Connect with us

Finance

Car finance: what is the FCA looking into and will people get money back?

Published

on

Car finance: what is the FCA looking into and will people get money back?

The financial watchdog has announced that it is investigating the car loans market to see if commission payments to brokers were too high. If the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) finds against the brokers, it could trigger payouts to potentially millions of car buyers.

What car finance is the FCA looking at?

The loans in question were taken out by people buying new and secondhand cars, probably in the form of hire purchase plans or personal contract purchase (PCP) plans – both of which involve making repayments over a long period.

In recent years PCPs have been used by about eight in 10 new car buyers. They are also offered by big secondhand dealers, including those online.

When a car buyer uses a PCP they pay a deposit and take out a loan for a set period – maybe three or four years. The loan is not for the price of the car, but for how much it will depreciate during the period.

During that time they make monthly repayments and at the end of the loan period are given the option of making a final, “balloon”, payment to own the car, or handing it back and starting a new plan.

Advertisement

So if, for example, the new car is advertised at £20,000 and the dealer judges it will be worth £12,000 after three years and the buyer pays a deposit of £2,000, they will take a loan for £6,000 over the three-year period.

The FCA is looking at finance plans used to buy a car before 28 January 2021.

Personal contract hire (PCH) plans are not affected.

What are the FCA’s concerns?

Overcharging, essentially.

People buying a car through a plan would typically use an intermediary – for example, the dealer – to arrange the finance. Before January 2021 some of the lenders providing the finance used to allow these middlemen, referred to as brokers, to adjust the interest rates they charged customers.

Advertisement

Some brokers had “discretionary commission arrangements”, which meant they were paid more if the interest rate was higher, and so they had an incentive to make the loan more expensive for the customer.

What has prompted the investigation?

Customers who took out loans before 2021 have been complaining to lenders and brokers, encouraged by claims management firms. Most have been turned away. About 10,000 have taken their complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service, the organisation that settles disputes between financial firms and consumers.

It has decided on two cases, and in both found that the way the commission arrangement between the lender and the car dealer worked was unfair to the consumer.

The FCA is clearly concerned that these are not isolated incidents.

skip past newsletter promotion
Advertisement

How much has been overpaid?

It will vary from case to case as it seems some lenders gave brokers a wide choice of interest rates to apply.

In one of the ombudsman cases, the buyer was found to have been charged an interest rate of 5.5% when she would have paid 2.9% without the broker’s commission. In the second, the driver paid 4.67% when without commission the rate was 2.68%.

Advertisement

To give you an idea, on a £5,000 loan arranged over three years the difference in cost between rates of 2.9% and 5.5% is about £200.

Will I get a refund?

Not if you bought your car on or after 28 January 2021.

Otherwise you might. The FCA says that if it does find “widespread misconduct” and that consumers have lost out it will work out how to compensate people – it could be that it orders a return of whatever extra interest is calculated to have been paid over the loan period.

That is some way off at the moment. In the meantime, you do not need to do anything – in fact, complaints have been paused so nothing will be done until the end of the process.

A claims management company has called. Shall I use it?

No. You will have to pay a fee if you use a company to make your claim – it typically comes out of the payout.

Advertisement

If you haven’t made a complaint about this issue previously, you could wait to see what happens to the FCA investigation. If it finds bad practice it may order brokers to proactively contact customers who were affected to arrange compensation.

But it could tell them to reimburse the customers who have complained – and there is a time limit on complaints. Generally, you need to complain to your provider within six years of a problem happening or within three years of you becoming aware that you had cause to complain. If you think you could be running out of time, you should consider complaining to your provider now.

For anyone who has complained to a lender or broker and had that dismissed between 12 July 2023 and 10 January 2024, the FCA has extended the period in which you can take your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman from six to 15 months.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Fed’s Barr Warns Bank Deregulation Threatens Financial Stability | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Fed’s Barr Warns Bank Deregulation Threatens Financial Stability | PYMNTS.com

Recent moves by the Federal Reserve and other banking regulators to weaken regulation and supervision of banks threaten to undermine the safety and soundness of the financial institutions and increase financial stability risks, Federal Reserve Gov. Michael S. Barr said in a recent speech.

Speaking Saturday (June 6) at American University in Washington, D.C., Barr pointed to what he described as decreases in capital requirements, lighter-touch bank supervision, a potential push for lower liquidity requirements and declines in consumer protection.

“Taken together, the regulatory and supervisory changes recently enacted or proposed represent the most significant deregulation of the banking system since the Global Financial Crisis,” Barr said. “They tip the imperative balance that must be maintained between openness and innovation, on the one hand, and safety and soundness, on the other, in a way that will increase the risks of financial instability.”

“I have voted against these changes, and I feel it is also my duty to continue to speak about them and explain that the costs they impose, in the form of risk, greatly outweigh the promised benefits of a lighter regulatory burden,” Barr said.

Barr also highlighted what he described as growing risks in the nonbank sector and said these risks require a strong banking sector.

Advertisement

Some have argued that the banking sector should be deregulated so it can better compete with private credit and other nonbanks, but the sector needs improved regulation to protect banks from their exposure to nonbanks, Barr said.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

Banks are exposed to nonbanks through credit lines and asset-holding commonalities, he said.

“What all of this means is that we need strong banks at the core of the financial system to deal with shocks, including from nonbanks,” Barr said. “Dealing with those shocks requires robust capital and liquidity, and loosening bank regulatory standards moves in the opposite direction.”

“Bank deregulation can also lead to a race to the bottom,” Barr said. “If the goal is greater overall safety, it is perverse to relax safeguards. Deregulating banks so that they can better compete with nonbanks may lead to even more risk-taking by nonbanks. The answer is thus not to regulate banks less, but to regulate unsafe practices at nonbanks more.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Exclusive: U.S. bank regulators ramp up scrutiny of AI use at financial companies

Published

on

Exclusive: U.S. bank regulators ramp up scrutiny of AI use at financial companies
U.S. banking regulators are stepping up scrutiny of how lenders deploy artificial intelligence as the developing technology sweeps through the industry, pressing firms on everything from data access and governance controls ​to risks posed by third-party vendors, according to people familiar with the situation.
Continue Reading

Finance

Crime Stoppers of Michigan could shut down while in dire financial straits

Published

on

Crime Stoppers of Michigan could shut down while in dire financial straits

Crime Stoppers of Michigan is in jeopardy. The anonymous crime tipline, responsible for helping solve countless cases, needs a financial fix and fast.

Big picture view:

Advertisement

FOX 2 got a pretty frantic call from Detroit police brass Thursday morning to explain what was going on with Crime Stoppers, and essentially they told us the nonprofit is in dire financial straits.

Since then, we have learned that if Crime Stoppers of Michigan doesn’t raise upwards of $250,000 by July 1, they’re going to cut almost all of their services, specifically, 90% of their services.

The only thing that would remain is the anonymous tip line you know it: 1-800-SPEAK-UP.

Advertisement

By the numbers:

They generate 5,000 anonymous tips a year, but a bulk of their work is elsewhere. This cut would mean no additional services for victims of crimes.

Advertisement

No press conferences. No posters. No community events.

“Sometimes I think people see the press conferences, the posters or the social media, and they forget there’s a mother, there’s a father, there’s a child. They have no clue what’s going on, and they’re seeking help from us, saying, ‘Please help us, please do something,’” said Dan DiBardino, President & CEO of Crime Stoppers.

A huge chunk of those 5,000 tips goes to Detroit police. They could be seriously affected by this if Crime Stoppers folds.

Advertisement

Watch FOX 2 Detroit LIVE:

Crime and Public SafetyDetroit
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending