Tommy Tuberville has no particular reason to care about the Alabama Crimson Tide, save for the fact many of the team’s fans vote, and a large percentage of those do so in the state he represents as a U.S. senator.

So even though he wasn’t speaking about the College Football Playoff when he addressed Birmingham’s Monday Morning Quarterback Club this week, he was speaking about the College Football Playoff.

His topic ostensibly was legislation on Name/Image/Likeness restrictions for college sports, but it was not by accident that he chose the Indiana Hoosiers to be his Exhibit A of the scourge of the NIL/transfer portal era.

“You pretty much buy a team now,” Tuberville said. “And that was a little bit forbidden when I was in coaching, but now it’s legal. Look at Indiana. They went out and bought them a football team, and look where they’re at.”

He could have said the same about Tennessee, Georgia, Ole Miss or certainly Alabama, but he knows where he’s from, and it’s not Big Ten country. So he took a shot at the team that attracted 31 transfers in advance of this season, including 13 from that established national high-major football power at, ahem, James Madison. Yeah, JMU, which joined the NCAA’s highest division two whole years ago.

BENDER: Breaking down the CFP bubble after latest rankings

In the cacophonous conversation around college football that has grown CFP-centric, Indiana is the favored target of those who fear there might be a very-good-but-not-great SEC team excluded in favor of an IU squad that might finish the season 11-1. It was no accident Tuberville chose the Hoosiers. The only thing that would have made them a more inviting subject of derision is if they represented a blue state.

Indiana is 10-0. It won road games at UCLA, Northwestern and Michigan State, but none has a winning record. It won at home against Maryland, Nebraska, Washington and Michigan, but the Terps and Huskers have since collapsed, and UW and UM already were hurting when they arrived in Bloomington.

Indiana’s schedule strength will improve, no doubt, when it travels Saturday to Ohio State for what could fairly be described as the biggest football game in IU history. But it’s still going to fall behind most. If the Hoosiers somehow win as a two touchdown-underdog, it won’t really matter what anyone thinks of anything else. A big, crimson IU logo will appear on the CFP bracket Dec. 8.

If they lose, and if they don’t lose close, the harangues will be downright congressional.

This might not be such an issue if we all understood how the CFP evaluates teams. They have taken reporters through “mock” selection exercises the past several years, and they conducted a Zoom “webinar” last month for members of the media that revealed little of their process. We heard the words “eye test” way too much. They did mention a particular analytics company on which they rely; access to that appears to be restricted to those willing to pay for the privilege.

MORE: Bowl projections after Week 12

The NCAA men’s basketball selection committee tells you exactly which data is evident to members, and all of those numbers can be examined by fans on a daily basis. Publicly available football power ratings and schedule strength numbers are wildly inconsistent from one evaluator to the next, and we’ve little idea whether the committee uses any or none of them.

For instance: ESPN’s strength of schedule rating puts Notre Dame at No. 82 and Indiana at No. 106. Because of the network’s ubiquity, it’s common to see that 106 number cited in discussions of IU’s fitness to reach the playoff field. But why IU and not the Fighting Irish?

Remember: It’s can’t just be about the schedule a team plays. It’s must involve how one plays against that schedule.

Notre Dame’s collection of wins is not much more imposing than Indiana’s. There’s a win at Texas A&M and little else. And Notre Dame owns the worst loss, by far, of any team that’s even thinking about doing anything with the CFP beyond watching it on television. There ought to be some consideration given to the horror/hilarity of losing at home to Northern Illinois, which currently holds a 3-4 record in Mid-American Conference play.

Indiana, currently, owns no losses to anyone, anywhere. If the Hoosiers do fall, it likely will be to a team regarded by any ranking you can find as one of the nation’s best (Ohio State).

MORE: Picks against the spread for Week 13’s Top 25 games

Indiana may spend Saturday afternoon consumed with the pursuit of a Big Ten championship, but while they’re at it, they’ll be dissected like a seventh-grade science experiment by, at the very least, fans of other CFP contenders, talk hosts looking for inflammatory segment topics and reporters who regularly cover the sport. If the Hoosiers wind up on the wrong end of the Vegas line, it’s a safe bet they’ll be the subject of dissent that will reach heavy metal decibels.   

Why is Indiana viewed as the vulnerable team in these hypotheticals? Because Knute Rockne (and Johnny Lujack and Leon Hart and Tim Brown) did not go there. IU does not have the historic success or football brand recognition the Irish have built over a century. That record of long-term excellence has earned ND a loyal television following for which NBC pays handsomely and crowds at their home stadium that consistently test capacity.

That should not get them in the field, any more than the excellence of Steve Alford, Isiah Thomas, Scott May should matter for the Hoosiers. Yeah, that’s another sport, but it’s also history.

If IU loses Saturday to Ohio State, the CFP debate should be Indiana vs. Georgia or Indiana vs. Tennessee or, indeed, Indiana vs. Notre Dame.

Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson was a television program disguised as a sporting event. March Madness is a sporting event that makes for great television. We all know which the College Football Playoff should aspire to emulate.