Connect with us

News

Students and civil rights groups blast police response to campus protests

Published

on

Students and civil rights groups blast police response to campus protests

Police face off with pro-Palestinian students after dismantling part of the encampment barricade on the campus of the University of California, Los Angeles, early on May 2.

Etienne Laurent/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Etienne Laurent/AFP via Getty Images


Police face off with pro-Palestinian students after dismantling part of the encampment barricade on the campus of the University of California, Los Angeles, early on May 2.

Etienne Laurent/AFP via Getty Images

A broken ankle.

Concussions.

Advertisement

Tasered.

Pepper sprayed.

These are some of the claims of injuries stemming from police conduct — and inaction — from students and university faculty involved in pro-Palestinian demonstrations on university campuses in New York and Los Angeles.

Aidan Doyle, a 21-year-old junior at the University of California, Los Angeles, told NPR that the slow response from police, decisions made by university officials and the violence from counterprotesters would be things he’s unlikely to ever forget.

“The treatment of the protesters by the cops was horrible and unforgivable. But it was nothing compared to what the counterprotesters did assaulting 80, 90, 100 of us,” said Doyle, a member of the school’s pro-Palestinian encampment.

Advertisement

The students, like Doyle, and some faculty at universities across the country have spent the past few months protesting for Palestinian freedom. They’ve called on their universities to divest from companies that have businesses or investments in Israel because of the country’s military operation in Gaza.

These demonstrations have ramped up in recent weeks as students began erecting encampments on their school campuses, even taking over a school building to bring awareness to their cause.

University and police officials repeatedly demanded students disperse and take down their encampments, but protesters refused, arguing a right to free speech, and maintained that their demonstrations were peaceful. Some protesters at demonstrations, including at the University of California, Los Angeles, fought with counterprotesters.

Students and faculty, alumni, civil rights groups and some politicians allege that universities endangered public safety by calling in police in response to the protesters’ refusal to disperse. Some have said law enforcement used excessive, military-like force in their effort to clear some of the biggest student-run pro-Palestinian demonstrations and encampments in New York City and Los Angeles.

Days after police broke up the encampment and takeover of Columbia University’s Hamilton Hall, the New York City Police Department admitted that an officer accidentally fired his gun while inside the building. No one was hit by the bullet in that incident.

Advertisement

Isabelle Leyva, a senior organizer with the New York Civil Liberties Union, described “a consistent pattern of NYPD escalation at pro-Palestine protests” over the past few months. The organization is an affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union.

The NYPD has responded to more than 2,400 protests and demonstrations since Oct. 7, and nearly half of them were related to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, Police Commissioner Edward Caban said during a press conference last week.

“And every one, we’ve worked to keep protesters safe and protect their First Amendment rights,” he said.

But Leyva said that last week’s protests in New York City were unlike anything she’s seen before. She worked with several monitors, including students, that observed the demonstrations at Columbia University and The City College of the City University of New York where police were called in to disperse student encampments on April 30.

Advertisement

“We saw, in my personal experience, the largest deployment of the NYPD that I’ve ever seen at a protest,” Leyva said. She saw violence during the arrests of people outside of campus that were protesting during the NYPD’s raid on Columbia’s Hamilton Hall.

In Los Angeles, students at UCLA reported being struck by rubber bullets fired by a massive police response to the demonstration at the school while also witnessing officers reportedly delaying their response as counterprotesters rained sticks, fists and rocks onto their encampment.

More than 2,100 people have been arrested on college campuses across the country over the previous two weeks on universities across the U.S, according to a tally from the Associated Press.

On Monday, tense interactions between protesters and police were still being reported. Columbia leadership requested a police presence through May 17, until commencement activities for the school were over.

Advertisement

UCLA’s chapter of the Students for Justice in Palestine reported more than 45 students, other members of the university, members of the press and lawyers were arrested at 6 a.m. Monday by the members of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department and the Los Angeles Police Department. At the time, UCLA SJP said, no students were protesting. The group also alleges that police kept these students on the ground in handcuffs for hours.

In New York protests, police used a controversial specialty unit

Russ Hicks, a longtime police academy trainer in Washington state, told NPR’s Martin Kaste that to have a larger response from law enforcement is safer, both for officers and for the protesters.

“What you don’t want is a handful of five officers managing a large crowd because that’s when things get out of control,” Hicks said. Officers may end up “using too much force because they don’t have enough people,” he said.

But Molly Biklen, the NYCLU’s associate legal director, argues that police arriving in such large numbers, as was the case at Columbia and City College, “often leads to escalation rather than de-escalation.”

The NYPD’s controversial Strategic Response Group (SRG) was brought in to break up the student encampments on the night of April 30. The SRG “responds to citywide mobilizations, civil disorders, and major events with highly trained personnel and specialized equipment,” according to the NYPD’s website.

Advertisement

The NYCLU has long called for the dissolution of the SRG, saying it is “a violent, overfunded, and unaccountable unit of the NYPD notorious for its abuse of protesters, particularly those standing up for racial justice.” The SRG has also drawn condemnation from Human Rights Watch.

The NYCLU filed a lawsuit over alleged aggressive over-policing from the NYPD during Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. Last September, a settlement was reached that mandates the NYPD will only be allowed to deploy the SRG under certain conditions. Not all provisions have been fully implemented, Biklen said.

The New York Police Benevolent Association, the police union, said it intends to appeal the settlement, calling it “misguided” and dangerous to the lives of frontline officers.

Biklen said other universities have responded “with dialogue” and in other ways.

“There’s a number of ways to respond,” Biklen said, “that just don’t involve throwing hundreds of cops at problems. That has been a way in which society has tried to respond to every single problem that we have in a city. And, I think we’ve seen that that is not the answer.”

Advertisement

Officials claim some protesters weren’t students and that they threatened safety

Pro-Palestinian supporters confront police during demonstrations at The City College of New York as the NYPD cracks down on protest camps at both Columbia University and CCNY on April 30, in New York City.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Advertisement


Pro-Palestinian supporters confront police during demonstrations at The City College of New York as the NYPD cracks down on protest camps at both Columbia University and CCNY on April 30, in New York City.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Police in New York City and the Mayor Eric Adams have repeatedly said that about half of the people arrested at Columbia and City College are not currently affiliated with either school — allegations the schools are repeating.

City officials said 29% of the 112 people arrested at a protest at Columbia last week were not affiliated with the school. At the City College protest, 60% of the 170 arrested were not affiliated with the school, according to the city’s press release.

The NYPD has not directly responded to NPR’s repeated requests to get clarification on how the department and Adams have made that determination.

Advertisement

Police said school officials have said they made the decision to call in extra security measures in response to “violence and vandalism” — not because the students were holding peaceful protests.

Since October, “there has been a pattern of demonizing protesters specifically that are protesting in support of Palestinian Liberation,” said the NYCLU’s Leyva. “When we start to paint protesters as outside agitators, as terrorists, as people who want to harm the city, etc. in the public’s mind, that allows people to justify mass police presence, including police violence and mass arrests.”

NPR has submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for police body camera footage from law enforcement agencies in New York and Los Angeles.

In response to the encampment at UCLA, officers from multiple units arrived including the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the California Highway Patrol, the Los Angeles Police Department, and the UCLA Police Department.

“The Sheriff’s Department is committed to protecting people’s constitutional rights and their right to exercise free speech,” the agency said in a statement to NPR on Monday. “However, when actions turn violent and cross the line into criminal misconduct the Department will intervene and enforce the laws appropriately. We encourage the public to protest peacefully and listen to law enforcement instructions.”

Advertisement

The California Highway Patrol confirmed to NPR that officers responding to the demonstrations “utilized aerial distraction devices” that didn’t come into physical contact with anyone. When certain demonstrators threatened officers by throwing objects and weapons, the CHP said “sponge rounds and bean bag rounds were used on a limited basis in response. The CHP did not deploy any chemical agents during this incident.”

The LAPD referred NPR to UCLA police, which didn’t respond to a request for comment.

A student says he will never forget what happened at UCLA

Police face off with pro-Palestinian students after dismantling part of the encampment barricade on the UCLA campus in Los Angeles early on May 2.

Etienne Laurent/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Etienne Laurent/AFP via Getty Images


Police face off with pro-Palestinian students after dismantling part of the encampment barricade on the UCLA campus in Los Angeles early on May 2.

Etienne Laurent/AFP via Getty Images

A large number of police arrived at schools in New York City and Los Angeles, dressed in riot gear, some holding shields and batons.

Advertisement

Graphic videos and images have emerged of violent clashes on the night of April 30 and May 1 between pro-Palestinian student demonstrators and counterprotesters on the UCLA campus. Videos on social media showed law enforcement standing off to the side during the fighting and shooting rubber bullets into the melee.

Doyle, the UCLA junior, said he joined the encampment on the school’s Royce Quad the week before arrests were made calling it peaceful.

He allowed NPR to use videos he shared of his experience at the encampment on Instagram.

On Sunday, April 28, a pro-Israeli rally started near the encampment. Nothing violent happened, but tension was brewing, Doyle said. Pressure continued to mount when on Tuesday, April 30, things erupted. That’s when a large group of counterprotesters surrounded the encampment, hurling fireworks, sticks and other items.

Doyle said he was hit in the face with a rock and a plastic traffic cone.

Advertisement

Counterprotesters continued to attack the encampment throughout the night, including hitting students with pepper spray and other chemicals, he said.

“I saw a girl probably 20 years old, being struck in the face by men who are counterprotesting. It was one of the most disturbing things I’ve ever seen,” Doyle said.

Advertisement

At around 2 a.m., Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass tweeted that LAPD officers were responding to the violence and said that the “violence unfolding this evening at UCLA is absolutely abhorrent and inexcusable.”

Police arrived at around midnight or 1 a.m., from Doyle’s recollection.

“We watched as they lined up on the hill alongside the counterprotesters, and they stood there and did nothing,” he said.

The LAPD confirmed that its officers, along with other state and local law enforcement agencies responded.

“Once mutual aid resources were formed and coordinated, they separated the two groups. No arrest were made, no force was used, and no officers were injured,” the LAPD wrote on X.

Advertisement

A California Highway Patrol (CHP) officer fires a flash-bang while clearing a pro-Palestinian encampment after dispersal orders were given at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) campus, on May 2, 2024 in Los Angeles, California.

Mario Tama/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Advertisement


A California Highway Patrol (CHP) officer fires a flash-bang while clearing a pro-Palestinian encampment after dispersal orders were given at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) campus, on May 2, 2024 in Los Angeles, California.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Students, including Doyle, returned to the encampment the next night, on May 1, despite the attacks from the night before.

That’s when more than 200 pro-Palestinian protesters were surrounded by Los Angeles police and were arrested. LAPD Chief Dominic Choi said 210 arrests were made by the UCLA Police Department for failure to disperse and that he was “thankful there were no serious injuries to officers or protestors.”

But the UCLA Palestine Solidarity Encampment said police “tore students from our human chain and shot rubber bullets at close range. Many were rushed to the ER after the bullets connected with heads and hands.”

Advertisement

Doyle said he and hundreds of other protesters were handcuffed and bundled into buses where they stayed for hours before getting to the police station.

“We were in the bus for something like 4 1/2 hours,” he said. One of his fellow demonstrators requested a trip to the bathroom, which was ignored, Doyle said. Eventually, Doyle said, that person defecated on himself.

UCLA Chancellor Gene Block issued a statement defending the decision to call in law enforcement.

“Several days of violent clashes between demonstrators and counter-demonstrators put too many Bruins in harm’s way and created an environment that was completely unsafe for learning,” Block wrote. “In the end, the encampment on Royce Quad was both unlawful and a breach of policy. It led to unsafe conditions on our campus and it damaged our ability to carry out our mission.”

Block has said the attack on the encampment from counterprotesters will be investigated and “may lead to arrests, expulsions and dismissals.”

Advertisement

City College violence was “more aggressive” than Columbia’s, civil rights group says

Police arrest protesters during pro-Palestinian demonstrations at The City College Of New York as the NYPD cracks down on protest camps at both Columbia University and CCNY on April 30, in New York City.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Advertisement


Police arrest protesters during pro-Palestinian demonstrations at The City College Of New York as the NYPD cracks down on protest camps at both Columbia University and CCNY on April 30, in New York City.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

The images that emerged from the NYPD’s response at Ivy League Columbia University were striking.

As media attention was trained on Columbia, students at City College faced violence “even more aggressive than what we saw outside of Columbia,” Leyva said.

This kind of response is even more striking and layered because City College has more students of color “who are already impacted disproportionately by policing and police violence,” Leyva said.

Advertisement

NYCLU’s protest monitors saw pepper spray and tasers being deployed, students being beaten and sustaining injuries, she said. Arrests continued well into the early hours at City College.

“Around campus is where we documented the bulk of the violence. So that was six or seven police on top of one person for arrest, pushing people onto the sidewalk, using barricades that were lifted and then arresting those people on the sidewalk, despite the fact that the orders to avoid arrest was to go onto the sidewalk,” Leyva said. “This was all in an effort to keep people as far away from campus and being able to see what was going on.”

In a recent statement, the CUNY Gaza Solidarity Encampment said, “We reject the claim that there was violence against any officer from a member of the encampment or a supporter since their injuries were a consequence of their own pepper spray,”

Corinna Mullin, an adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at John Jay College, said the police raid on the City College encampment “was a horrifying experience.” Mullin supported the students’ cause and stood alongside other faculty members. She spoke last week at a press conference organized by student protesters.

“We were surrounded on all sides by hundreds of police officers. It felt like a military invasion. It was terrifying — terrifying. I’ve never experienced anything like it before. There was an unnecessary and excessive use of force,” Mullin said.

Advertisement

She detailed witnessing police batons pressed against protesters’ necks and chests. Once in jail, people were left standing, denied water and access to a bathroom for hours, she said. She also witnessed a Muslim woman’s hijab being removed from her head.

News

Exxon prevails over dissident shareholders in board battle

Published

on

Exxon prevails over dissident shareholders in board battle

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

ExxonMobil easily rebuffed an attempted shareholder revolt against its board of directors sparked by the supermajor’s decision to sue two climate-focused investors.

Investors in the biggest US oil company voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday to re-elect all 12 members of the company’s board despite a campaign against two directors — chief executive Darren Woods and lead independent director Jay Hooley — in protest over its lawsuit against activists.

Shareholders voted 95 per cent in favour of the company’s slate of directors, down marginally from 96 per cent last year. The lowest support for an individual director was 87 per cent, versus 91 per cent last year, according to a preliminary tally of votes at the company’s annual meeting.

Advertisement

“Today our investors sent a powerful message that rules and value-creation matter,” Exxon said in a statement following the results. “We expect the activist crowd will try and claim victory on today’s vote, but common sense should tell you otherwise in light of the large margin of the loss.”

Wall Street had been closely monitoring the outcome of the meeting after a number of large shareholders pledged to lodge protest votes. The backlash followed Exxon’s decision to sue US investment adviser Arjuna Capital and Dutch shareholder group Follow This, after they introduced a resolution demanding the company do more to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

The groups have since withdrawn their resolution but Exxon has persisted with its lawsuit. A judge last week threw out the case against Follow This on jurisdiction grounds but allowed the case against Arjuna to proceed.

The lawsuit has sparked fears in the financial community of a broader attack on shareholder rights in the US, with critics warning it will have a chilling effect on the willingness of small investors to file motions.

Calpers, the biggest US public pension plan, voted against the re-election of all Exxon directors in protest over what it called a “reckless” legal action to “silence” shareholder voices. Norway’s $1.5tn sovereign wealth fund said it would vote against the re-election of Hooley.

Advertisement

Exxon’s lawsuit stems in part from a change at the Securities and Exchange Commission to allow more environmental, social and governance motions to proceed to shareholder votes. The agency has become less inclined to use its powers to halt shareholder proposals that companies argue are frivolous or micromanage their day-to-day affairs. Exxon argues that the SEC has allowed too many burdensome proposals on to the ballot, leaving it with no option but to turn to the courts.

Continue Reading

News

3 Black passengers sue American Airlines after alleging racial discrimination following odor complaint

Published

on

3 Black passengers sue American Airlines after alleging racial discrimination following odor complaint

Three passengers are suing American Airlines after alleging employees from the company removed a total of eight Black men from a flight due to a complaint about a passenger with body odor. 

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, claims that as American Airlines Flight 832 from Phoenix to New York was boarding in January, American Airlines employees removed eight Black men from the plane allegedly over a complaint about “offensive body odor.”

Video central to the lawsuit displayed a group of Black men who were not traveling together and did not know each other being removed from the flight. According to the suit, they were the only Black passengers on the flight.

Emmanuel Jean Joseph, Alvin Jackson and Xavier Veal — the three plaintiffs— were on a connecting flight from Los Angeles. The three allege that at no point throughout the other flight did any employee from American Airlines say anything to them about an offensive odor.

Jean Joseph told CBS News senior transportation correspondent Kris Van Cleave that as he gathered his belongings and walked to the jet bridge, he noticed that only Black men were being removed from the flight. 

Advertisement

“I started freaking out,” Xavier Veal said. He decided to record the incident on his phone.

The lawsuit claims that the men were held in the jetway for about an hour and then moved to the gate area where they were told they would be rebooked on another flight to New York later that day. The lawsuit alleges that an American Airlines employee indicated that the complaint about body odor came from a “white male flight attendant.”

A gate agent seen in the video at one point seemed to agree that race was a factor in the decision to remove the men from the flight.

When another flight to New York could not be found, the men were put back on the same plane. Jackson described the experience as uncomfortable, saying, “Everybody staring at me, me and all the other Black people on the plane were just taken off.” 

“I knew that as soon as I got on that plane, a sea of White faces were going to be looking at me and blaming me for their late flight of an hour,” said Jean Joseph.

Advertisement

The lawyer representing the three men, Sue Huhta, said that American Airlines declined to provide her clients any answers about the incident and said it seems “fairly apparent that race was part of this dynamic.” 

“It’s almost inconceivable to come up with an explanation for that other than the color of their skin, particularly since they didn’t know each other and weren’t sitting near each other,” said Huhta.

The lawsuit also cites other recent incidents where passengers have alleged discrimination by American Airlines and references a 2017 NAACP travel advisory urging members not to fly on the airline, which was lifted eight months later.

CBS Legal Analyst Rikki Klieman said the lawsuit suggests that the plaintiffs might be more interested in making a public statement about racial discrimination than in financial compensation. Klieman believes the question at trial is about American Airlines’ protocols and how it handled the employees after the incident.

But Veal said it is his belief that if it had been a White person, the situation probably wouldn’t have happened. 

Advertisement

“We were discriminated against. The entire situation was racist,” he said.

In a statement to CBS News, American Airlines said, “We take all claims of discrimination very seriously and want our customers to have a positive experience when they choose to fly with us. Our teams are currently investigating the matter, as the claims do not reflect our core values or our purpose of caring for people.”

Continue Reading

News

Czech billionaire Daniel Křetínský agrees to buy Royal Mail owner in £5.2bn deal

Published

on

Czech billionaire Daniel Křetínský agrees to buy Royal Mail owner in £5.2bn deal

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Czech billionaire Daniel Křetínský has reached an agreement to buy the owner of Royal Mail in a deal valuing the group at £5.2bn, as he pledged to revive the fortunes of the former UK postal monopoly away from the glare of public markets.

Křetínský’s EP Group said on Wednesday it had agreed a takeover price of 370 pence per share for London-listed International Distribution Services, which owns Royal Mail and the international parcel business GLS, setting the path for intense political scrutiny of the proposal during a UK election year.

EP Group and IDS have spent the past few weeks hammering out the details of a deal for the former state-owned postal group, which since privatisation has been beset by strikes and growing competition from the likes of Amazon.

Advertisement

The move to place the 508-year-old postal service under foreign ownership comes with various commitments, including keeping its UK headquarters, recognising the postal workers’ union and maintaining Royal Mail’s obligation to deliver mail everywhere in the UK at the same cost. But these commitments have been made for just five years, with the Labour party and the union already vowing to protect the future of the group.

Jonathan Reynolds, shadow business secretary, said the Labour party, which is expected to win the general election on July 4, would “take the necessary steps to safeguard [Royal Mail’s] undeniable identity and place in public life”, adding that “Labour in government will ensure [EP Group’s commitments] are adhered to”.

Daniel Křetínský has pledged to revive Royal Mail’s fortunes © David W Cerny/Reuters

Dave Ward, general secretary of the Communication Workers Union, said: “We do welcome some of the commitments that have been made but the reality is postal workers across the UK have lost all faith in the senior management of Royal Mail and the service has been deliberately run down.”

He said the CWU would be “engaging with the Labour party and other stakeholders to call for a new model of ownership for Royal Mail where our members and customers have a direct say in key decisions”, adding that “this situation is a direct result of a failed and ideological privatisation over a decade ago”.

Jeremy Hunt, chancellor, previously said a bid for Royal Mail would be subject to “normal” scrutiny on national security grounds, but added that international investment in British companies was generally welcomed.

Advertisement

Křetínský, a lawyer-turned-energy tycoon, is already the largest shareholder in IDS with a 27.5 per cent stake. His IDS takeover bid marks his latest UK dealmaking spree, after he acquired stakes in supermarket chain J Sainsbury and English Premier League football club West Ham United.

Křetínský said that “IDS’s market is evolving quickly, and it must accelerate its transformation and investments into modernisation to keep up with the competition”.

EP Group’s offer follows years of losses and failures to hit performance targets at Royal Mail, which have seen IDS’s shares drop from more than 550p in 2018 to just 213p before the company’s first bid was announced in April.

While being required to meet Royal Mail’s historic obligation to deliver everywhere in the UK at the same cost, EP Group would face the challenge of declining demand for letters and growing competition for parcel deliveries.

Previous attempts by IDS to overhaul the business in response to that competition have been strongly opposed by postal workers, who walked out for 18 days in 2022 over plans to bring working practices closer in line with more modern rivals.

Advertisement
Line chart of Share price, pence showing IDS shares fail to reach offer price

Shares in IDS rose 3 per cent on Wednesday morning to 330 pence, significantly below the offer price, suggesting doubts over whether the deal will pass.

One top IDS shareholder said he was “disappointed” by the offer price, but warned that “if the deal doesn’t go through, you are stuck with a management team that didn’t want the company to remain public and no longer seem to believe there is much value”.

Analysts have previously suggested that a takeover of IDS could lead to a break-up of Royal Mail and the more profitable GLS, a move strongly opposed by the postal workers’ union. EP Group’s recommended offer, which includes restrictions on breaking up GLS from the broader IDS group for five years, comes just days after IDS said GLS had helped the group return to profit in the 12 months to March.

“The IDS board believes that the offer from EP is fair and reasonable given that there are uncertainties ahead and allows investors to realise value at a significant premium,” said IDS chair Keith Williams.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending