Connect with us

Entertainment

With a full heart, 'Friday Night Lights' creator Jason Katims reflects on the 'emotional journey' of the series finale

Published

on

With a full heart, 'Friday Night Lights' creator Jason Katims reflects on the 'emotional journey' of the series finale

In “Inside the Episode,” writers and directors reflect on the making of their Emmy-winning episodes.

Clear eyes. Full hearts …

It took a lot of tears, both on- and offscreen, but “Friday Night Lights,” the drama about small-town high school football that was about way more than just small-town high school football, finally won two Primetime Emmys in its final season. At the 2011 ceremony, one award went to lead actor Kyle Chandler as the coach and (sometimes de facto) patriarch Eric Taylor. The other went to “FNL’s” behind-the-scenes father figure, showrunner Jason Katims, who wrote the drama’s series finale, “Always.”

“FNL” was beloved because it had the magical ability to be set around the lives of high schoolers and their parents — Coach Taylor was nothing without his wife, Tami (played by 2011 Emmy nominee Connie Britton) — but to not necessarily feel like a teen soap.

“It’s funny, when I first started talking to reporters and critics about it, they would ask, ‘How does this compare to other teen shows?’” said Katims, who wrote for “My So-Called Life” and created “Roswell.” “Until somebody mentioned it as a possible teen genre kind of show, I literally never even thought of it that way. … I thought of it as a story of this town, a story of these people.”

Advertisement

He speculates that perhaps this was because “even though those people are teens, they’re dealing with such adult things and themes.”

To wit: The series finale isn’t just about the football team making it to the state tournament, it’s about love, marriage and partnership. Just as Eric and Tami argue against their teen daughter Julie (Aimee Teegarden) getting engaged to her on-again, off-again boyfriend Matt Saracen (Zach Gilford), they have their own marital strife as they decide whether Eric should sign a new contract for a coaching job that would keep them in town or if Tami should have her moment and follow her career out of state.

Meanwhile, Tim Riggins (Taylor Kitsch) has grand plans to stay in his home of Dillon, Texas, forever while his ex-girlfriend Tyra Collette (Adrianne Palicki) explores new opportunities in college. Aspiring football coach Jess Merriweather (Jurnee Smollett) relocates to Dallas while her boyfriend, all-star player Vince Howard (Michael B. Jordan), starts his own journey. And, with his football career derailed after an injury, Luke Cafferty (Matt Lauria) joins the military. He and newly reunited girlfriend Becky Sproles (Madison Burge) share a tearful goodbye at the bus stop as he gives her his championship ring.

Over a decade later, The Times held it together long enough to speak with Katims about the events of “Always.”

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Advertisement

Jason Katims accepts the Emmy for writing for a drama series for “Friday Night Lights” in 2011.

(Mark J. Terrill / Associated Press)

The show aired on NBC before finishing its run on Audience Network. Given those changes and how this would affect cast availability, how far out did you start planning the series finale?

We didn’t really know in the fourth season exactly what we were going to do. We had it vaguely in our mind. But for the fifth season of the show, we really were planning it right from the beginning in the writers’ room.

Advertisement

Were there serious scheduling issues [with actors who’d already left the show]? I’m sure there were. But I think everybody who had been part of the show felt very committed and very, very, very much part of it and wanted to be there for the end.

There were the actors who really wanted to be part of it. Scott Porter [who played injured football star Jason Street earlier in the series’ run] showed up for the last scene, even though he wasn’t written into it. It was the scene where they were on Riggins’ land and he really wanted to be in that scene [because those characters were such good friends]. [That scene was cut from the finale.]

The show had some key phrases that you also worked into the finale. We see Coach Taylor, who relocates with his family to Philadelphia for Tami’s job, trying to teach a new group of football players the inspirational message “clear eyes, full hearts, can’t lose.” And we see Tim Riggins and his brother Billy (Derek Phillips) clinking longnecks and saying, “Texas forever.” Was there a conversation about who would get to utter those phrases?

It was really clear to me that Coach was going to be in the “clear eyes” and Riggins was going to be “Texas forever.”

Those weren’t conversations that happened in the writers’ room. Those happened when you were writing the script. But the big ideas, like the ball going up in the air at state and then landing in Philadelphia was not my idea. It was an idea that came out of the writers’ room.

Advertisement

Whether this team does win the state tournament is kind of like not seeing a body in a horror movie. It’s never explicitly shown or said.

It’s a funny thing about that because you do know who won the game because there were so many things in that final montage that were references to [them winning]. A lot of people had rings. They take down the championship sign from the [high school]. It was clear that they had won and the reason we didn’t see the win itself was because I felt that that football game should be poetic. There weren’t any more moves to make at that point in the show, in terms of the drama of the football game. To me, it was more the emotional journey that we’d all gotten to.

I’m really happy with the way the game transitioned into the final montage of the season. The whole episode is about closure. You don’t usually write that way. Usually there’s tension and then some catharsis, and these days, then another catharsis and then a cliffhanger. But there were five seasons leading up to that episode, and it was all about resolution. There were people declaring their love and all that stuff.

The tensions running through it were the questions of what’s going to happen to Coach and Tami. That was a serious dilemma. I felt like that made for the most dramatic tension in the episode.

Obviously, there were other things as well. There’s that scene with Tyra and [her ex-boyfriend] Tim where they’re talking about the future. It feels so beautiful to me to watch these two people who were so in love and put on divergent paths.

Advertisement

Why did you decide to call the episode “Always”?

The show is about love. It is a love story. It was about Coach and Tami and Matt and Julie and Vince and Jess and Luke and Becky.

But it was also the permanence of that culture of high school football. And there’s something touching to me, and moving to me, in that final montage. You see all these people playing in different stadiums, but they’re still playing the same game, but it doesn’t, weirdly, matter that much.

So much of this show, and its characters’, identity is wrapped up in Southern culture and lifestyle. So I always thought it was interesting that the Taylors moved out of the South.

What we were trying to do for the whole season was make this a really difficult choice for Coach. Coach and Tami, people would talk about that as such a great marriage. We knew, at a certain point, that we were never going to tell a story about one cheating on the other or divorce. Those stories were off the table. There was something sacred about that, about them. That’s wonderful to watch. But as a writer, it’s challenging because we need conflict.

Advertisement

In their particular marriage, it had always been that they were going where Coach would go [for work]. To me, the key to the whole episode and the whole season was him coming to her and saying, “It’s your turn.”

It’s very feminist and progressive of Coach to think this way.

You know, Coach is a very traditional guy. You see it when Matt says [to him that] he wants to marry his daughter. You see it at the dinner scene when they’re all together [and Coach and Tami tell them they’re too young to get married]. He doesn’t address his daughter. He addresses Matt.

There’s a lot of traditional thinking around Coach Taylor, which is why that decision he makes [with Tami] is so dramatic. It shows a man really changing.

This seems like something Tyra went through a lot. That’s a character who felt like she had to get out, otherwise nothing would change for her.

Advertisement

For Tyra, that’s a big thing. In the last episode, when she has that scene with Tim, she’s talking about wanting her life to be big and going into politics. … She was inspired by a woman like Tami, but she could see that her future should be bigger.

One of the things that’s so powerful about the show is that Dillon, Texas, is this beautiful town and you feel all these things about community and faith and lifting each other up and love and all that. But it’s also a place where you can get stuck and feel like you have limitations on you.

It was also really touching to see that last scene with Matt and Julie [when they move to Chicago and are engaged]. My thought about that is that they’ve become Coach and Tami. She looked a little more like Tami. But she was doing it in their world. It was a different, more urban world.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Here comes “THE BRIDE!”, audacious and wild – Rue Morgue

Published

on

Movie Review: Here comes “THE BRIDE!”, audacious and wild – Rue Morgue

That’s both a promise and a challenge she delivers, since what follows may rub some viewers the wrong way. Yet Gyllenhaal’s full-throttle commitment to her vision is compelling in and of itself, and she has marshalled an absolutely smashing-looking and -sounding production. The story proper begins in 1936 Chicago, which, like everything and everyplace else in the movie, has been luminously shot by cinematographer Lawrence Sher and sumptuously conjured by production designer Karen Murphy. Her involvement is appropriate given that her previous credits include Bradley Cooper’s A STAR IS BORN and Baz Luhrmann’s ELVIS, since among other things, THE BRIDE! is a nostalgic musical. Its Frankenstein (Christian Bale), who has taken the name of his maker, is obsessed with big-screen tuners, and imagines himself in elaborate song-and-dance numbers. (Considering the reception to JOKER: FOLIE À DEUX, one must applaud the daring of Warner Bros. for greenlighting another expensive film in which a tormented protagonist has that kind of fantasy life.)

THE BRIDE! may be revisionist on many levels, but its characterization of its “monster” holds true to past screen incarnations from Karloff’s to Elordi’s: His scarred appearance masks a lonely soul who desires companionship. Frankenstein has arrived in Chicago to seek out Dr. Cornelia Euphronious (Annette Bening), correctly believing she has the scientific know-how to create an appropriate mate for him. Rather than piece one together, Dr. Euphronious resurrects the corpse of Ida (Jessie Buckley), whose consorting with underworld types led to her brutal death. Previously chafing against the man’s world she inhabited in life, she becomes even more defiant and unruly as a revenant, apparently possessed by the spirit of Shelley herself, declaiming in free-associative sentences and quoting rebellious literature.

Buckley, currently an Oscar favorite for her very different literary-inspired role in HAMNET, tears into the role of the Bride (who now goes by the name Penny) with invigorating abandon that bursts off the screen. Unsure of her identity yet overflowing with self-confident bravado, she’s the opposite of the sensitive “Frank,” but they’re united by the world that stands against them. That becomes literal when a violent incident sends them on the lam, road-tripping to New York City and beyond, on a trail inspired by the films of Ronnie Reed (Jake Gyllenhaal), Frank’s favorite song-and-dance-man star.

With THE BRIDE!, Gyllenhaal has made a film that’s at once her very own and a feverish homage to all sorts of cinema past and present. It’s a horror story, a lovers-on-the-run movie, a crime thriller, a musical and more, and historical fealty be damned if it makes for a good scene (as when Penny and Frank sneak into a 3D movie over a decade before such features became popular). In-references are everywhere: It might just be a coincidence that the couple’s travels take them past Fredonia, NY (cf. “Freedonia” in the Marx Brothers’ DUCK SOUP), but it’s certainly no accident that the former Ida is targeted by a crime boss named Lupino, referencing the actress and pioneering filmmaker whose works included noirs and women’s-issues stories. Penny’s exploits lead legions of admiring women to adopt her look and anarchic attitude, echoing the first JOKER (while a headline calls them “Twisted Sisters”), and the use of one Irving Berlin song in a Frankensteinian context immediately recalls a classic comedic take on the property.

Whether the audience should be put in mind of a spoof at a key point in a film with different goals is another matter. At times like these, Gyllenhaal’s pastiche ambitions overtake emotional investment in the story. As strong as the two lead performances are (Bale is quite moving, conveying a great deal of soul from behind his extensive prosthetics), it’s easier to feel for them in individual scenes than during the entire course of the just-over-two-hour running time. The diversions can be entertaining, to be sure, but they also result in an uncertainty of tone. The dissonance continues straight through to the end, where the filmmaker’s choice of closing-credits song once again suggests we’re not supposed to take all this too seriously.

Advertisement

There’s nonetheless much to admire and enjoy about THE BRIDE!, and this kind of risk-taking by a major studio is always to be encouraged (especially considering that we’ll see how long that lasts at Warner Bros. once Paramount takes it over). Beyond the terrific work by the aforementioned actors, there’s fine support from Peter Sarsgaard and Penelope Cruz as detectives on Penny and Frank’s heels, with Sandy Powell’s lavish costumes and Hildur Guðnadóttir’s rich, varied score vital to fashioning this fully imagined world. Kudos also to makeup and prosthetics designer Nadia Stacey and to Chris Gallaher and Scott Stoddard, who did those honors on Frank, for their visceral, evocative work. Uneven as it may be, THE BRIDE! is also as alive! as any film you’ll likely see this year.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

These 3 Disney movie songs, animated with sign language, are headed to Disney+

Published

on

These 3 Disney movie songs, animated with sign language, are headed to Disney+

New animated sequences of songs from “Encanto,” “Frozen 2” and “Moana 2” are headed to Disney+.

Disney Animation announced Wednesday that “Songs in Sign Language,” comprised of three musical numbers from recent Disney movies newly reimagined in American Sign Language, will debut April 27 in honor of National Deaf History Month.

Directed by veteran Disney animator Hyrum Osmond, “Songs in Sign Language” will feature fresh animation for “Encanto’s” chart-topper “We Don’t Talk About Bruno,” “Frozen 2’s” poignant ballad “The Next Right Thing” and “Moana 2’s” anthem “Beyond.” Produced by Heather Blodget and Christina Chen, the new versions of these songs were created in collaboration with L.A.-based theater company Deaf West Theatre.

“In the majority of cases, we created entirely new animation,” Osmond said in a press statement. “There were a lot of adjustments that we had to do within the animation to be true to the original intention.”

Deaf West Theatre artistic director DJ Kurs, sign language reference choreographer Catalene Sacchetti and a group of eight performers from Deaf West worked together to craft and choreograph the ASL version of the musical numbers for “Songs in Sign Language.” The creatives focused on being true to the concepts and emotion of the songs rather than direct translations of the lyrics.

Advertisement

Kurs said his team jumped at the chance to collaborate and integrate ASL into “the fabric of Disney storytelling.”

“Disney stories are the universal language of childhood,” Kurs said in a statement. “The chance to bring our language into that world was a historic opportunity to reach a global audience. Working on this project was very emotional. For so long, we have known and loved the artistic medium of Disney Animation. Here, the art form was adapting to us. I hope this unlocks possibilities in the minds and hearts of Deaf children, and that this all leads to more down the road.”

Osmond, who led a team of more than 20 animators on this project, said animation was the perfect medium to showcase sign language, which he described as “one of the most beautiful ways of communication on Earth.” The director, whose father is deaf, also saw this project as an opportunity to connect with the Deaf community.

“Growing up, I never learned sign language, and that barrier prevented me from really connecting with my dad,” Osmond said. “This reimagining of Disney Animation musical numbers helps bring down barriers and allows us to connect in a special way with our audiences in the Deaf community. I’m grateful that the Studio got behind making something so impactful.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Maxime Giroux – ‘In Cold Light’ movie review

Published

on

Maxime Giroux – ‘In Cold Light’ movie review

Maxime Giroux – ‘In Cold Light’

Advertisement

The action is relentless in the complex thriller In Cold Light, a tense combination of crime and fugitive tale and family drama. It is the third feature and first English language film by Maxime Giroux, best known for a very different kind of film, the critically acclaimed 2014 drama Felix & Meira.

The tension and high energy of In Cold Light almost overwhelm the film, but are relieved, barely, by moments of character development and introspection that keep the audience pulling for the restrained and outwardly cold main character. 

Speaking at the film’s Canadian premiere, director Giroux admitted he found creating an action film a challenge. Part of his approach was using very minimal dialogue, especially for the central character, letting the action speak for itself, and allowing silence to intensify suspense. Giroux has said he likes the lack of dialogue and speaks highly of the importance of silence in cinema; he prefers using “physical aspects of communication” in his films. 

Young Ava Bly (Maika Monroe) is a competent and businesslike drug dealer, working in partnership with her brother Tom (Jesse Irving) and a small team. As the film begins, Ava has just been released from a brief prison sentence. She is hoping to return to her former position, but her brother’s associates consider her a risk due to her recent incarceration. While she works to re-establish herself, a shocking encounter with a corrupt police officer sends Ava’s life into chaos and forces her to go on the run.

Ava’s fugitive experience introduces a new character, to whom Ava turns for help: her father, Will Bly, played by Troy Kotsur, known for his excellent performance in CODA. Their first interaction is handled in a fascinating way, as Will is deaf and the two communicate through sign language. This, of course, provides another form of the silent interaction the director prefers; he explained that much of the father-daughter interaction was rewritten with the actor in mind. Their conflict is nicely expressed through a scene in which their initial conversation is intermittently cut off by a faulty light which goes out periodically, making communication through sign momentarily impossible, nicely expressing the rift between father and daughter. 

Advertisement

As Ava continues to evade danger, her escape becomes complicated by new information, placing her in a painful dilemma. We gradually learn more about Ava, her background, and her character through occasional flashbacks and glimpses of her dreams. The plot becomes more complex and more poignant, and gains features of a mystery as well as an action tale, as she is pressed to choose from among equally unacceptable alternatives.

The climax of her efforts to protect both herself and those close to her comes to a head as she meets with the director of a rival drug gang. Veteran actress Helen Hunt is perfect in the minor but significant role of Claire, the rival drug lord, who plays odd mind games with Ava in an intriguing psychological fencing match. It’s an unusual scene, in which Ava’s personality is made clearer, and Claire’s understated dominance and casual speech do not quite conceal the threat she represents. 

The frantic pace and emotional turmoil are enhanced by the camera work, which tends to focus tightly on Ava, and by a harsh, minimal musical score that sets the tone without distracting from the action. Giroux chose to shoot the film in Super 60; he describes digital as “too perfect” for the look he was going for, and since “Ava is rough,” the film portrays her better. The director describes the entire movie as “rough,” in fact, and deliberately chose a dark, washed-out look for much of the footage, occasionally using light and colour, in the form of fireworks, lightning, or a colourful carnival, to both relieve and emphasise the darkness. 

The dynamic, intense story holds the attention in spite of the lengthy, sometimes repetitive chase scenes and subdued dialogue. Ava’s predicament, and the difficult decisions she is forced to make, are made surprisingly relatable, from the initial disaster that starts the action to the surprising flash-forward that concludes the film, on as high a note as the situation could allow. Fans of action movies will definitely enjoy this one.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending