Connect with us

Fitness

What's the Least Amount of Exercise I Can Get Away With?

Published

on

What's the Least Amount of Exercise I Can Get Away With?

A few years ago, personal trainer Anna Maltby cut back on exercise as she juggled work with being a new mother. Like some of her clients, she suddenly lacked the time and energy to work out the way she used to. She could manage no more than several 15-minute workouts per week, “but I actually felt like I got my minimum effective dose for that stage of my life,” she says.

Many of us feel like we’re too busy for exercise. Others actively avoid it. But research shows that doing at least some exercise is important for longer, healthier lives without dementia, heart disease, diabetes, or cancer. Other advantages are reaped right away: we’re happier and more energetic on a daily basis.  

So, just how little exercise can you get away with, while still getting these benefits? Here’s how low you can go, according to experts. Getting there may require changing how we define exercise in the first place.

Meet the minimum guidelines

Official guidelines from the World Health Organization, the U.S. government, and other groups give adults a few choices for how low they can go with aerobic physical activity on a weekly basis. One option is getting at least 75 to 150 minutes of “vigorous” activity, meaning your level of huffing and puffing makes conversation difficult, and your heart rate rises to about 80% of its peak. Another option takes longer, but it’s less intense: 150 to 300 minutes of “moderate” activity, at 60-70% of your maximum heart rate. 

You could also combine just enough vigorous and moderate exercise so they add up to the weekly minimum. Because tougher workouts are especially health-giving, they count more toward your weekly goal; every minute of vigorous activity is equivalent to two minutes of moderate activity. (This means that if you got 50 minutes of vigorous activity, that would count 100 minutes toward the 150-minute requirement for moderate activity. Then, you’d only need to add 50 minutes of moderate activity to meet your weekly minimum.)

Advertisement

Read More: Your Brain Doesn’t Want You to Exercise

These bare-minimum amounts deliver the biggest rewards for the fewest drops of sweat, according to decades of research. “If you look at the statistical curve, the increase in benefits is most dramatic” when these minimums are achieved, says Regina Guthold, an epidemiologist at the WHO. If you go higher—over 300 minutes of moderate exercise, for example—you’ll keep accruing greater health, but the gains become smaller. 

Similar thresholds also support mental health, says Mary de Groot, a psychologist and associate professor of medicine at Indiana University School of Medicine. In a study with more than one million people, those who exercised 120 to 360 minutes per week had the best mental health, compared to those who did more or less. 

Save time with hybrid workouts

But here’s the catch: On top of cardio, strength training is a must, no less than twice per week. If you neglect it, some unsavory effects of older age may await you, like muscle atrophy and osteoporosis. 

Now, the time-saving loophole: strength training can be mixed into cardio sessions. By using your own body weight as resistance (instead of heavier barbells), you can do more repetitions, upping your heart rate along with building muscle. Seniors in particular should focus on this “multicomponent activity,” the guidelines say, including moves that improve balance to help reduce the risk of falls.  

Advertisement

Cardio-strength workouts include pushups, Turkish get-ups, mountain climbers, burpees, air squats, and lunges. With this hybrid approach, you could still wrap up exercise for the week in as few as 75 minutes.

Skip days, not months

Work gets busy; parenthood, vacations, and colds disrupt routines. We often need to skip exercise for several days in a row. (After all, we’re only human—not exercise robots.) So, how do the weekly minimums translate into everyday life? Must we bust a move every single day or face imminent demise? 

Thankfully, no, Guthold says, as long as you catch up later in the week. “Weekend warriors get the same benefits as those who are active every day for less time,” she says. “There’s no evidence it needs to be spread out.”

How about if you skip a week or two at a time? Well, if you reach the minimum amount of physical activity for only, say, three out of every four weeks, that’s much better than never reaching it. “It’s normal for people to have highs and lows with physical activity, even if they love it,” adds Stella Volpe, a professor of exercise and nutrition at Virginia Tech and president of the American College of Sports Medicine, another influential organization that publishes activity guidelines.

Read More: How to Get Back to Sleep After Waking Up at Night

Advertisement

“Life happens,” says Katrina Piercy, an exercise physiologist at HHS who leads development of the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. “But if you’re working toward meeting the guidelines in a typical week, you’re going to see benefits.” 

Even on your off-weeks, just five minutes of activity per day will send more blood pumping through the body, which supports health by preventing blood vessels from stiffening. It could also improve blood sugar and sleep quality, Piercy says. But the more weeks that pass without meeting the guidelines, the more your health may eventually suffer, notes Volpe. Just two weeks straight being very sedentary causes aerobic fitness and muscle mass to decline significantly, potentially paving the way for disease. 

Combine exercise with movement breaks

Stay still for over an hour, and your feet may start tingling as the blood pools there, compelling you to get up and stretch. This light movement is important, but for most people, it’s not taxing enough to count toward their weekly exercise minimum. So here’s another way to save time on exercise: use these breaks to get your heart rate up so it qualifies as moderate or even vigorous exercise.

Studies show that the more movement breaks you take, the lower your risk of death (at least anytime soon), says Keith Diaz, an associate professor of behavioral medicine at Columbia University Medical Center. It’s necessary to take these breaks even if you also exercise. “The other 98% of the day you’re not moving does matter,” Diaz says. 

To save time, you can use four or five of these breaks as mini-exercise sessions, each about five minutes long. If you’re healthy enough to ramp up the intensity, try one-minute exercise snacks, 20 times per week or more, says Martin Gibala, a professor of kinesiology at McMaster University, who wrote a book called The One-Minute Workout. That could mean walking quickly or running up some stairs, depending on your fitness level. “Your total time spent exercising will be reduced, and there’s the simultaneous benefit of breaking up periods of prolonged sedentary behavior,” Gibala says. 

Advertisement

We shouldn’t “blow off exercise completely” on days we’re too busy for one long workout, Gibala says. “Exercise doesn’t have to be this special thing you do at a special place.” In a study with over 25,000 people wearing fitness trackers, Gibala and colleagues found that people who didn’t formally exercise but got three separate bouts of vigorous activity, each lasting only 1 to 2 minutes, during their everyday lives lowered their risk of dying from cancer by about 40% and heart disease by 50% over a period of about seven years.

Read More: How to Properly Cool Your Home With a Fan

Diaz found that adults who engaged in five minutes of walking every 30 minutes improved their blood sugar, blood pressure, mood, and energy levels. Taking such breaks actually leads to more productivity at work, not less, according to Diaz’s preliminary findings. “Humans tend to have trouble focusing for longer than 20 minutes at a time anyway,” he notes.  

You could have speed-walking meetings, or run from your office to the coffee shop. Volpe, the ACSM president, has a friend who watches TV with his kid but mutes the commercials, puts on music, and dances with the kid until the show resumes. “You’ll be amazed how good you feel by dancing a little instead of getting a snack,” Volpe says. 

Piercy, the HHS physiologist, turns supermarket shopping into races, timing herself while carrying her groceries in a basket for muscle-strengthening. “Some days I don’t have a formal workout,” she says, “but I grocery shopped, or found other ways to multitask some activity.” 

Advertisement

Redefine “exercise”

Here’s the ultimate hack to reduce exercise time: find physical activities that don’t feel like exercise at all. (Warning: This may involve being social, having fun, and bonding with nature.) For example, you could ask a friend to join sessions of high-intensity interval training at a park. HIIT mixes bursts of activity with recovery breaks. When you can talk with people you like during the rest intervals, exercise drudgery transforms into a mobile hangout. 

Sports like tennis count as HIIT. So does interval walking if it gets your heart rate up. The kicker is that the recovery intervals also go toward your minimum weekly exercise goal. “The rest intervals certainly count toward total minutes because your heart rate stays high during the breaks,” Volpe says. Magically, your 75 minutes of vigorous exercise could drop below 40.

You may forget you’re exercising when distracted by the park’s natural beauty, leading to more benefits. “The improvements in mood…are even better when people exercise outside,” Diaz says, “away from their tech.” So-called “green exercise” improves emotions and self-esteem, and protects against depression, de Groot says.

Find your ME

This game of exercise limbo—how low can you go—involves more than the official guidelines. Your level of minimum exercise—your “ME”—depends on who you are. “When working with people on physical activity plans, the first thing I do is encourage them to think about their goals and values,” de Groot says.

If you prioritize longevity and defying your age, your self-chosen ME will be higher than others’ minimums. “The more you exercise, the longer you’ll live free of chronic disease,” Diaz says. “But that’s not everyone’s goal.” Some care more about finding a sustainable amount that helps them feel good in the present moment, Diaz says, so they can carry groceries or climb steps without fatigue or pain.

Advertisement

Here are some factors to consider in setting your ME: 

  • Time commitments: Some of Maltby’s clients are pregnant. “What counted as a great workout before this season of life just may not be possible in a few months,” she says.
  • Physical capacity: Activity guidelines may differ for those with illness or disability.
  • Stage of development. Kids need more activity than adults—they should average at least 60 minutes per day. 
  • Psychological makeup: Teens with ADHD, for instance, may need more exercise to “optimize their brain functioning,” says Erin Gonzalez, a clinical psychologist specializing in ADHD and health behaviors at Seattle Children’s Hospital.

Fitness trackers and mood apps can show how different MEs translate into heart health, sleep quality, and positive emotions, and HHS created a “Move Your Way” weekly activity planner. “Monitoring your health data and progress objectively is very helpful,” Gonzalez explains. 

Fitness wearables can also make exercise more efficient by turning it into family time through family fitness tracking. Instead of telling your teen to run around the house, strive toward your minimum goals together. “Doing so can sustain family lifestyle change,” Gonzalez says.

Fitness

What is Americans’ favorite exercise? New study reveals a surprising trend in fitness habits

Published

on

What is Americans’ favorite exercise? New study reveals a surprising trend in fitness habits
Walking is often treated as the simplest, most sustainable way to stay active and for good reason. It requires no equipment, no gym membership, and it fits easily into daily life. But a large new analysis suggests that while walking is extremely popular, it may not be enough on its own for most people to meet widely recommended fitness benchmarks.

A study published in the open-access journal PLOS ONE analyzed data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, drawing on survey responses from almost 400,000 U.S. adults. The objective was to know which leisure-time physical activities people prefer and whether those options align with federal activity guidelines.

Walking is most popular but not the most effective for fitness goals

The results were notable. Walking appeared as the most frequently reported leisure-time physical activity across both urban and rural groups. In fact, roughly 44.1% of adults indicated that walking was their main form of exercise.

However, popularity did not translate into achieving recommended health standards. Based on the analysis, individuals who primarily walked had the highest likelihood of not meeting either aerobic or muscle-strengthening guidelines compared with other exercise categories. Even more significant, only about one in four walkers (25%) satisfied both recommended benchmarks, while approximately 22% failed to meet either requirement at all. In contrast, participants who reported running, resistance training, or conditioning workouts as their primary activities were considerably more likely to achieve federal physical activity targets.

Advertisement

What the guidelines actually require

The American College of Sports Medicine recommends that adults get:

  • At least 150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity aerobic activity
  • Plus muscle-strengthening exercises on two to three days per week

While walking can contribute to aerobic activity mainly if done briskly, it generally does not fulfill the strength-training requirement on its own.

Rural vs urban differences in activity patterns

The study also revealed geographic variations in exercise behavior. Rural residents were more likely to participate in activities such as gardening, hunting, and fishing, whereas urban residents showed higher engagement in running, cycling, dancing, and weight training. Despite differing preferences, urban participants were overall more likely to meet both aerobic and strength-based guidelines compared to rural populations. Researchers suggest that access to facilities, infrastructure availability, and cultural influences may contribute to these differences.

Why this matters: muscle is a key part of health

A key takeaway from the study is that physical activity guidelines are not just about movement, but about different types of movement. Walking supports cardiovascular fitness and daily activity levels, but it does not significantly develop or preserve muscle mass. This distinction is important because muscle deterioration begins gradually with age. Research indicates that adults may lose around 3% to 8% of muscle mass per decade after age 30, a condition known as sarcopenia. This decline is associated with slower metabolism, increased fat storage, reduced mobility, and higher risk of falls and fractures in later life.

Resistance training helps counteract this decline. Studies show it can increase lean muscle mass, boost resting metabolic rate by approximately 7%, and reduce body fat. A large meta-analysis also found resistance training linked to:

  • 15% lower risk of all-cause mortality
  • 19% lower cardiovascular disease mortality
  • 14% lower cancer mortality

The most notable benefits were observed with around 60 minutes per week of resistance exercise, making it a time-efficient health strategy. Additionally, resistance training supports mental well-being by improving mood and increasing BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor), which promotes brain health and neural growth.

What truly makes the difference

The study aligns with broader longevity research suggesting that higher-effort activities tend to deliver stronger physiological benefits.

Advertisement

Running, weight training, and conditioning workouts share a common feature: they sufficiently challenge the body to trigger adaptation. Walking, although beneficial, generally remains in a lower-intensity range that may not fully satisfy all fitness requirements on its own.

In practical terms:

  • Walking supports general cardiovascular health, mental well-being, and daily movement
  • Resistance training builds and preserves muscle, supports metabolism, and reduces age-related decline
  • Higher-intensity cardio (running, cycling, HIIT) improves cardiovascular fitness more efficiently and helps meet aerobic goals faster

Expert perspective from the study

The researchers emphasized that the findings are not meant to discourage walking but to emphasize gaps between perception and results.

As lead researcher Christiaan Abildso explained:

“We expected to see that walking would continue to be the most common physical activity. However, it was surprising to see that nearly one in four adults who walk as their main activity did not meet either of the physical activity guidelines. That is, they reported less than the recommended 150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity aerobic activity and fewer than the recommended two days per week of muscle-strengthening activity, such as yoga or exercises with resistance bands,”

He also pointed to wider environmental and structural elements influencing activity levels:

Advertisement

“What we might be seeing in these rural–urban differences in preferences may just reflect what people have access to or what is culturally supported. In our work, we see a need to continue to support our partners in small towns and rural places by creating physical, social, and cultural conditions that support physical activity. This could mean creating a wide shoulder on a country road for running and cycling, helping a senior centre with their chair exercise programming, creating or improving park spaces, expanding the national network of rail trails, renovating abandoned and dilapidated structures (brownfields) into viable activity centres, keeping school facilities open to the public, and many other strategies. Everyone needs to ask, ‘how does what we’re doing affect physical activity?’, in order to help get people more active, more often, in more places,”

FAQs:

1. Is walking good for health?
Yes, walking supports heart health and general well-being. It is a low-impact activity suitable for most people.

2. Can walking replace all exercise?
Not entirely, because it does not build muscle strength effectively. A balanced routine usually includes strength training.

Continue Reading

Fitness

Exercise improves fitness for kids, adults with FA, study finds

Published

on

Exercise improves fitness for kids, adults with FA, study finds

A combination of exercise and an energy-boosting supplement may improve physical fitness in children and adults with Friedreich’s ataxia (FA), although the added benefit of the supplement over exercise alone remains unclear, according to results from a clinical trial.

Those who participated in a 12-week program combining aerobic and strength training with nicotinamide riboside supplementation saw a significant increase in cardiopulmonary fitness, the body’s ability to supply oxygen to muscles during physical activity, compared with trial participants who did not exercise and received a placebo.

However, researchers found no significant difference between the combination group and participants who followed the same exercise program without supplementation, indicating the study did not show a clear added benefit of the supplement beyond exercise alone.

“The combination of nicotinamide riboside plus exercise for 12 weeks was safe and increased cardiopulmonary fitness in children and adults with Friedreich’s ataxia,” the researchers wrote. “Longer studies are needed to establish whether adding nicotinamide riboside to exercise could be considered as part of a long-term, comprehensive treatment approach.”

The study, “Safety and efficacy of individualised exercise and NAD+ precursor supplementation in patients with Friedreich’s ataxia in the USA: a single-centre, 2 × 2 factorial, randomised controlled trial,” was published in The Lancet Neurology.

Advertisement
Recommended Reading

Fatigue, safety worries limit participation

FA is caused by mutations that reduce the production of frataxin, a protein needed for cells to generate energy. When frataxin levels are too low, cells in energy-demanding tissues, such as the nervous system, heart, and muscles, gradually deteriorate, leading to FA symptoms including impaired coordination, fatigue, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. People with FA also have markedly reduced cardiopulmonary fitness.

Although current guidelines recommend exercise to help manage symptoms, clinical evidence in people with FA is limited, and participation is often low due to barriers such as fatigue and safety concerns, the researchers noted.

Studies in other conditions have shown that supplementation with NAD+ precursors — compounds that raise levels of NAD+, a molecule involved in cellular energy production — can improve muscle function. These findings have raised the possibility that increasing NAD+ might complement or enhance the benefits of exercise alone. However, there’s limited research on whether these therapies might improve FA patients’ ability to exercise.

Advertisement

The team of researchers in the U.S. conducted a 12-week clinical trial (NCT04192136) involving 66 people with FA enrolled at a single center in Philadelphia from September 2020 to April 2025.

Half of the participants were children, ages 10 to 17, and half were adults, ages 18 and older. Most (56%) were male. The overall mean age was 20.3. At the start of the study, participants generally had lower-than-average muscle mass and slightly higher body fat compared with reference values for the general population.

Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: 17 received a placebo and served as controls, 17 received only the NAD+ precursor nicotinamide riboside, 16 followed a structured exercise program and were given a placebo, and 16 followed the exercise program in addition to supplementation with nicotinamide riboside. All participants completed the study.

The exercise program consisted of three aerobic and two resistance training sessions per week, performed at home under remote supervision. Participants took nicotinamide riboside or placebo orally each day using weight-based dosing: one capsule (300 mg) for patients weighing 24-48 kg (about 53-110 lbs) and three capsules (900 mg) for patients weighing more than 72 kg (about 159 lbs). The study’s main goal was to assess changes in peak oxygen uptake (VO₂), a key measure of cardiopulmonary fitness.

At the end of the 12-week program, participants who received both exercise and nicotinamide riboside showed the greatest improvements in cardiopulmonary fitness. Peak VO₂ increased by 13.2% in the combination group, compared with a 3.9% decline in the control group.

Advertisement

VO₂ rose by 9.5% with exercise alone and 5% with nicotinamide riboside alone, but those changes were not statistically significant compared with controls.

The combination was not significantly more effective than exercise alone, indicating no clear added benefit from the supplement.

Some secondary measures improved. Compared with controls, the combination group reached higher maximum workloads during exercise, and oxygen pulse — a measure of how efficiently the body uses oxygen — improved in both the combination and exercise-only groups. Participants in the combination group also reported spending more time in physical activity and leisure exercise.

The interventions were generally safe and well-tolerated. No serious adverse events were reported, and all side effects were mild or moderate. The most common ones were skin problems (53%), gastrointestinal symptoms (45%), upper respiratory infections (35%), and falls (20%).

Falls, a known barrier to exercise in FA, occurred at similar rates across all groups, and no increase in heart-related or other adverse events was seen in participants assigned to exercise.

Advertisement

In an accompanying commentary, “Targeting exercise, energy, or both in Friedreich’s ataxia,” published in The Lancet Neurology, two researchers in Germany highlighted the study’s implications.

The trial’s findings extend existing clinical evidence on the benefits of exercise in FA by using an objective measure of fitness, such as peak VO₂, and by demonstrating that a home-based intervention is feasible, they wrote. Further studies “are needed to determine durability and clinical significance of fitness gains and to clarify any incremental contribution of nicotinamide riboside beyond structured exercise,” they said.

Continue Reading

Fitness

Diane Sawyer uncovers ‘The Mystery of Richard Simmons,’ the famed fitness guru, in latest special

Published

on

Diane Sawyer uncovers ‘The Mystery of Richard Simmons,’ the famed fitness guru, in latest special

Known for his energetic and positive persona, fitness instructor and TV personality Richard Simmons led a captivating life, until his puzzling disappearance in 2014 and sudden death a decade later.

Emmy Award-winning journalist Diane Sawyer digs into it all in “The Mystery of Richard Simmons: A Diane Sawyer Special.”

Phillip Palmer spoke with Sawyer about the special – and her personal involvement in the story.

Simmons rose to fame in the late ’70s and early ’80s. After developing a love for fitness, he opened his own exercise studio where he led a series of motivational and aerobics classes. Eventually, he landed a recurring role on “General Hospital,” portraying himself, and then his own show “The Richard Simmons Show.” Simmons also led some of the most popular exercise videos of the ’80s, including “Sweatin’ to the Oldies.”

Sawyer explains, “He came with a great purpose, which was to reach out to everybody of all sizes. And somebody said, ‘love them back to health.’ And that was his mission, and it fueled him night and day.”

Advertisement

Uncover the magic and mystery of Richard Simmons in the new Diane Sawyer special “The Mystery of Richard Simmons,” airing tonight at 9/8c on ABC and streaming next day on Disney+ and Hulu.

“You couldn’t go anywhere without seeing Richard Simmons,” Palmer adds.

“Yes, and he was hilarious and surprising. And he kind of lit up the room every time he arrived – surprised everybody,” says Sawyer.

And surprise everybody he did.

10 years after his sudden seclusion, which began in 2014, Sawyer received a message from Simmons.

Advertisement

“I get a phone call, and he sends me an incredible number of flowers. Each had the same card on it, ‘I trust you.’ And we talked on the phone, and he said he was ready to come tell his story,” Sawyer tells Palmer. “It was the old Richard. And then, as we know, not long after, he died.”

Shortly after his death, Simmons’ brother reached out to Sawyer to finish telling his story, along with those closest to the star.

Sawyer compared the experience to “a mosaic. (It) gave me tiles and pieces of the mosaic to put together who he was before he decided to go into hiding, who they think he was during it, and what might have happened if he had come back.”

“The Mystery of Richard Simmons: A Diane Sawyer Special” premieres tonight, May 12, at 9/8c on ABC and streams the next day on Disney+ and Hulu.

The Walt Disney Company is the parent company of ABC, Disney+, Hulu and this ABC station.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 OnTheRedCarpet.com. All Rights Reserved.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending