Connect with us

Lifestyle

She Was a Candidate to Lead Levi’s. Then She Started Tweeting.

Published

on

Earlier than 2020, Jennifer Sey, a high govt at Levi Strauss & Firm and a number one candidate to be the corporate’s subsequent chief, barely used social media. Two years later, Ms. Sey was out of a job, partly, in her telling, due to her exercise on Twitter.

Ms. Sey’s uncommon exit final month from Levi’s after greater than 20 years generated a flurry of headlines, together with her claiming in a broadly circulated essay that her advocacy for varsity reopenings through the pandemic made her a pariah at work and finally led to her ouster.

However the highway to her departure was difficult. It touched on points like whether or not firms can management the private speech of their staff, notably in a interval of isolation, and the politics tied to talking on sure platforms, like Fox Information opinion reveals.

The overwhelming majority of Ms. Sey’s tweets had been about faculties, however a few of them criticized guidance from the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention and Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, whom she accused of fear mongering. (“So when is Fauci going to cease doing the morning reveals on Sunday, terrorizing the already fearful?” she tweeted in April 2021.)

She additionally expressed skepticism concerning the effectiveness of masking, largely for younger youngsters. (“At the moment there may be not sufficient proof for or in opposition to the usage of masks (medical or different) for wholesome people within the wider neighborhood,” she posted in Might 2020.)

Advertisement

Ms. Sey’s outspokenness drew criticism each inside and outdoors the corporate, together with threats of boycotts. The tweets got here when Levi’s was utilizing public well being steering to handle protocols throughout a whole lot of shops and in distribution facilities. However Ms. Sey stated she was talking as a involved mom, not a company govt. She additionally famous that Levi’s — which has been vocal about hot-button points like gun management — had not beforehand complained when she posted on social media in assist of Democratic politicians like Senator Elizabeth Warren or extra liberal causes.

Levi’s disputes Ms. Sey’s account of occasions, together with her claims that she was punished as a result of her views veered from “left-leaning orthodoxy” and that she walked away from a $1 million severance package deal with a purpose to have the opportunity converse freely concerning the firm. Levi’s stated Ms. Sey had stop fairly than negotiate an exit package deal, which might have contained a nondisclosure settlement. It “wouldn’t include a prohibition on the manager talking out about issues of public curiosity akin to faculty closures or on participating in any legally protected speech,” Kelly McGinnis, the senior vice chairman of company affairs at Levi’s, stated in a press release.

Ms. McGinnis stated that Levi’s supported Ms. Sey’s advocacy on faculties, however that she “went far past calling for faculties to reopen, and steadily used her platform to criticize public well being pointers and denounce elected officers and authorities scientists.”

She added that Ms. Sey “did this at a time in 2020 and 2021 when hospitalizations and deaths from Covid had been spiking, when the corporate had its personal staff hospitalized, and in some instances dying, and firms like Levi’s had been utilizing steering from public well being officers to implement insurance policies to maintain our staff and shoppers secure.”

The corporate’s social media coverage says that staff are free to debate their views however that it expects staff to guard the corporate’s “status and picture.”

Advertisement

Ms. Sey stated she didn’t assume that corporations like Levi’s wanted to endorse particular viewpoints from staff, however they need to “arise for an worker’s proper to speech on what they care about.”

Sarah Sobieraj, a professor of sociology at Tufts College, stated Ms. Sey’s scenario, together with her frustration with how colleagues interpreted her private views, was an instance of an more and more frequent phenomenon within the digital age generally known as “context collapse.”

“You used to have the ability to section who you might be — you may go to church and behave such as you did in church and go to work and behave such as you did at work, then out with associates and behave that manner,” she stated. Now, “no matter it’s we’re saying or posting, we’re posting in entrance of all of the folks in our lives.”

“That blurring is a part of the discomfort for Levi’s, and it’s a part of the difficulty that Jen Sey has confronted,” she added.

Ms. Sey, a former nationwide champion gymnast, was the chief advertising officer at Levi’s earlier than being promoted to model president in October 2020. She was often supplied as much as journalists for interviews, together with Chip Bergh, the corporate’s chief govt. A mom of 4 — two of her youngsters are faculty age whereas the opposite two are 5 and seven — Ms. Sey was effectively favored internally and was an govt sponsor of the corporate’s useful resource group for Black staff.

Advertisement

When the pandemic began, Ms. Sey was residing in San Francisco, the place Levi’s has its headquarters. She grew nervous about how younger youngsters like hers is likely to be harmed by public faculty closures. That was when she turned to Twitter, the place in a time of isolation she discovered different like-minded mother and father.

“I used to be used to being within the workplace and seeing a whole lot of individuals, and whereas it was work-focused, we’d chitchat within the hallways, ask about folks’s children and what’s happening of their lives,” Ms. Sey, 53, stated. “So this reference to different mother and father was significant for me. It might really feel in San Francisco that no person shared this view.”

She often posted about faculty closures, an particularly contentious situation within the metropolis, and was concerned with rallies about reopening them. She stated she had taken care to symbolize herself as a mom and a non-public citizen, leaving Levi’s, which is publicly traded, out of her public profiles.

Advertisement

“I do know it was straightforward to seek out,” she stated of her position with Levi’s, “however I used to be in truth talking for myself.”

Ms. Sey, whose commentary got here earlier than vaccines had been launched and when lecturers’ unions opposed returns, stated that she had been “inspired to tone it down” by a board member and different leaders on the firm, however that she had by no means been informed to cease posting or supplied any company social media pointers.

Final spring, Ms. Sey was requested to seem on Laura Ingraham’s present on Fox Information to speak about her choice to maneuver to Denver in order that her youngsters might expertise in-person education. Whereas she was not recognized as a Levi’s govt, the looks prompted an outcry on the firm. Round that point, Ms. Sey additionally did a YouTube interview with Naomi Wolf, who has been barred from Twitter for spreading vaccine misinformation.

Levi’s, like many corporations on the peak of the pandemic, held employees conferences each few weeks the place staff might ask questions anonymously. At a March 31 assembly, there have been questions on Ms. Sey’s look on Ms. Ingraham’s present.

In a message shared by Levi’s with The New York Occasions, one worker wrote: “I’d not have had an issue together with her showing on Fox Information however that isn’t what Ingraham Angle is. It’s Fox opinion and he or she is an particularly divisive and bigoted character who often assaults the very causes that Chip and the corporate champion.”

Advertisement

Ms. Sey stated she had been hesitant about happening the present, however having did not get the eye of retailers like CNN, she appeared as a result of she “felt assured that I might get my message throughout and never be backed into something I didn’t need to say or agreeing with something that was maybe Covid denialism.”

“Simply because I don’t agree with all the things she says doesn’t imply I can’t have a dialog together with her,” Ms. Sey added, pointing to the present’s excessive viewership.

Whereas Ms. Sey caught to her message and he or she stated Mr. Bergh had internally defended her proper to talk on the subject as a mom, the corporate requested Ms. Sey to carry a separate assembly with staff.

“If you give an interview to somebody who’s forged doubt on vaccines, you actually do lend some type of legitimacy to that individual and people views,” stated Kara S. Alaimo, a professor of public relations at Hofstra College, referring to Ms. Ingraham. “I can perceive why folks would have been upset about it, and if I used to be advising her, I don’t assume these platforms had been the suitable ones for sharing her views.”

Ms. Sey stated she had deleted some posts after receiving pushback on matters that may have an effect on Levi’s enterprise, together with one which was considered internally as shaming plus-size prospects for poor Covid well being outcomes. She was additionally requested by Levi’s to chorus from tweeting about matters like pharmaceutical corporations and the California governor recall.

Advertisement

Ms. Sey stated she unfairly confronted criticism for tweets from her husband, who was outspoken on social media about his opposition to vaccines and masks, posting comments like: “Covid masks are obedience coaching and Covid vaccines are loyalty oaths.”

“Present me a married couple that agrees on all the things and I’ll present you a unicorn,” stated Ms. Sey, who did reply to a few of her husband’s posts at instances. “Can we need to reside in a world the place the opinions of relations decide your employment choices?”

Ms. Sey stated her views on faculties made her a goal. “The concept of pushing for varsity openings bought conflated with being anti-science and a Covid denier, and I’d say neither of these issues are true,” she stated. “I take situation with this concept that you just can not criticize public well being pointers, as a result of so a lot of them have confirmed to be deeply flawed.”

Final October, Ms. Sey met with Mr. Bergh. She stated he had requested for approval to conduct a background verify on her, a routine step for these being vetted as potential C.E.O.s. She was informed that her social media conduct was the one factor holding her candidacy again and that Levi’s needed to overview it.

In January, Mr. Bergh stated her Twitter presence was “too problematic so that you can maintain this position of C.E.O., and there’s not a viable path ahead for you on the firm,” Ms. Sey stated. Whereas Levi’s requested her to remain till it discovered her alternative, she stated, she was not and stop.

Advertisement

Ms. Sey has argued that she was topic to “viewpoint discrimination” by Levi’s. She stated she had beforehand posted on social media in assist of Senator Warren within the Democratic presidential primaries and about her unhappiness over the murders of Ahmaud Arbery and George Floyd in 2020. The corporate had “not been against political speech or criticism of presidency insurance policies and even weighing in on candidates” in these cases, she stated.

Certainly, that has difficult the circumstances of Ms. Sey’s departure, in line with public relations consultants. Whereas corporations and company leaders have lengthy tried to keep away from wading into political debates, the heightened divides of this period have prompted Levi’s and another manufacturers to be extra outspoken on public points, together with L.G.B.T.Q. rights and immigration.

“A non-public employer can impose restrictions on staff’ speech or conduct,” Ms. Sobieraj stated. “The important thing situation right here is the place that boundary lies and what about if you’re not working.”

Each Ms. Alaimo and Ms. Sobieraj famous that at the least a few of the criticism that Ms. Sey confronted, together with from former gymnasts who nonetheless comply with Ms. Sey’s profession, might have appeared outsized to Levi’s as a result of ladies are inclined to face extra vitriol and harassment on-line.

Ms. Alaimo stated that “corporations must be extra clear about what their insurance policies are.” She added: “Since 2016, we’ve seen corporations begin to take much more stances on political and social points, and we’ve seen loads of staff converse out once they disagree with them.”

Advertisement

As for Ms. Sey, she is completed with working within the retail business and company America, she stated. She felt vindicated final month when three members of San Francisco’s Board of Training had been voted out. She stays energetic on Twitter and is engaged on a memoir “that’s centered on utilizing your voice and talking up with integrity and doing it as a girl in company America.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Lifestyle

In 'Kinds of Kindness,' the cruelty is the point : Pop Culture Happy Hour

Published

on

In 'Kinds of Kindness,' the cruelty is the point : Pop Culture Happy Hour
Kinds of Kindness is a surprisingly weird, dark, and bleak film. It’s directed by Yorgos Lanthimos (Poor Things) and it reteams him with Emma Stone and Willem Dafoe, along with Jesse Plemons. Each actor plays different characters in three different stories — which all involve someone going to extreme measures to regain something they’ve lost.
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

57 California native plants that survived the Ice Age to live on today

Published

on

57 California native plants that survived the Ice Age to live on today

At the La Brea Tar Pits and Museum, Jessie George and other paleobotanists — the folks who study ancient plants the way paleontologists study prehistoric bones — are compiling a list of California native plants that survived the Ice Age and the region’s first huge climate change and are still alive today.

The researchers believe we have much to learn from these resilient plants that adapted after millennia of severe temperature change, drought and wildfire that changed Southern California from moist and cool woodlands to the dry, shrubby chaparral landscape we see today.

Maybe, they say, these hardy plants can help our urban landscapes weather our current climate change.

Note that not all these survivors would be happy living near the Tar Pits today, and those are marked with an asterisk (*). Most pines, for instance, prefer wetter, cooler parts of the state, like the Central Coast, George said, and would not fare well in Southern California’s hot, dry climate.

Advertisement

If you have a question about whether a native plant would work well in your area, talk to the experts at places like the Tree of Life Nursery and Theodore Payne Foundation, or consult the California Native Plant Society’s handy native plant database at Calscape.

For more on these Ice Age survivors, read our July 1 L.A. Times Plants newsletter.

Trees/tall shrubs

  • Monterey cypress (Hesperocyparis macrocarpa)
  • Cypress (Hesperocyparis sp.)*
  • California juniper (Juniperus californica)
  • Rocky Mountain juniper (Juniperus scopulorum)*
  • Bishop pine (Pinus muricata)*
  • Monterey pine (Pinus radiata)*
  • Pine (Pinus sp.)*
  • Torrey pine (Pinus torreyana)*
  • Blue elderberry (Sambucus mexicana)
  • American dogwood (Cornus sericea)*
  • Eastwood manzanita (Arctostaphylos cf. glandulosa)
  • Big berry manzanita (Arctostaphylos glauca)
  • Coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia)
  • Scrub oak (Quercus dumosa)
  • Southern California black walnut (Juglans californica)
  • California sycamore (Platanus racemosa)
  • Box elder (Acer negundo)
  • Willow (Salix sp.)

Grasses/rushes

  • Sedge (Carex sp.)
  • Spikerush (Eleocharis sp.)
  • Fimbry (Fimbristylis sp.)
  • Barley (Hordeum sp.)

Shrubs/vines

  • Big saltbush (Atriplex lentiformis)
  • Poison oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum)
  • Baccharis (Baccharis sp.)
  • Ceanothus (Ceanothus sp.)
  • Chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum)
  • Toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia)
  • California blackberry (Rubus ursinus)
  • Grape (Vitis sp.)
  • Parish’s purple nightshade (Solanum parishii)

Perennial herbs

  • Bur-reed (Sparganium eurycarpum)
  • Water parsley (Oenanthe sarmentosa)*
  • Ragweed (Ambrosia psilostachya)
  • Deltoid balsam root (Balsamorhiza deltoidea)*
  • Thistle (Cirsium sp.)
  • Aster (Symphyotrichum sp.)
  • Blue-eyed grass (Sisyrinchium bellum)
  • Willow dock (Rumex salicifolius)
  • White water buttercup (Ranunculus aquatilis)*
  • Three-petaled bedstraw (Galium trifidum)*

Annual herbs

  • Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)
  • Common madia (Madia elegans)
  • Clustered tarweed (Deinandra fasciculata)
  • Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium)
  • False rosinweed (Osmadenia tenella)
  • Fiddleneck (Amsinckia sp.)
  • Phacelia (Phacelia sp.)
  • Carolina geranium (Geranium carolinianum)
  • Parry’s mallow (Eremalche parryi)
  • Red maids (Calandrinia menziesii)
  • Miner’s lettuce (Claytonia perfoliata)
  • Water montia (Montia fontana)
  • Little spring beauty (Claytonia exigua)*
  • California poppy (Eschscholzia californica)
  • Purple owl’s clover (Castilleja exserta)
  • Nuttall’s snapdragon (Antirrhinum nuttallianum)
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

What does 'The Bear' restaurant review say? We take our best guess

Published

on

What does 'The Bear' restaurant review say? We take our best guess

Jeremy Allen White as Carmy Berzatto.

FX


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

FX

Haven’t watched the season finale of The Bear yet? Then you probably don’t want to read this. Don’t blame us for spoilers. 

So what does that review say?

At the end of the third season of The Bear, Carmy (Jeremy Allen White) looks at his phone late one night and sees a review of his new restaurant, The Bear, in the Chicago Tribune. All we see are flashes of words and phrases, some seemingly good and some seemingly bad, and then Carmy says, “mother——,” and that’s the season.

Advertisement

And look: The idea is to leave you uncertain about what the review says, and to be clear, the review could say a lot of things. Trying to decode the words we can see and come up with an idea of whether this is a good or a bad review is rank speculation. Rank, I say! So let’s speculate.

I’m really not excited to reveal how long I spent doing this, but what I am about to show you is the best rendering I can manage of the words (and parts of words) that they show in this little sequence. I present them in the form of a poem, since I can’t offer you screenshots. (These groups of words, of course, are undoubtedly not in this order in the actual review. And yes, I think this is a show that’s probably playing fair; I think these probably are all consistent with the actual review that we will eventually learn much more about.)

of flavors both d
the confusing mis
any apprehension

an almost sloppy fas
f innovative d
nu was a testa
complex array
, as each dish arrived, there
were excellent, sho
rt, leaving me fee

focus on pushing
true culinary gem
my experience at

Advertisement

tto, offering a
palpable dissonance b
ng the chef’s brilliant cr
disappointed and craving
Feeling disapp

and downs, t
inconsistent
as resting on

undeniable inco
of delicious pe
tchen couldn’t

e. However,
was simple an
s the potential

Berzatto p

Advertisement

s not subtract f

felt overdone

incredible
Carmen Berzatto

re tired a

t stale a
talent

Advertisement

Clear as day, right?

For my money, the most interesting phrase comes from the screen that highlights the word “delicious.” Below that, you can see “tchen couldn’t.” My guess is that the full review uses the words “kitchen couldn’t.” And I’m going to further guess that “undeniable inco” is part of something like “undeniable inconsistency” or “undeniable incompleteness” — in other words, something negative. And in the middle, the word “delicious.”

So: what if the review is basically saying that there is an inconsistency in the operation because the kitchen isn’t doing a solid enough job?

That would also fit with this bit right here:

tto, offering a
palpable dissonance b
ng the chef’s brilliant cr
disappointed and craving
Feeling disapp

Advertisement

Now, the “tto” is probably the end of Carmy’s name (although I suppose a word like “risotto” is possible). But right in the middle, you have “the chef’s brilliant cr,” which might be “the chef’s brilliant creations” or “the chef’s brilliant creativity” or something like that. And before that, you have “dissonance.” And after it, “disappointed.” Again, what if this is saying Carmy is a brilliant genius, but something is amiss in the staffing and the execution?

Could this also be what “an almost sloppy fas” is about? What if that says the dining room — Richie’s beloved dining room — operates in an almost sloppy fashion? It also occurred to me that it could be a reference to The Beef, that The Beef was “almost sloppy fast food” or something. Or perhaps Neil Fak is a little too sloppy for this reviewer’s refined tastes.

Here’s another interesting part:

f innovative d
nu was a testa
complex array

That middle line should be “menu was a testament,” right? The menu is a testament to something? Probably Carmy’s brilliance? The changing menu he’s been obsessed with? And that would fit with “f innovative d,” which could be, say, “of innovative dishes.”

Advertisement

A prediction

Go back and read it all, like a poem, all together, and let it wash over you. Here’s what I think the review might say: Carmy is an amazing chef, full of potential, creative and amazing. But the rest of the team is not living up to his great ideas. In other words, I think the review says everybody else at The Bear needs to get on Carmy’s level.

If it says that, then that would explain why, after reading a review that (probably) calls him “brilliant,” he swears angrily. It would also complicate his obsession with his own standards to see the system he insisted on (the changing menu especially) wind up making him look good, but interfering so much with how the place runs that other people look bad.

Advertisement

I want to stress that if this is all completely and totally wrong, it will be no surprise. The whole thing could be a misdirect, every word could be misleading — “the chef” might not be Carmy, “nu” could be “Keanu” instead of “menu,” you get the idea.

But to me, it would be consistent with this season if Carmy had the most pyrrhic of pyrrhic victories, and this review gave him what he wanted at the expense of the people he works with.

Continue Reading

Trending