opposition of a trademark application by the Brown Jug, a bar and restaurant near the University of Michigan’s campus in Ann Arbor.
“The Buckeye Tears mark … plays into a perception shared by Michigan fans — particularly in the wake of their football team’s four consecutive victories over Ohio State — that Ohio State and its supporters may on occasion act like sore losers,” attorneys from the law firm Fenwick & West wrote on the Brown Jug’s behalf.
“Ohio State’s very filing of the opposition validates that perception,” they wrote.
OSU put itself on record Aug. 27 against the bar’s application for a trademark on Buckeye Tears. The university said the beer would create “a false sense of connection with Ohio State” and damage the university’s “reputation and goodwill.”
Ohio State holds trademarks on the Buckeyes’ name and said it has reaped more than $145 million in royalties from it over the last decade.
The Brown Jug’s lawyers, however, said the word Buckeye is already used for more than 5,700 licensed businesses in Ohio and is a brand name on beer, wine and liquor that OSU has “apparently not seen fit to police.”
“Ohio State called its team of lawyers only when a Michigan small business sought to make a good-natured joke,” he said.
At least one of the eight Buckeyes-named products used as an example, though, is licensed by Ohio State.
OSU spokesman Ben Johnson declined to comment on the Brown Jug’s response, which included another dig at the Buckeyes.
“The generic use of ‘buckeye’ to refer to Ohioans goes back to at least 1788,” wrote the four lawyers, one of whom is a University of Michigan Law School graduate. “In its early meaning, the term ‘buckeye’ was used to convey that Ohioans as a group were ‘untaught’ and ‘awkward.’ It was not until over 100 years later that Ohio State, the leading public institution of higher learning in Ohio, thought that it should also use this word to refer to its students and commercial offerings.”
Bob Vitale can be reached at rvitale@dispatch.com or at @dispatchdining on the Instagram social platform.
Ohio
What is the status of the MAGA movement in Ohio? And what does it mean for the 2026 Election?
Ohio
Emeka Egbuka defends Ohio State WR Carnell Tate’s selection to Titans
Tampa Bay Buccaneers and former Ohio State wide receiver Emeka Egbuka is defending former Buckeye Carnell Tate.
Tate has received some scrutiny after he was selected as the first wide receiver in the 2026 NFL Draft, despite not having been Ohio State’s top receiver target in college. Appearing on the “Up and Adams” show May 6, Egbuka shut down the narrative that meant Tate would not find success with the Tennessee Titans.
“I mean, we can see the correlation,” Egbuka said. “That was the same talk that was about me when I was coming out of the draft. At the end of the day, it’s all semantics. If you can play football, you can play football, and Carnell Tate can play football.”
Selected with the No. 20 pick in the 2025 NFL Draft, Egbuka finished his final college season with 1,011 receiving yards, more than 300 fewer than Jeremiah Smith in his freshman year. Egbuka led the team in receptions with 81 compared to Smith’s 76 catches.
With Buccaneers wide receivers Mike Evans and Chris Godwin Jr. playing fewer than 10 games during the 2025 season due to injuries, Egbuka led the team in receiving yards with 938. He finished fifth in 2025 AP Offensive Rookie of the Year voting.
Tate, the No. 4 overall pick in this year’s draft, was called a “talented player” by New York Giants wide receiver Malik Nabers during Bleacher Report’s draft night coverage on April 23, but Nabers questioned Tate’s selection.
“I don’t see him being a number one,” Nabers said. “He hasn’t been the number one on the team he’s been on. You have to be a number one on the team that you’re coming from to be a number one receiver on the team you’re going to. … You can’t be the second.”
Green Bay Packers edge rusher Micah Parsons, also on the broadcast, quickly dismissed Nabers’ statement by bringing up that former Buckeyes receiver Jaxon Smith-Njigba was a second option while in college.
“You said you got to be number one on the team that you’re coming from. … [Jaxon Smith-Njigba] was not number one. Bro, you got to understand that the number one [Ohio State] player will be the number one pick in the draft next year. … Give him a chance to fulfill the role,” Parsons said.
Tate finished the 2025 season with 875 receiving yards and nine touchdowns, second to Smith with 1,243 receiving yards and 12 touchdowns.
Ohio
Sherrod Brown wins Ohio Democratic Senate primary
-
New York54 minutes agoMamdani Wants Free Buses for All. The City Council Has Different Ideas.
-
Detroit, MI1 hour ago
Breaking down the Detroit Lions roster: Defense
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoMissing man, 85, last seen in South San Francisco
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoCowboys’ Stephen Jones says what NFL won’t admit about the Micah Parsons trade
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoWhat we learned about the pecking order after Miami
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoI was ready to hate the new Copley Square Park. Then I visited it. – The Boston Globe
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoJonah Coleman says being a Bronco is ‘the best thing in the world’ as rookie camp begins
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoMeet the ‘fuel mitigation specialists’ protecting Pierce County from wildfires