Connect with us

Lifestyle

She Was a Candidate to Lead Levi’s. Then She Started Tweeting.

Published

on

She Was a Candidate to Lead Levi’s. Then She Started Tweeting.

Earlier than 2020, Jennifer Sey, a high govt at Levi Strauss & Firm and a number one candidate to be the corporate’s subsequent chief, barely used social media. Two years later, Ms. Sey was out of a job, partly, in her telling, due to her exercise on Twitter.

Ms. Sey’s uncommon exit final month from Levi’s after greater than 20 years generated a flurry of headlines, together with her claiming in a broadly circulated essay that her advocacy for varsity reopenings through the pandemic made her a pariah at work and finally led to her ouster.

However the highway to her departure was difficult. It touched on points like whether or not firms can management the private speech of their staff, notably in a interval of isolation, and the politics tied to talking on sure platforms, like Fox Information opinion reveals.

The overwhelming majority of Ms. Sey’s tweets had been about faculties, however a few of them criticized guidance from the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention and Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, whom she accused of fear mongering. (“So when is Fauci going to cease doing the morning reveals on Sunday, terrorizing the already fearful?” she tweeted in April 2021.)

She additionally expressed skepticism concerning the effectiveness of masking, largely for younger youngsters. (“At the moment there may be not sufficient proof for or in opposition to the usage of masks (medical or different) for wholesome people within the wider neighborhood,” she posted in Might 2020.)

Advertisement

Ms. Sey’s outspokenness drew criticism each inside and outdoors the corporate, together with threats of boycotts. The tweets got here when Levi’s was utilizing public well being steering to handle protocols throughout a whole lot of shops and in distribution facilities. However Ms. Sey stated she was talking as a involved mom, not a company govt. She additionally famous that Levi’s — which has been vocal about hot-button points like gun management — had not beforehand complained when she posted on social media in assist of Democratic politicians like Senator Elizabeth Warren or extra liberal causes.

Levi’s disputes Ms. Sey’s account of occasions, together with her claims that she was punished as a result of her views veered from “left-leaning orthodoxy” and that she walked away from a $1 million severance package deal with a purpose to have the opportunity converse freely concerning the firm. Levi’s stated Ms. Sey had stop fairly than negotiate an exit package deal, which might have contained a nondisclosure settlement. It “wouldn’t include a prohibition on the manager talking out about issues of public curiosity akin to faculty closures or on participating in any legally protected speech,” Kelly McGinnis, the senior vice chairman of company affairs at Levi’s, stated in a press release.

Ms. McGinnis stated that Levi’s supported Ms. Sey’s advocacy on faculties, however that she “went far past calling for faculties to reopen, and steadily used her platform to criticize public well being pointers and denounce elected officers and authorities scientists.”

She added that Ms. Sey “did this at a time in 2020 and 2021 when hospitalizations and deaths from Covid had been spiking, when the corporate had its personal staff hospitalized, and in some instances dying, and firms like Levi’s had been utilizing steering from public well being officers to implement insurance policies to maintain our staff and shoppers secure.”

The corporate’s social media coverage says that staff are free to debate their views however that it expects staff to guard the corporate’s “status and picture.”

Advertisement

Ms. Sey stated she didn’t assume that corporations like Levi’s wanted to endorse particular viewpoints from staff, however they need to “arise for an worker’s proper to speech on what they care about.”

Sarah Sobieraj, a professor of sociology at Tufts College, stated Ms. Sey’s scenario, together with her frustration with how colleagues interpreted her private views, was an instance of an more and more frequent phenomenon within the digital age generally known as “context collapse.”

“You used to have the ability to section who you might be — you may go to church and behave such as you did in church and go to work and behave such as you did at work, then out with associates and behave that manner,” she stated. Now, “no matter it’s we’re saying or posting, we’re posting in entrance of all of the folks in our lives.”

“That blurring is a part of the discomfort for Levi’s, and it’s a part of the difficulty that Jen Sey has confronted,” she added.

Ms. Sey, a former nationwide champion gymnast, was the chief advertising officer at Levi’s earlier than being promoted to model president in October 2020. She was often supplied as much as journalists for interviews, together with Chip Bergh, the corporate’s chief govt. A mom of 4 — two of her youngsters are faculty age whereas the opposite two are 5 and seven — Ms. Sey was effectively favored internally and was an govt sponsor of the corporate’s useful resource group for Black staff.

Advertisement

When the pandemic began, Ms. Sey was residing in San Francisco, the place Levi’s has its headquarters. She grew nervous about how younger youngsters like hers is likely to be harmed by public faculty closures. That was when she turned to Twitter, the place in a time of isolation she discovered different like-minded mother and father.

“I used to be used to being within the workplace and seeing a whole lot of individuals, and whereas it was work-focused, we’d chitchat within the hallways, ask about folks’s children and what’s happening of their lives,” Ms. Sey, 53, stated. “So this reference to different mother and father was significant for me. It might really feel in San Francisco that no person shared this view.”

She often posted about faculty closures, an particularly contentious situation within the metropolis, and was concerned with rallies about reopening them. She stated she had taken care to symbolize herself as a mom and a non-public citizen, leaving Levi’s, which is publicly traded, out of her public profiles.

Advertisement

“I do know it was straightforward to seek out,” she stated of her position with Levi’s, “however I used to be in truth talking for myself.”

Ms. Sey, whose commentary got here earlier than vaccines had been launched and when lecturers’ unions opposed returns, stated that she had been “inspired to tone it down” by a board member and different leaders on the firm, however that she had by no means been informed to cease posting or supplied any company social media pointers.

Final spring, Ms. Sey was requested to seem on Laura Ingraham’s present on Fox Information to speak about her choice to maneuver to Denver in order that her youngsters might expertise in-person education. Whereas she was not recognized as a Levi’s govt, the looks prompted an outcry on the firm. Round that point, Ms. Sey additionally did a YouTube interview with Naomi Wolf, who has been barred from Twitter for spreading vaccine misinformation.

Levi’s, like many corporations on the peak of the pandemic, held employees conferences each few weeks the place staff might ask questions anonymously. At a March 31 assembly, there have been questions on Ms. Sey’s look on Ms. Ingraham’s present.

In a message shared by Levi’s with The New York Occasions, one worker wrote: “I’d not have had an issue together with her showing on Fox Information however that isn’t what Ingraham Angle is. It’s Fox opinion and he or she is an particularly divisive and bigoted character who often assaults the very causes that Chip and the corporate champion.”

Advertisement

Ms. Sey stated she had been hesitant about happening the present, however having did not get the eye of retailers like CNN, she appeared as a result of she “felt assured that I might get my message throughout and never be backed into something I didn’t need to say or agreeing with something that was maybe Covid denialism.”

“Simply because I don’t agree with all the things she says doesn’t imply I can’t have a dialog together with her,” Ms. Sey added, pointing to the present’s excessive viewership.

Whereas Ms. Sey caught to her message and he or she stated Mr. Bergh had internally defended her proper to talk on the subject as a mom, the corporate requested Ms. Sey to carry a separate assembly with staff.

“If you give an interview to somebody who’s forged doubt on vaccines, you actually do lend some type of legitimacy to that individual and people views,” stated Kara S. Alaimo, a professor of public relations at Hofstra College, referring to Ms. Ingraham. “I can perceive why folks would have been upset about it, and if I used to be advising her, I don’t assume these platforms had been the suitable ones for sharing her views.”

Ms. Sey stated she had deleted some posts after receiving pushback on matters that may have an effect on Levi’s enterprise, together with one which was considered internally as shaming plus-size prospects for poor Covid well being outcomes. She was additionally requested by Levi’s to chorus from tweeting about matters like pharmaceutical corporations and the California governor recall.

Advertisement

Ms. Sey stated she unfairly confronted criticism for tweets from her husband, who was outspoken on social media about his opposition to vaccines and masks, posting comments like: “Covid masks are obedience coaching and Covid vaccines are loyalty oaths.”

“Present me a married couple that agrees on all the things and I’ll present you a unicorn,” stated Ms. Sey, who did reply to a few of her husband’s posts at instances. “Can we need to reside in a world the place the opinions of relations decide your employment choices?”

Ms. Sey stated her views on faculties made her a goal. “The concept of pushing for varsity openings bought conflated with being anti-science and a Covid denier, and I’d say neither of these issues are true,” she stated. “I take situation with this concept that you just can not criticize public well being pointers, as a result of so a lot of them have confirmed to be deeply flawed.”

Final October, Ms. Sey met with Mr. Bergh. She stated he had requested for approval to conduct a background verify on her, a routine step for these being vetted as potential C.E.O.s. She was informed that her social media conduct was the one factor holding her candidacy again and that Levi’s needed to overview it.

In January, Mr. Bergh stated her Twitter presence was “too problematic so that you can maintain this position of C.E.O., and there’s not a viable path ahead for you on the firm,” Ms. Sey stated. Whereas Levi’s requested her to remain till it discovered her alternative, she stated, she was not and stop.

Advertisement

Ms. Sey has argued that she was topic to “viewpoint discrimination” by Levi’s. She stated she had beforehand posted on social media in assist of Senator Warren within the Democratic presidential primaries and about her unhappiness over the murders of Ahmaud Arbery and George Floyd in 2020. The corporate had “not been against political speech or criticism of presidency insurance policies and even weighing in on candidates” in these cases, she stated.

Certainly, that has difficult the circumstances of Ms. Sey’s departure, in line with public relations consultants. Whereas corporations and company leaders have lengthy tried to keep away from wading into political debates, the heightened divides of this period have prompted Levi’s and another manufacturers to be extra outspoken on public points, together with L.G.B.T.Q. rights and immigration.

“A non-public employer can impose restrictions on staff’ speech or conduct,” Ms. Sobieraj stated. “The important thing situation right here is the place that boundary lies and what about if you’re not working.”

Each Ms. Alaimo and Ms. Sobieraj famous that at the least a few of the criticism that Ms. Sey confronted, together with from former gymnasts who nonetheless comply with Ms. Sey’s profession, might have appeared outsized to Levi’s as a result of ladies are inclined to face extra vitriol and harassment on-line.

Ms. Alaimo stated that “corporations must be extra clear about what their insurance policies are.” She added: “Since 2016, we’ve seen corporations begin to take much more stances on political and social points, and we’ve seen loads of staff converse out once they disagree with them.”

Advertisement

As for Ms. Sey, she is completed with working within the retail business and company America, she stated. She felt vindicated final month when three members of San Francisco’s Board of Training had been voted out. She stays energetic on Twitter and is engaged on a memoir “that’s centered on utilizing your voice and talking up with integrity and doing it as a girl in company America.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Lifestyle

Jonathan Groff loves criticism … up to a point

Published

on

Jonathan Groff loves criticism … up to a point

A note from Wild Card host Rachel Martin: When I was growing up my parents talked a lot about purpose. They wanted my siblings and me to find careers that were satisfying but really they wanted us to find our purpose — the thing we were put in the world to do. And that’s the idea that came into my head when I was thinking about how to introduce Jonathan Groff. Because yes, he’s a mega talent with a long list of Broadway credits including “Spring Awakening” and “Hamilton.” He won a Tony award for his role in “Merrily We Roll Along” and now he’s nominated for another Tony for his new musical about singer Bobby Darin called “Just in Time.”

But when I watch Jonathan Groff perform it’s more than just watching a person do what they love – it’s watching a person live out their purpose. It’s like he couldn’t do anything else if he tried. And watching him on stage, doing his very special thing, is just a complete joy.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Pennsylvania kindergarten student handed out jello shots to classmates, district says

Published

on

Pennsylvania kindergarten student handed out jello shots to classmates, district says

Pennsylvania kindergarten student passed out jello shots to classmates, district says

Advertisement



Pennsylvania kindergarten student passed out jello shots to classmates, district says

00:13

Advertisement

An investigation is underway after a Pennsylvania school district said a kindergarten student gave jello shots to classmates. 

The Greater Johnstown School District said a kindergarten student at the elementary school gave out “alcohol in the form of small jello cups” to three other students. 

The superintendent said once staff learned about the situation, “immediate action was taken.” The students were taken to the nurse’s office for evaluation, and out of an abundance of caution, EMS was called to take the kids to a local hospital. Parents were notified and met first responders at the hospital, the district said.

It’s unclear how the student got the alcoholic jello cups, but the district said it’s looking into it and cooperating with authorities.  

“We are currently in possession of the jello cups and the matter is under investigation,” the district said in a release. “We are cooperating fully with local authorities to determine how the student came into possession of these items and to ensure the continued safety of our students and staff.” 

Advertisement

The superintendent said the district is committed to transparency, though it’s limited in what it can share because of student privacy laws. The district called it an “isolated incident.” 

“We want to assure our families that the health and well-being of our students is our top priority. Counselors and support staff will be available for any students who may need assistance processing today’s events,” the district said. 

The school thanked staff, administration, school nurses and school police officers for their “swift response” to the situation. 

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

No Naked Dressing at Cannes Film Festival? How Will Stars Make News?

Published

on

No Naked Dressing at Cannes Film Festival? How Will Stars Make News?

The Cannes Film Festival is getting more covered-up — and just in time for the opening ceremony honoring the octogenarian Robert De Niro. Bella Hadid, newly blonde, is already in town, and stars expected include Halle Berry, Scarlett Johansson and Emma Stone. But anyone expecting one of the most reliable moves on the red carpet might be disappointed. The new dress code for gala screenings includes the admonition, “for decency reasons, nudity is prohibited on the red carpet, as well as in any other area of the festival.”

Cue a crisis in the fashion-film industrial complex.

After all, nowhere has the naked dress been more of a presence than at Cannes, where the combination of Mediterranean, sun and a certain Gallic disdain for prudishness (or at least perceived disdain for prudishness) have conspired to create its own tradition of sartorial liberation.

And “nudity,” when it comes to celebrity dressing, is a relative term. The idea that it may no longer be a shortcut to the spotlight is even more shocking than the clothing it may be proscribing.

“Naked dressing,” or that mode of dress in which large swaths of the normally private body are aired for public viewing, has been a tent pole of the publicity machine since long before Marilyn Monroe cooed “Happy birthday, Mr. President” into a microphone in a flesh-colored sheath so tight it left little to the imagination.

Advertisement

In recent years it has become practically a category unto itself, especially at events like the Met Gala. That’s where Beyoncé played Venus on the half shell in 2015 in sheer Givenchy with strategically placed floral embroidery. Where, in 2024, Rita Ora wore a nude Marni bodysuit covered in what looked like strings, and Kylie Minogue modeled a Diesel dress with a naked torso superimposed on her actual torso. It has been framed as a post-Covid libidinal celebration and a post-#MeToo reclamation of the body. Either way, it is pretty much always a talking point.

All the way back in 1985, Ilona Staller, or La Cicciolina, the porn star, politician and former wife of Jeff Koons, walked the Cannes red carpet in a white satin … well, what would you call it? An evening version of Rudi Gernreich’s monokini, with breast-baring straps and a long white satin skirt. Madonna dropped her opera cape to reveal her Jean Paul Gaultier bullet bra and undies on the carpet in 1991, and in 2002 Cameron Diaz wore a sheer beaded gown and panties, starting a peekaboo trend that is still going strong.

Indeed, the dress as scrim, a transparent piece of nothing draped over bare skin or lingerie to suggest clothing without actually covering much of anything, is perhaps the most popular current form of naked dressing. It is more omnipresent than, say, the skirt slit up to here and the top cut down to there that has also been modeled by many on the red carpet. It provides the illusion of clothes while also teasing what is underneath.

It’s unclear from the wording of the Cannes dress code if the new policy applies only to literal nudity or to clothing that exposes body parts that might reasonably be termed “indecent.” According to Agnès Leroy, the head of press for the festival, the new rules were established to codify certain practices that have been long in effect. The aim, she said, “is not to regulate attire per se, but to prohibit full nudity — meaning the absence of clothing — on the red carpet, in accordance with the institutional framework of the event and French law.” (Even if French law allows toplessness on some beaches, a reality that may add to the confusion around the Cannes rules.)

Still, that leaves the dictum somewhat open to interpretation, given the general absence of fabric in many evening looks. One person’s vulgarity can be another person’s celebration, and who is to say who gets to police whose body?

Advertisement

(This is reminiscent of the time Melania Trump addressed critics of her naked photo shoots in her memoir, situating them in an artistic tradition that includes John Collier’s “Lady Godiva” and Michelangelo’s “David,” and noting that “we should honor our bodies and embrace the timeless tradition of using art as a powerful means of self-expression.”)

Perhaps the new code is simply calculated to prevent the sort of attention-grabbing stunt that occurred at the Grammys in February, when Ye, the rapper formerly known as Kanye West, crashed the red carpet with his wife, Bianca Censori, only to have her take off her fur coat to reveal her fully naked body “covered” by an entirely transparent nylon slip that provided no coverage at all. That seemed to have taken the trend to its ultimate, disturbing extreme by breaking the last barrier in naked dressing: genitalia.

Even though Ye had not actually been invited to the event, he and his wife dominated the headlines the next day more than the actual award ceremony.

The fact that the Cannes dress code also prohibits “voluminous outfits, in particular those with a large train, that hinder the proper flow of traffic of guests and complicate seating in the theater” suggests that what the organizers were really forestalling was the appearance of dresses that act as their own sort of performance art, grabbing eyeballs and dominating conversations that might otherwise be focused on the films that are the nominal point of the festival.

If that was the aim, however, it has somewhat backfired. By officially banning nudity on the carpet, the Cannes organizers simply sparked a raft of pieces (like this one) discussing nudity on the carpet. Most of them focus less on the actual meaning of the term in all its thorny nuance than the opportunity to revisit notorious nude-adjacent moments past.

Advertisement

You could have seen that one coming.

Continue Reading

Trending