Connect with us

North Dakota

1st funds from Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law flow into North Dakota

Published

on

1st funds from Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law flow into North Dakota


Two state businesses are set to obtain a number of the first cash for North Dakota from the Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Regulation handed final fall.

The governor-led, six-member Emergency Fee on Friday accredited $2.5 million of elevated spending authority for the Division of Mineral Assets for its deserted oil effectively plugging program.

The panel additionally accredited about $1 million for the Division of Environmental High quality to rent 4 momentary, full-time-equivalent staff to manage future funding for consuming water initiatives and to deal with new federal necessities on lead and copper water strains.

The board’s state Home members objected to the unique request for six momentary staff, seeing that dialogue as extra applicable for the subsequent legislative session in 2023. The panel pared the six staff to 4 for the company’s director to put the place he deems finest.

Advertisement

Each businesses want closing approval from the Legislature’s Finances Part, which is about to fulfill June 28. 

Persons are additionally studying…

Advertisement

Funding potential

Most state businesses are nonetheless making use of for aggressive grants or awaiting steering on the $1.2 trillion infrastructure package deal, in accordance with Workplace of Administration and Finances Director Joe Morrissette.

The Legislative Council, lawmakers’ nonpartisan fiscal and authorized analysis company, is monitoring the infrastructure package deal’s implementation and when and the way a lot North Dakota could obtain, in accordance with Legislative Finances Analyst & Auditor Allen Knudson.

An April memo outlines a preliminary estimate that North Dakota might have out there to it greater than $1.1 billion of potential new cash from the invoice over the subsequent 5 years, along with $1.3 billion in reauthorized, common funding to the state in that very same time-frame.

North Dakota eyes federal money for expansion of oil well plugging program

Advertisement






111820-nws-helms.jpg (copy)

State Mineral Assets Director Lynn Helms.


Advertisement

Tom Stromme



Nicely plugging

Mineral Assets’ funding is a part of a $25 million grant; $22.5 million will go into the Deserted Oil and Gasoline Nicely Plugging and Web site Restoration Fund, not needing fee approval due to a seamless appropriation already licensed by state legislation.

This system begun in 2020 plugged 380 wells utilizing $66 million of federal CARES Act coronavirus support; 186 wells stay.

The $22.5 million will likely be used to fund contract work for effectively plugging and reclamation prices for the remaining wells, Morrissette stated. The $2.5 million is to manage this system, he stated.

Advertisement

North Dakota’s program turned a mannequin for a $4.7 billion nationwide effort coated by the federal infrastructure package deal, to handle 1000’s of deserted wells in different states, in accordance with Mineral Assets Director Lynn Helms.

“It’s going to be a sequence of three to 4 grants that we’ll be coming to speak to you about; that is the primary,” Helms instructed the panel. 

Legislature approves stopgap limit for North Dakota spending panel

Spending limits

Gov. Doug Burgum raised the problem of spending caps on the Emergency Fee, limits the 2021 Legislature imposed after gobs of federal coronavirus support flowed by means of the six-person panel in 2020 with little enter from state lawmakers. 

The board cannot approve in mixture greater than $50 million in federal funds or $20 million in particular funds each two years with out approval of the complete Legislature.

Advertisement

The particular funds restrict was initially $5 million, however the Legislature accredited a stopgap $20 million cap final fall after the caps raised issues final summer time.

The caps may complicate federal cash set to move to North Dakota in coming years, particularly massive sums, and probably put in danger aggressive grant alternatives, in accordance with the governor.

“I am certain that the intention was effectively which means of in some way ensuring that there was applicable oversight on funds, however the capability to obtain federal funds which might be being distributed by the federal authorities is one factor that we most likely should not be handcuffing ourselves on, relative to different states,” Burgum instructed the panel. 

The board has 74% of its federal spending authority and 18% of its particular funds authority remaining midway by means of this funds cycle, in accordance with Morrissette.



Advertisement




Doug Burgum mug

Gov. Doug Burgum




Small sums

The governor additionally stated he’d “wish to see” that Morrissette as state funds director be allowed to approve minimal funding requests, akin to $5,000 for the state Faculty for the Blind that the Emergency Fee accredited Friday. 

Advertisement

That quantity “should not represent the gathering of six elected officers,” Burgum stated. The board contains the governor, secretary of state and 4 key lawmakers, who met Friday in individual and by videoconference.

“We should let OMB simply approve these sorts of adjustments in the event that they’re this small, and never must have them come earlier than the Emergency Fee,” Burgum stated, directing his feedback as “an ask for change in authority going ahead.”

The Emergency Fee is about to see large turnover after the November election, when there will likely be a brand new secretary of state and new legislative majority leaders and appropriations committee chairs. Burgum will proceed to chair the panel. 

Attain Jack Dura at 701-250-8225 or jack.dura@bismarcktribune.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Bills seek to add protections for North Dakota renters • North Dakota Monitor

Published

on

Bills seek to add protections for North Dakota renters • North Dakota Monitor


Lobbyists for the ACLU and North Dakota Apartment Association clashed over three bills that would provide North Dakota renters with more protections.

Three bills heard by the Senate Industry and Business Committee this week would provide renters protection from snowballing late fees, and empower the Department of Labor and Human Rights to investigate complaints against landlords. The department would also be able to take disciplinary action against a landlord for violations of North Dakota Century Code involving the leasing of property and eviction.

Cody Schuler, advocacy manager for ACLU of North Dakota, said 40% of renters in North Dakota are “cost burdened,” meaning those tenants tend to live paycheck-to-paycheck, spending more than 30% of their income on rent. He testified in support of all three bills.

Cody Schuler, advocacy manager for ACLU of North Dakota, speaks about renter protections during a public hearing on Jan. 29, 2025. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor)

“Individuals who are living on those margins, they live on the cusp of possibly becoming homeless,” Schuler said in an interview. “And when we look at the sheer volume of the cost of homelessness, and how to correct homelessness, it’s so much more financially responsible for everyone involved … to be able to prevent homelessness.”

Advertisement

Opposing all three bills, Jeremy Petron, lobbyist for the North Dakota Apartment Association, said a lot of the confusion over late fees stems from renters not reading their lease agreements, and landlords not explaining the lease and late fee processes well enough during the lease signing.

“I myself have been in the property management industry for 20 years, and the company that I work for, we communicate with our tenants and let them know … We don’t try to just automatically evict someone for just one late fee,” Petron said. “We’re going to work with them.”

All three bills were introduced by Sen. Ryan Braunberger, D-Fargo.

After the public hearing, Braunberger said he’s concerned that the committee didn’t seem receptive to his three bills.

“I think we need to make sure we’re looking at both sides,” Braunberger said. “We don’t necessarily want to punish good landlords, but we want to make sure we’re protecting good tenants too.”

Advertisement

Late rent payments and fees

Senate Bill 2235 would prioritize processing the payments of late rent first before late fees are processed, Braunberger said. By processing the late rent amount first, renters wouldn’t accrue as many additional late fees.

Schuler shared a story with lawmakers about a Fargo resident who lost his minimum wage job and needed rental assistance to cover a late payment and fees. The renter thought the full amount had been paid but received a three-day eviction notice after the additional late fees were processed before the late rental payment, leaving an unpaid balance.

“The fact of the matter is, he wouldn’t have even needed this assistance had this law been in place,” Schuler said.

Multiple senators on the committee questioned whether the new payment priority changes would incentivize tenants not paying any late fees.

Jeremy Petron, lobbyist for the North Dakota Apartment Association, speaks during a public hearing on protections for renters during a public hearing on Jan. 29, 2025. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor)

Petron said the payment of late rent and fees is spelled out in the rental agreement, so both the renter and the landlord are on the same page.

The late fees could still be recouped by the landlord through an itemized deduction from the tenant’s security deposit after they move out, he said.

Advertisement

Senate Bill 2236 would cap the amount landlords can charge in late fees at 8% of the rent, Braunberger said.

“This basically will address issues regarding compounded fees,” he said. Landlords wouldn’t be able to keep adding late fees for each day or week that a payment is late unless the total fees are under 8% of the rent for the month.

Another supporter of all three bills, Kaden Felch, a fair housing specialist with the High Plains Fair Housing Center, said late fees can range from $10 to $100 with fees being added until the rent is paid in full.

“Large and accumulating late fees can set renters back for months, leading to eviction or lead to large bills that may stay with them for a long time and prevent renters from finding stable housing in the future,” Felch said. “This cap will just allow more flexibility for North Dakotans who may not have as much expendable income as others.”

Petron said the bill was essentially “price fixing” what landlords can charge for late rent payments.

Advertisement

“A property owner’s costs associated with operating and maintaining a property aren’t fixed and can fluctuate,” Petron said. 

Investigations of complaints

Senate Bill 2237 would empower the Department of Labor and Human Rights to be able to investigate complaints against landlords and take disciplinary action against a landlord found to be in violation of state law.

Zachary Greenberg, interim commissioner for the Department of Labor and Human Rights, speaks during a public hearing on Jan. 29, 2025. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor)

Schuler said North Dakota doesn’t have a clear pathway for a state agency to address landlord-tenant disputes outside of the courtroom. During North Dakota eviction proceedings in 2022, he said landlords retained legal representation in 98% of all eviction cases and tenants were represented by attorneys in only 1% of cases, according to the Legal Services Corp. 

“When we get into this place where 40% of North Dakota renters are considered cost-burdened, it’s unlikely that those individuals would have, or be able to afford, legal counsel,” Schuler said.

Zachary Greenberg, interim commissioner for the Department of Labor and Human Rights, asked lawmakers to recommend a “do not pass” on the bill due to the department’s jurisdictional, legal and administrative concerns.

He added the department doesn’t license or register landlords in the state and disciplinary actions needed to address complaints would focus on the license they don’t issue. He said other industries have their own licensing boards that can issue disciplinary actions against their membership.

Advertisement

“This bill grants the labor commissioner enforcement powers that do not align with existing regulatory frameworks, raising legal and procedural concerns,” Greenberg said.

He said the investigative burdens on the department would be large and require “substantial new resources.” Greenberg said the department’s estimate of about $750,000 per biennium needed to implement any sort of landlord-tenant program was very conservative.

After the hearing, Schuler said federal fair housing laws don’t address business practices, which is what the three bills are attempting to address.

No action was taken by the committee on the bills after the public hearing.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota Senate passes bill to protect deer baiting on private property

Published

on

North Dakota Senate passes bill to protect deer baiting on private property


BISMARCK — The North Dakota Senate voted 31-15 Wednesday to pass a bill preventing the North Dakota Game and Fish Department from restricting the use of supplemental feed on private property to hunt big game – commonly referred to as baiting.

Senate Bill 2137 still needs to pass through the House and receive the governor’s signature before it becomes law.

Supporters of the bill say that baiting bans infringe on private property rights and are based on needless fears over the spread of Chronic Wasting Disease. CWD is a brain disease that affects deer, elk, moose and other cervids. The disease always leads to death, and there is no treatment or vaccine for it.

Sen. Keith Boehm, R-Mandan, said 49,596 deer have been tested over 22 years resulting in 105 detections of CWD. He said that detections do not equate to disease — that a deer must be necropsied for confirmation of the disease. He said one deer in North Dakota has been confirmed to have died from CWD.

Advertisement

Boehm said that while deer numbers are declining in the state, it is not a result of CWD.

The Game and Fish Department could not immediately be reached to comment on Boehm’s contentions. The agency has published information since 2009 — the year the first case was detected in North Dakota — on 105 positive cases of CWD identified through its hunter-assisted surveillance program. The department also has previously commented on one documented case of a natural deer death due to the disease — a whitetail found dead and emaciated by a landowner near Williston in February 2019.

Senate Bill 2137 would prevent North Dakota’s Game and Fish Department from banning baiting on private property.

Contributed / Matt Neibauer

Advertisement

Boehm said baiting bans do not make sense when landowners are allowed to feed deer year-round and it only becomes illegal when a deer is killed over the feed piles.

Sen. Paul Thomas, R-Velva, said that the baiting is crucial for elderly and disabled hunters, and bow hunters, who need to bring deer in close to have a chance at harvesting one.

“Bait has been used for a long, long time as that tool that allows that person to at least have a chance,” Thomas said. “Many landowners have that opportunity … because we have certain areas that naturally attract deer. Unfortunately many sportsmen across this state do not have that opportunity. We cannot take that opportunity away from them. I urge you to vote green (yes).”

Opponents of the bill say it strips the Game and Fish Department of an important tool in its mission to mitigate the spread of diseases passed between game animals by close contact.

“I don’t think we should decide this issue on the basis of property rights,” Sen. Michael Dwyer, R-Bismarck, said during the floor session. “This is an issue of CWD, as the carrier said. The Game and Fish Department is trying to balance the concern over the disease with the attempt to provide as many hunting opportunities as possible. I think we should let the Game and Fish Department do their job and vote red (no) on this bill.”

Advertisement

Sen. Michelle Axtman, R-Bismarck, questioned the bill carrier on what the repercussions would be if a new highly contagious disease is discovered in the next season and Game and Fish is no longer able to institute baiting bans.

Sen. Randy Lemm, R-Hillsboro, said he does not think the bill would have an effect in the event a new disease is discovered.

The bill has a sunset clause that was added in committee which means that should it become law it would be rendered ineffective after July 31, 2029. Lemm said this was done so the topic can be revisited after further research on CWD has been conducted by Game and Fish.

The bill received a 5-1 do-pass recommendation out of committee. Its committee hearing was a marathon event with a plethora of testimony on both sides of the issue, forcing the committee to change chambers to accommodate all who wished to testify.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Time for change? Locals react to the push to remove daylight savings in North Dakota

Published

on

Time for change? Locals react to the push to remove daylight savings in North Dakota


BISMARCK, N.D. — Lawmakers in the North Dakota House have passed Bill 1259 that could make the state the third in the nation to permanently observe standard time, eliminating daylight saving time.

Arizona and Hawaii are the only states that already observe standard time year-round, and if the bill becomes law, North Dakota would join them.

The bill has sparked mixed reactions from residents, especially in Fargo-Moorhead, where the change would have a noticeable impact on daily life. According to Representative Dan Ruby, a co-sponsor of the bill, the benefits of no longer switching the clocks twice a year outweigh the potential disruptions.

“It’s maybe not preferable for the time that I would like to be on, as many other people would, but it is the advantage of not having to disrupt our lives twice a year. It kind of outweighs that,” Ruby said.

Advertisement

However, students at Minnesota State University Moorhead (MSUM) have expressed concerns about the potential confusion. “It is just one hour, but it’s the mental, cognitive load to remembering that time difference in terms of planning on two different time schedules is going to be a little bit of an annoyance,” said Tony Urbanski, an MSUM student.

Some residents also worry about the complications along the North Dakota-Minnesota border. If the bill passes, residents in North Dakota would permanently observe standard time, while neighboring Minnesota would continue to follow daylight saving time. “If I lived in Moorhead, and worked in Fargo, my clock would fall back an hour when I cross the state line getting to work… for six months out of the year, and vice versa,” said one Fargo resident.

Others, like former State Senator Tim Flakoll, don’t see the value in the change. “I just don’t see the value in it from my perspective… I think a lot more people want to be out in the evening doing things than they care about being up at 4:30 or 5:30 in the morning to get things done,” he said.

Meanwhile, MSUM students voiced concerns about missing classes or flights due to the time change. “I think that would cause people a lot of trouble, especially since the Hector International is, is over there. I mean, I always fly through there… I could definitely see myself missing a flight because of that,” said Aiden Price, an MSUM student.

Ruby acknowledged the confusion but emphasized that the change would simplify life overall. “He had voted no on the bill on the floor, and said, ‘You know, I think I voted wrong, because I’m kind of thinking that in the spring, kids would be getting on the school bus with more light when, when that switches, it moves back, and kind of puts them back into darkness for a while when they’re going to school,’” Ruby said.

Advertisement

As of now, the bill has passed in the House and is set to be discussed in the Senate, where Ruby will be gauging support in the coming future.

Ryan McNamara joined WDAY as a reporter in late 2024. He is a native of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota and graduated from St. Cloud State University in 2024.

His time as a Husky included copious amounts of time spent at “The Herb” reporting on Husky hockey, or at Halenbeck Hall calling Husky basketball. He also spent two summers with the Northwoods League’s St. Cloud Rox. Along with his duties in news and sports, Ryan dons a headset for occasional play-by-play broadcasts for North Dakota and Minnesota high school sports.

When he’s away from the station, he’s most likely lifting, finding time to golf, or taking in as much college basketball as possible, in order to complete the elusive perfect March Madness bracket.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending