Connect with us

North Dakota

Judy Estenson is running for state Senate in North Dakota

Published

on

Judy Estenson is running for state Senate in North Dakota


DEVILS LAKE- Judy Estenson believes that each one issues have a time and a spot and every little thing has its season. Estenson believes in change and progress, and he or she is hoping to your vote for the Senate seat this June. 

Etenson, who’s at present working towards incumbent Dave Oehlke, has labored for the  as a Registered Nurse, in addition to partnering along with her husband Hal of their house farming and ranch operation. 

“We now have been blessed to boost our 5 kids on this nice group,” Estenson mentioned. “We stay twenty miles southeast of Devils Lake and have been right here for 43 years.”

Why did you determine to run for Senate?

Etenson: I made a decision to run for the Senate as a result of I consider in Freedom.  My experiences in each agriculture and well being care have proven me how an over burdensome authorities and rules can hurt our lifestyle.  Extra authorities means much less freedom.  The previous couple of years, I watched as the federal government turned extra tyrannical, and our present State Senator repeatedly didn’t defend our particular person freedoms.  I consider power on the State stage can shield us from federal overreach.

Advertisement

What shall be your foremost aim you want to accomplish in the event you have been to win the election?

My foremost aim within the Senate can be to carry the road on authorities overreach and shield our particular person liberties.  If we will do these two issues, future generations may have the hope of residing the American Dream.

What modifications do you see have to made for the state of North Dakota and the way do you are feeling you particularly would be capable of accomplish this within the Senate?

We have to be sure that there are alternatives for enterprise and folks to want to stay on this state.  The local weather will not draw them…that’s for certain! If we do what we are saying and preserve taxes low, authorities small, and shield their particular person freedoms, I consider they may keep or come. 

How will your expertise working/residing in the neighborhood put together you for this potential position?

I consider every little thing in life teaches us issues that put together us for the subsequent issues.  I’ve raised 5 kids whereas farming/ranching and nursing.  That’s  lots of juggling and prioritizing. It is also budgeting. My kids have typically heard the query, “Is {that a} need or a necessity?” I am fairly frugal and I promise to spend the states cash in the identical method. I perceive that ND has the best spending and the best earnings per capita within the nation. I feel that sounds fairly good for ND, however perhaps we needs to be spending in a different way. Perhaps non-public property taxes may very well be nonexistent on this state. That may draw a number of extra folks to ND!

What’s the foremost factor you’d say you need voters to know earlier than the election June 14?

I consider that authorities is not the answer to each downside.  I consider in particular person duty. How do people study to be sturdy, self-sufficient people if their households or the federal government proceed to resolve their each downside? In nursing, we have been taught to by no means do for the affected person what they may do for themselves. I feel this pertains to folks generally.

If there was one phrase that describes you, what would that one phrase be?

Just one phrase to explain me is tough. Religion. It’s an important.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands • SC Daily Gazette

Published

on

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands • SC Daily Gazette


A group of North Dakota tribal citizens and conservation advocates are calling on President Joe Biden to make roughly 140,000 acres of undeveloped federal land in western North Dakota a national monument.

The proposed Maah Daah Hey National Monument would preserve land recognized as sacred by members of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation and other Native cultures, advocates said during a Friday press conference at the North Dakota Heritage Center and State Museum.

“Maah Daah Hey” means “grandfather, long-lasting” in the Mandan language.

With its close proximity to President Theodore Roosevelt National Park, the area is popularly remembered for its ties to the former president and cowboy culture.

Advertisement

The country should honor Native historical and cultural ties to the land as well, said Michael Barthelemy, director of Native Studies at Nueta, Hidatsa, Sahnish College in New Town.

“What we’re proposing, as part of this national monument, is a reorientation around that narrative,” Barthelemy said. “When you look at the national parks and you look at the state parks, oftentimes there’s a singular perspective — as Indigenous people, we kind of play background characters.”

The monument would include 11 different plots of land along the Maah Daah Hey Trail between the north and south units of Theodore Roosevelt National Park.

Badlands Conservation Alliance Executive Director Shannon Straight likened the proposal to “stringing together the pearls of the Badlands.”

The tribal councils of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation, the Spirit Lake Nation and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe have passed resolutions supporting the creation of the monument.

Advertisement

“It is important that the Indigenous history of the North Dakota Badlands is formally recognized,” state Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, D-Mandaree, said during the presentation. “If created, the Maah Daah Hey National Monument would also allow Indigenous people to reconnect to our ancestral lands.”

The land is managed by the United States Forest Service. Turning the 11 plots into a national monument would protect them from future development, according to the group’s proposal.

The land is surrounded by oil and gas development, maps included in the proposal show.

In addition to being an area of significant cultural heritage for Native tribes, it’s also home to sensitive ecosystems, unique geological features and fossil sites, the proposal indicates.

Dakota Resource Council Executive Director Scott Skokos said Friday the group has visited Washington, D.C., twice so far to speak with President Biden’s administration — including the U.S. Forest Service, Department of the Interior, United States Department of Agriculture — about the proposed monument.

Advertisement

“The reception has been pretty good,” Skokos said.

He said the group hopes to see action from Biden on the monument before he leaves office in January, but is also open to working with President-elect Donald Trump’s administration on the project.

“We believe this is a good idea, regardless of who’s president,” Skokos said.

Advocates said the designation would not impact recreational access to the land, and that cattle grazing would still be permitted.

In a statement to the North Dakota Monitor, U.S. Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., called the proposal “premature at best.” He said he was not convinced the proposal had sufficient local support from North Dakota residents and worried the project would “lock away land as conservation.”

Advertisement

“Any proposal should have extensive review as well as strong support from local communities and the stakeholders who actually use the land,” he said.

When asked for comment, the North Dakota governor’s office provided this statement from Gov. Doug Burgum, who Trump has chosen as the next Department of Interior secretary: “North Dakota is proof that we can protect our precious parks, cultural heritage and natural resources AND responsibly and sustainably develop our vast energy resources.”

To learn more about the proposal, visit protectmdh.com. The website also includes a petition.

Presidents can designate federal land as national monuments under the Antiquities Act of 1906. The first land to receive this status was Devils Tower in Wyoming, which Roosevelt proclaimed a national monument that same year.

Should Maah Daah Hey become a national monument, it’d be the first of its kind in North Dakota.

Advertisement

Like the SC Daily Gazette, North Dakota Monitor is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. North Dakota Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Amy Dalrymple for questions: [email protected]. Follow North Dakota Monitor on Facebook and X.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands, with tribes’ support

Published

on

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands, with tribes’ support


A coalition of conservation groups and Native American tribal citizens on Friday called on President Joe Biden to designate nearly 140,000 acres of rugged, scenic Badlands as North Dakota’s first national monument, a proposal several tribal nations say would preserve the area’s indigenous and cultural heritage.

The proposed Maah Daah Hey National Monument would encompass 11 noncontiguous, newly designated units totaling 139,729 acres (56,546 hectares) in the Little Missouri National Grassland. The proposed units would hug the popular recreation trail of the same name and neighbor Theodore Roosevelt National Park, named for the 26th president who ranched and roamed in the Badlands as a young man in the 1880s.

“When you tell the story of landscape, you have to tell the story of people,” said Michael Barthelemy, an enrolled member of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation and director of Native American studies at Nueta Hidatsa Sahnish College. “You have to tell the story of the people that first inhabited those places and the symbiotic relationship between the people and the landscape, how the people worked to shape the land and how the land worked to shape the people.”

The U.S. Forest Service would manage the proposed monument. The National Park Service oversees many national monuments, which are similar to national parks and usually designated by the president to protect the landscape’s features.

Advertisement

Supporters have traveled twice to Washington to meet with White House, Interior Department, Forest Service and Department of Agriculture officials. But the effort faces an uphill battle with less than two months remaining in Biden’s term and potential headwinds in President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration.

If unsuccessful, the group would turn to the Trump administration “because we believe this is a good idea regardless of who’s president,” Dakota Resource Council Executive Director Scott Skokos said.

Dozens if not hundreds of oil and natural gas wells dot the landscape where the proposed monument would span, according to the supporters’ map. But the proposed units have no oil and gas leases, private inholdings or surface occupancy, and no grazing leases would be removed, said North Dakota Wildlife Federation Executive Director John Bradley.

The proposal is supported by the MHA Nation, the Spirit Lake Tribe and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe through council resolutions.

Advertisement

If created, the monument would help tribal citizens stay connected to their identity, said Democratic state Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, an MHA Nation enrolled member.

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum is Trump’s pick to lead the Interior Department, which oversees the National Park Service. In a written statement, Burgum said: “North Dakota is proof that we can protect our precious parks, cultural heritage and natural resources AND responsibly develop our vast energy resources.”

North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven’s office said Friday was the first they had heard of the proposal, “but any effort that would make it harder for ranchers to operate and that could restrict multiple use, including energy development, is going to raise concerns with Senator Hoeven.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Two people hospitalized following domestic assault and shooting in Fargo, suspect dead

Published

on

Two people hospitalized following domestic assault and shooting in Fargo, suspect dead


FARGO — Two people were injured in a separate domestic aggravated assault and shooting Saturday, Nov. 23, and the suspect is dead from what appeared to be a self-inflicted gunshot wound, the Fargo Police Department said.

Fargo police were dispatched at 2:19 a.m. to a report of a domestic aggravated assault and shooting in the 5500 block of 36th Avenue South, a police department news release said.

When officers arrived, they learned the suspect had committed aggravated assault on a victim, chased that person into an occupied neighboring townhouse and fired shots into the unit.

Another person inside the townhouse was struck by gunfire, police said. Both victims were taken to a local hospital for treatment of non-life threatening injuries.

Advertisement

Officers found the suspect’s vehicle parked in the 800 block of 34th Street North by using a FLOCK camera system to identify a possible route of travel from the crime scene, the release said.

Police also used Red River Valley SWAT’s armored Bearcat vehicle to get close to the suspect’s vehicle to make contact with the driver, who was not responding to officers’ verbal commands to come out of the vehicle.

The regional drone team flew a drone to get a closer look inside the suspect’s vehicle. Officers found the suspect was dead from what appeared to be a self-inflicted gunshot wound, the release said.

This investigation is still active and ongoing. No names were released by police on Saturday morning.

Anyone with information about this incident is asked to call Red River Regional Dispatch at 701-451-7660 and request to speak with a shift commander. Anonymous tips can be submitted by texting keyword FARGOPD and the tip to 847411.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending