Connect with us

North Dakota

Presidential candidate Doug Burgum takes credit for North Dakota term limits. Is that accurate?

Published

on

Presidential candidate Doug Burgum takes credit for North Dakota term limits. Is that accurate?


FARGO — On the presidential campaign trail, Doug Burgum has touted achievements during his tenure as North Dakota governor, like tax cuts and balanced budgets.

But when he takes credit for the state enacting term limits for the governor and state legislators this year, it leaves some of the policy’s biggest supporters scratching their heads.

Burgum pointed to term limits as one of his achievements in his campaign announcement speech on June 7 and has used them as a selling point in pamphlets distributed in Iowa as he spends millions to get his name out in TV ads and mailers in early primary states.

While Burgum has expressed support for term limits for years, it was North Dakota voters, not the governor, who approved the policy through a ballot measure in the 2022 election.

Advertisement

In North Dakota, petitioners who gather enough signatures in support of an issue can put a question directly to voters, bypassing the need for elected officials to enact new policies. It was through that process, not the governor and Legislature, that the state created term limits.

Many who backed the measure were part of a political group often in conflict with Burgum. Backers of the measure included former legislator and perennial statewide candidate Rick Becker, the founder of the right-wing Bastiat Caucus — a group of lawmakers that is often a thorn in the side of the state’s traditional conservative Republican establishment.

“He as a candidate is taking credit where actually the credit is deserved by others,” said Becker, a former Republican who ran against Burgum in 2016. “And in the case of term limits, deserved by not only the people that were behind it but by the voters of North Dakota.”

Term limits are often championed by populists as a way to challenge the status quo by getting career politicians out of office, and Becker said he believes Burgum is trying to tie his name to an issue that will resonate with GOP primary voters.

Interestingly, Burgum’s support for term limits is a point of departure between him and the more traditional Republicans he tends to align with more closely.

Advertisement

Many longtime lawmakers in the North Dakota Legislature, including former House Majority Leader Chet Pollert, R-Carrington, and former Senate Majority Leader Rich Wardner, R-Dickinson, opposed term limits.

The state’s Republican Party did not take an official stance on the measure, though former party chairman Perrie Schafer told Forum News Service the measure was a bad idea. The Democratic-NPL also opposed term limits.

Meanwhile, much of the support for the 2022 term limits ballot measure came from ultra-conservative lawmakers. including former Rep. Becker and then Rep. and now Sen. Jeff Magrum, R-Hazelton.

Burgum in September 2022 told The Forum he supported the term limits, but when asked why Burgum supported the term limits ballot measure, a spokesman did not respond. Burgum did not campaign for term limits in 2022 and expressed his support in a statement after The Forum inquired about his stance.

“While most statewide offices aren’t included in the measure, it’s a good first step and we support it and encourage North Dakotans to give it their full consideration,” Burgum told The Forum in a statement last September.

Advertisement

Since Burgum didn’t come out in direct support, he can’t truly take any credit, Magrum said.

“We liked it that he didn’t oppose it, but he never did necessarily support the measure directly,” Magrum said. “I think he knew politically it was the right move.”

Though it’s worth noting Burgum had backed the idea for years — as a candidate for governor in 2016, he positioned himself as an anti-career politician with his support for the policy.

In a 2016 advertisement, he called for term limits “to break up the good ol’ boy network, because politicians are too cozy with lobbyists and special interests,” Forum News Service reported at the time.

Despite his stated support for the measure, Burgum, who’s made major political donations to unseat lawmakers who impede his policy goals, did not provide any financial backing for term limits.

Advertisement

Burgum’s political committee Dakota Leadership PAC did not contribute to the ballot measure campaign. However, Burgum had used the same committee to spend more than $1.2 million to influence North Dakota legislative races.

Term limits, which went into effect in January, won’t immediately apply to Burgum, who under the new rules can seek a third term in office if he chooses.

The governor, state senators and state representatives are now limited to eight years in office. Members of the Legislature can serve eight years in each the House and Senate. Limits do not apply to other statewide offices like secretary of state and attorney general.

So far it’s been unclear what Burgum’s plans are if he drops out of the presidential race. If he ran for governor again, the election would be in 2024.

Burgum officially announced his intent to run for president in early June and has been working on getting the national name recognition and donor base he’ll need to compete with longer-established GOP candidates with higher profiles.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

North Dakota Badlands national monument proposed with tribes’ support

Published

on

North Dakota Badlands national monument proposed with tribes’ support


A coalition of conservation groups and Native American tribal citizens on Friday called on President Joe Biden to designate nearly 140,000 acres of rugged, scenic Badlands as North Dakota’s first national monument, a proposal several tribal nations say would preserve the area’s indigenous and cultural heritage.

The proposed Maah Daah Hey National Monument would encompass 11 noncontiguous, newly designated units totaling 139,729 acres in the Little Missouri National Grassland. The proposed units would hug the popular recreation trail of the same name and neighbor Theodore Roosevelt National Park, named for the 26th president who ranched and roamed in the Badlands as a young man in the 1880s.

“When you tell the story of landscape, you have to tell the story of people,” said Michael Barthelemy, an enrolled member of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation and director of Native American studies at Nueta Hidatsa Sahnish College. “You have to tell the story of the people that first inhabited those places and the symbiotic relationship between the people and the landscape, how the people worked to shape the land and how the land worked to shape the people.”

The U.S. Forest Service would manage the proposed monument. The National Park Service oversees many national monuments, which are similar to national parks and usually designated by the president to protect the landscape’s features.

Advertisement

Supporters have traveled twice to Washington to meet with White House, Interior Department, Forest Service and Department of Agriculture officials. But the effort faces an uphill battle with less than two months remaining in Biden’s term and potential headwinds in President-elect Trump’s incoming administration.

If unsuccessful, the group would turn to the Trump administration “because we believe this is a good idea regardless of who’s president,” Dakota Resource Council Executive Director Scott Skokos said.

Dozens if not hundreds of oil and natural gas wells dot the landscape where the proposed monument would span, according to the supporters’ map. But the proposed units have no oil and gas leases, private inholdings or surface occupancy, and no grazing leases would be removed, said North Dakota Wildlife Federation Executive Director John Bradley.

The proposal is supported by the MHA Nation, the Spirit Lake Tribe and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe through council resolutions.

If created, the monument would help tribal citizens stay connected to their identity, said Democratic state Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, an MHA Nation enrolled member.

Advertisement

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum is Trump’s pick to lead the Interior Department, which oversees the National Park Service. In a written statement, Burgum said: “North Dakota is proof that we can protect our precious parks, cultural heritage and natural resources AND responsibly develop our vast energy resources.”

North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven’s office said Friday was the first they had heard of the proposal, “but any effort that would make it harder for ranchers to operate and that could restrict multiple use, including energy development, is going to raise concerns with Senator Hoeven.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Port: Make families great again

Published

on

Port: Make families great again


MINOT — Gov.-elect Kelly Armstrong is roaring into office with some political capital to spend. I have some ideas for how to spend it during next year’s legislative session.

It’s a three-pronged plan focused on children. I’m calling it “Make Families Great Again.” I’m no marketing genius, but I have been a dad for 24 years. There are some things the state could do to help.

The first is school lunches. The state should pay for them. The Legislature had a rollicking debate about this during the 2023 session. The opponents, who liken this to a handout, largely won the debate. Armstrong could put some muscle behind a new initiative to have the state take over payments. The social media gadflies might not like it, but it would prove deeply popular with the general public, especially if we neutralize the “handout” argument by reframing the debate.

North Dakota families are obligated to send their children to school. The kids have to eat. The lunch bills add up. I have two kids in public school. In the 2023-2024 school year, I paid $1,501.65 for lunches. That’s more than I pay in income taxes.

Advertisement

How much would it cost? In the 2023 session,

House Bill 1491

would have appropriated $89.5 million to cover the cost. The price tag would likely be similar now, but don’t consider it an expense so much as putting nearly $90 million back in the pockets of families with school-age children. A demographic that, thanks to inflation and other factors, could use some help.

Speaking of helping, the second plank of this plan is child care. This burgeoning cost is not just a millstone around young families’ necks but also hurts our state’s economy. We have a chronic workforce shortage, yet many North Dakotans are held out of the workforce because they either cannot find child care or because the care available is prohibitively expensive.

State leaders haven’t exactly been sitting on their hands. During the 2023 session, Gov. Doug Burgum signed

Advertisement

a $66 million child care package

focusing on assistance and incentives. We should do something bolder.

Maybe a direct tax credit to cover at least some of the expenses?

The last plank is getting vaccination rates back on track.

According to data from the state Department of Health,

Advertisement

the kindergarten-age vaccination rate for chicken pox declined 3.76% from the 2019-2020 school year. The rate for the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine is down 3.72%, polio vaccines 3.54%, hepatitis B vaccines 2.27%, and the vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis 3.91%.

Meanwhile, personal and religious exemptions for kindergarten students have risen by nearly 69%.

This may be politically risky for Armstrong. Anti-vaxx crankery is on the rise among Republicans, but, again, Armstrong has some political capital to spend. This would be a helpful place for it. A campaign to turn vaccine rates around would help protect the kids from diseases that haven’t been a concern in generations. It would help address workforce needs as well.

When a sick kid can’t go to school or day care, parents can’t go to work.

These ideas are practical and bold and would do a great deal to help North Dakota families.

Advertisement
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service with an extensive background in investigations and public records. He covers politics and government in North Dakota and the upper Midwest. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota 77-73 Loyola Marymount (Nov 22, 2024) Game Recap – ESPN

Published

on

North Dakota 77-73 Loyola Marymount (Nov 22, 2024) Game Recap – ESPN


LOS ANGELES — — Treysen Eaglestaff had 23 points in North Dakota’s 77-73 win over Loyola Marymount on Friday night.

Eaglestaff also contributed five rebounds for the Fightin’ Hawks (3-2). Mier Panoam scored 16 points and added seven rebounds. Dariyus Woodson had 12 points.

The Lions (1-3) were led in scoring by Caleb Stone-Carrawell with 17 points. Alex Merkviladze added 16 points, eight rebounds, four assists and two steals. Will Johnston had 15 points and four assists.

North Dakota went into the half ahead of Loyola Marymount 36-32. Eaglestaff led North Dakota with 12 second-half points.

Advertisement

——

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending