Connect with us

Entertainment

Steven Spielberg isn’t the only director grumbling about the Oscars’ show changes

Published

on

Steven Spielberg isn’t the only director grumbling about the Oscars’ show changes

The movie academy’s resolution to change the Oscars broadcast this 12 months in a bid to reverse final 12 months’s traditionally low scores is dealing with resistance from a few of Hollywood’s heaviest hitters.

Administrators Steven Spielberg and Jane Campion are amongst these expressing their dismay in latest days over the choice to maneuver eight classes out of the printed window and into the hour earlier than the telecast begins.

“We should prioritize the tv viewers to extend viewer engagement and maintain the present important, kinetic, and related,” academy president David Rubin wrote final month in a letter to the group’s roughly 10,000 members. “This has been an essential focus of debate for fairly a while.”

One member of the academy’s 54-person board of governors scoffed at the concept that these attending in individual can be stylish sufficient to take a seat politely by way of an untelevised hour earlier than the printed. Eight awards shall be handed out beginning at 4 p.m. Pacific time, and the outcomes, in response to Rubin, shall be “folded seamlessly into the reside present” that begins at 5 p.m.

Advertisement

“I believe most individuals shall be on the bar,” the unidentified governor informed the Hollywood Reporter final week. “We’re going to want much more seat-fillers. In order that’s going to be a bummer for the nominees whose awards are being offered then.”

Whereas Rubin mentioned that every one nominees and winners shall be acknowledged in the course of the broadcast, a few of the pomp and circumstance is likely to be muted for nominees within the affected classes: movie enhancing, make-up and hairstyling, unique rating, manufacturing design, sound, documentary quick topic, animated quick and live-action quick.

After quite a lot of academy members spoke up instantly when the modifications have been introduced, here’s what a handful of Hollywood’s prime filmmakers are saying about modifications to this 12 months’s ceremony.

Steven Spielberg

The “West Facet Story” directing and greatest image nominee disagrees with the choice to separate some disciplines from the primary a part of the ceremony, provided that filmmaking is, as he informed Deadline on Sunday, “essentially the most collaborative medium on the planet.”

“I really feel that on the Academy Awards there isn’t any above-the-line, there isn’t any below-the-line. All of us are on the identical line bringing the very best of us to inform the very best tales we presumably can,” Spielberg mentioned. “And meaning for me we should always all have a seat on the supper desk collectively reside at 5.”

Advertisement

He didn’t have excessive hopes {that a} reversal would come earlier than this 12 months’s Academy Awards have been underway.

“The identical factor got here near taking place three years in the past and on the eleventh hour a choice was made that reversed it and 4 classes that have been within the business breaks have been reinstated on the reside present,” Spielberg mentioned. “I hope it’s reversed, however I’m not anticipating a reversal and I’m not optimistic about it.”

Denis Villeneuve

The “Dune” director thought the Oscars have been simply nice earlier than saying this 12 months’s modifications. Now the present goes by way of an identification disaster, he informed Deadline over the weekend, and individuals are making some dangerous decisions.

“Truthfully, I believe that the academy’s throwing the newborn out with the bathwater,” Villeneuve mentioned. “I believe it’s a mistake. And I perceive that they’re beneath large strain, however I believe it isn’t the fitting resolution.”

He famous that the actors and the administrators get numerous media consideration whereas the remainder of the individuals on a movie don’t. “All of the individuals which can be working within the shadows, they should be seen and to be acknowledged, and these award reveals are made for them,” he mentioned.

Advertisement

Jane Campion

The director of “The Energy of the Canine,” whose nomination for guiding made Oscars historical past, took problem with one of many classes that shall be relegated to the preshow: manufacturing design.

“I’d have undoubtedly included design in the primary physique of the awards as a result of design is so important,” she informed Deadline. “It’s some of the essential relationships.”

Sadly, in doing so she may need unintentionally instructed that the opposite seven classes have been much less important. 4 of her movie’s dozen nominations — movie enhancing, rating, sound and manufacturing design — will occur earlier than the primary broadcast.

Ava DuVernay

The “Selma” and “A Wrinkle in Time” filmmaker took problem with one phrase that retains popping up within the dialogue: excluded. As in, the concept that the eight classes are going to be “excluded” from the awards — which they don’t seem to be. They may merely be awarded off-camera, earlier than the printed begins.

“[T]he phrase ‘excluded’ is a strong one for a lot of. It has a selected and heightened that means to many,” DuVernay informed the Hollywood Reporter final week. “I believe it’s essential to name issues by their proper title in order to not decrease the that means of true exclusion in these areas.”

Advertisement

Will Packer

OK, he’s not a big-name director, however Packer is one one that thinks the modifications are a good suggestion — and he’s producing this 12 months’s Oscars broadcast.

“It’s an oversaturated content material setting,” he informed Selection final Friday, referring to awards reveals basically. “Individuals have decisions to observe something and the whole lot they need.

“I’m going to do the very best I can to deal with this present with the reverence, respect and correct positioning it deserves,” he continued, “however I’m additionally going to attempt to make a really entertaining present.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Film Review | Power Play Stationing

Published

on

Film Review | Power Play Stationing

On the index of possible spoil alert sins one could make about the erotic thriller Babygirl, perhaps the least objectionable is that which most people already know: The film belongs to the very rare species of film literally ending with the big “O.” Nicole Kidman’s final orgasmic aria of ecstasy caps off a film which dares to tell a morally slippery tale. But for all the high points and gray zones of writer-director Halina Reijn’s intriguing film, the least ambiguous moment arrives at its climax. So to speak.

The central premise is a maze-like anatomy of an affair, between Kidman’s Romy Mathis, a fierce but also mid-life conflicted 50-year-old CEO of a robotics company, and a sly, handsome twenty-something intern Samuel (Harris Dickinson, who will appear at the Virtuosos Tribute at this year’s Santa Barbara International Film Festival). Sparks fly, and mutually pursued seduction ensues behind closed doors and away from the prying eyes of her family (and husband, played by Antonio Banderas).

From the outset, though, it’s apparent that nefarious sexual exploits, though those do liberally spice up the film’s real estate, are not the primary subject. It’s more a film steeped with power-play gamesmanship, emotional extortion, and assorted manipulations of class and hierarchical structures. Samuel teases a thinly veiled challenge to her early on, “I think you like to be told what to do.” She feigns shock, but soon acquiesces, and what transpires on their trail of deceptions and shifting romantic-sexual relationship includes a twist in which he demands her submission in exchange for him not sabotaging her career trajectory.

Kidman, who gives another powerful performance in Babygirl, is no stranger to roles involving frank sexuality and complications thereof. She has excelled in such fragile and vulnerable situations, especially boldly in Gus Van Sant’s brilliant To Die For (also a May/October brand dalliance story), and Stanley Kubrick’s carnally acknowledged Eyes Wide Shut. Ironically or not, she finds herself in the most tensely abusive sex play as the wife of Alexander Skarsgård in TVs Big Little Lies.

Compared to those examples, Babygirl works a disarmingly easygoing line. For all of his presumed sadistic power playing, Dickinson — who turns in a nuanced performance in an inherently complex role — is often confused and sometimes be mused in the course of his actions or schemes. In an early tryst encounter, his domination play seems improvised and peppered with self-effacing giggles, while in a later, potentially creepier hotel scene, his will to wield power morphs into his state of vulnerable, almost child-like reliance on her good graces. The oscillating power play dynamics get further complicated.

Advertisement

Complications and genre schematics also play into the film’s very identity, in fresh ways. Dutch director (and actress) Reijn has dealt with erotically edgy material in the past, especially with her 2019 film Instinct. But, despite its echoes and shades of Fifty Shades of Gray and 9½ Weeks, Babygirl cleverly tweaks the standard “erotic thriller” format — with its dangerous passions and calculated upward arc of body heating — into unexpected places. At times, the thriller form itself softens around the edges, and we become more aware of the gender/workplace power structures at the heart of the film’s message.

But, message-wise, Reijn is not ham-fisted or didactic in her treatment of the subject. There is always room for caressing and redirecting the impulse, in the bedroom, boardroom, and cinematic storyboarding.

See trailer here.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

It's de-lovely, it's official: Sutton Foster and Hugh Jackman hold hands on L.A.-area date

Published

on

It's de-lovely, it's official: Sutton Foster and Hugh Jackman hold hands on L.A.-area date

For Sutton Foster and Hugh Jackman, it seems Monday evening was a swell night for romance.

The Tony-winning “Anything Goes” star and “The Greatest Showman” actor stepped out this week for a dinner date and a stroll in Santa Monica, seemingly making their romance paparazzi-official a year after dating speculation began. Photos published by People and TMZ show the former “Music Man” co-stars smiling at each other as they walk hand-in-hand.

Jackman, 56, can be seen wearing a dark jacket, a gray T-shirt, white jeans and dark sneakers. “Once Upon a Mattress” star Foster, 49, wore an olive dress, a light brown trench coat, dark stilettos and a handbag.

Foster and Jackman made their first public outing together two months after the former filed for divorce from screenwriter Ted Griffin. The Broadway star, who also starred in TV series “Bunheads” and “Younger,” filed to divorce Griffin after 10 years of marriage. They share a young daughter, whom they adopted in 2017.

Jackman recently split with his longtime spouse, Deborra-Lee Furness. In September 2023, the “Les Misérables” Oscar nominee and Furness announced they were going their separate ways after 27 years of marriage. Months after the exes’ announcement, In Touch reported that the “Wolverine” star had sparked up a connection with Foster after the pair grew close during their time in “The Music Man,” which ran from December 2021 to January 2023.

Advertisement

Both Foster and Jackman earned Tony nominations in 2022 for their work in the revival of the Meredith Willson musical.

The duo went on their Santa Monica dinner date days after gossip account Deuxmoi published a photo of Jackman sitting next to comedy icon Carol Burnett at the Ahmanson Theatre. The two stars were in the audience at a Saturday performance of Foster’s “Once Upon a Mattress.” Burnett made her Broadway debut originating the role of Foster’s Princess Winifred in 1959.

“Two Freds,” Foster captioned a postshow photo with the beloved entertainer. “I love you Carol Burnett.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

A Real Pain (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

A Real Pain (2024) – Movie Review

A Real Pain, 2024.

Written and Directed by Jesse Eisenberg.
Starring Jesse Eisenberg, Kieran Culkin, Will Sharpe, Jennifer Grey, Kurt Egyiawan, Ellora Torchia, Liza Sadovy, and Daniel Oreskes.

SYNOPSIS:

Mismatched cousins David and Benji reunite for a tour through Poland to honor their beloved grandmother. The adventure takes a turn when the pair’s old tensions resurface against the backdrop of their family history.

Advertisement

At one point on the Holocaust tour in Poland, Benji (a devastatingly complex Kieran Culkin) loses his cool and freaks out. To be fair, he does this multiple times in writer/director/star Jesse Eisenberg’s achingly effective but sharply funny A Real Pain (marking his return to Sundance following up his debut feature When You Finish Saving the World), portraying a somewhat contradictory individual, tormented and lost following the death of his Jewish grandmother, seemingly the only adult who was able to successfully ground him. Part of the magic trick here is that Kieran Culkin is fully raw, vulnerable, authentic, and hilarious throughout every bit of his unexpected, brash, and sometimes uncalled-for behavior. 

Traveling with his close cousin from New York to Poland to reconnect and pay respects to their grandma, Jesse Eisenberg’s David is also unsure what to expect, repeatedly calling Benji on the way to the airport as if disaster is going to strike if he doesn’t check up on him often. They also share polar opposite personalities, with David being, well, the socially awkward and nervous Jesse Eisenberg moviegoers are familiar with, whereas Benji is a directionless stoner (he has also arranged for some marijuana to be delivered to him at the hotel they will be staying at in Warsaw) who needs this trip as a form of therapy. As a married father, David takes time out of his busy life to be there for his cousin and provide support.

Being present is a huge theme in A Real Pain, but considering these cousins are also taking up a Holocaust tour before ending their vacationing week by visiting their grandmother’s home (where she lived in Poland before experiencing 1,000 incidents of luck to avoid concentration camps and flee the country), it’s also about suffering and the different baggage people bring to these situations. One minute, Benji is playful and encourages the rest of the group to pose alongside some memorials of soldiers, pretending to be medics or fighting alongside the resistance. In the next scene, he could be irritable riding first class on a train expressing that such privileged treatment feels distant from the reality of what his grandmother and others lived through.

Grouped up with a non-Jewish but friendly, well-meaning tour guide named James (Will Sharpe), Benji also points out that the nonstop barrage of facts, especially when visiting a historic cemetery, also feels cold and counterproductive to the experience. This shouldn’t be about statistics, but something that can be felt. In that same vein, David and Benji must also have difficult conversations about the past and what the latter will do in the present (there’s one revealed that, while sensitively handled, also feels like something this story doesn’t even need.) However, the actors do have charming chemistry whenever they are alone and reminiscing about the good times, which is unsurprisingly dynamite when things turn serious. 

A Real Pain is historically and culturally emotional as it is personally involving, with Jesse Eisenberg noticeably evolving as a filmmaker. Here, he is confident and comfortable taking brief moments with cinematographer Michał Dymek to linger on statues, murals, and architecture or anything that might deliver a vicarious feeling that we are alongside these characters on this tour. There’s a beautiful, soft scene where buildings and landmarks are rattled off, each with a shot of what exists there now. It’s enough to make one wish the film delved even deeper into the historical context and the tour itself.

Advertisement

Naturally, this also elicits curiosity about what they will find when the cousins inevitably visit their grandmother’s former home. Whatever it is, we hope Benji finds healing and that the struggles would then he and David’s relationship will also feel repaired (it’s that typical notion of feeling lost when a relative no longer has time to be carefree and hang out constantly since they now have a family.) Without giving it away, David certainly tries resulting in a painfully funny, cathartic sensation. A Real Pain is a multilayered look at generational trauma with poignant and hilarious complex chemistry from its leads.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending