Connect with us

Entertainment

Which season of ‘Bridgerton’ is better? We fight it out

Published

on

The next accommodates spoilers from Season 2 of “Bridgerton.”

The return of Netflix’s wildly well-liked “Bridgerton,” a sudsy romantic drama from government producer Shonda Rhimes and creator Chris Van Dusen, is certain to set off loads of debates: Who’s hotter, Jonathan Bailey or Regé-Jean Web page? Who’s extra ruthless, Queen Charlotte (Golda Rosheuvel) or Woman Danbury (Adjoa Andoh)? And which of our canny ingenues, Eloise (Claudia Jessie) or Penelope (Nicola Coughlan), is the “Unhealthy Artwork Pal”?

However none is more likely to be debated as fiercely because the relative deserves of Season 1 and Season 2, which take contrasting approaches to intercourse, marriage, ambition and obligation, amongst different main themes of the sequence. Workers writers Meredith Blake and Ashley Lee, who got here down on both facet of the divide, duke it out — see what we did there? — in time for Friday’s season premiere.

Blake: When “Bridgerton” arrived approach again in late 2020, it turned a large breakout success for Netflix thanks largely to the charisma of its lead, Regé-Jean Web page, its many, many intercourse scenes, and its not-entirely-unrealistic depiction of a younger girl regularly determining how infants are made. It was all the time going to be arduous for “Bridgerton” to high the bonkers lightning-in-a-bottle of Season 1, particularly given Web page’s departure from the sequence. However though I got here in with lowered expectations, I used to be nonetheless disillusioned by the present’s sophomore flip.

To start out with: I miss the Sizzling Duke. It appears apparent that the oldsters at Shondaland massively screwed up by not getting him again for Season 2, particularly since his absence is barely defined and his supposedly devoted spouse, Daphne, performs a vital position within the season. He’s turn into the equal of Samantha Jones in “And Simply Like That” — the character made conspicuous by his absence.

Advertisement

Ashley, I do know you felt fairly in a different way. Persuade me I’m unsuitable!

Simone Ashley as Kate Sharma, Adjoa Andoh as Woman Danbury, Shelley Conn as Mary Sharma, and Charithra Chandran as Edwina Sharma in “Bridgerton.”

(Liam Daniel/Netflix)

Lee: I’m the alternative! I missed the preliminary “Bridgerton” boat in 2020, and solely binged the primary season a number of weeks in the past after I was craving extra low-stakes corset drama between episodes of HBO’s “The Gilded Age.” Whereas it’s an undeniable fact that Web page is the human embodiment of intercourse attraction, I used to be past postpone by the second half of the season, wherein the principle “impediment” to beat was Simon Basset’s objection to getting married or beginning a household.

Advertisement

I get that it’s a sequence based mostly on Julia Quinn’s books and nonetheless a interval piece, nevertheless it’s additionally 2022 — if the Sizzling Duke doesn’t need to be Sizzling Duke with a spouse and a child, let him be! Plus, the best way wherein all of it went down was fairly gross, and no quantity of very, very effectively accomplished intercourse scenes might make me look previous that. I’m shocked that so many different viewers might, although a part of me has to marvel if its huge reception was as a consequence of its launch date, when many people have been sheltering in place for the vacation season and usually determined for frivolity and extra.

Fortunately, each these issues are nonetheless sizzling commodities, which is why I loved the second season. I completely seemed previous Anthony Bridgerton in Season 1 (it’s arduous to assert heartthrob standing when standing subsequent to Web page), however in studying extra about him (that bee sting, yikes!), his attraction grew on me, because it did on Kate Sharma. After they lastly kissed, I squealed. It was cute.

Blake: I used to be largely bored by the romance between Kate and Anthony, and the (roughly) 3,198 scenes wherein they argued passionately, received in one another’s faces and almost kissed whereas gazing into one another’s eyes.

I like a little bit of repressed ardour, don’t get me unsuitable! I do know they have been going for an Austen-esque gradual burn — they usually even paid homage to Colin Firth’s well-known moist shirt scene — relatively than the steaminess of Season 1, however I discovered all of it fairly tedious because it was clear from the primary episode after they bumped into one another on horseback the place this was going to finish up. Almost each episode was an excellent 10 to fifteen minutes too lengthy (additionally an issue for the Shondaland sequence “Inventing Anna” and roughly each different drama on Netflix) and but we by no means get a way of why these two folks merely should be collectively, besides the conventions of the style.

To me, Anthony’s professed lack of curiosity in marrying for love and unresolved daddy points felt like a much less fascinating retread of emotional terrain we spent lots of time on in Season 1. (Bear in mind the Sizzling Duke and his daddy points?) We didn’t even get a giant marriage ceremony scene on the finish, as if the writers of “Bridgerton” weren’t invested on this romance.

Advertisement
Two young women have a serious conversation in a fancy study

Nicola Coughlan as Penelope Featherington and Claudia Jessie as Eloise Bridgerton in “Bridgerton.”

(Liam Daniel/Netflix)

Lee: Ha! I didn’t thoughts the extra-long episodic size, since I additionally cherished the arcs of the Sharma sisters, individually and collectively. I used to be instantly on board for the complete conceit of Kate, the older sister shunned for being from a earlier marriage, guiding the youthful Edwina to marry a person of the Aristocracy due to an inheritance clause. The phrases Kate lastly heard from her mom have been lovely, and the dialogue between the siblings was extra real than any back-and-forth from Season 1. And like Edwina, I discovered Anthony’s fierce protection of the household fairly enticing.

I agree with you — it’s very clear from the get-go that Anthony and Kate would be the two who find yourself collectively. However I used to be entertained whereas discovering out how that will occur, particularly since Edwina was topped the season’s diamond. Like, I didn’t assume they’d make all of it the best way to the altar!

So when Kate and Anthony collectively realized that selecting to be with one another meant selecting themselves, after a lifetime of sacrificing their very own needs for the sake of their households, I shipped them greater than I ever did Daphne and Simon. The 2 seasons are lust versus love, and for me, the latter will all the time win. I hope Edwina and that prince discover their joyful ending too.

Advertisement

Blake: It’s most likely simply the journalist/consummate gossip in me, however the one storyline that basically stored me going was the ordeal involving Eloise and Penelope. Season 1 ended with the reveal that candy, unassuming Penelope Featherington was truly Woman Whistledown, the author behind the influential scandal sheet. I cherished the concept that somebody who was handled like a wallflower wielded such energy behind the scenes.

Season 2 follows Penelope as she scrambles to maintain her id a secret, particularly from her finest pal, Eloise. (I cherished the scenes of Nicola Coughlan sliding into her pure Irish accent.) In an ironic twist, Penelope writes about Eloise’s flirtation with the lovable radical on the print store — please, please deliver this again for Season 3 — as a way to save her from Queen Charlotte’s suspicions.

I discover the friendship between these two ladies, who grew up in privilege but really feel like outsiders within the aristocratic marriage market, relatively convincing. I’m curious to see the way it all pans out subsequent season — which, sure, I’ll watch. Sigh. I’m rooting for them to patch issues up and begin writing some feminist pamphlets or one thing.

Lee: Sooner or later, I had guessed that Woman Whistledown can be Penelope, the massive household’s comparatively forgotten sibling who turns to writing as a approach to declare affect and garner reward. I did love how the season framed her gossip column as a small enterprise, which after all was revolutionary on the time, and the way she teamed with dressmaker Genevieve Delacroix to spice up each their backside traces. Her choice to betray Eloise to avoid wasting what she had constructed was fairly heartbreaking.

If the sequence follows the books, Season 3 will probably be tailored from “An Supply from a Gentleman,” which facilities on Benedict Bridgerton in a “Cinderella”-like seek for Sophie Beckett, a servant who sneaks right into a masquerade ball and hits it off with the eligible bachelor.

Advertisement

What do you assume, after what we’ve seen from Benedict within the first two seasons? I used to be as bummed as he was in regards to the reveal that his coveted spot on the artwork faculty was all due to his brother’s donation and never purely his advantage, however such is the lifetime of a wealthy Bridgerton boy who’s free to pursue artwork within the first place, proper? I additionally thought his preliminary publicity to portray in Season 1 was constructing to an exploration of his sexuality, however this final batch of episodes proved in any other case.

A man in a white shirt painting

Luke Thompson as Benedict Bridgerton in “Bridgerton.”

(Liam Daniel/Netflix)

Blake: Provided that I consider Benedict as “the one who paints,” and there are many viewers who can’t even inform the Bridgerton boys aside, I’m not positive how promising that is.

Principally I’m wanting to skip forward and see how issues end up for Eloise, the Bridgerton I’m most invested in. I’ll even resort to studying the guide as a substitute. Drastic measures, certainly!

Advertisement

Lee: Right here’s hoping “Bridgerton” will get renewed by means of Season 5, because the fifth guide is all about Eloise! My curiosity in Season 3 shall be closely influenced by the casting of its main girl, since I’m undoubtedly a type of individuals who can’t inform the Bridgerton boys aside.

In any other case, I’ll circle again with Season 4, for the reason that fourth guide is all about Colin and Woman Whistledown herself, Penelope. She is aware of what her readers need, so when it’s her flip to take heart stage, “Bridgerton” higher not disappoint.

‘Bridgerton’

The place: Netflix

When: Any time, season two out there Friday, March 25

Advertisement

Score: TV-MA (could also be unsuitable for kids underneath the age of 17)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Film review: The Promised Land

Published

on

Film review: The Promised Land

A Danish veteran back from war with Germany in the mid-18th century is on a mission to tame the brutal Jutland heath by turning it into fertile land. The idea is a pet project of the Danish king; when the soldier, Captain Ludvig Kahlen (Mads Mikkelsen) offers to fund the project from his war pension, officials cynically agree. Should he succeed, he will become a Danish noble with a title, a manor and servants.

We make plans and God laughs, says the writer and director Nikolaj Arcel. He first collaborated with Mikkelsen in 2012 in The Royal Affair which was set at a similar time in Danish history and was equally magnificent in its themes of ambition and madness.

The Jutland heath was a place of wildness, a barren wasteland occupied by outlaws and Taters – descendants of Romany gypsies who speak a Latinate patois. There is also a missionary church led by the sweet-faced pastor Anton Eklund (Gustav Lindh) who helps Kahlen by handing on two runaways he has been sheltering, Anna Barbara (Amanda Collin from Raised by Wolves) and her husband Johannes (Morton Hee Andersen). They had fled the estate of nobleman Frederik de Schinkel (Simon Bennebjerg), a weak and evil drunkard whose delusions of grandeur in his eyes make him the owner of the heath on which Kahlen wants to farm.

The story is complex and takes some investment as Kahlen, the unrecognised bastard son of a servant woman and estate owner, is in turns humiliated and courted by de Schinkel, a man unaccustomed to being denied. When de Schinkel arrives with leftovers from a banquet and a purse full of money, Kahlen accepts then returns them in disgust at having let himself be bought. The landscape darkens, with a scene of extraordinary cruelty that deserves an audience warning for the squeamish.

Yet Kahlen stays in the log home he calls King’s House, believing in his right to build on the land of the Danish king. When one option is taken away, he finds another and for a time has the Taters helping him burn the land ahead of sowing the resistant German crop in which he has such faith, the humble potato.

Advertisement

Everything, including nature, conspires against him and Kahlen’s grim determination starts raising larger questions about the price he will pay to become a noble.

Advertisement

It is at heart a love story that takes many forms. It’s a psychodrama about a man’s journey to find himself, and also a riveting fight between wrong and right as an unscrupulous nobleman tries to claim what is not his. In short, it’s a lot.

But this forbidding and magnificent drama has at its disposal Mads Mikkelsen’s face which, in repose, is one of the wonders of cinema for the depth it conveys of hidden pain and purpose. His tour de force performance, older and greyer than we have seen him, is the rock on which this quintessentially Danish saga stands.

The Promised Land is in cinemas now.

Support local arts journalism

Your support will help us continue the important work of InReview in publishing free professional journalism that celebrates, interrogates and amplifies arts and culture in South Australia.

Advertisement

Donate Here

. You are free to republish the text and graphics contained in this article online and in print, on the condition that you follow our republishing guidelines.

You must attribute the author and note prominently that the article was originally published by InReview.  You must also inlude a link to InReview. Please note that images are not generally included in this creative commons licence as in most cases we are not the copyright owner. However, if the image has an InReview photographer credit or is marked as “supplied”, you are free to republish it with the appropriate credits.

We recommend you set the canonical link of this content to https://inreview.com.au/inreview/film/2024/06/24/film-review-the-promised-land/ to insure that your SEO is not penalised.



Copied to Clipboard

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

TV executive Jamie Kellner, who helped create Fox and the WB, dies at 77

Published

on

TV executive Jamie Kellner, who helped create Fox and the WB, dies at 77

Jamie Kellner, a pioneering media executive who helped expand the world of broadcast television by creating Fox and the WB networks, died Friday. He was 77.

Kellner also oversaw CNN, TNT and TBS as chairman and chief executive of Turner Broadcasting System.

He died at his home in Montecito after a long battle with cancer, according to a spokesperson for the family.

Born in Brooklyn and raised on Long Island, Kellner first made a name for himself at Orion Entertainment Group, where he spearheaded an effort with Lorne Michaels to buy the rights to original episodes of “Saturday Night Live,” which were cut into 30-minute episodes and sold in syndication.

Advertisement

The lucrative partnership caught the attention of Rupert Murdoch and Barry Diller, who in the mid-’80s were plotting to launch an upstart broadcast network to rival the long-established “Big Three”: ABC, NBC and CBS. Kellner became the first president and chief operating officer of the Fox Broadcasting Co.

Launched in 1986, Fox was the first new network on American broadcast television since ABC in 1948.

Kellner poached a young NBC executive named Garth Ancier to run programming.

In a phone call Sunday, Ancier recalled Kellner as a formidable executive who “understood not just TV audiences, he also understood the entire way the TV system in the United States worked,” from affiliates to advertisers. Ancier, who also worked with Kellner at the WB, recalled flying to affiliates across the country, attempting to woo them to Fox.

At the time, few industry insiders thought Fox would have much staying power.

Advertisement

“My bosses — [NBC chief executive] Grant Tinker in particular — believed there would never be a fourth network,” Ancier said. “And they said, ‘On top of that, most of those stations they’re putting together are UHF,’ as if it was like the plague. It just meant we had to be different from the other networks.”

Kellner helped shape the network’s brand identity and make it a destination for edgier content, like the bawdy family sitcom “Married…With Children” — a show that initially attracted controversy but became a long-running hit.

“One of the first tests we apply is: Would one of the three networks do this? And quite often, if the answer is ‘yes,’ then we disqualify it. There is no reason for us to exist if we are going to do what they have already done,” Kellner told the New York Times in 1986.

Fox attracted younger viewers with shows that bucked long-held industry convention, like “In Living Color,” the irreverent sketch comedy show featuring a predominantly Black cast; and “Beverly Hills, 90120,” a high school soap opera that became one of the defining shows of the 1990s.

“The whole reason we did ‘The Simpsons’ was because no one had done animation in prime time since ABC in the ‘60s with ‘The Flintstones’ and ‘The Jetsons.’”

Advertisement

“The most important lessons we learned were to be different, to speak in a different voice than what was available to viewers already, and to get as young as you can get,” Kellner told The Times in 1997.

He left Fox in 1993, just as the network was expanding into a seventh night of programming and had numerous buzzy hits like the “90210” spinoff “Melrose Place.” In just seven years, Kellner had turned a “rickety string of UHF affiliates into a significant competitor,” as The Times then put it.

He soon began shopping around an idea for a fifth broadcast network. In 1995, he launched the WB, which initially made its mark with Black sitcoms including “The Wayans Bros.,” “The Jamie Foxx Show” and “Sister, Sister,” but faced stiff competition from another would-be contender, UPN. “We wouldn’t be doing this if I didn’t believe this would be as successful, or more successful, than the Fox network,” he said early in the WB’s reign.

One of the network’s first hits was the squeaky clean family drama “7th Heaven.” Throughout the late ‘90s, the network leaned into teen-centered dramas and ushered in a Golden Age for young adult programming that could be both sentimental and self-aware, with shows such as “Dawson’s Creek,” “Felicity” “Gilmore Girls” and “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.” By 2002, the network, in which he had ownership stake, was valued at $1 billion.

“I think the magic of that place came so much from his form of leadership, which was about taking bets on people,” said Greg Berlanti, who was tapped at age 28 to become showrunner on “Dawson’s Creek” and created two other shows at the WB, “Everwood” and “Jack & Bobby.” He recalled Kellner as an executive who supported creative talent and gave shows time to grow, but could also tell you “what five cities your show was most popular in.”

Advertisement

“I’m so glad I met that kind of leader at that age, someone who led with curiosity and compassion and was clear-headed and honest. He imbued people around him with a sense of faith in themselves.” Berlanti believes Kellner-era WB was “the most successful YA network in the history of television,” in part because Kellner “didn’t see it as a lesser audience.”

While still at the WB, he was tapped to succeed Ted Turner as chairman and chief executive of Turner Broadcasting System, where he oversaw TBS, TNT and CNN. He angered wrestling fans in 2001 by canceling World Championship Wrestling programming on TNT and TBS. He presided over CNN during a period of seismic shifts in the news business, with increased competition from Fox News and MSNBC and the cataclysmic attacks of 9/11.

Kellner was known for fostering loyalty among his top executives, several of whom moved with him from network to network. “He gave you tremendous latitude as a boss and mentor, always empowering you to make bold, decisive decisions and never settling for what’s always been done,” said Brad Turell, who was head of corporate communications at Fox, the WB and Turner Broadcasting under Kellner.

Kellner retired from the business in 2004, when he was just 57.

“I found it hard to believe because he was so competitive, in the best sense of the word, and so vigorous. But when he was done, he was really done,” said Ancier.

Advertisement

He remained busy pursuing passions like sailing and gold. He also opened a winery, Cent’Anni, in the Santa Ynez Valley, and was known for hosting Italian meals at his home.

He is survived by his wife, Julie Smith, daughter Melissa, son Christopher, and three grandchildren, Jake, Scarlett and Oliver.    

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: “Casablanca” – A Timeless Masterpiece –

Published

on

Movie Review: “Casablanca” – A Timeless Masterpiece –

A staff report

“Casablanca,” directed by Michael Curtiz and released in 1942, remains a cinematic gem cherished by audiences and critics alike. Set against the backdrop of World War II, this classic romance-drama unfolds in the exotic Moroccan city of Casablanca, a haven for refugees fleeing Nazi-occupied Europe.

The film stars Humphrey Bogart as Rick Blaine, a cynical American expatriate and nightclub owner, whose world-weary demeanor conceals a deep sense of morality. His life takes a dramatic turn when his former lover, Ilsa Lund (played by Ingrid Bergman), re-enters his life with her husband, resistance leader Victor Laszlo (Paul Henreid). As political tensions rise and personal dilemmas intensify, Rick is faced with difficult choices that test his principles and define his destiny.

“Casablanca” is celebrated for its impeccable storytelling, memorable dialogue, and stellar performances. Bogart’s portrayal of Rick Blaine is iconic, capturing both the character’s toughness and vulnerability. Ingrid Bergman shines as the enigmatic Ilsa, torn between love and duty. The film’s supporting cast, including Claude Rains as the charmingly corrupt Captain Renault and Dooley Wilson as the soulful pianist Sam, adds depth and richness to the narrative.

The film’s cinematography, evocative of film noir with its shadowy interiors and smoky atmosphere, enhances the mood of intrigue and romance. Max Steiner’s haunting musical score, highlighted by the timeless melody of “As Time Goes By,” underscores the emotional depth of the story.

Advertisement

Beyond its cinematic achievements, “Casablanca” resonates as a poignant exploration of love, sacrifice, and redemption amidst the turmoil of war. Its themes of honor, patriotism, and the power of personal integrity remain relevant and compelling to this day.

As a classic of American cinema, “Casablanca” continues to captivate audiences with its timeless charm and universal appeal. Whether revisiting it or experiencing it for the first time, this film promises an unforgettable journey into the heart of one of cinema’s greatest love stories and moral dilemmas.

About Author

Continue Reading

Trending