Connect with us

North Dakota

Senators say money at heart of whistleblower dispute was intended for Fargo center

Published

on

Senators say money at heart of whistleblower dispute was intended for Fargo center


FARGO — Members of Congress who were instrumental in establishing the federal Rural Export Center in Fargo say a $1 million boost in federal funding for rural export efforts was meant for the Fargo center.

Comments from U.S. Sens. Kevin Cramer, John Hoeven and Amy Klobuchar echo assertions made by Rural Export Center Director Heather Ranck,

who is facing an effort to remove her from her job

after she raised concerns about how the additional dollars are being spent.

Advertisement
Sen. Kevin Cramer.

File photo.

Asked if it was their understanding that the additional $1 million was intended to go to the Fargo operation, Cramer and Hoeven, both Republicans from North Dakota, were direct in their answers.

“Yes, That was the expectation,” Cramer said.

Advertisement

Hoeven said that at the time the additional money was approved, “We anticipated that the funding would go to the REC in Fargo, but the final language for the program did not limit the funding.”

Sen. John Hoeven

Sen. John Hoeven

David Samson/The Forum

A spokesperson for Klobuchar, D-Minn., said Klobuchar has been a longtime champion of rural exports and has worked productively with Ranck for a number of years.

Advertisement

After introducing the original bill creating the Rural Export Center, Klobuchar’s office pushed for higher funding levels for the center, Klobuchar’s spokesperson said, adding that at the time the additional funding was approved, only the Rural Export Center in Fargo existed.

The funding in question was approved in December 2022, when Congress voted to boost the annual funding for rural export support from $500,000 to $1.5 million.

AmyKlobuchar.jpeg

Sen. Amy Klobuchar.

File photo.

Advertisement

Ranck provided her immediate supervisor with a proposal for how the additional money could be spent, emphasizing a dozen actions based on the impact they would have on rural exporters.

Ranck maintains, however, that senior officials in the Commerce Department, which oversees the export center, redirected the $1 million to establish seven new rural centers.

The new centers have Commerce Department employees, but according to Ranck, the centers do not have the ability to provide the type of research support that the Rural Export Center in Fargo provides U.S. companies looking to find markets for their products in other countries.

Concerned about how the additional allocated dollars were being directed, in February of 2023, Ranck notified a senior manager at the Commerce Department’s International Trade Administration, saying she was concerned the agency could be in trouble if it did not follow Congressional intent regarding the $1 million.

According to Ranck, shortly after she voiced those concerns, she was summoned to a virtual meeting with senior officials with the International Trade Administration, during which Ranck said Joseph Hanley, acting deputy assistant secretary for U.S. field operations and national field director for the International Trade Administration, shouted angrily at her and told her to never bypass the normal chain of command again.

Advertisement

In April 2023 and after the virtual meeting with Hanley, Ranck filed a whistleblower complaint with the Office of Inspector General, alleging patterns of abusive treatment, harassment, retaliation, gross mismanagement and abuse of authority.

Ranck named herself as the person who brought the complaint and she named Hanley as the source of the problems.

Ranck maintains that in June 2023, Hanley made a trip to the Rural Export Center in Fargo, claiming in advance that it was a courtesy visit to catch up on what had been happening at the office.

Instead, Ranck said, Hanley arrived at the center accompanied by an attorney and an armed security guard.

Ranck said she was told she was being placed on a 30-day paid administrative leave pending the outcome of an investigation.

Advertisement

Ranck, who has been on administrative leave ever since, said she was not told the reasons for her leave until early October 2023, when she received a “notice of proposed removal,” along with accompanying materials.

She (Ranck) is a collaborator, a facilitator, and a leader. If anything, she’s guilty of being good at her job.

Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D.

That same month, Ranck’s attorney, Joe Pekich, of the Pekich Law Firm PLLC, sent federal officials a written response refuting allegations made against Ranck by the Commerce Department’s International Trade Administration, which oversees the U.S. Commercial Service, the federal agency for which Ranck directly works.

Ranck said she is accused of three things: being too closely engaged with members of Congress; refusing to follow directives to promote newly created federal jobs in locations elsewhere in the country; and violating rules relating to how personally identifiable information involving people she supervised should be handled.

Advertisement

Ranck maintains there is no truth in the allegations and counters that the action to remove her is retaliation for the whistleblower complaint she filed in April 2023, a complaint that was subsequently dismissed without any negative consequences for Hanley, the official Ranck named in her complaint.

After filing a Freedom of Information Act request, Ranck said she was informed in September 2023 that the reason her complaint was dismissed was because the enabling legislation behind the $1 million in additional funding for rural export support said the money was to go toward rural export centers — plural — and not a specific export center.

After her attorney responded in writing to the notice of proposed removal she received in October, Ranck had a hearing before James Golsen, deputy director general of the International Trade Administration, the U.S. government’s primary commercial diplomacy, export and investment promotion agency.

At the time this story was published, Ranck was waiting to see how Golsen would rule on the allegations she faces.

Abuse thrives on fear and isolation. I’ve discovered how liberating truth-telling can be.

Heather Ranck, director of Fargo’s Rural Export Center

Advertisement

Ranck maintains that because the funding bill language for rural export support wound up using the word “centers” instead of “center,” the Office of Inspector General did not investigate any of the other claims contained in her complaint filed in April 2023, which alleged patterns of abusive management and continued attempts at sabotaging the Rural Export Center in Fargo.

When the International Trade Administration of the Department of Commerce was asked for comment regarding Ranck’s claims and the disciplinary action against her, a spokesman for the Department of Commerce said the ITA does not comment on personnel matters and added that the allegations in the complaint Ranck filed were investigated and found to be unsubstantiated.

Hoeven said when the North Dakota District Export Council, an organization of experienced export volunteers, notified his office that Ranck had been placed on administrative leave, he and Cramer contacted the Department of Commerce, as well as Marisa Lago, the undersecretary of commerce for the International Trade Administration, for an explanation regarding the issue.

Hoeven said the Department of Commerce would not provide any details, as it involved a personnel issue, but Hoeven said he and Cramer are continuing to work to bring Commerce Department officials to North Dakota to meet with District Export Council members intent on expressing their concerns about the issue.

Advertisement

“We’ve worked with Heather over many years and believe she has always been very professional and done a great job. We have made clear to Commerce that they need to treat Heather fairly and resolve this issue transparently,” Hoeven said.

Cramer went further, stating: “A good public servant is supposed to work closely with other public servants like the mayors, county commissioners, governors, departments of state, chambers of commerce, and Congressional delegations. She (Ranck) is a collaborator, a facilitator, and a leader. If anything, she’s guilty of being good at her job.”

Cramer added that one of the advantages of living in the Midwest is that people know each other and work in a collaborative manner.

“She (Ranck) would be derelict in her duties if she didn’t work with Congressional offices to help advance the agency’s mission on behalf of our workers and businesses. It’s what I would expect and what she always delivers. She’s a great public servant, and it’s a shame for her to be in this situation,” Cramer said.

In late December, Jay Schuler, current chairman of the North Dakota District Export Council, which also serves a portion of northwest Minnesota, sent a letter supporting Ranck to a number of federal officials, including Lago and Golsen.

Advertisement

More than two dozen individuals with connections to area companies and trade organizations endorsed the letter of support, including Thomas Shorma, former chairman of the North Dakota District Export Council and a long-standing member of the North Dakota Trade Office.

101620.B.FF.EXIM.03.jpg

Thomas Shorma, Doug Goehring, Sen. Kevin Cramer, Kimberly Reed, Sen. John Hoeven, Kirt Gallatin and John Harju participate in the EXIM Trade Finance Town Hall on Wednesday, Oct. 14, 2020 at the Sanctuary Events Center in downtown Fargo. David Samson / The Forum

Shorma said many past and current members of the North Dakota District Export Council are on record as stating they will resign their positions and cut their connection with the organization if Ranck is removed from her position.

Advertisement

In early January, Schuler sent a letter to Michael Horowitz, inspector general of the United States, asking him to look into the matter and to put Ranck back to work as director of the Rural Export Center.

Ranck said she has received an overwhelming amount of support, including phone calls and emails, following

The Forum’s publication of a story detailing her administrative leave and the whistleblower complaint she filed

before the disciplinary action was launched.

Ranck said more than 200 people have reached out to her to express disbelief and outrage, including 40 current or past employees of the Commerce Department who told her they went through something akin to what she is experiencing.

Advertisement

“Abuse thrives on fear and isolation. I’ve discovered how liberating truth-telling can be,” Ranck said.





Source link

North Dakota

Motorcycles line up to support North Dakota Army pilot critically injured in Iraq

Published

on

Motorcycles line up to support North Dakota Army pilot critically injured in Iraq


WEST FARGO — Dozens, likely even hundreds, of motorcycles will roar through southeast North Dakota Saturday, June 1.

It’s in support of 41-year-old U.S. Army Chief Warrant Officer 4 Garrett Illerbrunn.

The native of Langdon was seriously injured in a drone attack in Iraq on Christmas Day.

“Really honor Garrett, he’s a hero to a lot of us,” said John Brooks who is Illerbrunn’s brother-in-law.

Advertisement

The 2001 graduate of Langdon High School was nearly killed in a drone strike in Iraq on Christmas Day.

“His therapists really say he has no quit in him, so we’re really proud of that. He’s got a long road ahead of him,” said Brooks.

Illerbrunn is currently at a rehabilitation center for traumatic brain injuries in Richmond, Virginia, where he will likely stay for the next year to focus on basic motor functions like walking, eating, and talking.

“Responding to questions with yes, no. He knows people in the room, he knows his family, so he’s doing wonderful for the situation he’s in,” Brooks said.

Most of the money raised from the ride will go to Semper Fi & America’s Fund. The organization has helped the army pilot’s wife and 7-year-old son, along with other family members, be by his side during his time at the hospital and now at rehab.

Advertisement

Brooks says while Illerbrunn will be on his mind he said the ride is much bigger than just his brother-in-law.

“Support all veterans, whether they are injured or not. This has really just opened a lot of people’s eyes,” he said.

Illerbrunn will receive a Purple Heart on June 6 for his sacrifice.

The Ride for a Warrior starts and ends at Harley-Davidson of Fargo.

Registration is from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on Saturday morning with kickstands up at 11 a.m.

Advertisement

Bikers and hot rods will then travel 150 miles, making various stops through the region.

Matt Henson is an Emmy award-winning reporter/photographer/editor for WDAY. Prior to joining WDAY in 2019, Matt was the main anchor at WDAZ in Grand Forks for four years.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota congressmen voice support for Trump after guilty verdicts

Published

on

North Dakota congressmen voice support for Trump after guilty verdicts


WASHINGTON, D.C. — All three members of North Dakota’s congressional delegation weighed in on the outcome in former President Donald Trump’s criminal hush money trial Thursday, May 30, with Sen. Kevin Cramer condemning nearly every aspect of the case and its outcome, including New York City itself.

Cramer, who is up for reelection this fall, posted on Facebook less than a half-hour after the jury announced guilty verdicts on 34 criminal counts, making Trump the first-ever former U.S. President to become a convicted felon.

“A kangaroo court in a third world city has ensured Donald Trump will be elected again. A corrupt judge enabled by the Democrat election tampering machine working with a corrupt prosecutor and well paid witnesses will obviously lead to a successful appeal for President Trump. The American people know better than to fall for this farce. We must de-weaponize our justice system so corrupted by the current administration,” he wrote.

Rep. Kelly Armstrong, who earlier in the day received a much-sought-after endorsement for the Republican nomination for North Dakota governor from Trump in his primary battle against Lt. Gov. Tammy Miller, questioned the legality of the case, saying the statute of limitations for the allegations had long passed.

Advertisement

“I talked to President Trump this morning and just told him to keep his head up while he was going through this,” he said during his debate with Miller on Thursday. “As someone who used to practice in this area … I have no idea how this happened.”

Sen. John Hoeven predicted the former president would appeal the case before Trump officially announced those intentions in a press conference Friday.

“Clearly, the Manhattan DA is politically motivated and both this case and the verdict undermine Americans’ confidence in our judicial system. This case is far from over, and President Trump can and undoubtedly will appeal the verdict. Ultimately, the American people will have their say in the election,” Hoeven said in a statement Thursday evening.

The state’s all-GOP delegation’s support for Trump mirrored that of elected and other high-profile Republicans from across the country. Gov. Doug Burgum also piled on to the verdict, calling it a “travesty of justice” on the social media platform X. During an appearance on Fox News Thursday, he said the trial had been unfair to Trump and claimed the jury was made up of only Biden voters.

Our newsroom occasionally reports stories under a byline of “staff.” Often, the “staff” byline is used when rewriting basic news briefs that originate from official sources, such as a city press release about a road closure, and which require little or no reporting. At times, this byline is used when a news story includes numerous authors or when the story is formed by aggregating previously reported news from various sources. If outside sources are used, it is noted within the story.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota Supreme Court sides with Summit in landowner dispute

Published

on

North Dakota Supreme Court sides with Summit in landowner dispute


North Dakota Supreme Court Chief Justice Jon Jensen, left, and Justice Lisa Fair McEvers hear arguments Dec. 18, 2023, in a case involving Summit Carbon Solutions and landowners. (Kyle Martin/For the North Dakota Monitor)

BY: JEFF BEACH

BISMARCK, N.D. (North Dakota Monitor) – The North Dakota Supreme Court has ruled in favor of pipeline company Summit Carbon Solutions in a dispute with landowners over the right to access properties to survey the land. 

Advertisement

The ruling released Thursday affirms a lower court ruling that the pipeline company did not need permission from landowners before accessing property to determine a possible route. 

Some landowners have refused to grant Summit access to survey their property as Summit attempts to site its carbon capture pipeline. 

Several cases regarding survey access were grouped together in the case SCS Carbon Transport v. Malloy. 

Howard Malloy of Bismarck owns land in Morton County where Summit wants to site its pipeline. Malloy contends the property is a prime housing development area. 

Iowa-based Summit is trying to obtain property easements for its five-state carbon capture pipeline.  

Advertisement

Summit says it has secured more than 80% of the North Dakota route through voluntary easements but some landowners, such as Malloy, have refused to grant survey access. 

In December, attorneys for the landowners argued that the state law granting survey access is unconstitutional. 

North Dakota law does not require written notice to landowners for survey access and allows survey crews access for projects that would benefit the public to show up at any time. Attorney Brian Jorde argued in December that written notice should be required and landowners should be compensated up front. They also should have a right to challenge access requests in court, he argued.

Without those protections, a pipeline or utility company effectively has an easement on the property, he argued. 

The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a district court ruling, saying that court’s order “did not grant the functional equivalent of an easement, either temporary or permanent.” 

Advertisement

Jorde said Thursday that for the courts to deem the statute constitutional, it needed to determine that there were already limits on the survey access. He contends the court incorrectly applied the statute’s limits on the use of the property, in this case a pipeline, and applied it to survey access, where the statute provides no limits. 

The ruling did add that landowners could take legal action if Summit damages the land “and unreasonably interferes with its ordinary use, or continues to occupy the land beyond the time reasonably needed to complete its examinations, surveys, and maps.” 

Bismarck attorney Derrick Braaten also represented landowners in the case. 

“The good thing for landowners is that it appears the Supreme Court is going to narrow the scope of what is allowed in precondemnation surveys and has left open the issue of compensation for any damages,” Braaten said in an email. “We disagree that these kinds of surveys are a background restriction on our property rights.” 

Summit issued this statement: 

Advertisement

“Summit Carbon Solutions respects the North Dakota Supreme Court’s decision. We are committed to conducting our surveys responsibly, respecting landowners’ rights, and ensuring minimal impact. We will continue to adhere to legal requirements and compensate for any damages during our activities.”

Jorde said he would continue to analyze the ruling and determine next steps in the coming weeks.

Jorde’s Domina Law firm represents landowners across the footprint of the Summit pipeline project, which aims to connect 57 ethanol plants to an underground carbon storage site northwest of Bismarck. 

There was a similar survey access case argued before the South Dakota Supreme Court, which has yet to rule. A date for oral arguments in another case before the Iowa Supreme Court has yet to be set. 

Jorde said North Dakota’s law would be the most difficult for landowners to overcome. 

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the North Dakota Public Service Commission is holding hearings on Summit’s pipeline route permit application. The PSC denied Summit a permit last year but has allowed Summit to address the PSC’s concerns and reconsider the case.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending