Connect with us

Indiana

Michigan loss to Indiana calls Sherrone Moore’s game management into question

Published

on

Michigan loss to Indiana calls Sherrone Moore’s game management into question


BLOOMINGTON, Ind. — Michigan’s five losses have come in different flavors, from deflating to shocking to maddeningly predictable.

Saturday’s 20-15 loss to No. 8 Indiana was a new twist. Michigan’s defense played inspired football and held one of the most explosive offenses in the country to 18 yards in the second half. The Wolverines offense missed numerous opportunities, but that’s nothing new. There was another issue, one that’s been in the background all season but became harder to ignore after a game that came down to the final minute.

Sherrone Moore’s game management was not good. If he’s going to succeed as a head coach, it will have to get a lot better.

Moore wasted a timeout challenging an obvious fumble. He gave his leading rusher one carry in the first half. He took a delay-of-game penalty instead of going for fourth-and-3 at Indiana’s 42-yard line. Gifted an interception at Indiana’s 7, Michigan ran the ball three times and kicked a field goal. And then the kicker: With three timeouts and a theoretical chance to get the ball back, Moore let nearly 30 precious seconds tick away before stopping the clock.

Advertisement

GO DEEPER

Indiana’s Cinderella run reaches 10-0 for first time after rare win against Michigan

Those mistakes didn’t cost Michigan the game, but they’re symptomatic of a program that isn’t doing the little things well. Michigan needed to do everything right to have a shot at beating Indiana, which is a sentence that has not been typed many times in the history of college football.

Entering Saturday, Michigan had lost twice in its previous 44 games against the Hoosiers, and one of those was the Twilight Zone season of 2020. But this is a different Indiana team, one that has captured the hearts of football fans everywhere during its 10-0 start. It’s also a different Michigan team, not that Michigan fans need the reminder.

Michigan was the first team all season to put the Hoosiers on the ropes. After falling behind 17-3 in the first half, the Wolverines smothered Indiana’s offense and gave themselves a chance to win. A game that looked like a rout turned into high-stakes drama, with Indiana’s College Football Playoff hopes hanging in the balance.

Advertisement

In a game like this, every decision is magnified. A lot of Moore’s decisions didn’t end up looking great, and his explanations weren’t much better.

On the decision to challenge Alex Orji’s fumble: “We got the word buzzing down that it was possible the knee would have been down. I wanted to challenge and fight for my kids.”

On kicking a field goal at the 3-yard line, down 17-3: “It really was the momentum of moving the football. We wanted to get points. It was later in the game, so we had time to go back down there and try to score.”

On giving carries to redshirt freshman Benjamin Hall instead of leading rusher Kalel Mullings in the first half: “We just wanted to get Ben some carries. He’s been throughout the whole year doing a really good job, and we just felt like it was time for him to get some work as well.”

On waiting to call a timeout when Michigan still had a shot to get the ball back: “It was just talking about conversations of what the play call was going to be, what we were going to do. That’s where it all came from.”

Advertisement

The full context is helpful here. After Michigan came up less than a yard short on fourth down, Indiana took over near midfield with 1:35 on the clock. The Hoosiers gained 8 yards on first down, and Moore seemed caught between calling a quick timeout or conceding the first down. Indiana got the first down on the next play, so the lost time didn’t matter. But the criticism on the CBS broadcast, coupled with a shot of Moore hanging his head, didn’t paint a pretty picture.

Moore is a first-time head coach, and rookie mistakes are to be expected. Lots of coaches struggle with game management early in their careers and get better with time. And it’s worth remembering that Moore filled in for Jim Harbaugh last season and pushed a lot of the right buttons to keep Michigan’s undefeated season alive.

The puzzling part is that Moore seems to be getting away from things that were supposed to be his strengths. Moore went for it three times on fourth down against Ohio State last season, and Michigan converted all three. Those were great, gutsy calls. Against Indiana, the Wolverines went for a fourth-and-goal in the fourth quarter — they really didn’t have a choice — and scored on a 1-yard touchdown run from Mullings, but other times they played it safe.

The sequence that hurt the most came after Zeke Berry intercepted a pass at Indiana’s 7. Michigan called three unimaginative runs and kicked a 22-yard field goal to pull within 17-6. That’s the difference between a tie game and a five-point loss.

“We’ve got to be able to punch that ball in, no question about it,” quarterback Davis Warren said. “The opportunity was there for us. We’re definitely going to think about those a lot. It stinks. It hurts. We knew that we were good enough to win this football game.”

When Michigan had players like Blake Corum and J.J. McCarthy, going for it on fourth down was an easy call. It’s not as easy this year. Michigan’s offensive struggles make it tempting to take points when they’re available, but the lack of explosiveness also means the Wolverines need to score touchdowns when they have the chance. As a result, a lot of Michigan’s decision-making has felt haphazard and inconsistent.

Advertisement

Despite their offensive limitations, the Wolverines had every opportunity to win this game and spoil Indiana’s Cinderella season. For the good of college football and the enjoyment of all, perhaps it’s better that they didn’t. A 10-0 Indiana team on its way to the College Football Playoff is a much better story than a 5-5 Michigan team trying to make the Pinstripe Bowl.

This is not Michigan’s year, but the Wolverines don’t plan to be irrelevant for long. Their goal is to be playing meaningful games again, preferably as soon as next season. When that happens, Michigan will need to know that Moore can push the right buttons. Saturday was a clear indication that he needs to get better in that area.

This game was there for the taking. When time was running out, Michigan let it get away.

(Photo: Joe Robbins / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)





Source link

Advertisement

Indiana

An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.

Published

on

An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.


(CHALKBEAT INDIANA) — When Pete Hinnefeld and his wife started looking for a preschool for their daughter, they hoped to send her to the same school her brother attended, which was just down the road from their house and offered Spanish-language immersion.

To do this for Lydia, then age 3, they were prepared to pay the $600 monthly cost.

But after voters approved a property tax referendum to fund early learning for children living within the Monroe County Community School Corporation, the family’s preschool bill was cut by more than half. Nearby preschool cut down time spent commuting to their parents’ house for babysitting, and helped Lydia build social skills.

The family are one of hundreds now benefitting from the 2023 referendum, which has more than doubled the number of children attending 3- and 4-year-old preschools in the district.

Advertisement

“For us, this is why you pay taxes,” Hinnefeld said. “It’s important for young kids to have access to school and if parents need to work, it’s an opportunity to let them work.”

The referendum put forward by the district, located in Bloomington, is a first in the state, offering all families tuition support on a sliding scale based on income, no matter whether children attend a district preschool or a partner provider.

It represents a local solution to problems with accessing and affording early learning that have left thousands of Indiana families waiting for help. Indiana in December 2024 froze its Child Care and Development Fund, or CCDF, and On My Way Pre-K dollars, which provide funding for early learning for income-eligible households.

A $200 million funding increase for CCDF approved by the State Budget Committee this week will allow Indiana to begin issuing vouchers againin May to around 14,000 more children, for a total enrollment of around 57,000. Those funds will last around one year.

Still, around 20,000 children will remain on the waitlist, and families may have fewer options for where to use their vouchers as hundreds of providers have closed since the freeze was announced, according to early learning advocates in the state. In a recent survey of early childhood educators in Indiana — which includes those working in a variety of settings — 90% of respondents said families are struggling to pay tuition.

Advertisement

A statewide universal preschool program is unlikely, Republican leaders have said. Instead, a legislative proposal this year would have let cities and counties — not just school districts — ask voters to fund preschool seats. It failed to get traction, but its advocates expect it to return.

The political climate isn’t especially promising for local tax increases: A new Indiana law has placed caps on property tax revenue that are already affecting local budgets. Lawmakers also recently restricted when schools can place referendums on the ballot.

Still, a new local revenue stream could be a boon in some Indiana communities, such as those with high demand for preschool, existing programs, and high social cohesion, said Sam Snideman, vice president of government relations for United Way of Central Indiana.

“There are going to be communities where this makes a ton of sense,” Snideman said. “The increasing challenge for an entity that goes before the public for a referendum is making a very clear value case. What is the common good and what is in the community interest is very important.”

School district’s pre-K enrollment doubles after referendum

Before Monroe schools brought the referendum request to voters, the district conducted a study that showed there were not enough early learning seats to serve children in the community, said Timothy Dowling, director of early learning and enrollment at Monroe schools. And families couldn’t always afford the seats that were available.

Advertisement

But the district also knew that research links quality early learning improved later academic outcomes, Dowling said.

“We wanted to do everything we can to help our students get the benefit of early learning, because we know it pays off in huge dividends,” Dowling said.

The referendum equated to around a $50 increase yearly for a home with an assessed value of $250,000, according to the district website, and also paid for instructional supplies for K-12 students. It passed with 55% of the vote; Dowling said the community study and transparency about how the referendum funds would be used were key to its success.

As a result of the successful referendum, all families in the district qualify for at least $4,000 in tuition assistance for preschool for 4-year-olds, whether their children attend a district school or at one of seven community providers.

Around 76% students in the district’s program attend for free based on their family’s income, Dowling said. Families in the lowest income tier who send their children to community providers receive $8,000 in tuition assistance.

Advertisement

The program also offers tuition assistance for 3-year-old preschool based on income and where the student attends school. For families making 225% or less of the federal poverty level, preschool is free at district programs. Often those families struggled the most to afford child care, even when state child care vouchers were available, Dowling said.

In 2024-25, the year after the referendum passed, the number of 4-year-olds attending preschool doubled from 184 to 378, with 64 of those children attending preschool at outside centers. This year, the district expanded preschool for 3-year-olds, based on the timeline laid out in the referendum. Enrollment jumped from 78 to 123, with another 33 students attending community child care centers, Dowling said.

With multiple types of providers, families have options, said Kelly Sipes, the executive director for Penny Lane Childcare Centers, which is a partner provider with the district. Those who need transportation might choose a district-run preschool, she said, but those who need year-round care during school holidays can choose a center like Penny Lane instead.

Her centers are usually at capacity, Sipes said, and child care needs in the community persist. When CCDF funding was cut, some of her families turned to the funding from the district instead.

“It’s awesome for the families,” Sipes said. “We should be all in this together as a community.”

Advertisement

Pitching child care: ‘We live in a society’

Replicating referendum-funded preschool might work well in communities where school-based providers already exist, and where there’s a sufficient tax base and steady demand for child care, Snideman said. It would also be an incentive to attract working families.

But it could be a harder sell in rural districts, where there are fewer families and less demand.

Generally, school referendums pass in districts that are wealthier, and in areas with less farmland, said Larry DeBoer, a Purdue University professor emeritus of agricultural economics, who has studied school referendums in depth.One of the biggest predictors of success is whether a school district has tried to pass a referendum before — even if they’ve failed, a second referendum is more likely to pass, DeBoer said.

Monroe schools had previously passed an operating referendum the year before its 2023 preschool referendum. As a county, Monroe has a slightly lower per-person income than Indiana as a whole, and has more students than the small and medium-sized districts most likely to propose successful ballot measures. It’s home to Indiana University, and tends to vote Democratic in a largely conservative state.

A legislative proposal this year, HB 1430, would have given the power to levy preschool referendums to counties and cities, potentially casting a wider net for both family demand and child care providers.

Advertisement

The bill did not receive a hearing, in part because Indiana legislative leaders are usually reluctant to consider bills with a fiscal impact in even-numbered years where they don’t pass a state budget. And the most recent state budget passed in 2025 was tight, with cuts to spending and programs due to a revenue shortfall.

The bill’s author, Rep. Blake Johnson, a Democrat, said that conversations about the bill have been fruitful, and that he expects the idea to return in a future session.

Given budget concerns, a locally funded solution that communities can tailor to their own needs may be more successful than a statewide one, said Patrick McAlister, who leads the Preschool Choice Alliance, a statewide group.

“This is an economic development need. Here’s the tool and the option to exercise it or not,” Johnson said.

A successful referendum would be a boon to working parents who struggle to afford the cost of early learning, said McAlister, who used to be the director of the Indianapolis Mayor’s Office of Education Innovation. But even for non-parents, a preschool referendum could have a positive impact on property values and in other ways, McAlister said.

Advertisement

Ultimately, it would be one part of an “all and above strategy” addressing care for children from birth to age 2.

“We live in a society,” McAlister said. “There are certain things we hold true and caring for children is a value many people share.”

Aleksandra Appleton covers Indiana education policy and writes about K-12 schools across the state. Contact her at aappleton@chalkbeat.org.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Ty Simpson tells why he believes Indiana dominated Alabama in Rose Bowl

Published

on

Ty Simpson tells why he believes Indiana dominated Alabama in Rose Bowl





© Grace Hollars/IndyStar / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Ty Simpson was a guest on the “Downs 2 Business” podcast with Caleb Downs and Josh Downs, and he discussed why he believed Indiana beat Alabama in the Rose Bowl.

The Crimson Tide’s offense was unable to score a touchdown against the Hoosiers in the 38-3 loss. Simpson shone a light on why he felt Indiana had so much success against Alabama on X.

“From my point of view, I was like they don’t much,” Simpson said. “I was like they do the same thing every down and so when I get the ball, I knew exactly what was going to happen. They just didn’t mess up, bro. They were in the exact same spot they were supposed to be, and they were so well coached. It was so much different than the SEC. In the SEC, they’ll play man, they’ll do these unorthodox coverages because kind of how it is. That game was crazy to me. Of course, I got hurt; that was a bummer. But I just knew what they were going to do, but we couldn’t really run the ball. We didn’t really throw it. It was so crazy to me how it happened.”

Advertisement

Indiana went on to beat Oregon in the semifinals of the College Football Playoff, and the Hoosiers defeated Miami in the National Championship after defeating the Crimson Tide.

Simpson and Caleb Downs are now both gearing up to be drafted this month.







Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

3 Big Takeaways From Indiana Basketball’s Transfer Portal Dominance

Published

on

3 Big Takeaways From Indiana Basketball’s Transfer Portal Dominance


Indiana may be one of the most decorated programs in college basketball history, but a brand name no longer has the recruiting pull it used to. In the past, the Hoosiers had a foolproof sell: it’s Indiana. Nowadays, in the NIL era, the playing field has been leveled. 

To win in the transfer portal and recruiting as a whole, a program like Indiana needs a premier recruiter – and it has one in Darian DeVries.

Heading into his second season as the Hoosiers head man, DeVries is on an absolute heater, as he just landed his sixth transfer (Villanova guard Bryce Lindsay) on Wednesday night. 

With the addition of Lindsay, the Hoosiers have arguably the No. 1 transfer class in the nation and certainly one of the top three. Here are three takeaways from Indiana’s offseason thus far:

Advertisement

Indiana Hoosiers head coach Darian Devries reacts in the first half of the NCAA game at Value City Arena on Saturday, March 7, 2026 in Columbus, Ohio. | Samantha Madar/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Advertisement

Indiana won’t have a talent problem in 2026-27

On one hand, the expectations are high in Bloomington – especially after the turnaround Curt Cignetti engineered in just two quick years on the gridiron. And an NCAA Tournament appearance isn’t exactly the Herculean task a College Football Playoff berth, let alone a national title, is. 

Then again, DeVries didn’t have much time to craft his 2025-26 roster, and the end result wound up being less-than ideal from a talent perspective. All things considered, DeVries didn’t do a poor job given the roster he had. But it was also his roster. 

Advertisement

Coaching is a balance of roster-building, X’s and O’s and culture. It’s up to DeVries to tailor a roster fit to his coaching strengths. Here in the 2026 offseason, he’s sent a message: recruiting will not be a problem. As a result, talent won’t be a weakness – it’ll be a strength. 

The question now: can DeVries take advantage of an uber-skilled crew? Can he mesh the pieces and, ideally, create a product better than the sum of its parts? If the 2025-26 season was any sign, the answer is yes – which means a Big Dance appearance should be the bare minimum next year. 

Advertisement

How will the backcourt depth chart shake out?

Notre Dame guard Markus Burton celebrates during a NCAA men’s basketball game against Missouri at Purcell Pavilion on Tuesday, Dec. 2, 2025, in South Bend. | MICHAEL CLUBB/SOUTH BEND TRIBUNE / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Advertisement

The Hoosiers are going to have a loaded guard rotation, and DeVries has a variety of options in terms of a starting backcourt.

Advertisement

Markus Burton is a surefire starter at lead guard, but then DeVries can choose between Bryce Lindsay and Jaeden Mustaf at the two, or, potentially, he could run both together at shooting guard and small forward.

What about Duke transfer Darren Harris, though? He’s more of a wing, but it’s not exactly clear how he’ll fit in the fold. And incoming combo guard Prince-Alexander Moody can also compete for minutes. 

Fortunately, DeVries can’t exactly go wrong. A Burton-Lindsay starting backcourt would be undersized but loaded, chock-full of shooting and playmaking, while a Burton-Mustaf combo would be a slashing nightmare for opponents, strong defensively and tough on the boards. 

And if Moody shocks the college hoops world and manages to sneak in over both Lindsay and Mustaf, that means the Hoosiers have a bona fide star on their hands. 

With the addition of Lindsay, the Hoosiers have arguably the No. 1 transfer class in the nation and certainly one of the top three. Here are three takeaways from Indiana’s offseason thus far.

Advertisement

The Hoosiers should be much better on the glass

Indiana could have been a lot better on the boards a year ago. The Hoosiers were No. 296 in offensive rebounding rate and No. 122 in defensive rebounding rate, per Bart Torvik. As a squad, Indiana was often undersized – and sometimes by a huge margin. Naturally, the glass suffered, affecting both sides of the floor. 

Advertisement

Mar 20, 2026; Tampa, FL, USA; Alabama Crimson Tide forward Aiden Sherrell (22) shoots against Hofstra Pride forward Victory Onuetu (6) in the second half during a first round game of the men’s 2026 NCAA Tournament at Benchmark International Arena. Mandatory Credit: Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images | Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images

In 2026-27, the Hoosiers should flip the script in that department. With incoming big men Aiden Sherrell (Alabama) and Samet Yigitoglu (SMU) combining for 14.1 total rebounds per outing despite neither playing more than 30 minutes per game in this past campaign, Indiana should have a dominant glass-cleaning unit in the frontcourt in 2026-27.

Advertisement

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending