Connect with us

Finance

After cyberattack, Minnesota health care groups struggling with UnitedHealth financial aid

Published

on

After cyberattack, Minnesota health care groups struggling with UnitedHealth financial aid

Emily Benson can see UnitedHealth Group’s headquarters from her office in Edina, but this close proximity hasn’t made it easy for her clinic to find emergency funding from the company.

Benson’s mental health practice submits bills through a UnitedHealth Group subsidiary that shut down its systems more than three weeks ago because of a cyberattack.

That’s left Benson and eight other therapists at Beginnings and Beyond Counseling with basically no revenue and reliant on a $40,000 loan she took out this month from UnitedHealth.

She resorted to this financing, which includes a $780 fee, because the company’s initial no-fee assistance program following the hack offered just $1,100 per week — a small fraction of the clinic’s claims total.

“They’re offering us money, but it’s such an insubstantial amount — such an unhelpful amount,” Benson said, while stressing that she values her relationship with both UnitedHealth and its beneficiaries. “I want to be honest about how much we’re struggling.”

Advertisement

Beginnings and Beyond is one of three Minnesota health care providers that told the Star Tribune this week they haven’t been able to use UnitedHealth’s financial aid programs to fully bridge a cash crunch that’s hitting thousands of hospitals and clinics across the country.

The cyberattack targeted Change Healthcare, a UnitedHealth subsidiary that runs a widely used clearinghouse for electronic claims data that processes 15 billion health care transactions annually and is involved in one out of every three patient records in the U.S. UnitedHealth Group is cooperating with a federal investigation into the cyberattack while scrambling to restore Change Healthcare systems that it shut down to contain the threat.

By week’s end, there were some signs of improvement for providers seeking financial help after the Star Tribune contacted Minnetonka-based UnitedHealth about all three situations.

For two small independent clinics in the Twin Cities, a UnitedHealth temporary assistance program launched March 1 evaluated need based on an assessment of historical claims that was far from complete. As a result, the sums offered were paltry compared with the need — a mismatch that has been reported in recent weeks by some other health care providers in Minnesota and across the country.

“We didn’t even bother to apply,” said Gretchen Moen, clinical director at Dakota Child and Family Clinic in Burnsville.

Advertisement

Late last week, UnitedHealth launched a new “last resort” funding program that’s designed to provide more help, particularly for small and regional health care providers.

“We are currently engaged with several thousand provider organizations to help them with their cash flow challenges, from large regional health systems to small, rural independent physician practices,” UnitedHealth said Friday in a statement to the Star Tribune.

At Robbinsdale-based North Memorial Health, where hundreds of millions of dollars worth of claims are in limbo, negotiations over financial assistance have been ongoing.

“The amounts offered … have been insufficient to resume normal cashflow operations,” the health system said in a Tuesday statement.

On Thursday, North Memorial added: “The conversations are fluid; we are hopeful for short-term, temporary resolution in the days ahead.”

Advertisement

The frustrations voiced publicly by some small clinics, and privately by some large health systems, reflect UnitedHealth’s challenge of quickly standing up assistance programs for the subset of health care providers that have been profoundly impacted. This includes health care providers and insurers that used on an exclusive basis the claims processing clearinghouse from Change Healthcare.

After the American Hospital Association slammed the company’s initial assistance program as insufficient, UnitedHealth responded March 7 with improvements including the last-resort funding mechanism, which offers help on a case-by-case basis for health care groups with no other options.

“We are determined to make things right as fast as possible,” UnitedHealth Group chief executive Andrew Witty said in a statement.

Amy Tannahill, a nurse practitioner with the Rosenberg Center in Roseville, said UnitedHealth’s initial program offered her practice a loan of just $90 per week — an amount she called “ridiculous,” since it wouldn’t even cover the cost of one standard office visit.

In lieu of the UnitedHealth offer, Tannahill and her fellow clinic owners are considering everything from dipping into personal savings to finding a lender that can provide more help. Closing temporarily is one option, but Tannahill says the clinic feels an obligation to keep taking care of patients.

Advertisement

Rosenberg Center offers services for children with developmental and behavioral needs.

“I would like to see [United] take serious ownership of this issue and advance payments immediately [for] providers and support staff who deserve to be paid for their work,” Tannahill said Tuesday via email. “This seems reasonable given that [United] had a profit of $22 billion last year.”

On Thursday, Rosenberg Center received a call from UnitedHealth offering more help.

“I told the rep that we have approximately $170,000 in claims and requested that amount,” clinic manager Mary Thissen Thompson wrote in an email Friday. “He took the information and said if it was approved we would see it … within five days.”

She added: “We would be completely shocked if they came through with that amount.”

Advertisement

At Beginnings and Beyond Counseling, Benson said her UnitedHealth representative contacted her Thursday about a $40,000 no-interest loan. She mentioned how she’d already borrowed that amount from a UnitedHealth loan program that’s been available for many years.

“I asked him to waive the [$780] fee I’m being charged for it in lieu of his offer. He said he’d have to escalate that request,” Benson said via email.

Benson’s first loan will only go so far. Another company representative on Thursday encouraged her to also apply for help through the new last-resort program, Benson said, but she provided a screenshot to the Star Tribune of the “Something went wrong” messages she received Friday morning when trying to do so.

“The page kept rejecting my request,” she said. “I tried three times.”

Some health care providers don’t have much patience for snags because they’ve already invested so much energy in recent weeks trying to use the claims submission “workarounds” that UnitedHealth has been touting.

Advertisement

Revenue at Benson’s practice has gone from about $70,000 per month to “basically zero,” because her health record system relies exclusively on the Change Healthcare clearinghouse for submitting bills. UnitedHealth Group has encouraged practices like hers to use alternate systems, but Benson says they aren’t viable.

She would have to download information on each patient visit and then submit data through a combination of electronic and manual steps depending on the health insurer. Benson tried doing this and found the process for submitting just one claim took about six to seven minutes.

“I’m a single mom with eight practitioners. It’s not feasible for me to do that,” she said. “I don’t have an administrative staff because I’m too small.”

An even bigger problem, she said, is that once the Change Healthcare system is restored, claims submitted through a workaround could trigger her health record to send a duplicate bill to patients for what they owe in cost-sharing. For now, Benson is not submitting any claims, saying she’ll wait for Change systems to resume, even though patients might then receive multiple bills for their cost-sharing all at once.

“We had to send out a letter to everybody we serve, which is about 250 clients, saying: ‘Hey, this is what’s happening right now, please be prepared for really large bills once this gets resolved because we’re not going to be able to stagger your payments,’” she said.

Advertisement

At North Memorial, the Change shutdown effectively halted all claims submissions and many electronic payments to the health system, said Nate Dell, the vice president of revenue cycle management.

Some funds are arriving based on claims submitted before the Feb. 20 attack, but this revenue is “declining precipitously,” Dell said.

“We’re sitting on hundreds of millions of dollars in unbilled accounts receivable,” he said in an interview last week.

Those bills carry values that are significantly larger than the sums that ultimately get paid, since insurers negotiate steep discounts off health system charges.

At North Memorial, patient care generates about $18 million in revenue per week. Financial reserves at the end of last year exceeded $300 million, according to a Star Tribune review of financial statements.

Advertisement

Even so, Dell said the systems outage has been “tremendously disruptive” for the health system, which employs about 5,000 people across two hospitals, more than a dozen clinics and a large EMS service.

“This is a hundred-year storm that no one plans for — that you can’t really insure yourself against,” he said.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Published

on

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a proud sponsor of Proximo Congress 2026. This senior meeting of the US energy, infrastructure, and digital infrastructure finance community is shaped around the questions credit and investment committees are actually asking in 2026: how asset classes are converging, how risk is being priced in a recalibrated policy and geopolitical environment, and how public and private capital are being structured together to deliver projects at scale.

Mayer Brown has also been recognized for three separate awards which will be presented during the event. These awards include:

  • Proximo North America Transport Deal of the Year 2025 – SR 400 Peach Partners
  • Proximo North America Rail Deal of the Year 2025 – Brightline West
  • Proximo North America LNG Deal of the Year 2025 – Port Arthur LNG 2

For more information, visit the event website. 

Continue Reading

Finance

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

Published

on

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

If you have ever taken out a mortgage, you’ll know there are a lot of requirements to meet. You may need to put down a certain amount and have a debt-to-income ratio below a certain threshold. You may also run into limits on how much you can borrow or what sources of income the lender will count.

These rules do not apply to all mortgages — just to conforming mortgages, which is what the majority of borrowers take out. However, mortgage lenders are increasingly offering what are known as nonconforming loans, or mortgages that do not “comply with every one of the strict standards put in place after the housing crisis,” said The Wall Street Journal. While “still a small portion,” the “share of mortgages using alternative lending practices” has “doubled in size over the past three years.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

What U.S. consumers ask of their credit cards has changed. For financially stressed households, it has little to do with rewards.

As more households turn to credit cards to manage liquidity and cover everyday expenses, a new set of practical concerns is driving card behavior: Can the card help avoid a missed payment? Can it make balances easier to track? Can it provide enough visibility into available credit and upcoming obligations to help manage an uncertain month?

Those concerns are beginning to reorder what consumers value most in their credit card relationships.

That evidence is clear in “Winning Top of Wallet: How Credit Card Apps Shape Choice,” a PYMNTS Intelligence and Elan Credit Card report examining how consumers use mobile apps to manage spending, payments and engagement across their credit card portfolios. The report found 30% of consumers primarily use credit cards to build credit or extend purchasing power, while another 22% primarily use cards for cash flow management, together outweighing rewards-based usage.

The divide is more pronounced among financially stressed households. Among consumers living paycheck to paycheck and struggling to pay bills, 40% cited credit dependence as their primary reason for using credit cards. Just 11% pointed to rewards.

Advertisement

For a growing share of consumers, credit cards are functioning less like discretionary spending products and more like liquidity management tools.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

What Matters Most

That evolution is also changing which app features matter most.

Among cash flow-focused consumers, 31% said scheduling payments or autopay encouraged them to spend more on a card, while 27% cited alerts and reminders. Credit-motivated consumers showed similarly high engagement with tools tied to available credit visibility and payment timing.

Rewards still influence spending behavior, particularly among financially stable households. Half of consumers who prioritize rewards said tracking or redeeming rewards through a mobile app encouraged them to spend more on the card.

Advertisement

But the report suggests that financial stress changes the hierarchy of engagement. As household budgets tighten, rewards become less central than predictability, visibility and control.

That shift helps explain why mobile apps increasingly influence which cards become top of wallet.

Among credit-dependent consumers, 77% said the quality of a credit card app influences which card they use most often. Credit-dependent consumers also reported the highest app adoption levels, with 77% using their primary card’s app regularly or occasionally.

The competition, in other words, is no longer simply about card acquisition. It is about becoming the card consumers rely on to navigate everyday financial management.

Digital Experience Becomes a Financial Retention Tool

The report also suggests that digital experience increasingly shapes retention risk.

Advertisement

Nearly 1 in 4 cardholders said a poor app or digital experience contributed to reduced card use. Among Gen Z consumers, that figure climbed to 45%.

At the same time, 7 in 10 cardholders said app quality influences which card becomes their primary card, underscoring how mobile interfaces are becoming embedded directly into consumer payment behavior.

For issuers, the implications extend beyond app design.

Consumers living paycheck to paycheck hold nearly as many credit cards as financially stable households, meaning financially stressed consumers are not disengaging from credit entirely. Instead, they are becoming more selective about which cards feel easiest to manage and most useful during periods of financial pressure.

Rewards and promotional offers still matter, particularly among affluent and financially stable consumers. But for a growing segment of households, the most valuable card may be the one that reduces uncertainty around balances, payment timing and available liquidity.

Advertisement

In a crowded multi-card market, financial visibility itself is becoming part of the product.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending