Connect with us

Entertainment

Why Anne Hathaway and other women are saying enough to the haters | CNN

Published

on

Why Anne Hathaway and other women are saying enough to the haters | CNN

Some popular culture moments, as they age, really feel an increasing number of like bouts of collective insanity. Why did everybody hate Anne Hathaway all of these years in the past? Round 2013, regardless of profitable a slew of awards for her position in “Les Miserables,” it appeared the actress couldn’t catch a break. Regardless of an absence of scandal or outright offensive habits, she was “the star we like to detest,” ” the unhealthy sort of theater child,” “the kind of person who inexplicably bugs people.”

Since then, the criticism has all however pale from public consciousness, a half-remembered Hollywood fever dream akin to the time everybody ragged on Taylor Swift for writing about her exes or that one 2009 live performance when everybody physique shamed Jessica Simpson.

Hathaway hasn’t forgotten, although, and he or she’s not the one one reminding those who ruthless superstar criticism – a treasured and profitable Hollywood pastime – isn’t as trendy because it as soon as was.

At Elle’s 2022 Girls in Hollywood occasion this week, Hathway commented on the bygone “Hathahate” with painful intimacy, saying the outward hatred solely elevated her internal hatred of herself.

“When your self-inflicted ache is all of a sudden amplified again at you, it’s a factor,” she stated. The expertise taught her to not “maintain house” for such language, for herself or anybody else. She additionally urged others to do the identical.

Advertisement

“You’ll be able to choose habits. You’ll be able to forgive habits or not,” she stated. “However you do not need the proper to guage – and particularly not hate – somebody for present.”

Hathaway’s dialogue of psychological well being highlights a comparatively new addition to the dialog. Stars have been talking out in opposition to bullying for fairly a while, nevertheless it has solely been up to now few years that we have now seen ample conversations about how fame impacts their psychological well being.

In her new memoir “Making a Scene,” actress Constance Wu writes about struggling along with her identification, and balancing the particular person she is with the particular person she thought she needed to be to make it within the leisure enterprise.

“I write about eager to be the cool lady in my 20s, not eager to make a scene,” she instructed Shondaland. “As a result of I believed that’s what would make me cool and liked and valued. Nevertheless it doesn’t work as a result of it’s not genuine.”

Advertisement

Wu additionally writes concerning the sexual harassment she endured on her sitcom “Recent Off the Boat.”

“I endured all this sexual harassment and intimidation and abuse the primary two years of the present, however then as soon as it was a hit, I not talked to my abuser, and I used to be in a position to proceed my job professionally and even joyfully,” she says. “So, I believed I dealt with it. However I noticed that repressed abuse and emotions don’t go away simply because you’ll them to.”

Whereas the particulars of being a star could also be distant to most individuals, working by trauma and contending with damaging expectations are common experiences. By discussing these points head-on, girls like Hathaway and Wu are indicating a sea change in superstar tradition.

In fact, ruthless superstar gossip isn’t only a favourite pastime of the lots. It’s a profitable cog within the Hollywood machine. Whole franchises, like Bravo’s “Actual Housewives” sequence, are constructed across the sport of pitting girls in opposition to one another in rivalries each actual and imagined. However in the identical means that some stars are pulling the curtain again on the actual results of bullying and criticism, others are severing these traditions nearer to the foundation.

Hailey Bieber and Selena Gomez defused longstanding rumors and hate by posing together at the 2022 Academy Museum Gala.

Social media had a minor meltdown just lately when Selena Gomez and Hailey Bieber posed collectively for the primary time on the Academy Museum Gala. To these outdoors the sphere of Hollywood gossip, this implies completely nothing. However to these within the know – people who know Gomez is the longtime ex of Bieber’s husband, Justin Bieber, the second was near iconic.

Advertisement

The 2 girls have lengthy been pitted in opposition to one another by followers, with Gomez solid because the one which obtained away and Bieber because the usurping, second-best spouse. They’ve each used their platforms to warn in opposition to on-line hate and harassment, however the proxy feud fueled by their followers has been insistent.

To see them collectively, then, was as monumental as a photograph op with, say, Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie would have been within the early 2000s, when everybody was “Workforce Aniston” or “Workforce Jolie” following the previous’s divorce from Brad Pitt.

Within the current media surroundings, it isn’t essentially uncommon for well-known girls to point out some solidarity with one another, or get private concerning the damaging results of fame. What’s exceptional is seeing followers so looking forward to and receptive to those developments.

The feedback on photographer Tyrell Hampton’s Instagram publish of Gomez and Bieber paint a transparent image of this:

“Is that this what world peace seems like?”

Advertisement

“Everybody desires them to hate one another so badly, and for what?”

“I’m pleased with them.”

They’re not dissimilar to the social media reactions that adopted Hathaway’s latest feedback.

“Why did everybody hate Anne Hathaway for no purpose?”

“They had been simply being haters.”

Advertisement

It’s one factor for stars to disclose how merciless the churn of superstar gossip might be. Extra typically, we’re seeing followers hear and agree, interrogating their very own position in these obsessions. Collectively, either side of the display are trying to find a extra constructive relationship with fame.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

We Grown Now (2023) – Movie Review

Published

on

We Grown Now (2023) – Movie Review

We Grown Now, 2023.

Written and Directed by Minhal Baig.
Starring Blake Cameron James, Gian Knight Ramirez, S. Epatha Merkerson, Lil Rel Howery, Jurnee Smollett, Ora Jones, Giovani Chambers, and Avery Holliday.

SYNOPSIS:

Two young boys, best friends Malik and Eric, discover the joys and hardships of growing up in the sprawling Cabrini-Green public housing complex in 1992 Chicago.

Writer/director Minhal Baig’s We Grown Now is a moving tale of a tested childhood friendship during the ups and downs of Cabrini-Green life. Minhal Baig has pulled together various stories of what it is like to grow up and live in the Chicago housing complex, setting the story here in 1992, mostly focused on Malik (Blake Cameron James), who believes that there are no rules here and that the only thing that matters is seeing how high you can jump.

Advertisement

This is, obviously, a film with sincere affection for a specific place in time, but also not one that lets periods spent allowing viewers to observe the housing complex hallways and homes (whether it be from the boys here dragging mattresses down multiple floors or stairs since the elevator is busted, or gentle camera movements taking us from one floor, above to the next) to get in the way of drawing these characters and telling an authentically engaging story about the trials and tribulations of raising a family in Cabrini Green, ensuring that the children are safe, and of course, the joys of living there as an innocent child assuming that just because one young boy has been shot and murdered, they will be safe.

Malik and his best friend Eric (Gian Knight Ramirez) play outside, discuss what they want from the future, and also debate about Chicago-specific arguments, such as whether Michael Jordan needed Scottie Pippen or not to lead the Chicago Bulls to NBA championships. The film was wise enough not to overly romanticize life here, which was increasingly weighed down upon by oppressive local law enforcement insisting that due to the recent shootings, everyone (including the children) requires a keycard to enter their homes. Cinematographer Pat Scola is also fittingly instructed not to photograph these policemen’s faces during some scenes, keeping the vantage point from the low perspective of the children and often sticking with their reactions.

Meanwhile, Malik’s mother, Dolores (a winning performance from Jurnee Smollett), is a woman uncertain of how to continue making ends meet while putting up with the unfortunate failings of the housing complex. She is a family woman close to her mother (S. Epatha Merkerson) and isn’t so much still grieving the loss of her father but still paying tribute to him at dinner as a means to instill the importance of family onto Malik. On the same floor, Eric struggles with his education as his single father, Jason (a delightful dramatic turn from the reliably hysterical Lil Rel Howery), does his best to tutor the boy while managing the funds for his older daughter’s upcoming high school graduation.

Once it becomes clear that one of these families is contemplating making a drastic change to their lives, a rift emerges in the friendship between Malik and Eric, which is believably heartbreaking but threatens to become overwritten in the film’s third act. Thankfully, the script pulls away from that and returns to the initial theme of jumping and what it means to soar. Similarly, We Grown Now is a sweet and charming tale of friendship set inside a specific setting, with that combination of romanticism and honesty allowing it to fly.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★

Advertisement

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Opinion: For the greats of the jazz age, life on the road was perilous as well as glamorous

Published

on

Opinion: For the greats of the jazz age, life on the road was perilous as well as glamorous

For traveling musicians, there are two versions of life on the road.

Jazz greats Duke Ellington, Count Basie and Louis Armstrong gave their own sentimentalized retelling of their nomadic existence from the 1930s onward, portraying the jaunts as being as amorous as they were glamorous, a veritable luxury cruise along bucolic byways jammed with adulatory fans and a femme fatale or two.

Much of that might have been true, but they were also living the other version of the wayfaring life. Those trips, often through hostile territory, were a harsh crucible, keeping Ellington, Basie and Armstrong away from home and family for lonely months at a time. They became professional wanderers, driving all day, performing into the early morning, learning to eat from greasy paper sacks. On bad nights for the bandleaders and their players, they caught a little sleep on the bus or in the car, scrunched between sweaty orchestra mates. On good ones, they found a lodging house and raced upstairs, hoping to claim a catnap before that evening’s gig. The more savvy veterans would leave the lights on to keep the cockroaches and bedbugs in their crevices. Layering newspapers atop the mattress was another trick; the crinkling sent the vermin scampering.

Peeling back those curtains can be enlightening because the three jazzmen from last century helped set the template for today’s migratory music makers, be they Taylor Swift or Beyoncé. Whatever the reality of their days and nights on the road, Ellington, Basie and Armstrong built the expectation that touring is all about luxe accommodations and fat paychecks. Looking into that tuneful past — on the occasion of Duke’s 125th birthday and the Count’s 120th, as we approach the centennial of Satchmo’s genre-defining Hot Five recordings — helps us not just separate myth from reality but also appreciate ways in which our world has gotten better.

The biggest change since their era? The hostile terrain that Jim Crow America created even for the nation’s most venerated Black travelers. Accidentally picking a whites-only hotel or eatery could land a band member in jail or worse.

Advertisement

Their journeys attuned these three orchestra leaders to the subtleties and unsubtleties of America’s color lines. No dining in Chicago’s Loop. No entry at night, and sometimes at all, into Goshen, Ind., La Crosse, Wis., and thousands of other “sundown towns.” And don’t mention the Civil War below the Mason-Dixon line, because down there it was still called the War of Northern Aggression. When Black musicians pulled up, sometimes gas station owners locked their restrooms. Other times the swimming pool at their motel was drained just as they arrived and refilled as they were leaving.

Ellington, Basie and Armstrong successfully navigated that perilous world, and these self-described gadabouts got to see this vast country in a way few Americans, and almost no Black Americans, did then. Hundreds of white fans who had never seen a Black person turned out in farming villages and mining towns — and boy, what an encounter it was on both ends. The farmers and miners got to hear the most intoxicating music on Earth from brassy cornet players and driving saxophonists, exotic trombone mutes, squealing trumpets and sultry clarinets. The musicians, meanwhile, were doing what they loved, being treated like celebrities in ways that shaped the mold for the likes of last year’s Eras and Renaissance tours.

One night in particular captured the joy Count Basie felt on the road, in circumstances that would have unsettled less determined performers. His band rolled into the lakefront burg of Manitowoc, Wis., the heart of Green Bay Packers country, on a night in 1972 when the Packers were facing off against the Detroit Lions. A TV set broadcast the gridiron action from one end of the venue while at the other end the band sat morosely, doubting they could compete for attention. Basie merely leaned forward and ordered, “Play.” For an hour he gave the football-mad audience his best and, little by little, fans headed across the large hall toward the music. Then they called friends to join them. Near the end of the evening the host borrowed the microphone to announce that the Packers had won. There was a polite cheer, then someone yelled, “How ’bout ‘April in Paris’ again?” Basie smiled, whispering, “Touchdown.”

Among African Americans, only the Pullman porters saw more of America, and even they just rolled through places like Fargo, N.D. But Ellington stayed on one winter night in 1940 for a concert at the Crystal Ballroom that drew about 700 fans who, for the price of $1.30, got to hear the orchestra hitting on all cylinders. The population of North Dakota was only 0.03% Black then, and so perhaps racism wasn’t as all-consuming as in other parts of the country. There was no TV to take people’s minds off the raging war, little money for the motion pictures, not much else to do in a city that celebrated its political and cultural isolation. That left jazz.

To Duke, the Count and Satchmo, music meant movement, and their freedom to roam was more liberating than a running back breaking into the clear.

Advertisement

Larry Tye is the author of “The Jazzmen: How Duke Ellington, Louis Armstrong and Count Basie Transformed America.”

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

La Chimera (2023) – Movie Review

Published

on

La Chimera (2023) – Movie Review

La Chimera, 2023.

Directed by Alice Rohrwacher.
Starring Josh O’Connor, Carol Duarte, Vincenzo Nemolato, and Isabella Rossellini.

SYNOPSIS:

Everyone has their own Chimera, something they try to achieve but never manage to find. For the band of tombaroli, thieves of ancient grave goods and archaeological wonders, the Chimera means redemption from work and the dream of easy wealth. For Arthur, the Chimera looks like the woman he lost, Beniamina. To find her, Arthur challenges the invisible, searches everywhere, goes inside the earth – in search of the door to the afterlife of which myths speak. In an adventurous journey between the living and the dead, between forests and cities, between celebrations and solitudes, the intertwined destinies of these characters unfold, all in search of the Chimera.

Italian Director Alice Rohrwacher has built an acclaimed career around films that mix reality and fantasy to perfection. Her latest film La Chimera continues this trend, depicting a lovelorn Englishman Arthur (Josh O’Connor) in 1980s Italy working with a gang to steal historical artefacts from local graves and selling them through a mystery bidder. While it may seem an odd premise, it is never less than captivating for its 2hr 10-minute runtime, balancing a world of ideas, mysterious, beguiling and distinct.

Advertisement

Italy here is a far cry from some of the more glamorous depictions of major Hollywood movies, this is an idyllic, rural community with a sense of poverty, perhaps at odds with the value of Arthur and Co’s finds. It is a clever juxtaposition between both the recent past and ancient history and playing with our sense of history and memory.

O’Connor gives a transformative performance speaking almost entirely in Italian and imbuing Arthur with a sense of internal turmoil that we slowly unpack, what is he running from and why does he seem so lost? We find out his love Beniamina is dead and Arthur is still processing her loss, after spending some time in prison. He gives off a cool air, chainsmoking with a white suit, which has been compared to Elliot Gould in Robert Altman’s The Long Goodbye. The supporting Italian cast ably supports O’Connor with Isabella Rossellini featuring in a small but vital role as Flora, whom Arthur resides with, a mentor figure for him.

What is perhaps La Chimera’s greatest achievement is balancing its contemplative emotional beats with a commentary on the nature of history and antiquities Rohrwacher perhaps acknowledges how many museum items are stolen. There is a spiritual feel to things that adds a fantastical layer as Arthur seeks a way to reconnect with his lost love, this also makes us question what we are seeing, is everything playing out how we think, is there something else at play? It’s these questions and layers that make this such a unique and mystifying film.

Never quite going where we might expect with hidden meaning lurking behind every corner, it is easy to fall under La Chimera’s spell. It feels like a film from years gone by in the best way possible, showing a side of Italy so rarely captured in mainstream film. It is at times both a critique of the world of archaeology and a deep, meaningful glance at how losses linger, the bizarre marriage of the two miraculously in sync.

Josh O’Connor, who is of course on a hot streak with Challengers, is magnificent giving off a cool exterior while anguishing on the inside, losing himself in this dangerous yet exhilarating world. This further cements Alice Rohrwacher as a filmmaker of the highest order a singular talent.

Advertisement

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★

Chris Connor

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending