Connect with us

Indiana

Indiana governor candidate Q&A: Jamie Reitenour on the issues

Published

on

Indiana governor candidate Q&A: Jamie Reitenour on the issues


play

Jamie Reitenour admits that for most of her life, she was a conservative voter who felt like she was merely checking boxes.

But the 2016 election piqued her interest in politics. Not long after, the Indianapolis mother of five said, she felt a calling from God to become governor of Indiana. Last year, she said, she felt the calling resurge and decided to act on it.

Advertisement

She has significant ground to cover in terms of name recognition compared to her opponents in the Republican primary, which include Fort Wayne businessman Eric Doden, U.S. Sen. Mike Braun, Lt. Gov. Suzanne Crouch, former Attorney General Curtis Hill and former Commerce Secretary Brad Chambers. Donald Rainwater is running as a Libertarian and former schools Superintendent Jennifer McCormick as a Democrat.

IndyStar asked Reitenour, as well as the seven other candidates, a set of questions about issues relevant to the 2024 race, some of which were submitted by readers. This interview is edited for length and clarity.

Q: What do you think sets you apart from your competition in the Republican primary?

A: I haven’t been in politics. That’s why people should want me in politics. Because America needs normal people. Not perfect people ― true people. Because the country is in need. And the people are hurting. It’s real. So that’s the biggest difference.

Q: What would be your first priority as governor?

A: I’ve traveled over 13,000 miles in the last two years ― I got started January 2022. And so as I went around, I looked for, where is the most vulnerable place in our state? And what I saw was that education is the area where it is most vulnerable. Our children are vulnerable. Our scores are low. Kids are losing their identity. They’re losing their desire. That’s a big deal ― their vision for life. When you leave, and you have no reason to continue to get a job, when you’ve got half a society that’s just dropping off and saying, who cares? That’s a big deal.

Advertisement

So my head of education, her name is Paige Miller. And she’s a Mom for Liberty. I love that group; they are a wonderful group of people. We bring to the table, desiring that every senior would graduate having completed an apprenticeship. Senior year is a year where they’re not doing a whole lot anyway. We want Indiana to be the training capital of the United States. So we start there, and we very rapidly go around the state. We’ve got great plans for our small towns. We’ve got our eyes on Gary, Indiana.

Q: In many ways today’s Republican Party has factions defined by one’s posture toward Donald Trump. What’s yours?

A: Whether it’s President Trump or Tim Scott or Nikki Haley or Ron DeSantis ― if any of those people were in the position that President Trump has been put in, I’d have a problem with it. I don’t believe that what’s happening in our country is fair justice. I think it’s easy to not like a person or blame something on a person’s personality, but I love the law. And there’s a lot to be wanting, in the situation that he finds himself in. In the Bible, in Micah, it says, “What is required of you but to do justly, and to love mercy and to walk humbly before thy God.” I would just say to anyone in that position, I would want everyone to do justly. And I think that is wanting, so I would direct my comment less to the person and more to the situation.

Q: Do you believe the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump?

A: I believe the 2020 election had an incredible amount of irregularity, and it should have been questioned.

Q: Where do you stand on Indiana’s new abortion law, and what changes to it would you support?

A: I definitely am a person that believes in life at conception, and I’m not an exception person. I’m just, life at conception. I know a lot of babies that people would have said “no” to that are just so beautiful. And our society needs their beauty.

Advertisement

Q: Gun violence is an epidemic in today’s American society. How should Indiana respond?

A: Fatherless homes is an epidemic in our society, and that’s what we need to be addressing. Kids model their examples. They want to be wanted. They want leadership. They want to belong.

The issue is not the item they’re picking up to do violence; the issue is their homes and the brokenness of their homes. There needs to be a wake-up call for the families that have been constantly going to the same well, but the water has run dry, and the solutions are not working. So they need to be looking for something different. My solution to gun violence is education. It’s walking in those streets, looking at those children, going to those high schools.

I’m willing to consider very outside-of-the-box things for schools that are struggling in education. If you’ve got a 10% graduation rate, everything is on the table. We will talk apprenticeships, we will talk early training in freshman year. We will talk all solutions so that kids can get out of this cycle of poverty and violence and broken family and really experience what they were made for.

Q: The 2023 legislative session dealt with culture war topics such as LGBTQ issues and school library books. Where do you stand on those issues?

A: Some of the books they’ve read, the way that they speak in these books are things that I would never let my children hear. So, there was a need for discretion. So I’m happy with the laws that have promoted that discretion and given the boundaries. But it was done for just up to third or fourth grade. It’ll be interesting to see if they stop at third grade or if they continue it for all the grades. I think if it’s good for a third grader, I don’t understand how it cuts off at fourth grade. I think it’ll be an interesting conversation.

Q: Should citizens have a right to collect signatures to put questions on the ballot without legislative approval?

A: Yeah, I think Hoosiers should.

Advertisement

Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Kayla Dwyer at kdwyer@indystar.com or follow her on Twitter @kayla_dwyer17.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Indiana

Solar belongs on rooftops, not Indiana farmland | Opinion

Published

on

Solar belongs on rooftops, not Indiana farmland | Opinion



Solar farms depend on subsidies. It is hard to justify this corporate welfare while the state and federal governments take away similar benefits from homeowners.

play

While solar farms might not cross your mind as an issue that can decide elections, their development fills town halls in rural Indiana with angry locals. Tippecanoe and Clark counties passed new restrictions on solar farms this month, while more than 70 other counties have temporary bans, for good reason.

Advertisement

“The locations that solar companies want are in the best agricultural grounds in my district,” state Sen. Jean Leising, R-Oldenburg, told me over the phone. Leising is the chair of the Senate Committee on Agriculture.  “[Some people are] worried about the valuation of their property. Then you have people that are saying, plus, I just don’t want to look at it in my backyard.”

Leising successfully pushed the state to study the loss of prime farmland last year. Indiana has lost 345,000 acres of farmland and over 3,050 farms since 2010. However, the farmland still in use has become more efficient and the state is producing more crops than ever before.

A bigger concern is that commercial-scale solar farms depend on government subsidies and tax abatements. It is hard to justify this corporate welfare while the state and federal governments take away similar benefits from individuals looking to make their homes more self-sufficient. If the state and federal governments are going to invest in solar somewhere, it should be on rooftops, not on Indiana farmland.

The state recently created the ultimate tax abatement for solar farms. Businesses won’t pay any personal property taxes if they have less than $2 million worth of equipment in 2026, and the personal property taxes paid for new equipment can lower to zero as the equipment fully depreciates in value. Some estimates show Indiana solar farms averaged about $50,000 in personal property per acre, meaning they will likely save hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Advertisement

In the same bill, Indiana eliminated a property tax deduction for homeowners whose home values increase after installing solar panels. A study from Zillow showed that homes that installed solar panels increased in value by 4.1%, and the deduction was originally put in place to make sure they weren’t unfairly punished for making their homes more energy efficient.

Not to mention, the state recently eliminated net metering on behalf of energy companies. Rather than receiving full retail rates for excess electricity sent back to the grid, homeowners are now paid at a much lower rate. Meanwhile, new limits on tax credits for solar energy in the federal budget reconciliation bill are predicted to favor large companies that can pass on development costs and make it much harder for homeowners to invest in solar.

Not only do large solar corporations receive unfair advantages at the expense of homeowners, but also they’re getting these benefits despite being less efficient at producing energy.

“Some people say sun is free and wind is free, but they’re not … because there’s a huge transmission cost,” Leising said. “When you site a solar field in the middle of nowhere … then how are you going to get that power to where it needs to go? Right now, we don’t have enough battery storage to store the energy produced when the sun is shining.”

Advertisement

Solar panels on homes, on the other hand, are right next to where most of the energy produced is used.

If there is any benefit to solar energy, it is the possibility of seeing more self-sufficient homes and a more decentralized energy grid, where people aren’t dependent on government-granted monopolies to live their daily lives.

The benefit is almost entirely lost when it becomes another tool in the belts of those monopolies, because there are more efficient, reliable and cleaner forms of energy out there.

Any issue that involves personal property rights is going to be complicated, but when a community’s tax dollars are being stewarded poorly, it should surprise no one to see them mobilize like they have in rural Indiana.

Contact Jacob Stewart at 317-444-4683 or jacob.stewart@indystar.com. Follow him on X and Instagram.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Oklahoma City Thunder vs. Indiana Pacers: How to watch Game 6 of the 2025 NBA Finals

Published

on

Oklahoma City Thunder vs. Indiana Pacers: How to watch Game 6 of the 2025 NBA Finals


DirecTV’s MySports pack is a curated live TV package geared toward sports fans, with access to local ABC, plus ESPN’s suite of channels, TBS, TNT, USA, FS1 and an included subscription to ESPN+ for $69.99/month.

The MySports pack guarantees access to thousands of live televised events, plus all the live-streaming and library content on ESPN+, all on one interface and one bill. You can try it for free for five days before committing.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

NBA Finals Chat: OKC Thunder vs. Indiana Pacers (Game 5)

Published

on

NBA Finals Chat: OKC Thunder vs. Indiana Pacers (Game 5)


The NBA Finals continue tonight with Game 5 between the Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers!

After the Thunder snuck away with Game 4 on the road in the final minutes, things head back to OKC with the series knotted up at 2-2. Which team will break the deadlock and move one win away from an NBA title? Time to find out.

This is your open thread to discuss the game and anything else NBA-related that we haven’t covered in other posts. So hang out here for the night and enjoy the action!

Here’s the broadcast info:

Advertisement

No. 1 OKC Thunder vs. No. 4 Indiana Pacers | 5:30 p.m. PDT | ABC | Series tied, 2-2



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending