Connect with us

Indiana

Indiana’s New Abortion Ban May Drive Some Young OB-GYNs to Leave a State Where They’re Needed

Published

on

Indiana’s New Abortion Ban May Drive Some Young OB-GYNs to Leave a State Where They’re Needed


On a Monday morning, a gaggle of obstetrics and gynecology residents, wearing blue scrubs and white coats, gathered in an auditorium at Indiana College Faculty of Medication. After the standard updates and bulletins, Dr. Nicole Scott, the residency program director, addressed the elephant within the room. “Any extra abortion care questions?” she requested the trainees.

After a number of moments of silence, one resident requested: “How’s Dr. Bernard doing?”

“Bernard is definitely in actually good spirits — I imply, comparatively,” Scott answered. “She has 24/7 safety, has her personal lawyer.”

Advertisement

They had been speaking about Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indiana OB-GYN who supplies abortions and trains residents on the college hospital. Bernard was lately caught in a political whirlwind after she spoke about an abortion she supplied to a 10-year-old rape sufferer from Ohio. Bernard was the goal of false accusations made on nationwide tv by pundits and political leaders, together with Indiana’s legal professional normal.

The medical doctors interviewed for this text stated that they don’t seem to be talking on behalf of their college of drugs however reasonably about their private experiences throughout a tumultuous second that they fear will have an effect on the way in which they care for his or her sufferers.

The vitriol directed at Bernard hit house for this group of residents. She has mentored most of them for years. Most of the younger medical doctors had been sure they wished to follow in Indiana after their coaching. However these days, some have been ambivalent about that prospect.

Dr. Beatrice Soderholm, a fourth-year OB-GYN resident, stated watching what Bernard went by means of was “scary.” “I believe that was a part of the purpose for many who had been placing her by means of that,” Soderholm stated. They had been attempting “to scare different individuals out of doing the work that she does.”

In early August, Gov. Eric Holcomb, a Republican, signed a near-total abortion ban into legislation, making Indiana the primary state to undertake new restrictions on abortion entry because the Supreme Court docket struck down Roe v. Wade in June. When the ban takes impact Sept. 15, medical suppliers who violate the legislation danger shedding their licenses or serving as much as six years in jail.

Advertisement

Lately, Scott, the residency program director, makes use of some assembly time with residents to fill them in on political updates and out there psychological well being providers. She additionally reminds them that authorized counsel is on name round the clock to assist in the event that they’re ever uncertain in regards to the care they need to present a affected person.

“Our residents are devastated,” Scott stated, holding again tears. “They signed as much as present complete well being care to girls, and they’re being informed that they’ll’t try this.”

She expects this may “deeply impression” how Indiana hospitals recruit and retain medical professionals.

A 2018 report from the March of Dimes discovered that 27% of Indiana counties are thought of maternity care deserts, with no or restricted entry to maternal care. The state has one of many nation’s highest maternal mortality charges.

Scott stated new legal guidelines proscribing abortion will solely worsen these statistics.

Advertisement

Scott shared outcomes from a current survey of almost 1,400 residents and fellows throughout all specialties on the IU Faculty of Medication, almost 80% of the trainees stated they had been much less more likely to keep and follow in Indiana after the abortion ban.

Dr. Wendy Tian, a third-year resident, stated she is fearful about her security. Tian grew up and went to medical college in Chicago and selected to do her residency in Indiana as a result of this system has a robust family-planning focus. She was open to practising in Indiana when she accomplished her coaching.

However that’s modified.

“I, for certain, don’t know if I might be capable to keep in Indiana postgraduation with what’s happening,” Tian stated.

Nonetheless, she feels responsible for “giving up” on Indiana’s most susceptible sufferers.

Advertisement

Even earlier than Roe fell, Tian stated, the local weather in Indiana may very well be hostile and irritating for OB-GYNs. Indiana, like different states with abortion restrictions, permits almost all well being care suppliers to decide out of offering care to sufferers having an abortion.

“We encounter different individuals who we work with each day who’re against what we do,” Tian stated. Tian stated she and her colleagues have needed to cancel scheduled procedures as a result of the nurses on name weren’t snug helping throughout an abortion.

Scott stated the OB-GYN program on the IU Faculty of Medication has supplied residents with complete coaching, together with on abortion care and household planning. Since miscarriages are managed the identical means as first-trimester abortions, she stated, the coaching provides residents plenty of hands-on expertise. “What termination procedures assist you to do is that sort of repetition and that understanding of the feminine anatomy and how one can handle problems that will occur with miscarriages,” she stated.

The ban on abortions dramatically reduces the hands-on alternatives for OB-GYN residents, and that’s an enormous concern, she stated.

This system is exploring methods to supply coaching. One choice is to ship residents to study in states with out abortion restrictions, however Scott stated that might be a logistical nightmare. “This isn’t so simple as simply displaying as much as an workplace and saying, ‘Can I observe?’ This contains getting a medical license for out-of-state trainees. This contains funding for journey and lodging,” Scott stated. “It provides lots to what we already do to teach future OB-GYNs.”

Advertisement

4 in 10 of all OB-GYN residents within the U.S. are in states the place abortion is banned or more likely to be banned, so there may very well be a surge of residents trying to exit of state to make up for misplaced coaching alternatives. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Training, the physique that accredits residency packages, proposed modifications to the commencement necessities for OB-GYN residents to account for the altering panorama.

For among the Indiana OB-GYN residents — together with Dr. Veronica Santana, a first-year resident — these political hurdles are a problem they’re greater than prepared to tackle. Santana is Latina, grew up in Seattle, and has been concerned in group organizing since she was a youngster. One purpose she selected obstetrics and gynecology was due to how the sphere intersects with social justice. “It’s political. It all the time has been, and it continues to be,” she stated, “And, clearly, particularly now.”

After Roe was overturned, Santana, alongside different residents and mentors, took to the streets of Indianapolis to take part in rallies in assist of abortion rights.

Indiana may very well be the proper battleground for Santana’s advocacy and social activism. However these days, she stated, she is “very uncertain” whether or not staying in Indiana to follow after residency is smart, since she needs to supply the whole vary of OB-GYN providers.

Soderholm, who grew up in Minnesota, has felt a robust connection to sufferers on the county hospital in Indianapolis. She had been sure she wished to follow in Indiana. However her household in Minnesota — the place abortion stays largely protected — has lately questioned why she would keep in a state with such a hostile local weather for OB-GYNs. “There’s been numerous hesitation,” she stated. However the sufferers make leaving troublesome. “Sorry,” she stated, beginning to cry.

Advertisement

It’s for these sufferers that Soderholm determined she’ll seemingly keep. Different younger medical doctors might make a distinct choice.

This story is a part of a partnership that features Aspect Results Public Media, NPR, and KHN.

KHN (Kaiser Well being Information) is a nationwide newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about well being points. Along with Coverage Evaluation and Polling, KHN is without doubt one of the three main working packages at KFF (Kaiser Household Basis). KFF is an endowed nonprofit group offering data on well being points to the nation.

USE OUR CONTENT

This story might be republished without cost (particulars).



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Indiana

Celtics-Pacers: 4 things to look for in Game 4 of East Finals

Published

on

Celtics-Pacers: 4 things to look for in Game 4 of East Finals


Pascal Siakam’s playoff-friendly midrange game has added an expected source of offense for the Pacers.

• Download the NBA App

INDIANAPOLIS — No team in NBA history has come back from a 3-0 deficit to win a best-of-seven playoff series. But four have come back to force a Game 7, with the last being the Boston Celtics, who did it a year ago in the Eastern Conference Finals.

In these Eastern Conference Finals, the Celtics are the team with the 3-0 lead, and they know the job is not done.

Advertisement

“It’s a way different feeling, obviously,” Derrick White said on Sunday about being up 3-0. “But you just understand that anything can change after one game. So you can’t relax.”

Here are some things to keep an eye out for as the Celtics try to close out the Indiana Pacers in Game 4 on Monday (8 p.m. ET, ESPN).


1. How Haliburton’s absence changes the Pacers … defensively

Game 2 of this series was the one that wasn’t close. And it wasn’t close because the Celtics had their most efficient offensive performance (126 points on 94 possessions) of the playoffs.

It was as purposeful of an offensive performance as we’ve seen from the Celtics, who relentlessly attacked the weaknesses in the Indiana defense. Those weaknesses began with Tyrese Haliburton, who was consistently put into screening action involving Jayson Tatum or Jaylen Brown.

Advertisement

With Haliburton out in Game 3, the Pacers switched more screens, and the Celtics had to find other ways to gain advantages and create good shots. They certainly attacked other weaknesses, namely Doug McDermott and Ben Sheppard. Boston also made Myles Turner work a little more, with Al Horford setting 23 ball screens, the most he’s set in the playoffs and tied for the second most he’s set all season in 78 total games.

“Everything depends on the coverage and the matchup,” Celtics coach Joe Mazzulla said Sunday. “The way you attack and the type of spacing that you have and the reads you have are going to be different because the coverage is different.

“It’s more about that, finding the advantage and making sure we can exploit it as a team.”

Haliburton was listed as questionable on the initial injury report for Game 4. If he plays, it’s unlikely he’ll be at 100 percent, making him more of a target for the Celtics’ defense than he was in Game 2. If he doesn’t play, the Celtics also know what to do.


2. Do the Pacers have any more midrange magic?

Advertisement

Midrange shots (those that come between the paint and the 3-point line) accounted for just 11% of total field goal attempts this season. That’s half the midrange rate from just seven years ago (22% in 2016-17) and one third the rate from 16 years ago (33% in 2007-08).

But the midrange shot is not dead. It’s a key reason why the Pacers are still playing, and why two of the three games in this series have been close.

Over their 16 playoff games, the Pacers have taken 15% of their shots from midrange, the highest rate (by a healthy margin) among the four teams still playing and up from 10% (21st) in the regular season.

While the Pacers didn’t shoot a lot from midrange in the regular season, they were the first team in the last 27 years to make more than half (50.5%) of their shots from between the paint and the 3-point line. And they’ve been even better (52.4%) in the playoffs.

That includes a four-game stretch — Game 6 of the conference semis through Game 2 of this series — in which the Pacers shot an incredible 50-for-81 (61.7%), with those 81 attempts accounting for 23% of their total shots from the field.

Advertisement

The were still better than average (7-for-15) in Game 3, but that wasn’t enough. One possession before he had the ball stolen by Jrue Holiday, Andrew Nembhard missed a 13-foot pullup that would have given the Pacers back the lead with a little more than 30 seconds left.

If they’re going to take this series back to Boston for a Game 5, the Pacers may need a little more midrange magic on Monday.


3. Celtics’ small ball hasn’t worked

Game 4 will be the 10th straight game that Kristaps Porzingis has missed with the calf strain he suffered in Game 4 of the first round. That injury has pushed Al Horford into the starting lineup, and that lineup has been much better in the playoffs (plus-18.1 per 100 possessions in 195 minutes) than it was in the regular season (plus-2.7 in 311 minutes).

With Horford in the starting lineup, Luke Kornet was the backup center until he sprained his wrist in the first half of Game 2.

Advertisement

With Kornet out, the Celtics initially went to small lineups — with Tatum or Oshae Brissett at center — when Horford sat down. But those lineups haven’t been good:

Celtics in conference finals

Bigs on floor MIN OffRtg DefRtg NetRtg +/-
Two 6 133.3 108.3 +25.0 +3
One 121 122.1 112.2 +9.9 +28
Zero 21 129.7 147.4 -17.6 -8

OffRtg = Points scored per 100 possessions
DefRtg = Points allowed per 100 possessions
NetRtg = Point differential per 100 possessions
Doesn’t include a couple of minutes of Game 2 garbage time

So Xavier Tillman has been getting some minutes as the backup center, including more than six minutes alongside Horford in Game 3 (all of the two-big minutes in the table above).

In the second half on Saturday, the only time there were zero bigs on the floor was the last seven seconds of the third quarter). The bigs were missed in those seven seconds, because the quarter ended with McDermott getting a tip-in over Payton Pritchard to put the Pacers up nine.

Advertisement

Horford and Porzingis (when he returns) allow the Celtics to play big without sacrificing spacing on offense. Kornet (who’s listed as questionable for Game 4) and Tillman, not so much. But the latter’s minutes were critical in Game 3, and we may not see much more small ball going forward.


4. More numbers to know

Some other notes regarding the Celtics and Pacers:

  • This series is a huge contrast in ball movement, with the Pacers having averaged 400 passes per 24 minutes of possession and the Celtics having averaged just 276 per 24.
  • Celtics opponents have made just 19 corner 3-pointers over their 13 playoff games. That’s as many as the Wolves made in their four-game sweep of the Suns in the first round.
  • Though Boston is a plus-51 from 3-point range in this series, the Pacers have outscored them by three total points from the field. But Boston is a plus-27 at the free throw line.
  • After committing just 11.6 turnovers per 100 possessions through the first two rounds (lowest among teams that won a series), the Pacers have committed 16.4 per 100 in this series. Boston has won the possession battle, committing 14 fewer turnovers over the three games.
  • The Celtics’ Sam Hauser and the Pacers’ Ben Sheppard were a combined 33-for-72 (45.8%) from 3-point range through the first two rounds of the playoffs. They’re a combined 0-for-18 in the conference finals.

* * *

John Schuhmann is a senior stats analyst for NBA.com. You can e-mail him here, find his archive here and follow him on X. 

The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NBA, its clubs or Warner Bros. Discovery.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

How to watch Caitlin Clark: Time, TV for Indiana Fever vs Los Angeles Sparks on 5/28/24

Published

on

How to watch Caitlin Clark: Time, TV for Indiana Fever vs Los Angeles Sparks on 5/28/24


play

The Indiana Fever are 1-6 on the season after a 99-80 loss to the Las Vegas Aces on Saturday.

Caitlin Clark averages a team-leading 15.4 points as they host the Los Angeles Sparks (1-3), which is the only team Indiana has beaten this season. Kelsey Mitchell, who was slowed by injury to start the season, has scored at least 16 in each of the past four games. Aliyah Boston is coming off a game where she put up 12 points, six rebounds and four assists against the Aces on Saturday. Temi Fagbenle has provided help off the bench (12.3 points over the past four games).

Advertisement

Los Angeles is led by Dearica Hamby, who averages 21 points 13.3 rebounds and 3.8 assists per game. Cameron Brink, the second pick in the 2024 WNBA draft, has put up 8.3 points, 6.8 rebounds and 3.3 blocks this season.

Sign up: Subscribe to our Caitlin Clark Fever newsletter

Indiana Fever vs Los Angeles Sparks start time, date

7 p.m. ET Tuesday, May 28, 2024, at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indiana.

How to watch Caitlin Clark, Indiana Fever vs Los Angeles Sparks

TV: NBA TV

Streaming: Fubo (FREE)

Advertisement

‘I’m excited to go home’: Indiana Fever finish gauntlet of opening road schedule.

Caitlin Clark stats

Through 7 games: 15.4 points, 6.3 assists, 5.4 rebounds, 31.6% 3-point shooting.

Get Caitlin Clark and Indiana Fever jerseys, gear

Indiana Fever and Caitlin Clark jerseys, shirts, sweatshirts and hats from Fanatics can be found here.

Tickets to see Caitlin Clark, Indiana Fever

Tickets for Fever games are available here.

This is the Indiana Fever 2024 schedule, with TV info; all times are ET; ^-preseason.

Advertisement
Date, day place, opponent Time, TV/results
May 3, Fri. at Dallas^ L, 79-76
May 9, Thurs. vs. Atlanta^ W, 83-80
May 14, Tues. at Connecticut L, 92-71
May 16, Thurs. vs. New York L, 102-66
May 18, Sat. at New York L, 91-80
May 20, Mon. vs. Connecticut L, 88-84
May 22, Wed. at Seattle L, 85-83
May 24, Fri. at Los Angeles W, 78-73
May 25, Sat. at Las Vegas L, 99-80
May 28, Tues. vs. Los Angeles 7 p.m., NBA TV
May 30, Thurs. vs. Seattle 7 p.m., Prime, WTHR
June 1, Sat. vs. Chicago* 1 p.m., NBA TV, WALV
June 2, Sun. at New York* 7 p.m., NBA TV, WALV
June 7, Fri. at Washington* 7:30 p.m., Ion, WTHR
June 10, Mon. at Connecticut* 7 p.m., NBA TV, WTHR
June 13, Thurs. vs. Atlanta* 7 p.m., WTHR
June 16, Sun. vs. Chicago Noon, CBS
June 19, Wed. vs. Washington 7 p.m., NBA TV
June 21, Fri. at Atlanta 7:30 p.m., Ion
June 23, Sun. at Chicago 6 p.m., NBA TV, WALV
June 27, Thurs. at Seattle 10 p.m., Prime, WALV
June 30, Sun. at Phoenix 3 p.m., ESPN
July 2, Tues. at Las Vegas 10 p.m., ESPN
July 6, Sat. vs. New York 1 p.m., CBS
July 10, Wed. vs. Washington Noon, NBA TV, WTHR
July 12, Fri. vs. Phoenix 7:30 p.m., Ion
July 14, Sun. at Minnesota 7 p.m., ESPN
July 17, Wed. at Dallas 8 p.m., ESPN
Aug. 16, Fri. vs. Phoenix 7:30 p.m., Ion
Aug. 18, Sun. vs. Seattle 4 p.m., ABC
Aug. 24, Sat. at Minnesota 8 p.m., NBA TV
Aug. 26, Mon. at Atlanta 7:30 p.m., NBA TV, WTHR
Aug. 28, Wed. vs. Connecticut 7 p.m., NBA TV
Aug. 30, Fri. at Chicago 7:30 p.m., Ion
Sept. 1, Sun. at Dallas 4 p.m., NBA TV
Sept. 4, Wed. vs. Los Angeles 7 p.m., CBS SN, WALV
Sept. 6, Fri. vs. Minnesota 7:30 p.m., Ion
Sept. 8, Sun. vs. Atlanta 4 p.m., WTHR
Sept. 11, Wed. vs. Las Vegas 7 p.m., NBA TV
Sept. 13, Fri. vs. Las Vegas 7:30 p.m., Ion
Sept. 15, Sun. vs. Dallas 3 p.m., WALV
Sept. 19, Thurs. at Washington 7 p.m., Prime, WTHR

*-Commissioner’s Cup games

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Locked on Pacers: Indiana blows another game late in Game 3 against Boston Celtics

Published

on

Locked on Pacers: Indiana blows another game late in Game 3 against Boston Celtics


The Indiana Pacers had this game in hand but let it slip away. It’s an all-too-familiar story for them in this playoff series against the 1-seed Boston Celtics.

After being up 8 with 2:38 remaining, the Pacers were unable to get enough stops and unable to get the ball in the basket and ended up losing by a final score of 114-111.

Change one or two plays in the series and the Indiana Pacers are up 2-1 in the Eastern Conference Finals but instead they are facing a hole in which no team in NBA history has been able to dig themselves out.

I joined Locked on Pacers with SI.com’s Tony East to discuss the latest brutal defeat for the blue and gold. You can watch the podcast below or listen via any of your typical podcast providers.

Advertisement

We touch on a multitude of topics in this one including the following:

  • How close the Pacers are to having a lead in this series. Does it matter? Inexperienced team showing kind of showing n
  • Carlisle’s frustrations and whether or not he should have called a timeout before the Jrue Holiday game-sealing steal. The creative final play to give Aaron Nesmith a chance to to hit a game-tying jumper.
  • Referencing Dark Matter, a sci-fi show on AppleTV+ that maybe 12 people will appreciate, and having a wish to be able to examine the roads not taken with Carlisle seeing what the future would have held with a pair of timeouts.
  • The best game of Andrew Nembhard’s career, him being visibly down during his press conference. 32 points and 9 assists
  • The quartet of Nembhard, McConnell, Turner, and Siakam all playing well with over 20+ points but the Pacers couldn’t find a 5th guy to contribute with every player with 4 points or less.
  • Doug McDermott having a positive impact on the game with the highest plus/minus on the team, added a big tip in basket to end the third quarter and a one possession stop on Jayson Tatum on a play where for some reason he ended up on Tatum. What the hell do I know?
  • The five stages of grief all getting their runtime over the course of this series.
  • The usual banter and thinking out loud.

I’ll have more written coverage on Nembhard and others before Game 4. Stay tuned.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending