Connect with us

Ohio

Bullock: Ohio HB 6 took away consumer electric savings, but HB 79 can help bring them back

Published

on

Bullock: Ohio HB 6 took away consumer electric savings, but HB 79 can help bring them back


Consumers have been paying extra on their monthly electric bills since Ohio House Bill 6 was enacted — not only due to subsidies for 80-year old, uncompetitive power plants it mandated, but also because it ended utility work on energy efficiency that lowers Ohio power consumption and lowers costs along with it. To date, Ohioans have lost an estimated $890 million in savings.

But as early as this month, the Ohio General Assembly could vote to change that and take the first steps toward energy saving since HB 6 was enacted. A new bipartisan proposal, Ohio House Bill 79, could prompt utilities to resume efforts to help customers save through insulation, efficient appliances, less expensive energy, and lower grid maintenance costs.

New rules in HB 79 improve quality controls to ensure utilities’ work results in verifiable bill savings, and they eliminate past gimmicks such as sending light bulb “kits” to customers who did not request them.In practice, this means utilities could offer discounts and rebates to encourage residential and small business customers to invest in insulation, air conditioning and furnaces tune-ups, and efficient lighting, refrigerators, water heaters, and heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems.

Advertisement

This matters because the least expensive unit of power is the one we don’t use. For every $1 invested in energy waste reduction, consumers will save $1.30 to $1.90. HB 79 would lower energy inflation. If Ohio does nothing, energy inflation will cost everyone more. Power prices rise as power demand rises, unless we deploy energy efficiency to delink them.

Notably, HB 79 allows consumers to opt out. Customers who do will still save money thanks to lower energy prices (due to lowered demand) and lower peak demand (e.g. on hot summer days), which drives a significant portion of electricity costs.

HB 79 also would increase grid reliability. Ohio will need more power in coming years thanks to data centers, the Intel chip manufacturing facility in Lick County, and increasing electric vehicle use. If Ohio energy efficiency work had continued after HB 6, Ohioans could have used 5.4 million megawatt hours (MWh) less electricity in 2023 —about the same as the annual power output of the coal-fired Kyger Creek Power Plant along the Ohio River in Cheshire, Gallilia County (owned by Ohio Valley Electric Corporation).

The market alone is not enough, and utility-run programs can increase savings by getting more consumers to participate, lowering usage statewide that lowers costs for everyone. Critics claim that markets work and people make energy efficiency choices without utility involvement, but all evidence shows that utility discounts and rebates together with the market often produce the best results for consumers utilizing energy efficiency.

Advertisement

In a time of rising costs, the Ohio General Assembly can help Ohioans cut their energy use and monthly bills by passing HB 79. Will they?

Tom Bullock is executive director of the Citizens Utility Board of Ohio, a nonprofit, nonpartisan consumer advocacy organization works to reduce residential and small business utility customers.



Source link

Ohio

4-star 2026 recruit released from agreement with Tennessee, set to sign with Ohio State football

Published

on

4-star 2026 recruit released from agreement with Tennessee, set to sign with Ohio State football


COLUMBUS, Ohio — Four-star 2026 recruit Legend Bey has been released from signing with Tennessee and quickly flipped his decision to Ohio State.

As reported by Rivals on Tuesday, Bey no longer was a member of Tennessee’s program by the evening and quickly joined the Buckeyes’ 2026 class. He is free to play immediately in Columbus.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Ohio’s secretary of state shows “cognitive dissonance” on election integrity – again

Published

on

Ohio’s secretary of state shows “cognitive dissonance” on election integrity – again


Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose is once again demonstrating that he operates not based on principles but on his loyalty to President Donald Trump and the MAGA movement, say the hosts of the Today in Ohio podcast.

Tuesday’s episode took aim at LaRose’s recent announcement that Ohio is joining the EleXa Network, a system where states share voter data to combat fraud—nearly identical to the ERIC (Electronic Registration Information Center) system LaRose abandoned after MAGA criticism.

“This was the case that — for anybody that wanted to see it — showed just how lily-livered LaRose is, that he doesn’t stand for anything,” said Chris Quinn. He noted how LaRose was full-throated in supporting ERIC “until all of a sudden ‚the MAGA folks said it’s bad. And then like you said, hot potatoes.”

Lisa Garvin explained that LaRose had previously championed ERIC as an essential tool for maintaining accurate voter rolls and preventing fraud. However, when conservative media outlets began claiming the system favored Democrats and undermined election integrity, LaRose abandoned it—only to now join a nearly identical system with a different name.

Advertisement

Quinn didn’t hesitate to predict LaRose’s future behavior: “And watch, if MAGA comes out and says, ‘Oh, we hate this system,’ he’ll immediately turn tail again. And it shows you everything. He doesn’t stand for anything except supporting MAGA and the Republicans.”

Garvin said LaRose’s decisions are part of his pattern on election integrity.

“He’s always trumpeted the integrity of Ohio’s election system. And then he turns around and said, ‘well, there’s fraud everywhere.’” She said. “This is like cognitive dissonance?”

Both Eric and EleXa allow states to share information on people who may be registered in multiple states or who have died, helping to keep voter rolls accurate and prevent people from voting twice. Ohio is joining with nine neighboring states, including Indiana, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania.

Of course, as podcast hosts noted, voter fraud is extremely rare.

Advertisement

Listen to the episode here.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Leaders from dozens of states in Ohio to fight federal overreach

Published

on

Leaders from dozens of states in Ohio to fight federal overreach


COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — The Ohio Statehouse hosted a historic gathering of legislative leaders from across the country Monday, discussing concerns about the increasing power of the federal government.

Senate presidents and House speakers from about 40 states met in the chambers of the Ohio House of Representatives, unanimously adopting a nonbinding declaration for the restoration of federalism and state empowerment.

“The states are not instrumentalities of the federal government; the states created the federal government, the states created the constitution,” said Bryan Thomas, spokesperson for the National Conference of State Legislatures (NSCL), which organized the assembly.

In addition to the federalism declaration, the inaugural Assembly of State Legislative Leaders unanimously adopted rules and frameworks for future assemblies. These rules were submitted by a bipartisan steering committee made up of five Democrats and five Republicans. Likewise, the Assembly’s proposal process requires bipartisan support in order to get a vote.

Advertisement

“Coming from a blue state and minority [party] in the current federal government, it’s really important for us to find partners to work with,” Hawaii Senate President Ron Kouchi (D) said. “What better partners than our fellow legislators?”

Ohio Speaker of the House Matt Huffman (R-Lima) has been working to organize an assembly of legislative leaders to reassert the tenets of federalism for years.

“What we’ve done in the last 50 years or so, I don’t think that George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and John Adams would recognize,” Huffman said. “There are some things that the states do better and some things that constitutionally the states are required to do.”

According to Thomas, there are several specific issues where many states feel their power has been usurped by the federal government—particularly with regard to Medicaid policy.

“With changes to Medicaid coming down the pipe from Congress, what is the state role?” Thomas said. “What flexibility can states have in administering this program?”

Advertisement

“Medicaid is the Pac-Man of the state budget. It is costing the state more and more money each year, it’s completely unsustainable,” Ohio Senate President Rob McColley (R-Napoleon) said. “It’s necessary for us to have these conversations about Medicaid because every state’s dealing with the same challenges.”

The Assembly did not end up voting on a proposed declaration regarding Medicaid, which would have urged Congress to “avoid unfunded mandates” and assert that states should “retain the authority to customize eligibility, benefits, and delivery systems.”

Although Thomas said planning for the Assembly has stretched between presidential administrations, President Donald Trump has made several moves during the first year of his second term to assert federal authority over the states — most recently by signing an executive order limiting states’ ability to regulate AI, and attempting to pressure the Indiana state legislature into redrawing congressional maps.

“There’s no specific action here of the current administration or the past administration that spurred this,” Thomas said. “This is more about a real grounding in principles.”

“Anybody has the ability to voice their opinion or their concerns on a variety of these issues,” McColley said of Trump’s campaign to influence the Indiana legislature. “I think the administration is free to talk about it and be involved in the process.”

Advertisement

It is not clear when or where the Assembly will meet next, but Kouchi suggested a meeting could be held at July’s NCSL conference in Chicago. With a framework in place, Kouchi said he hopes the next assembly will get into the “meaty issues” concerning state legislative leaders.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending