Connect with us

Finance

Finance for Biodiversity updates nature target-setting framework for investors

Published

on

Finance for Biodiversity updates nature target-setting framework for investors

The Finance for Biodiversity (FfB) Foundation has launched an updated version of its nature target-setting framework for asset managers and asset owners. 

Developed with FfB members, the guidance follows a beta version released in November, and seeks to help investors align financial flows with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030.

The Finance for Biodiversity Pledge was launched in 2020 and boasts 177 signatories, including Amundi, Fidelity International, Legal & General Investment Management and Federated Hermes. Signatories commit to collaborate, engage, set targets and report on biodiversity before 2025.  

In 2021, the FfB Foundation was set up to “support a call to action and collaboration between financial institutions via working groups as a connecting body for contributing signatories and partner organisations”.  

Financial institutions that have signed the pledge can become members of the foundation if they want to be active in the working groups. There are currently 76 members. 

Advertisement

Among the updates to Wednesday’s document surround the types of nature targets for investors to set. 

Target reshuffle

The beta version outlined four types of targets: initiation, sector, engagement and portfolio coverage. 

The latest guidance proposes three types: initiation targets, optional monitoring targets and portfolio targets. 

The initiation targets would still see investors committing to assessing and disclosing their exposure to nature-related impacts, dependencies, risks and opportunities in line with the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures recommendations.

It also recommends setting targets on governance. For example, an investor could commit to ensuring board or executive-level oversight of the management of nature-related factors by a certain year. 

Advertisement

Turning to the optional monitoring targets, these are designed to ensure investors monitor sector-relevant KPIs “across priority sectors and implement stewardship actions to address the identified key impact drivers on nature”. 

An example of a monitoring target would be the percentage of companies with a deforestation and conversion-free policy, while a stewardship action could see the investor determine the engagement universe of companies to target on nature. 

Finally, for the portfolio targets the Foundation suggests a two-pronged approach: setting portfolio sub-targets, as well as stewardship sub-targets. 

An example of a sub-portfolio target could be that by 2030 a percentage of firms from relevant sectors will have committed to implement a validated Science-Based Target for Nature.

A stewardship sub-target could see an investor commit to engaging with a certain number of companies per year on each of the relevant pressures on nature. 

Advertisement

“The portfolio and stewardship sub-targets are complementary and indissociable as the latter is the lever through which the investor will influence companies to reduce their pressures on nature thereby achieving the required reduction to meet KPI thresholds,” according to the document. 

Unified approach

Another key change since the beta version is the removal of beginner and advanced tracks, which had different timelines for achieving targets. 

Instead, the foundation now advocates for a unified approach to applying these targets over time.

“This adjustment ensures that all targets are set to be achieved by 2030, in alignment with the GBF’s mission to halt and reverse biodiversity loss. However, investors retain the flexibility to target shorter timeframes according to their specific goals,” it said. 

Currently the framework remains limited to listed equity and corporate bonds – additional asset classes, including sovereign debt, will be integrated into the guidance in future iterations. 

Advertisement

The foundation said it is also planning to create guidance on how to set positive impact targets. 

ENCORE update 

In related news, the ENCORE nature tool has had a major update.

Launched in 2018 to help financial institutions and companies understand how their activities rely on nature, ENCORE is a collaboration between Global Canopy, the UNEP Finance Initiative, and the UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC).  

Previous updates included in 2019 when its functionality was extended to enable institutions to also assess their impacts on nature. 

One of the latest expansions is growing its previous list of 92 “production processes” to 271 “economic activities”.

Advertisement

These economic activities, ranging from livestock farming to the manufacture of chemicals and nuclear power production, “offer a more detailed breakdown on economic sectors”. 

It has also added information on key value chain links, covering two tiers of suppliers and two tiers of consumers for each economic activity, “enabling users to see their indirect nature-related impacts and dependencies”. 

“The release of an enhanced ENCORE methodological structure and knowledge base is more than just a procedural update,” said Neville Ash, director of UNEP-WCMC.

“The improvements come in response to pioneering users’ appetite to better understand how nature underpins their operations, and we encourage the business and financial community to use the tool to drive their decision-making towards a sustainable future – for economies, consumers and the planet.” 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Dividend Stability and Regional Strength: The Case for Truist Financial (TFC)

Published

on

Dividend Stability and Regional Strength: The Case for Truist Financial (TFC)

Truist Financial Corporation (NYSE:TFC) is included among the 11 Best Bank Dividend Stocks to Buy.

Dividend Stability and Regional Strength: The Case for Truist Financial (TFC)

Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

Truist Financial Corporation (NYSE:TFC) is a prominent American commercial bank with a strong footprint in the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic regions. Ranking among the top ten banks in the country, it enjoys a solid market position in high-growth states like Florida and Georgia. Recently, the bank has prioritized digital innovation and technology development to improve service delivery and remain competitive against fintech firms.

Regulatory compliance remains a key focus for Truist Financial Corporation (NYSE:TFC), as it operates under enhanced prudential standards and capital requirements as a Category III banking organization. Adhering to these standards is essential for sustaining its operations and long-term strategies. At the same time, Truist’s disciplined approach to capital management allows it to maintain financial stability while pursuing strategic growth opportunities, including potential mergers and acquisitions.

Truist Financial Corporation (NYSE:TFC) is also popular among investors because of its dividend policy. The company has been making regular payments to shareholders since 1997. Currently, it offers a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.53%, as of September 24.

Advertisement

While we acknowledge the potential of TFC as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you’re looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.

EAD NEXT: 12 Best Stocks to Buy Now for Passive Income and 12 Best Retail Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

Disclosure: None.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Financing opportunity: Q&A with Harold Pettigrew on the future of the CDFI Sector – Kresge Foundation

Published

on

Financing opportunity: Q&A with Harold Pettigrew on the future of the CDFI Sector – Kresge Foundation

As the community finance field enters a new era—shaped by economic uncertainty, shifting capital flows, and growing calls for accountability—how can CDFIs prepare for what’s ahead? The Kresge Foundation spoke with Harold Pettigrew, the president and CEO of the Opportunity Finance Network (OFN) to help answer that questionThis article is part of a series highlighting the impact of CDFIs and how the sector is adapting to the current environment. 

MD: CDFIs play a unique role in our financial ecosystem, often serving communities that mainstream banks overlook. Why are CDFIs so critical for advancing economic growth and creating opportunities in underserved communities?

HP: In every corner of America, CDFIs show that impact and financial performance aren’t at odds—they reinforce each other. We address market gaps and go where traditional capital doesn’t: listening first, solving for need, and providing capital to people and financing projects that strengthen families and communities. Whether it’s a small business on Main Street or a housing development in a rural town, CDFIs make investments that build wealth and create opportunities that reach people and communities that need it most. 

MD: CDFIs seem to have broad support in Congress, even when some administrations have looked to reduce funding or support. Is bipartisan support materially different today? What role has OFN played in telling the CDFI story and maintaining that support?

HP: Bipartisan support for CDFIs remains strong because our work cuts across political divides — we’re about creating jobs, building businesses and revitalizing communities. What’s different today is the urgency and scale of the need, and the growing recognition that CDFIs are essential partners in solving some of our nation’s toughest challenges. OFN and CDFIs tell real stories of impact—stories of people across the country whose lives and livelihoods have changed thanks to the capital provided by CDFIs. Through advocacy, research, and direct engagement with policymakers, we’ve elevated a clear, consistent message: For over 30 years, CDFIs have delivered results addressing market gaps in providing access to capital to communities across the country.  

MD: Beyond federal funding concerns, what are the current challenges and needs CDFIs are facing in their day-to-day efforts to support communities?

HP: CDFIs are navigating a complex economic environment— rising interest rates, tighter capital markets, and growing community needs are stretching our resources like never before. Many CDFIs are being asked to do more with less, while also investing in their own operations to scale effectively and sustainably. OFN is working to develop diverse pools of flexible capital, make deeper investments in talent and technology, and new policy frameworks that support and recognize the unique value CDFIs bring. The demand is clear —  what’s needed now is bold investments to meet the moment and craft new solutions for the future. 

MD: Philanthropies and community development departments of banks and insurance companies have always been crucial partners for CDFIs — how can they best support and invest in CDFIs right now?

HP: Our partners in philanthropy and financial services have been critical to the success of CDFIs, and now they have a critical opportunity to strengthen the CDFI industry for the future. That means moving beyond transactional grantmaking to long-term, trust-based partnerships. It means offering flexible, risk-tolerant capital that lets CDFIs innovate and expand, and it means investing in the infrastructure — people, systems, data — that helps us operate at scale.

Advertisement
MD: What keeps you optimistic about the future of the CDFI sector?

HP: What keeps me optimistic is the impact and commitment I see every day, from the entrepreneurs we finance, to the communities we serve, to the CDFI leaders innovating with courage and conviction. The sector is growing, diversifying and deepening its impact. We’re not just responding to the moment — we’re helping define the future of expanded access to finance and financial services. And with every new loan, every new partnership, every life changed, we’re proving that when we expand access to opportunity — we don’t just finance projects, we shape the future of communities across the country.  

Harold Pettigrew is the President and CEO of Opportunity Finance Network (OFN) 

Continue Reading

Finance

Reimagining Finance: Derek Kudsee on Coda’s AI-Powered Future

Published

on

Reimagining Finance: Derek Kudsee on Coda’s AI-Powered Future

Derek Kudsee is a veteran of the enterprise software industry, with senior leadership roles at industry giants such as SAP, Salesforce, and Microsoft under his belt. So, when he took the helm as the new Managing Director for Unit4 Financials by Coda, ERP Today sat down with Kudsee to discuss his vision for Coda, the promise of agentic AI to make work feel lighter for finance teams, and his mission to transform the classic system of record into a dynamic system of intelligence for the Office of the CFO.

What was it about the opportunity at Unit4, and specifically the challenge of modernizing Coda, that convinced you to take this role? 

A rare combination of having a deeply trusted platform and a clear opportunity to reimagine the finance function drew me to Unit4, and specifically the Coda business. Some of the largest enterprise customers have been running on this platform for decades. I’ve been brought in to help these finance teams run more efficiently and provide greater insight through agent-driven automation. We live in a world where technology has converged in our consumer and professional lives. Therefore, modernization is not only about addressing complex systems, but also about enhancing the user experience. This combination of running a deeply trusted platform, reimagining its capabilities in an AI-driven world, and modernizing the user experience was attractive. 

Unit4 Financials by Coda’s goal is to deliver an “AI-fueled office for the CFO” using agentic AI. How will a finance team using Coda experience this in their day-to-day work? 

When one thinks of an AI-fueled Office of the CFO, it’s about having agents deep inside those finance processes that will suggest, explain, and act within guardrails that finance teams can set. The work should feel like the machine is performing tasks that were previously done manually or laboriously. 

Advertisement

A simple example is in an accounts payable department. An agent can automate everything from invoice capture using AI-driven OCR, verify that the invoices are within policy, queue them for approval, send them to the respective individuals, and flag exceptions along the way. Users can see how the work feels lighter because the machine handles everything from capture to the final stage, including payment release. 

How do the AI functionalities offered by Coda differ from what competitors are offering right now? 

Many vendors today have a finance module. However, we aim to be the best standalone financial management system, not a generic suite. We’re not trying to be finance because we want to sell an HR or CRM system. That means we need to embed intelligence deeply within the finance processes so that the software acts, takes action, and performs activities for the finance function. For that, the agentic AI needs to operate with autonomy, understand financial context, and learn from user behavior. 

Moreover, fundamentally, Coda has always been built on a unified financial model. We’ve never had Accounts Payable separate from Accounts Receivable that needed to be consolidated. Our AI works on clean, structured data from day one, and that’s the foundation for accuracy. We don’t need to chase hype to incorporate AI. We’re going to redefine the finance function with AI at its core. 

How do you plan to balance the introduction of these cutting-edge innovations without disrupting the core stability that Coda is known for? 

Advertisement

The safest way to modernize finance is to add certainty around the core, rather than disrupting it. Our core is why customers have been running Coda for 20-30 years. Thus, stability is not a nice-to-have; it’s non-negotiable. Our customers run mission-critical processes, and that trust is sacred to us. Therefore, every innovation we deliver, whether it’s UX modernization or AI, will be built on one simple principle: if it compromises stability, we don’t build it. We don’t ship it. 

With that rock-solid foundation in place, we can layer intelligence and usability on top. While some software providers are still determining the stability of their platform, we can offer customers the best of both worlds. They’ll have the reliability they’ve counted on for decades, and now we bring them the innovation they need to stay ahead. 

What This Means for ERP Insiders 

Your biggest enemy is decision latency. According to Kudsee, the primary challenge for modern finance is the gap between a business event occurring and the ability to respond intelligently. This decision latency, caused by fragmented data, batch processes, and manual workarounds that are standard in traditional ERP environments, prevents finance from being a proactive and strategic partner. Coda’s goal is to shrink that gap from weeks or days to near-real-time. 

Shift the ERP mindset from system of record to system of intelligence. For decades, the primary function of ERP finance modules has been to record transactions accurately. This is no longer sufficient, as Kudsee notes. A modern financial platform must function as a system of intelligence that not only records data but also analyzes, predicts, and automates actions within core financial processes, effectively acting as the intelligent brain of the CFO’s office. 

Advertisement

Prioritize financial depth over suite breadth. Kudsee suggests that the single ERP for everything strategy can result in a finance module that is a jack-of-all-trades but master of none. The alternative approach is to prioritize depth and best-in-class functionality for the critical finance function. Instead of settling for the generic finance module within a larger suite, consider how a dedicated platform like Unit4 Financials for Coda, focused on deep financial control, insight, and automation, can deliver more agility and tackle core challenges, such as decision latency, more effectively. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending