Connect with us

Finance

PetroTal Announces Q2 2024 Financial and Operating Results

Published

on

PetroTal Announces Q2 2024 Financial and Operating Results

Q2 2024 average sales and production of 18,050 bopd and 18,290 bopd, respectively
Generated Q2 2024 free funds flow of $36 million (7% quarterly yield)
Exited quarter with $96 million in total cash
Declaring dividend of $0.015/share payable Sept 13, 2024
Board changes

Calgary, Alberta and Houston, Texas–(Newsfile Corp. – August 8, 2024) – PetroTal Corp. (TSX: TAL) (AIM: PTAL) (OTCQX: PTALF) (“PetroTal” or the “Company”) is pleased to report its operating and financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024.

Selected financial and operational information is outlined below and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, which are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and on the Company’s website at www.PetroTal‐Corp.com. All amounts herein are in United States dollars unless otherwise stated.

Selected Q2 2024 Highlights

  • Average Q2 2024 production and sales of 18,290 and 18,050 barrels (“bbls”) of oil per day (“bopd”), respectively, which included a brief river blockade;

  • Generated Q2 2024 EBITDA(1) and free funds flow(1) of $69.5 million ($42.31/bbl) and $36.3 million ($22.11/bbl), respectively;

  • Exited Q2 2024 in a strong cash position with $95.9 million in total cash ($84.1 million unrestricted), with over $93.2 million in current receivables due subsequent to June 30, 2024;

  • In early May 2024, PetroTal signed an acquisition agreement to acquire a 100% working interest in Peru’s Block 131, including the producing Los Angeles field for a purchase price of $5 million, subject to closing adjustments and with an effective date of January 1, 2024;

  • Successfully drilled two new oil wells in the quarter. Well 19H has averaged over 6,860 bopd over its initial 30 days, placing it in the Company’s top five initial rate wells and achieving payout in approximately 40 days;

  • Delivered strong operating cost metrics with lifting and variable transportation costs under $8.00/bbl in the quarter, slightly higher than Q1 2024, and generating a near 78% net operating income margin in the quarter;

  • Capital expenditures (“Capex”) totaled $38.9 million in Q2 2024 and were focused on drilling wells 18H and 19H;

  • Completed all regulatory approvals for the Company’s Oleoducto de Crudos Pesados Oil Pipeline (“OCP”) route to market in Ecuador, onto which oil loading into barges was subsequently commenced in mid July 2024. Actual final sale of the pilot oil is expected in October 2024;

  • Delivered strong Q2 2024 net income of $35.4 million ($0.04/share); and,

  • Paid total dividends of $0.015/share and repurchased 1.2 million common shares in Q2 2024, representing approximately $15 million of total capital returned to shareholders (approximately 3% of June 30, 2024, market capitalization).

Advertisement

(1) Non-GAAP (defined below) measure that does not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures presented by other entities. See “Selected Financial Measures” section.

Manuel Pablo Zuniga-Pflucker, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented:

“Our Q2 2024 operating and financial results were robust and Q3 and Q4 are now underpinned by strong drilling results this quarter. The 19H well was initially producing in excess of 8,000 bopd despite being designed with a shorter horizontal section compared to previous drills and has now averaged over 6,800 bopd over the last 30 days.

In addition, we are extremely excited about our formal route activation through the OCP. Having completed all the regulatory approvals, the Company is now in a position to further diversify its oil sales routes and to allow for offtake optionality during the dry season. Activating additional routes to market is a priority for the Company and we look forward to sending further updates in the fall of 2024.

We are expecting to close the Block 131 acquisition later this year becoming the Company’s first diversified production stream with the expectation of significantly increasing its light oil production profile in 2025.”

Advertisement

Selected Financial Highlights

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Q2-2024

Q1-2024

Advertisement

Q2-2024

Q2-2023

$/bbl

$ 000

$/bbl

Advertisement

$ 000

$/bbl

$ 000

$/bbl

$ 000

Advertisement

Average Production (bopd)

18,290

18,518

18,404

15,631

Advertisement

Average sales (bopd)

18,050

18,347

18,198

15,567

Advertisement

Total sales (bbls)(1)

1,642,578

1,669,537

3,312,115

2,817,573

Advertisement

Average Brent price

$83.87

$81.01

$82.46

$79.73

Advertisement

Contracted sales price, gross

$83.92

$81.14

$82.35

$78.86

Advertisement

Tariffs, fees and differentials

($21.15)

($20.89)

($20.86)

($20.75)

Advertisement

Realized sales price, net

$62.76

$60.25

$61.49

$58.11

Advertisement

Oil revenue(1)

$62.76

$103,086

$60.25

$100,583

Advertisement

$61.49

$203,669

$58.11

$163,723

Royalties(2)

Advertisement

$6.08

$9,991

$5.69

$9,500

$5.88

Advertisement

$19,491

$5.37

$15,137

Operating expense

$6.10

Advertisement

$10,023

$5.56

$9,278

$5.83

$19,301

Advertisement

$4.78

$13,454

Direct Transportation:

 

 

Advertisement

Diluent

$1.16

$1,898

$0.94

$1,567

Advertisement

$1.73

$5,740

$1.07

$3,009

Barging

Advertisement

$0.58

$951

$0.60

$1,005

$0.02

Advertisement

$54

$0.64

$1,802

Diesel

$0.11

Advertisement

$186

$0.05

$80

($0.03)

($106)

Advertisement

$0.08

$233

Storage

$0.01

$12

Advertisement

($0.27)

($457)

($0.13)

($445)

$0.00

Advertisement

$0

Total Transportation

$1.86

$3,047

$1.32

Advertisement

$2,195

$1.59

$5,243

$1.79

$5,044

Advertisement

Net Operating Income(3,4)

$48.72

$80,025

$47.68

$79,610

Advertisement

$48.19

$159,634

$46.17

$130,088

G&A

Advertisement

$6.41

$10,528

$4.83

$8,071

$5.61

Advertisement

$18,597

$4.30

$12,107

EBITDA(3)

$42.31

Advertisement

$69,497

$42.85

$71,539

$42.58

$141,037

Advertisement

$41.87

$117,981

Adjusted EBITDA(3,5)

$45.78

$75,201

Advertisement

$43.15

$72,048

$44.46

$147,250

$47.44

Advertisement

$133,670

Net Income

$21.55

$35,405

$28.52

Advertisement

$47,619

$25.07

$83,028

$22.58

$63,614

Advertisement

Basic Shares Outstanding (000)

914,196

914,104

914,196

922,306

Advertisement

Market Capitalization(6)

$504,152

$511,898

$504,152

$433,484

Advertisement

Net Income/Share ($/share)

$0.04

$0.05

$0.09

$0.069

Advertisement

Capex

$38,867

$30,352

$69,219

$59,286

Advertisement

Free Funds Flow(3) (7)

$22.12

$36,334

$24.97

$41,696

Advertisement

$23.56

$78,030

$26.40

$74,384

% of Market Capitalization(6)

Advertisement

7.2%

8.2%

15.5%

17.2%

Total Cash(8)

Advertisement

$95,859

$85,151

$95,859

$92,552

Net Surplus (Debt) (3) (9)

Advertisement

$50,324

$55,522

$50,324

$97,523

 

Advertisement

The table below summarizes PetroTal’s comparative financial position.

  1. Approximately 89% of Q2 2024 sales were through the Brazilian route vs 87% in Q1 2024.

  2. Royalties at year to date June 30, 2024 and March 31, 2024 include the impact of the 2.5% community social trust.

  3. Non-GAAP (defined below) measure that does not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures presented by other entities. See “Selected Financial Measures” section.

  4. Net operating income represents revenues less royalties, operating expenses, and direct transportation.

  5. Adjusted EBITDA is net operating income less general and administrative (“G&A”) and plus/minus realized derivative impacts.

  6. Market capitalization for Q2, 2024, Q1 2024 and Q2 2023, assume share prices of $0.53, $0.56, and $0.45 respectively on the last trading day of the quarter.

  7. Free funds flow is defined as adjusted EBITDA less capital expenditures. See “Selected Financial Measures” section.

  8. Includes restricted cash balances.

  9. Net Surplus (Debt) = Total cash + all trade and net VAT receivables + short and long term net derivative balances – total current liabilities – long term debt – non current lease liabilities – net deferred tax – other long term obligations.

Q2 2024 Financial Variance Summary

Three months ended

Six months ended

US$/bbl Variance Summary

Advertisement

Q2 2024

 

Q1 2024

Variance

Q2 2024

Advertisement

Q2 2023

Variance

Oil Sales (bopd)

18,050

 

Advertisement

18,347

(297)

18,198

15,567

2,631

Advertisement

Contracted Brent Price

$83.92

 

$81.14

$2.78

Advertisement

$82.35

$78.86

$3.49

Realized Sales Price

$62.76

Advertisement

 

$60.25

$2.51

$61.49

$58.11

Advertisement

$3.38

Royalties

$6.08

 

$5.69

Advertisement

$0.39

$5.88

$5.37

$0.51

Total OPEX and Transportation

Advertisement

$7.96

 

$6.88

$1.08

$7.42

Advertisement

$6.57

$0.85

Net Operating Income(1,2)

$48.72

 

Advertisement

$47.68

$1.04

$48.19

$46.17

$2.02

Advertisement

G&A

$6.41

 

$4.83

$1.58

Advertisement

$5.61

$4.30

$1.31

EBITDA

$42.31

Advertisement

 

$42.85

($0.54)

$42.58

$41.87

Advertisement

$0.71

Net Income

$21.55

 

$28.52

Advertisement

($6.97)

$25.07

$22.58

$2.49

Free Funds Flow(1,3)

Advertisement

$22.12

 

$24.97

($2.85)

$23.56

Advertisement

$26.40

$2.84

 

Q2 2024 Financial Variance Commentary

  • Near-flat sales volume compared to prior quarter with six months ended sales volumes up 17% from Q2 2023;

  • Higher lifting costs in the quarter, driven by higher contracted service and erosion control opex allocations compared to previous quarter. Higher diluent costs in the quarter due to higher transportation costs of diluent;

  • Capital spending increased by 28% to $38.9 million in the quarter from the prior quarter of $30.2 million due to increased drilling activity;

  • Strong Q2 2024 production and favorable oil pricing generated free funds flow per barrel in the quarter of approximately $22.1/bbl compared to $24.9/bbl in Q4 2023;

  • Liquidity increased 13% in Q2 2024 compared to Q1 2024, with total cash increasing by approximately $11 million to $96 million despite transferring nearly $12 million of restricted cash to the social trust fund; and,

  • PetroTal maintained a strong balance sheet in Q2 2024 with no long term bank debt and a net surplus(1,4) of $50 million, and inclusive of a $65 million net deferred tax liability.

  1. See “Selected Financial Measures”.

  2. Net operating income represents revenues less royalties, operating expenses, and direct transportation.

  3. Free funds flow is defined as adjusted EBITDA less capital expenditures.

  4. Net Surplus (Debt) = Total cash + all trade and net VAT receivables + short and long term net derivative balances – total current liabilities – long term debt – non current lease liabilities – net deferred tax – other long term obligations.

Additional Financial and Operating Updates in, and subsequent to June 30, 2024

Advertisement

Operations Update

Corporate production averaged 20,034 bopd in July 2024, with contributions from the 19H and 18H wells, which averaged 5,167 and 2,278 bopd, respectively. Dry river season indicators are at the moment at lower levels than 2023. Notwithstanding, production and sales constraints from August through October 2024 are kept as originally budgeted thanks to the increased barge fleet size. Q3 2024 production guidance is reiterated at approximately 13,000 bopd.

With expected low river conditions in Q3 and early Q4, the Company is reaffirming production guidance of 16,500 to 17,500 bopd for 2024. Assuming a full year 2024 Brent price of $82/bbl, full year 2024 EBITDA is now expected to be in the range of $200 to $240 million. Previous 2024 EBITDA guidance was $200 million.

PetroTal completed drilling 5WD on July 22, 2024, the Company’s fourth water disposal well with injectivity tests at approximately 50,000 barrels of water per day (“bwpd”). The 5WD well is already online at a total cost of $10.7 million and below its budget of $12.7 million. Once the three high pressure pumps and the additional 50,000 barrels of water tank are fully tied in, the total field water disposal capacity will reach an estimated 170,000 bwpd by year end from the current 110,000 bwpd.

Drilling commenced on Well 20H on July 26, 2024 with an estimated cost of $13.7 million. Well completion and first production are estimated by late Q3 2024.

Advertisement

In order to minimize rig standby fees and maximize production thanks to the increased water handling capacity heading into the next wet season, PetroTal is accelerating capex. Following the completion of the 20H well, PetroTal will drill and complete wells 21H, 22H and 23H at Bretana by the end of Q1 2025. As a result, total estimated 2024 capital spend is now expected to fall within a range of $150 to $175 million, from a range of $150 to $160 million previously.

ONP Update

On July 17, 2024 the Company was notified that approximately 322,000 barrels of Northern Peruvian Pipeline (“ONP”) oil located in section II of the line was successfully pumped to the Bayovar port for tender and eventual sale. When the tender process is completed by Petroperu, it will trigger a true up payment to PetroTal if the realized price for those barrels is greater than the oil’s cost base. The average cost base of the Company’s 2.2 million barrels of oil in the ONP is approximately $72.5/bbl Brent. Including the recent oil movement, as of the end of July, there are approximately 1.88 million barrels remaining in the ONP.

Cepsa Acquisition Update

Since the signing of the acquisition agreement in early May 2024, PetroTal’s integration team has been progressing on the necessary regulatory approvals required to close the acquisition. The first milestone was achieved in late June 2024 with an approval from Perupetro. Approval into supreme decree is still estimated in Q4 2024. The Block 131 assets have been producing between 800 and 1,000 bopd and generating positive EBITDA per month since the transaction effective date of January 1, 2024. It is the Company’s intention to optimize production starting next year.

Advertisement

JP Morgan Line of Credit

In May 2024, PetroTal was able to secure a $20 million line of credit with JP Morgan to further enhance short term liquidity. The line of credit is for 120 days at market variable interest rates with payment due in full at the end of the term. Including the previously announced $20 million line of credit with Banco de Credito del Peru, the Company has approximately $40 million of undrawn short term credit capacity.

Share Buyback Plan Update

PetroTal’s updated liquidity strategy prioritises dividend sustainability, potential Block 131 development, and erosion control working capital requirements. In Q2 2024, the Company set additional constraints on the share buyback program that better align daily buyback execution with lower share prices. As a result, a decreased volume of buybacks was realized in Q2 2024 compared to previous quarters. The Company will continue to monitor buyback levels.

Q3 2024 dividend declaration

Advertisement

A cash dividend of USD$0.015 per common share has been declared to be paid in Q3 2024. This approximately represents a 12% annualized yield based on the current share price and includes the recurring USD$0.015 per common share amount, without the liquidity sweep this quarter due to anticipated heavier cash requirements over the next two quarters. The total dividend of USD$0.015 per common share will be paid according to the following timetable:

  • Record date: August 30, 2024

  • Payment date: September 13, 2024

The dividend is an eligible dividend for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) and investors should note that the excess liquidity sweep portion of all future dividends may be subject to fluctuations up or down in accordance with the Company’s return of capital policy. Shareholders outside of Canada should contact their respective brokers or registrar agents for the appropriate tax election forms regarding this dividend.

Director Resignation

Effective August 8, 2024, Dr. Roger Tucker has resigned as a Company director so he can focus on leading the growth of Africa Oil. Dr. Tucker has been a board member since the end of 2019 when the Company started its successful horizontal well drilling campaign and has made many other significant technical contributions to our success at Bretana. PetroTal would like to thank Dr. Tucker for his contributions to the company and wishes him well in his future endeavors.

Q2 2024 Webcast Link for August 8, 2024

Advertisement

PetroTal will host a webcast for its Q2 2024 results on August 8, 2024 at 9am CT (Houston) and 3pm BST (London). Please see the link below to register.

https://stream.brrmedia.co.uk/broadcast/666ae961ee30aaf32018b5c3

ABOUT PETROTAL

PetroTal is a publicly traded, tri‐quoted (TSX: TAL) (AIM: PTAL) (OTCQX: PTALF) oil and gas development and production Company domiciled in Calgary, Alberta, focused on the development of oil assets in Peru. PetroTal’s flagship asset is its 100% working interest in Bretana oil field in Peru’s Block 95 where oil production was initiated in June 2018. In early 2022, PetroTal became the largest crude oil producer in Peru. The Company’s management team has significant experience in developing and exploring for oil in Peru and is led by a Board of Directors that is focused on safely and cost effectively developing the Bretana oil field. It is actively building new initiatives to champion community sensitive energy production, benefiting all stakeholders.

For further information, please see the Company’s website at www.petrotal-corp.com, the Company’s filed documents at www.sedarplus.ca, or below:

Advertisement

Camilo McAllister
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Cmcallister@PetroTal-Corp.com
T: (386) 383 1634

Manolo Zuniga
President and Chief Executive Officer
Mzuniga@PetroTal-Corp.com
T: (713) 609-9101

PetroTal Investor Relations
InvestorRelations@PetroTal-Corp.com

Celicourt Communications
Mark Antelme / Jimmy Lea
petrotal@celicourt.uk
T : 44 (0) 20 7770 6424

Strand Hanson Limited (Nominated & Financial Adviser)
Ritchie Balmer / James Spinney / Robert Collins
T: 44 (0) 207 409 3494

Advertisement

Stifel Nicolaus Europe Limited (Joint Broker)
Callum Stewart / Simon Mensley / Ashton Clanfield
T: +44 (0) 20 7710 7600

Peel Hunt LLP (Joint Broker)
Richard Crichton / David McKeown / Georgia Langoulant
T: +44 (0) 20 7418 8900

READER ADVISORIES

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: This press release contains certain statements that may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Such statements relate to possible future events, including, but not limited to, oil production levels and guidance. All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “plan”, “estimate”, “potential”, “will”, “should”, “continue”, “may”, “objective” and similar expressions. Without limitation, this press release contains forward-looking statements pertaining to: PetroTal’s drilling, completions, workovers and other activities; anticipated future production and revenue; drilling plans including the timing of drilling, commissioning, and startup; PetroTal’s 2024 guidance; expectations regarding the strategic acquisition of CEPSA Peruana, S.A.C (the “Acquisition”), including in respect of its terms, timing, benefits and closing (including that it will close pending regulatory approvals); the Company’s expectation to meet Q3 2024 production guidance in face of production and sales constraints in August and September of Q3; expectations of timing to realize revenues from the Company’s OCP oil route to market; expectations regarding the tender process and sale of the ONP oil; expectations surrounding PetroTal’s short term receivables and when they become due; Q3 2024 dividend declaration of $0.015/share payable September 13, 2024 and expectations in respect of thereof (including timing); the renewal of the share buyback plan; expectations surrounding PetroTal’s new leadership team; and average 2024 production. The forward-looking statements are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by the Company, including, but not limited to, expectations and assumptions concerning the ability of existing infrastructure to deliver production and the anticipated capital expenditures associated therewith, the ability to obtain and maintain necessary permits and licenses, the ability of government groups to effectively achieve objectives in respect of reducing social conflict and collaborating towards continued investment in the energy sector, reservoir characteristics, recovery factor, exploration upside, prevailing commodity prices and the actual prices received for PetroTal’s products, including pursuant to hedging arrangements, the availability and performance of drilling rigs, facilities, pipelines, other oilfield services and skilled labour, royalty regimes and exchange rates, the impact of inflation on costs, the application of regulatory and licensing requirements, the accuracy of PetroTal’s geological interpretation of its drilling and land opportunities, current legislation, receipt of required regulatory approval, the success of future drilling and development activities, the performance of new wells, future river water levels, the Company’s growth strategy, general economic conditions and availability of required equipment and services. Although the Company believes that the expectations and assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements because the Company can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to, risks associated with: counterparty risk to closing the Acquisition and unforeseen difficulties in integrating the assets pursuant to such acquisition into PetroTal’s operations; incorrect assessments of the value of benefits to be obtained from acquisitions and exploration and development programs (including the Acquisition); the oil and gas industry in general (e.g., operational risks in development, exploration and production; delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of reserve estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production, costs and expenses; and health, safety and environmental risks), commodity price volatility, price differentials and the actual prices received for products, exchange rate fluctuations, legal, political and economic instability in Peru, access to transportation routes and markets for the Company’s production, changes in legislation affecting the oil and gas industry and uncertainties resulting from potential delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; changes in the financial landscape both domestically and abroad, including volatility in the stock market and financial system; and wars (including Russia’s war in Ukraine and the Israeli-Hamas conflict). Please refer to the risk factors identified in the Company’s most recent annual information form and MD&A which are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.

OIL REFERENCES: All references to “light oil” in this press release mean “light crude oil” as defined in NI 51-101. All references to “heavy oil” in this press release mean “heavy crude oil” as defined in NI 51-101. All references to Brent indicate Intercontinental Exchange (“ICE”) Brent.

Advertisement

SHORT TERM RESULTS: References in this press release to peak rates, initial rates, production rates since inception, current production rates, and other short-term production rates are useful in confirming the presence of hydrocarbons, however such rates are not determinative of the rates at which such wells will commence production and decline thereafter and are not indicative of long-term performance or of ultimate recovery. While encouraging, readers are cautioned not to place reliance on such rates in calculating the aggregate production of PetroTal. The Company cautions that such results should be considered to be preliminary.

SPECIFIED FINANCIAL MEASURES: This press release includes various specified financial measures, including non-GAAP financial measures, non-GAAP financial ratios and capital management measures as further described herein. These measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and, therefore, may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures by other companies. Management uses these non- GAAP measures for its own performance measurement and to provide shareholders and investors with additional measurements of the Company’s efficiency and its ability to fund a portion of its future capital expenditures. “Adjusted EBITDA” (non-GAAP financial measure) is calculated as consolidated net income (loss) before interest and financing expenses, income taxes, depletion, depreciation and amortization and adjusted for G&A impacts and certain non-cash, extraordinary and non-recurring items primarily relating to unrealized gains and losses on financial instruments and impairment losses, including derivative true-up settlements. PetroTal utilizes adjusted EBITDA as a measure of operational performance and cash flow generating capability. Adjusted EBITDA impacts the level and extent of funding for capital projects investments. Reference to EBITDA is calculated as net operating income less G&A. “Netback” (non-GAAP financial measure) equals total petroleum sales less quality discount, lifting costs, transportation costs and royalty payments calculated on a bbl basis. The Company considers netbacks to be a key measure as they demonstrate Company’s profitability relative to current commodity prices. “Net Operating Income” (non-GAAP financial measure) is calculated as revenues less royalties, operating expenses, and direct transportation. The Company considers Net Operating Income measure as they demonstrate Company’s profitability relative to current commodity prices. “Net surplus (debt)” (non-GAAP financial measure) is calculated by adding together total cash, trade and VAT receivables, and short and long-term net derivative balances less total current liabilities, long-term debt, non-current lease liabilities, deferred tax, and other long-term obligations. Net surplus (debt) is used by management to provide a more complete understanding of the Company’s capital structure and provides a key measure to assess the Company’s liquidity. “Free funds flow” (non-GAAP financial measure) is calculated as net operating income less G&A less exploration and development capital expenditures less realized derivative gains/losses and is calculated prior to all debt service, taxes, lease payments, hedge costs, factoring, and lease payments. Management uses free funds flow to determine the amount of funds available to the Company for future capital allocation decisions. Please refer to the MD&A for additional information relating to specified financial measures.

Eligible Dividend: An eligible dividend is one which is characterized as such by the dividend-paying corporation for Canadian residents. The primary benefit of an eligible dividend is that it benefits from an enhanced gross-up and credit regime at the shareholder level (i.e., the shareholder pays less tax on eligible dividends than non-eligible dividends). This is meant to compensate for the higher general corporate tax rate paid by non-CCPC’s on their income and generally preserve integration of Canada’s tax rates. As an example, for federal income tax purposes the gross-up rate for eligible dividends is 38% (as compared to 15% for non-eligible dividends) such that the amount of the dividend is multiplied by 1.38 to determine the taxable income to the shareholder. The dividend tax credit for eligible dividends is additionally increased to 6/11 (or 15.02%), as compared to 9/13 (9%) for non-eligible dividends, to offset the greater income inclusion to the taxpayer. Each province provides similar relief on the tax they would otherwise levy on the dividends, although the effective gross-up and credit differs by province.

FOFI DISCLOSURE: This press release contains future-oriented financial information and financial outlook information (collectively, “FOFI”) about PetroTal’s prospective results of operations and production results, free funds flow, cost estimates, tax rates, budget, EBITDA, netback, dividends, capex, 2024 average production and production and sales targets, shareholder returns and components thereof, including pro forma the completion of the Acquisition, all of which are subject to the same assumptions, risk factors, limitations and qualifications as set forth in the above paragraphs. FOFI contained in this press release was approved by management as of the date of this press release and was included for the purpose of providing further information about PetroTal’s anticipated future business operations. PetroTal and its management believe that FOFI has been prepared on a reasonable basis, reflecting management’s best estimates and judgments, and represent, to the best of management’s knowledge and opinion, the Company’s expected course of action. However, because this information is highly subjective, it should not be relied on as necessarily indicative of future results. PetroTal disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any FOFI contained in this press release, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required pursuant to applicable law. Readers are cautioned that the FOFI contained in this press release should not be used for purposes other than for which it is disclosed herein. All FOFI contained in this press release complies with the requirements of Canadian securities legislation, including Canadian National Instrument 51-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities. Changes in forecast commodity prices, differences in the timing of capital expenditures, and variances in average production estimates can have a significant impact on the key performance measures included in PetroTal’s guidance. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from these estimates.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/219200

Advertisement

Finance

A 27-year-old drew down half of her stock portfolio to buy real estate. It’s part of her plan to hit financial independence.

Published

on

A 27-year-old drew down half of her stock portfolio to buy real estate. It’s part of her plan to hit financial independence.

A few years into her accounting career, Carolyn Yu began thinking seriously about financial independence.

“I’d feel very stressed and tired,” Yu, who was working at a Big Four firm at the time, told Business Insider. “I thought, maybe someday I could have more freedom and not spend 24/7 working at a very demanding job.”

She picked up “Rich Dad, Poor Dad” and started listening to the popular real estate podcast, BiggerPockets. One takeaway stood out: focus on buying assets that can grow in value.

Yu, who’d been consistently investing in the stock market since college, felt compelled to make a move. In late 2024, she drained about half her stock portfolio in order to pay cash for a two-bedroom, two-bathroom condo in Fort Worth, Texas.

The Bay Area-based Gen Zer had been eyeing Texas in part for its tax advantages, including the absence of state income tax. She considered other Texas markets, but Fort Worth stood out for its affordability and growth potential.

Advertisement

“The population growth, the crime rate, the property value growth — they all looked good to me,” she said.

She flew to Fort Worth, toured the condo, signed a contract the next day, and closed within a month. Yu intentionally kept her first purchase under $100,000, unsure whether she had the capital or experience to take on something larger.

“Pretty much 50% of my stock portfolio was gone,” she said. But the drawdown didn’t faze her. “I knew that $80,000 transitioned into another investment.”

Advertisement

Scaling to 5 properties in 2 years by recycling capital

Yu grew her portfolio by reinvesting equity from one property into the next.

Her strategy centers on buying below market value, improving the property, allowing it to appreciate, and then tapping into the built-up equity to help finance another purchase.

As her portfolio expanded, her financing evolved. She moved from paying all cash for her first condo to using conventional loans and later DSCR (debt service coverage ratio) loans, which are designed for investors and rely heavily on a property’s cash flow.

Her second purchase was a two-bedroom, one-bath single-family home. She bought it in June 2025 for about $105,000, putting down 25%. After investing about $50,000 in renovations, she said the home appraised at $195,000 and rented for $1,500 a month.

“This property allowed me to execute the BRRRR strategy successfully,” she said, referring to buy, rehab, rent, refinance, repeat. She said she was able to pull out about 70% of the appraised value to help fund her next purchases.

Advertisement

Within about two years of buying her first condo, Yu had a five-property portfolio. Her first three are cash-flowing, while her fourth is currently listed for rent, and her fifth is being prepared for tenants. Business Insider reviewed mortgage documents to confirm ownership and lease agreements to verify rental rates.


carolyn yu

Yu resides in the Bay Area, but invests in real estate in Fort Worth.

Courtesy of Carolyn Yu



One of the challenges she’s faced since buying property has been vacancy.

She purchased her first condo in late 2024 — “probably the worst time to rent because of winter vacancy,” she said — and it sat empty for six months. She eventually lowered the asking rent by about $100 a month before securing a tenant.

Advertisement

The vacancy was stressful, but manageable because she had paid cash and didn’t carry a mortgage. Still, she owed about $600 a month in HOA dues.

Her advice to other investors: keep at least six months of reserves, know your numbers inside and out, and expect vacancies and repairs.

Why she prefers real estate to stocks

Yu still invests in stocks, but said she prefers real estate because it feels more controllable and scalable. In addition to generating a few thousand dollars a month in rental income, she’s also building equity in her properties.

“Real estate gave me more control, more tangible assets, more tax efficiency,” she said, pointing to depreciation, mortgage interest deductions, and the ability to refinance without selling. She also enjoys negotiating deals.

She funnels most of her rental income back into her stock portfolio. Her end goal is financial independence and work flexibility.

Advertisement

Yu wants to own at least eight properties by 2027 and have her portfolio appraised at roughly $2 million. By then, she hopes rental income will cover her expenses and provide enough cushion to leave her W-2 job, so she can focus solely on her real estate business.

She’s also changed how she thinks about spending. Early in her career, she said she coped with work stress by traveling frequently. Now, she prioritizes investing over lifestyle upgrades.

“I would rather put my money into investments right now in exchange for vacations in the future,” she said. “I think it’s totally worth it because I think in two years, I could be financially free.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

When making travel plans, timing and financing are major considerations

Published

on

When making travel plans, timing and financing are major considerations

For the true travel fan, there’s often a built-in conflict on how best to plan for your next adventure.

On the one hand, the world awaits. Spin the globe, cover your eyes and point. Or, throw a dart at the map! Then it’s time to dig in and research your next dream destination.

On the other hand, getting the best bargain can be a last-minute proposition. There may be a fare sale today, but not tomorrow. How does that mash up with your bicycle tour in Italy? Or your friend’s wedding in Hawaii?

Spreading out all the options on the table can be daunting. It’s a bit like taking a sip from the fire hose. And we all have varying degrees of tolerance for changing prices, tiny seats and geopolitical uncertainty.

So let’s take a snapshot of what’s happening now, knowing you won’t likely drink from the same river, or fire hose, twice.

Advertisement

Since most of today’s snapshots are on the phone, there are some handy settings: You can zoom in for a closer look at that fruit and cheese platter, frame it up nicely for a good shot of your seatmate, or look out the window and get a nice view from 30,000 feet.

Fares we love. There are just a few fares to zoom in on right now.

Anchorage-Chicago. Three airlines will offer nonstop flights this summer: Alaska, United and American. Alaska and United fly the route year-round. There are just a couple of months where travelers have to stop in Denver or Seattle on the way. Right now, the Basic price is $349 round-trip. United has the least-expensive Main price of $429 round-trip. Alaska charges more: $449-$469 round-trip.

The rate to Chicago is steady throughout the summer, as long as you’re open to flying on other airlines, including Delta and now Southwest, starting May 15.

Anchorage-Dallas. Choose from four airlines with competitive prices. United and Delta offer great rates starting on March 30, for travel all summer and into the fall for $331 round-trip in basic economy. Remember: Basic economy means you’ll be sitting in the middle seat back by the potty. There are few, if any, advance seat assignments permitted and you’re the last to board. Don’t expect to accrue many frequent flyer points. Alaska will give you 30%. Delta and American offer none. United is axing MileagePlus points for basic travelers soon.

Advertisement

Delta and United offer the chance to pay $100 more for pre-reserved seats and mileage credit. Of course, they may charge you more for a nicer seat on the plane. But that’s another story.

American Airlines charges a little bit more, about $20 more for a round-trip, to fly nonstop. It’s a nice flight.

Anchorage-Albuquerque. Delta is targeting this route with a nice rate: $281 round-trip in Basic or $381 in Main. But it’s just between May 23 and June 29. Why? Well, it lines up nicely with Southwest’s launch on May 15. Who knows why airlines cut their fares during a traditionally busy season? It’s just a hunch.

Looking at airfares more broadly, there are a few more bargain rates out there, but most only go through May 20. Airlines are hoping for a robust summer — so prices go up after that.

For example, between March 29 and May 20, Alaska Air offers a nonstop from Anchorage to Los Angeles for $257 round-trip in basic. For pre-assigned seats and full mileage credit, the main price is $337 round-trip. Prices go up to $437 round-trip in the summer.

Advertisement

The view from 30,000 feet is pretty clear, although past performance is no guarantee of future results. Several carriers, including American, Delta, United, Southwest and Alaska are adding flights for the summer. There will be robust competition, which means lower fares. Just last week, Alaska Air dropped the price from Anchorage to Seattle to $210 round-trip. That rate is gone, but others will come along.

Charge it. Banks own the airlines by virtue of their popular credit cards. Do they own you, too?

Sifting through the various credit card offers and bonus points emails, it’s easy to forget that banks, not travelers, are the airlines’ biggest customers. At a Bank of America conference last year, Alaska Airlines reported it receives about 15% of its total revenue from its loyalty plan. That adds up to more than 1.7 billion in 2024. Delta has a similar deal with American Express, which paid the airline about $8.2 billion last year.

Think about that the next time the flight attendants are handing out credit card applications in the aisle.

Zooming in, if you’re going to play the Atmos loyalty game on Alaska Airlines, you have to have an Alaska Airlines credit card from Bank of America.

Advertisement

I carry the plain-old Alaska Air card. I used to have two of them, primarily for the $99 companion fare. That’s still a compelling offer. But to get that benefit, you have to charge it on an Alaska Airlines Visa card.

So the question is: Is it worth it to pay $395 per year for the new Summit Visa card from Bank of America?

If you use your credit card for your business or if you regularly charge thousands of dollars every month, the Summit card may be the card for you.

One of the foundational benefits is for every $2 you charge, you earn one status point toward your next elite tier, such as titanium. It’s possible to charge your way to the top tier of the frequent flyer ladder without ever stepping on a plane. If that’s your level of charge-card use, then the Summit is for you. For the lesser Ascent card like mine, you earn one status point for every $3 spent.

For a little wider view, consider that your other travel costs, including accommodations, can hit your budget a lot harder than an airline ticket. It’s one reason I carry a flexible spend credit card in addition to my Alaska Airlines card. Here’s a snapshot of some popular options:

Advertisement

1. Bilt Rewards. I finally signed up for a Bilt account, although I haven’t yet received my card. There are two big benefits with Bilt: You can charge your rent and transfer points to Alaska Airlines. There also is a scheme to charge your mortgage, but it’s more convoluted. But the charge-your-rent option is a stand-alone gold star for the Bilt program, even if you don’t fly Alaska Airlines.

In addition to the link with Alaska Airlines, Bilt points transfer to other oneworld carriers like British, Japan Airlines and Qatar Air. Hotel partners include Hyatt, my favorite, and Hilton. A big bonus comes with the “Obsidian” card, $95 per year: three points for every dollar spent on groceries.

But there’s also a Bilt card with no annual fee. And there are no extra fees incurred when you charge your rent.

2. American Express. If you fly on Delta, the American Express card is a natural choice.

The two companies really are joined at the hip. The last American Express card I had was a Delta “Gold” card, which included a 70,000-point signup bonus. Cardholders get a free checked bag, although Delta offers two free checked bags for SkyMiles members who live in Alaska, and 15% off award tickets.

Advertisement

The Delta card is free for the first year, then $150 per year thereafter.

There is a dizzying array of American Express cards available, including some with no annual fee. But with Delta there is a narrowed-down selection, including one that’s more than $800 per year. That includes lounge access and some other benefits, including a companion pass.

American Express cardholders also can transfer their points to Hilton and Bonvoy as well as to 15 other airlines.

Capital One offers the Venture X card, which offers cardholders 75,000 points plus a $300 travel credit at their in-house travel service. The cost is $395 per year. Get the slimmed-down Venture card for just $95 per year. You still can earn the 75,000 bonus points after spending $4,000 in the first three months. Plus, there’s a $250 credit with Capital One Travel.

Airline partners include EMirates, Singapore Air, Japan Air and EVA Air, from Taiwan. Hotel partners include Hilton and Marriott.

Advertisement

I’ve carried several Chase cards for years. Right now I have the Chase Sapphire Preferred card, for which I received 80,000 bonus points. But that was several years ago. More recently, I got the Chase-affiliated Ink Business Cash card to harvest a 90,000 point bonus. Previously, I carried the Chase Sapphire Reserve. I got a 100,000 point bonus for that. But I dropped that card when the fee went up to $795 per year.

Stacking the cards like that — getting more than one — has helped me to get more bonus points, both for American Express and for Chase.

The best value for Chase points that I’ve found is for Hyatt Hotels. Right now, it’s the best redemption ration, but that can change. Chase also allows for transfers to Emirates, United, Singapore Air and Southwest, among others. The Chase travel portal is managed by Expedia, so you can redeem points for other hotels at a lower redemption rate.

The long view: All airline mileage plans are now credit card loyalty plans. Terms and conditions change, along with signup bonuses and other features of the cards. Last year, Chase dropped its airport restaurant feature, which offered $29 per person at select restaurants in Los Angeles, Seattle and Portland. A couple of years ago, the Priority Pass affiliated with Chase dropped the Alaska Airlines lounges as a partner.

It takes some time and effort to keep up with the programs and get the best value. But airline credit card plans are here to stay, even if the frequent-flyer programs are watered down year after year.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Finance

Lawmakers target ‘free money’ home equity finance model

Published

on

Lawmakers target ‘free money’ home equity finance model

Key points:

  • Pennsylvania lawmakers are considering a bill that would classify home equity investments (HEIs) and shared equity contracts as residential mortgages.
  • Industry leaders have mobilized through a newly formed trade group to influence how HEIs are regulated.
  • The outcome could reshape underwriting standards, return structures and capital markets strategy for HEI providers.

A fast-growing home equity financing model that promises homeowners cash without monthly payments is facing mounting scrutiny from state lawmakers — and the industry behind it is mobilizing to shape the outcome.

In Pennsylvania, House Bill 2120 would classify shared equity contracts — often marketed as home equity investments (HEIs), shared appreciation agreements or home equity agreements — as residential mortgages under state law.

While the proposal is still in committee, the debate unfolding in Harrisburg reflects a broader national effort to determine whether these products are truly a new category of equity-based investment — or if they function as mortgages and belong under existing consumer lending laws.

A classification fight over home equity capture

HB 2120 would amend Pennsylvania’s Loan Interest and Protection Law by explicitly including shared appreciation agreements in the residential mortgage definition. If passed, shared equity contracts would be subject to the same interest caps, licensing standards and consumer protections that apply to traditional mortgage lending.

The legislation was introduced by Rep. Arvind Venkat after constituent Wendy Gilch — a fellow with the consumer watchdog Consumer Policy Center — brought concerns to his office. Gilch has since worked with Venkat as a partner in shaping the proposal.

Gilch initially began examining the products after seeing advertisements describe them as offering cash with “no debt,” “no interest” and “no monthly payments.”

Advertisement

“It sounds like free money,” she said. “But in many cases, you’re giving up a growing share of your home’s equity over time.”

Breaking down the debate

Shared equity providers (SEPs) argue that their products are not loans. Instead of charging interest or requiring monthly payments, companies provide homeowners with a lump sum in exchange for a share of the home’s future appreciation, which is typically repaid when the home is sold or refinanced.

The Coalition for Home Equity Partnership (CHEP) — an industry-led group founded in 2025 by Hometap, Point and Unlock — emphasizes that shared equity products have zero monthly payments or interest, no minimum income requirements and no personal liability if a home’s value declines.

Venkat, however, argues that the mechanics look familiar and argues that “transactions secured by homes should include transparency and consumer protections” — especially since, for many many Americans, their home is their most valuable asset. 

“These agreements involve appraisals, liens, closing costs and defined repayment triggers,” he said. “If it looks like a mortgage and functions like a mortgage, it should be treated like one.”

Advertisement

The bill sits within Pennsylvania’s anti-usury framework, which caps returns on home-secured lending in the mid-single digits. Venkat said he’s been told by industry representatives that they require returns approaching 18-20% to make the model viable — particularly if contracts are later resold to outside investors. According to CHEP, its members provide scenario-based disclosures showing potential outcomes under varying assumptions, with the final cost depending on future home values and term length.

In a statement shared with Real Estate News, CHEP President Cliff Andrews said the group supports comprehensive regulation of shared equity products but argues that automatically classifying them as mortgages applies a framework “that was never designed for, and cannot meaningfully be applied to, equity-based financing instruments.”

As currently drafted, HB 2120 would function as a “de facto ban” on shared equity products in Pennsylvania, Andrews added.

Real Estate News also reached out to Unison, a major vendor in the space, for comment on HB 2120. Hometap and Unlock deferred to CHEP when reached for comment. 

A growing regulatory patchwork

Pennsylvania is not alone in seeking to legislate regulations around HEIs. Maryland, Illinois and Connecticut have also taken steps to clarify that certain home equity option agreements fall under mortgage lending statutes and licensing requirements.

Advertisement

In Washington state, litigation over whether a shared equity contract qualified as a reverse mortgage reached the Ninth Circuit before the case was settled and the opinion vacated. Maine and Oregon have considered similar proposals, while Massachusetts has pursued enforcement action against at least one provider in connection with home equity investment practices.

Taken together, these developments suggest a state-by-state regulatory patchwork could emerge in the absence of a uniform federal framework.

The push for homeowner protections

The debate over HEIs arrives amid elevated interest rates and reduced refinancing activity — conditions that have increased demand for alternative equity-access products. 

But regulators appear increasingly focused on classification — specifically whether the absence of monthly payments and traditional interest charges changes the legal character of a contract secured by a lien on a home.

Gilch argues that classification is central to consumer clarity. “If it’s secured by your home and you have to settle up when you sell or refinance, homeowners should have the same protections they expect with any other home-based transaction,” she said.

Advertisement

Lessons from prior home equity controversies

For industry leaders, the regulatory scrutiny may feel familiar. In recent years, unconventional home equity models have drawn enforcement actions and litigation once questions surfaced around contract structure, title encumbrances or consumer understanding.

MV Realty, which offered upfront payments in exchange for long-term listing agreements, faced regulatory action in multiple states over how those agreements were recorded and disclosed. EasyKnock, which structured sale-leaseback transactions aimed at unlocking home equity, abruptly shuttered operations in late 2024 following litigation and mounting regulatory pressure.

Shared equity investment contracts differ structurally from both models, but those episodes underscore a broader pattern: novel housing finance products can scale quickly in tight credit cycles. Just as quickly, these home equity models encounter regulatory intervention once policymakers begin examining how they fit within existing law — and the formation of CHEP signals that SEPs recognize the stakes.

For real estate executives and housing finance leaders, the outcome of the classification fight may prove consequential. If shared equity contracts are treated as mortgages in more states, underwriting standards, return structures and secondary market economics could shift.

If lawmakers instead carve out a distinct regulatory category, the model may retain more flexibility — but face ongoing state-by-state negotiation.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending