Connect with us

Finance

'Worst ever’ debt crisis puts IDA’s financial model at risk, underscoring need for ambitious donor contributions to IDA21 replenishment – Bretton Woods Project

Published

on

'Worst ever’ debt crisis puts IDA’s financial model at risk, underscoring need for ambitious donor contributions to IDA21 replenishment – Bretton Woods Project

The 21st replenishment of the International Development Association’s (IDA21) – the World Bank’s low-income lending arm – due to conclude in December, takes place amid a worsening debt crisis. Even if IDA21 lives up to calls from World Bank President Ajay Banga for record breaking funding, the unfolding debt crisis will likely limit IDA’s ability to provide highly concessional loans and grants to its low-income country (LIC) members.

When an IDA country faces debt difficulties, its loans can be converted to grants, though this support is capped according to unpublished country quotas. From 2020 to 2022, as LICs struggled with the exogenous fallout of the Covid-19 pandemic and their debt situations worsened, the ratio of grants- to- loans in IDA’s portfolio rose from one-fourth to one-third. IDA began converting loans of moderately debt distressed LICs to 50-year credits instead of its usual mix of credits and grants which, according to Clemence Landers and Hannah Brown from US-based think tank Center for Global Development (CGD), should restore grants to a manageable level.

However, according to Development Finance International, the current debt crisis is the ‘worst ever’, with many LICs now paying more on debt servicing than on health, education, social protection and climate combined, meaning this crisis could place significant strain on IDA’s funding model.

The strength (and weakness) of IDA’s funding model: market-based finance

Since its 18th replenishment (2017-19), IDA has issued market debt backed by its equity base, mostly comprised of its outstanding loans (see Observer Winter 2017). This approach has allowed IDA to grow its resources to $185 billion. In IDA20, $23.5 billion of donor contributions were leveraged into a $93 billion replenishment, $33.5 billion in borrowing and $36 billion in reflows via repaid debt from IDA members. As long as grants are less than contributions, IDA does not have to dip into its equity base – but if it does, it could cause a larger contraction in its loan portfolio because its equity is the basis on which it raises market finance.

According to CGD’s calculations, a moderate worsening of LIC debt dynamics would require at least $36 billion in grants over the IDA21 replenishment cycle, requiring an additional $12 billion in contributions compared to IDA20 to avoid dipping into IDA’s equity base. A significant worsening would require at least $45 billion in grants over the replenishment cycle, requiring an additional $22 billion, compared to IDA20. As donor contributions to IDA have fallen by 20 per cent in real terms over the last decade and, as CGD notes, many large donors have signalled that reaching even the level of their contributions for IDA20 may prove difficult, even the moderate debt crisis scenario could significantly affect IDA.

Advertisement

As debt repayments surge and capital flows turn net-negative, LICs have been forced to rely on IDA for affordable finance, while high-income countries have persistently failed to meet their 0.7 per cent GNP target for Official Development Assistance or agree on a new allocation of SDRs (see Observer Summer 2024).

Quality vs quantity

However, concerns about the size of the IDA21 replenishment should not obscure more fundamental questions of how effective IDA assistance has been: only 17 out of 81 IDA countries have graduated out of IDA eligibility since 1996 (see Observer Spring 2024).

IDA assistance remains linked to highly problematic policies that have a strong pro-liberalisation, deregulation and private sector bias. This has favoured profit extraction by international investors, been linked to the financialisation of Global South economies, and has failed to catalyse economic transformation (see Report, Financialisation, human rights and the Bretton Woods Institutions: An introduction for civil society organisations). This approach looks set to continue in IDA21, with the draft policy package released on 17 June containing numerous references to efforts to crowd in private finance into climate and development efforts.

“IDA is of critical importance for the 39 African states that rely on its financing. But just ensuring it can continue current levels of support is not enough,” noted Jane Nalunga of Ugandan civil society organisation SEATINI. “We need a better IDA, that actively supports their economic transformation, not just keeps them on life support, and to do this we need rich countries to increase their contributions to substantially reduce IDA’s reliance on market finance.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Financial Experts’ 2025 Predictions for Student Loan Debt Under President Trump

Published

on

Financial Experts’ 2025 Predictions for Student Loan Debt Under President Trump

Paying off student loans can seem like an impossible task, especially when high interest rates mean loan amounts keep increasing. But student loan relief can provide a lifeline for borrowers in need.

Learn More: I’m a Retirement Planner: 7 Ways I Am Guiding Clients Now That Trump Won

Discover More: How To Financially Plan for the New Year Under the New Trump Presidency

A 2024 survey by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau revealed that nearly 61% of borrowers who received debt relief reported the relief gave them the opportunity to make a beneficial change in their life sooner than they otherwise could have.

But with President-elect Donald Trump poised to take office in January, existing student loan relief programs are in jeopardy, meaning borrowers could face substantial changes to their monthly payments and their student loan debt.

Advertisement

In August 2022, the Biden-Harris administration launched the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan to help borrowers better manage their student loan payments. This income-driven repayment plan offers several benefits to borrowers:

  • Loan payments are calculated based on a borrower’s income and family size, rather than basing payments on their loan balance.

  • Qualifying borrowers’ remaining balances can also be forgiven after a certain number of years.

  • Many borrowers’ monthly payments are reduced, and some borrowers don’t owe monthly payments at all.

  • If borrowers keep up with their monthly payments, the Department of Education won’t charge monthly interest that isn’t covered by the payments, so borrowers’ balances will decrease, and they can more easily pay off the loans.

While on the campaign trail, Trump called President Joe Biden’s planned student loan forgiveness “vile,” blaming student loan relief for increasing the federal deficit.

Check Out: How To Financially Plan for the New Year Under the New Trump Presidency

Bill Townsend, founder and CEO of College Rover, predicted that Trump will end the SAVE plan as part of a concerted effort by many conservatives to change the appeal and direction of college education.

“Interestingly enough, there is a contractual law issue that will arise from public servants who were contractually bound to certain jobs in exchange for student loan forgiveness,” Townsend explained. “Assuming SAVE, which included this preexisting loan forgiveness contract, is voided, there will be the potential for a class action lawsuit against the U.S. government.”

Advertisement

However, Townsend predicted that Trump could void the lawsuit with an executive action.

Continue Reading

Finance

MicroStrategy’s ‘financial engineering’ powers ascent to Nasdaq 100

Published

on

MicroStrategy’s ‘financial engineering’ powers ascent to Nasdaq 100

MicroStrategy has raised almost $20bn from investors this year to buy bitcoin, fuelling a meteoric rise for the once-obscure software company into the Nasdaq 100 index of large-cap US technology stocks.

A combination of selling shares and convertible bonds has funded a one-way bet on a rocketing bitcoin price that, despite a sell-off in recent days, has driven its shares up more than 400 per cent this year. Such is the investor demand that the company now has a market value of around $80bn, despite owning around $41bn of bitcoin.

Debt fund managers have been clamouring to get their hands on the convertible bonds, believing they offer exposure to the soaring share price while also providing protection if the price goes into reverse. The stock’s Nasdaq 100 inclusion will compel index-tracking funds to buy billions of dollars more of the company’s shares.

Its index inclusion after the close of trading on Friday — it is part of a trio replacing IT firm Super Micro Computer, Covid-19 vaccine maker Moderna and gene-sequencing company Illumina — is further vindication for founder Michael Saylor, who has become one of the most evangelistic proponents of bitcoin since his company began buying it four years ago.

“It’s some incredible financial engineering,” said a convertible bond portfolio manager invested in MicroStrategy. “[Saylor has] created this incredible situation where a stock trades at three times the price of the underlying bitcoin and then he just sells more shares every day and buys more bitcoin.”

Advertisement
Donald Trump has promised to make the US a ‘bitcoin superpower’ and ease the regulatory crackdown on cryptocurrency © Justin Chin/Bloomberg

For Saylor, who once tweeted that bitcoin’s “days are numbered” but later recanted, this year has been an extended opportunity to build on his plan to make MicroStrategy a “treasury” for what he calls “the most valuable asset in the world”. In October he announced plans to raise $42bn over the next three years, all to pay for more bitcoin.

The cryptocurrency’s value has more than doubled this year following the arrival of spot bitcoin exchange traded funds in the US and Donald Trump’s presidential election victory in November. Trump’s promises to make the US a “bitcoin superpower” and ease the regulatory crackdown pushed the value of the coin from less than $64,000 at the end of September to more than $108,000 this week, although at one point on Friday it fell close to $92,000.

“My attitude [on bitcoin] has gotten better every quarter,” Saylor told the Financial Times. “Now you have a president[-elect] who is ending the war on crypto.”

MicroStrategy’s success has been helped by the huge premium that investors place on its shares, with the company currently trading at roughly double the net asset value of its bitcoin holdings.

This allows it to issue stock at a premium and buy ever more of the cryptocurrency. Although existing shareholders end up owning a smaller percentage of the company, the underlying value of their shares increases because MicroStrategy now owns more bitcoin per share.

Advertisement
Line chart of Share price, $ showing MicroStrategy shares have climbed 370% this year

Convertible bonds have also become a key way for MicroStrategy to raise money. Such instruments usually pay a fixed coupon but also convert into shares at an agreed price, allowing investors to benefit from equity’s unlimited upside while providing the perceived downside protection of bonds.

The highly volatile nature of the stock has so far worked well for both the company and investors. It means the company can issue bonds with a higher conversion premium than usual and even offer zero coupon on the debt. Investors, meanwhile, have been drawn to the potential exposure to the firm’s soaring share price and the perceived downside protection.

As MicroStrategy’s shares surged earlier this year, bond investors who had lapped up its March convertibles quickly became equity holders as their bonds were converted. In November, Saylor returned to market for the fifth time this year, issuing $3bn of convertibles for zero interest and a 55 per cent conversion premium.

MicroStrategy Inc. headquarters in Tysons Corner, Virginia,
‘It’s arbitrage feeding arbitrage,’ said one convertible bond trader who has bought MicroStrategy’s bonds and shorted its equity © Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg

For investors who had snapped up MicroStrategy’s earlier debt, the company’s return to market could hardly have worked out better, as it allowed them to take profits on their shares and buy new bonds.

“This was an absolute home run for us. We got to lock in all of the upside of the past six months, and now we bring in downside protection,” said one convertible bond fund manager who owns MicroStrategy bonds. “There is no better outcome for a convertible bond manager.”

So-called convertible arbitrage hedge funds, which buy such bonds and then short the shares — bet on a falling price — have also provided a ready market for the firm’s mass issuance.

Their strategy is essentially a bet on volatility. They try to make money on their short position if the share price falls, with losses on the convertible limited by the bond’s downside protection. And if the shares climb, the aim is for the short position — which is smaller than the convertible bond exposure — to lose less money than the gain on the equity upside.

Advertisement

“It’s arbitrage feeding arbitrage,” said one convertible bond trader who has bought MicroStrategy’s bonds and shorted its equity. “Our arbitrage is OK. It’s decent. But [Saylor’s] arbitrage is brilliant.”

Traders exploiting the volatility of MicroStrategy’s shares have been helped by billions of dollars of inflows into highly levered exchange traded products that track the stock but amplify investors’ potential gains and losses. Two MicroStrategy ETFs, including the Defiance Daily Target two-times long MSTR ETF, own about $10bn of the company’s stock via swaps and options. 

Unlike traditional ETFs, which buy and hold shares, leveraged ETFs rebalance at the end of every trading day to hit their targeted returns. This means that when the underlying asset rises in price, fund managers must buy more of the stock, and vice versa should prices fall.

These end-of-day rebalancing flows can “significantly impact the underlying MicroStrategy stock price, amplifying price moves, thus enhancing volatility”, said JPMorgan strategist Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou.

But some investors are getting nervous. They fear that the virtuous circle that has driven up the share price so quickly could easily go into reverse if the bitcoin price falls substantially.

Advertisement

“Borrowing dollars to buy bitcoin is just a massive dollar short position, not a new financial invention,” says Barry Bannister, chief equity strategist at Stifel. “As any short seller in history knows, the price of being wrong is ruin.”

“If bitcoin traded down 90-95 per cent and stayed there, there would be no liquidation or debt accelerations,” Saylor told the FT. “Presumably our equity would suffer some dilution, but we still would not sell, or need to sell, our bitcoin.”

The shares could also fall if investors simply decide to place less of a premium on MicroStrategy stock. Since their peak on November 21, the shares are down around 40 per cent, while bitcoin is down just 5 per cent.

One North American hedge fund executive said they had held a position in bitcoin and a bet against MicroStrategy “to capture that spread”. This bet “worked on and off until the trade became a meme”, added the person, who now prefers to short one of the twice-leveraged ETFs.

Some suggest that share sales by insiders undermine the company’s pitch to investors: that bitcoin remains undervalued. MicroStrategy directors have sold a total of $570mn of the company’s stock so far this year, according to company filings.

Advertisement

MicroStrategy did not respond to a request for comment on the share sales.

Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.

“The subjects change — now it’s crypto — but over the centuries human investment behaviour does not deviate from the script one iota,” said Bannister.

Anyone buying assets “built on thin air” should be prepared to watch their money “vanish”, he added.

Continue Reading

Finance

US business equipment borrowings up more than 8% y/y in November, ELFA says

Published

on

US business equipment borrowings up more than 8% y/y in November, ELFA says

(Reuters) – U.S. companies borrowed 8.7% more to finance equipment investments in November compared with the same period a year earlier, the Equipment Leasing and Finance Association said on Friday.

New loans, leases and lines of credit signed up by companies in November rose to $10.36 billion, from $9.53 billion in the year-ago period.

The Washington-based trade association, which reports economic activity for the more than $1 trillion equipment finance sector, also said that credit approvals for U.S. companies were at 74% in November this year.

The Equipment Leasing & Finance Foundation, ELFA’s non-profit affiliate, said its confidence index for December reached a fresh three-year high, indicating that executives expect continued strength in lending volumes and further improvements in financial conditions.

The ELFA CapEx Finance Index of leasing and finance activity is based on a 25-member survey which includes Bank of America as well as the financing units of Caterpillar, Dell Technologies, Siemens AG, Canon and Volvo AB.

Advertisement

(Reporting by Abhinav Parmar in Bengaluru; Editing by Pooja Desai)

Continue Reading

Trending