Indiana has a small variety of giant well being care supplier networks that usually serve the whole state. Varied research reveal this can be the reasoning behind increased well being care costs in Indiana. One listener questioned why Indiana doesn’t have extra competitors.

Nir Menachemi is the chief affiliate dean at Indiana College’s Fairbanks Faculty of Well being at IUPUI.

“I would not say the dearth of competitors, I might say the dearth of sufficient competitors,” he mentioned.

Menachemi defined this downside isn’t Indiana-specific. He mentioned the difficulty is a “cat and mouse recreation” between medical insurance firms and supplier organizations.

“One is all the time attempting to determine tips on how to have a market benefit for what it kind of values most when it comes to how well being care ought to be organized and paid for,” he mentioned.

This usually results in well being care suppliers banding collectively, which Menachemi mentioned can “strengthen their skill” to barter with insurance coverage firms for optimum pricing.

“Annually, each supplier group has to barter with each medical insurance firm that operates of their state, what the costs are going to be for each single process that they do within the hospital or you already know, surgical procedure or that kind of factor,” he mentioned.

He mentioned if suppliers are bigger, it’s usually simpler for them to barter costs that profit them.

Menachemi mentioned there are additionally potential advantages that come from this consolidation.

“[Providers] can probably provide the next high quality of care and higher coordination and form of be the one-stop store for sufferers, which may be handy to sufferers,” he mentioned.

He added medical insurance firms will even consolidate for related causes.

“If you’re negotiating with anybody, measurement is all the time an even bigger kind of benefit,” he mentioned.

READ MORE: Why are Indiana’s well being care prices so excessive?

Be part of the dialog and join the Indiana Two-Approach. Textual content “Indiana” to 73224. Your feedback and questions in response to our weekly textual content assist us discover the solutions you want on statewide points.

However Menachemi mentioned this technique can result in increased costs for shoppers.

“I feel the principle problem that folk have complained about is that when you’ve gotten bigger and bigger supplier organizations, they are going to have the ability to negotiate increased costs from the well being insurers who yearly should renegotiate,” he mentioned.

The RAND 4.0 research, carried out by a nonprofit public coverage analysis group, confirmed a few of these excessive well being care prices for Hoosiers, notably with hospital care.

Menachemi defined rising competitors, and due to this fact driving down prices, is a multi-faceted resolution. Finally, it depends on steadiness.

“I might say among the issues that contribute to the check-and-balance are simply not right here,” he mentioned. “And it’s not that anybody is at fault, it is simply what’s. And so until we handle a few of these points, I do not assume we’ll reinstitute a few of these checks and balances into the system.”

He mentioned there are numerous stakeholders within the course of, together with: shoppers or sufferers, hospitals, well being insurers, pharmaceutical firms and employers who buy firm medical insurance. He defined cooperation between these events could be very important to making sure a extra balanced competitors system.

“If we put everybody in a room and drive them someway, both by way of coverage or by way of incentives, or by way of threats of another person fixing this downside for everybody, I feel we would get traction,” he mentioned.

Menachemi mentioned there’s not sufficient being accomplished to convey these stakeholders collectively and decide these options.

Contact reporter Violet at vcomberwilen@wfyi.org or comply with her on Twitter at @ComberWilen.