Connect with us

Fitness

Which Is Better: Counting Your Steps or Timing Your Workout?

Published

on

Which Is Better: Counting Your Steps or Timing Your Workout?

For years, federal physical activity guidelines have told Americans how much time they should spend moving each week: at least 150 minutes, or 75 minutes if workouts are particularly vigorous. But the popularity of wearable fitness devices has made many people obsessively track their step counts instead, often shooting for the goal of 10,000 per day (even though some studies suggest that number is arbitrary).

Is the length of your workout or your daily step count a better measure of wellness?

“Both are good metrics,” says Dr. Rikuta Hamaya, a preventive-medicine researcher at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston and lead author of the new study. But Hamaya and his colleagues wanted to know if one was better than the other, so they designed a head-to-head comparison.

The resulting study, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, is based on data from more than 14,000 U.S. women who were tracked for about a decade. When the study began, the women were all at least 62 years old and free of cardiovascular disease and cancer. They were asked to wear an activity monitor for a week, removing it only to sleep, shower, or swim. From those data, the researchers calculated how many steps people took per day, as well as how much time they spent doing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity like cycling, jogging, or walking quickly.

Read More: Why Walking Isn’t Enough When It Comes to Exercise

Advertisement

Among women in the study, the median number of daily steps was around 5,200, while the median physical-activity duration was about an hour per week. People who exercised more also tended to walk more, but the two measures weren’t perfectly synced. That’s in part because slower forms of walking, like puttering around the house, aren’t necessarily intense enough to register as moderate-to-vigorous activity on a fitness monitor, but still count toward the number of steps taken.

So which measure was better? Both were equally good: however they measured it, more movement equaled better health and longevity.

Over the years of follow-up, about 9% of women in the study died and 4% developed cardiovascular disease. Compared to the most sedentary members of the group, the most active women were significantly less likely—by 30% or even more—to experience either outcome, no matter how the researchers measured their activity. In the end, Hamaya says, there wasn’t a “material difference” between the two metrics, at least for the people in the study. 

But it’s important to note that the study focused solely on older, predominantly white U.S. women who were healthy when the research began, so it’s impossible to say if the same finding applies to all people. Younger adults, for example, may benefit more from vigorous activity, although more research is required to say for sure.

Still, the takeaway from the research is encouraging, Hamaya says, because it suggests that—at least for certain groups of people—there’s no single best way to assess fitness, and that people can shoot for whichever benchmark feels right to them. “If someone likes to count steps, go with it,” he says. “Or if someone likes to count [workout] time, that would be a good choice” too.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Fitness

Focused on Fitness | Ithaca College

Published

on

What: Bomber Fitness

Where: Needham, Massachusetts

An exercise science major at IC, Woodilla was working for a medical fitness facility in Boston when she was furloughed during the COVID pandemic. While looking for work, she came across PEX Health and Fitness, which provides a collaborative workspace for fitness and healthcare professionals, providing them with a facility and machines while covering the overhead costs. That gave her the idea (and provided the support necessary) to start Bomber Fitness, operating out of a three-story facility that she shares with other wellness practitioners.

Woodilla, who describes herself as “a guide helping clients up the mountain,” focuses her personal training on clients who have reached the end of their insurance-approved physical therapy. Many of these clients have a physical disability.

“Often, when someone recovering from an injury or dealing with a medical condition sees their results plateau in physical therapy, insurance will stop covering it,” she said. “But those individuals may have a disability that requires constant work, and they need a safe space where they can meet their fitness and wellness goals.”

Advertisement

Woodilla was inspired to work with that population after interning at Chapter 126 Sports & Fitness, an adaptive sports and fitness facility in Bristol, Connecticut, during her final semester at Ithaca.

“My time at Ithaca, both in the classroom and in my work in the Wellness Clinic, instilled a lot of great morals in me,” she said. “I believe everyone deserves of a place where they can explore their limits safely.”

No two health and wellness journeys are alike, so perhaps fittingly, no two journeys towards owning a gym or wellness center are the same either. But as these stories show, Ithaca alumni are making their mark in the fitness industry and ensuring their clients are living their best lives.

Continue Reading

Fitness

A few extra minutes of exercise and sleep may help you live a year longer

Published

on

A few extra minutes of exercise and sleep may help you live a year longer

Adding just a few minutes of exercise per day could impact a person’s life expectancy, a new study has found.

Combined with an extra 24 minutes of sleep and small improvements to diet quality, those daily changes could add up to several additional years of life. 

The research is one of two studies published this week that examine how small adjustments to day-to-day movement, sleep and diet are associated with substantial health improvements.

Sleep, physical activity and diet study

The study, published in eClinicalMedicine, followed up a group of people eight years after they signed up for UK Biobank, a massive project that collected data on demographics, health and lifestyle in the early 2000s.

The team of researchers, led by Nicholas Koemel of the University of Sydney, fitted 59,078 people with trackers to monitor their exercise and sleep patterns for a week.

Advertisement

They also rated the participants’ self-reported diet at the time they signed up for UK Biobank to come up with a score out of 100.

According to the researchers, the study is the first of its kind to investigate the minimum combined doses of device-measured sleep and physical activity, alongside a comprehensive dietary score. 

“We were aiming to look at the interconnection between sleep, physical activity, and diet; and our lifespan — which is the number of years that we live — and our healthspan, that’s essentially the number of years we live free from chronic disease,” Dr Koemel said.

The research found that small improvements in all three areas made gains in both lifespan and healthspan.

Advertisement

The study found that improvement of life expectancy by one year when participants added:

  • just five extra minutes of sleep per day,  plus
  • just under two minutes per day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and 
  • an extra half serving of vegetables.

“One of the core findings from our study was that realistic improvements, these modest tiny tweaks across multiple behaviours, the sleep, physical activity, and diet, were able to create meaningful improvements in our lifespan and healthspan,” Dr Koemel said. 

While these baby steps could help, overall the  study found that the “optimal combination” of the three categories correlated with an additional nine years of life expectancy was:

  • seven to eight hours of sleep, 
  • just over 40 minutes of moderate exercise per day, 
  • and a healthy diet.

Moira Junge, an adjunct clinical professor and health psychologist at Monash University, praised the studies and said looking at the combination of sleep, exercise and diet over the long term is crucial in longevity research.

“We absolutely need to put it together, and research like this is proof that even small changes can make a really big difference to your health and wellbeing,” Dr Junge said.

Cutting sitting by half hour helps with life expectancy

The second study, published in The Lancet, examined participants who had low activity levels and spent hours sitting throughout the day. 

Advertisement

Data from more than 135,000 adults across Norway, Sweden and the United States, combined with data from the UK Biobank examined the impact of daily physical activity and reductions in sedentary behaviours on mortality. 

The researchers found a nine per cent reduction in mortality risk when those sitting for eight or more hours a day reduced their sitting time by 30 minutes. 

Studies have linked long periods of sitting with increased risk of several chronic health conditions including cardiovascular disease, diabetes and some types of cancer.  (ABC News: Danielle Bonica)

Sedentary behaviour has previously been linked to higher rates of chronic health conditions, such as diabetes, colon cancer and cardiovascular diseases, prompting some claims that “sitting is the new smoking”.

The study also found that increasing physical activity by just five minutes a day could have a significant health impact, especially for minimally active people. 

Advertisement

Increasing from one minute to six minutes of exercise per day was associated with an approximately 30 per cent reduction in mortality risk. Those who increased activity from one minute to 11 minutes per day saw an approximate 42 per cent reduction in mortality risk.

Loading…

In 2022, a reported four in 10 Australian adults (aged 18–64) were insufficiently physically active: not meeting the recommended 150–300 minutes of moderate to vigorous activity across five or more days per week. 

“In reality, there’s always going to be people who don’t meet the guidelines,” said Melody Ding, a professor of public health at University of Sydney who co-led the study.

But what we know is that especially for those who are extremely inactive, for them to get to do a little bit more, that’s where we get the most bang for their buck.

“It tells us in terms of the benefits of physical activity, that we don’t need to get everybody to do so much. This micro-dosing concept, especially for those who are inactive, could make a huge difference in terms of health outcomes,” she said.

Advertisement

Something better than nothing

Dr Junge hoped the study findings could help people feel positive health outcomes are achievable. 

“I think that when people can feel like they’ve got mastery over something then they’re more likely to change their behaviour and more likely to have motivation to change. Health is a confidence game,” she said. 

Lauren Ball, a professor of community health and wellbeing at University of Queensland, said the two new studies reconfirm the importance of diet, physical activity and sleep for overall health and wellbeing. 

“The notion that modest increases in physical activity is beneficial is also supported by other studies, suggesting that doing something is always better than nothing,” she said. 

“The results also support behaviour change theories that suggest that improving one aspect of health behaviour, such as eating well, may increase motivation or self-efficacy for other health behaviours, such as being physically active. 

Advertisement

This is an uplifting reminder for us all about the value of these health behaviours.

‘Not a silver bullet’

While these numbers might be inspiring for some, Dr Koemel said they were not a “silver bullet”.

“It’s something that’s easy to accidentally take away from this; that maybe we only need to do one minute of exercise, and that’s not the case,” he said. 

“We still have physical guidelines, and those are there for a reason. This is really about helping us go that extra step, and ask what we would need to do to take the first step in the right direction.” 

The studies found that mortality improvements were most significant in participants who were inactive.

But Dr Ding said there was a “saturation point”.

Advertisement

“For example, in this study our data has shown that for those who are already doing 30 or 40 minutes per day; the active people who are meeting the guidelines, adding another five minutes, you don’t really see visible change.”

Despite this, Dr Koemel said looking at small daily changes across sedentary behaviours, sleep, diet and physical activity could have positive impacts more widely.

“We want to try to create opportunities where everybody can make change. The idea that we need to make these massive overhauls; wake up and and run a marathon or go to the gym every day of the week, that might not necessarily be the best starting place,” he said.

This gives that open door for us to go through and say, ‘Well, look, if we won’t be able to make massive changes or consume a perfect diet in the ideal world, here’s a starting place for everybody to put the best foot forward.’

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Fitness

Trending Exercise & Fitness Gear for the new year…

Published

on

Trending Exercise & Fitness Gear for the new year…
“Exercising” topped the list of resolutions for 2026, followed by “eating better” and “saving money.” Beauty and Style Editor, Marianne Mychaskiw, joins California Live with trending exercise products that will help you keep your fitness resolution… Or motivate you to get started.
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending