Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Thor: Love and Thunder’ Review: A God’s Comic Twilight

Published

on

‘Thor: Love and Thunder’ Review: A God’s Comic Twilight

Every now and then in “Thor: Love and Thunder,” the 92nd Marvel film to hit theaters this yr (OK, the third), the studio equipment hits pause, and the image opens a portal to a different dimension: Its star, Chris Hemsworth, embraces wholesale self-parody, a pair of large screaming goats gallop alongside a rainbow freeway and Russell Crowe flounces round in a flirty skirt and Shirley Temple curls. Because the film briefly slips right into a parallel realm of play and pleasure, you may really feel the director Taika Waititi having an excellent time — and it’s infectious.

That is the fourth “Thor” film in 11 years and the second that Waititi has directed, following “Thor: Ragnarok” (2017). That film was far and wide, however it was humorous (sufficient) and had a lightness that proved liberating for the collection and Hemsworth. “Love and Thunder” is sillier than any of its predecessors, and thinner. Rather a lot occurs in overstuffed Marvel Studios trend. However as a result of the collection has jettisoned lots of its earlier parts — its Shakespearean pretensions, meddlesome family members and, crucially, Thor’s godly grandeur — the brand new film roughly performs like a rescue mission with jokes, tears and smackdowns.

It begins with a pasty, near-unrecognizable Christian Bale, who, having been relieved of his DC Darkish Knight duties, has signed up with Marvel as a villain with the spoiler title of Gorr the God Butcher. Waititi rapidly sketches in Gorr’s background, giving it a tragic solid. Believing himself betrayed by the god he as soon as worshiped, Gorr is dedicated to destroying different deities. It’s probably wealthy storytelling terrain, notably given Thor’s stature and Marvel’s position as a recent mythmaker. However whereas Bale takes the position by the throat, as is his behavior, investing the character with frictional depth, Gorr proves disappointingly boring.

For probably the most half, Gorr merely offers Thor one other likelihood to play the hero, which Hemsworth does with a stellar deadpan and considerable suppleness. He’s all the time been enjoyable to look at within the position and never simply because, because the slavering camerawork likes to remind you, he appears awfully wonderful with or with out garments. Hemsworth is aware of how you can transfer, which is stunning given his muscled bulk, and is relaxed together with his magnificence. He’s additionally realized how you can deploy — and puncture — Thor’s inborn pomposity, though by the point the ultimate credit rolled in “Ragnarok” that haughtiness had was shtick. Thor continues to be a god, but in addition he’s now an important huge goof.

To that finish, Thor enters midfight on a battlefield washed in grayish crimson mild, preening and posing and showboating alongside characters from Marvel’s “Guardians of the Galaxy.” With Guardians (Chris Pratt, the raccoon voiced by Bradley Cooper, and so on.) on backup, Thor vanquishes the enemy together with his customary hyperbole — he strikes the bottom, reaches for the heavens, flips his hair — and a brand new hammer the scale of a backhoe shovel. He additionally destroys a temple that appears proper out of an airport present store. This synergistic foreplay isn’t fairly, and neither is the remainder of the film, however it pronounces Waititi’s sensibilities, his irreverence and style for kitsch.

Advertisement

From the beginning, the “Thor” collection has pushed and pulled at its title character, by turns enshrining and undercutting his supernatural id, elevating him up solely to deliver him crashing again right down to Earth. The films have, virtually to a fault, emphasised Thor’s frailties: He has daddy points, a sibling rivalry and romantic woes. Gods, they’re identical to us! Thor’s love life humanized him for good and unhealthy, although his romance with an astrophysicist — Natalie Portman’s Jane Foster — labored finest as ballast for the he-man motion. Jane wasn’t attention-grabbing, regardless of Portman’s febrile smiles, however, after sitting out the final film, she’s again.

Why the encore? Effectively, principally as a result of Waititi, who wrote the script with Jennifer Kaytin Robinson, doesn’t appear to know what else he can do with Thor. By the top of “Ragnarok,” the character had been repeatedly lower right down to measurement. He’d squabbled together with his brother and wittiest foil (Tom Hiddleston as Loki). His lengthy hair was chopped off and his kingdom annihilated, and gone too had been the heavyweights who had helped fill the story’s holes with their magnetism and character. Anthony Hopkins (Thor’s dad) exited, as did Cate Blanchett (sis). Thor fought, beloved and misplaced, after which he packed on the kilos and went to hold with the Avengers.

“Love and Thunder” revs up the “Thor” franchise once more with the standard quips and beats, programmatically timed blowouts, brand-extending particulars, a kidnapping and a welcome if underused Tessa Thompson. Her Valkyrie, alas, receives much less display time than Jane, who’s given a disaster in addition to particular powers, a blond blowout and muscle tissue that inflate and deflate like occasion balloons. Jane’s new abilities don’t do a lot for the story and skim as a dutiful nod to girls’s empowerment (thanks). Portman does what she will, but she’s so tightly wound that she by no means syncs up with the loosey-goosey rhythms the way in which Thompson and Hemsworth do.

Waititi’s playfulness buoys “Love and Thunder,” however the insistence on Thor’s likability, his decency and dude-ness, has turn out to be a artistic useless finish. The film has its sights, notably Hemsworth, Thompson and Crowe, whose Zeus vamps via a sequence with a butt-naked Thor and fainting minions. It’s a pleasant and cheerfully vulgar interlude, and critically, it reminds you of the sheer otherworldliness of those beings who — with their vanities, cruelties, deeds, mysteries and powers — flip actuality into fable and tales into goals. Like film stars, gods aren’t like us, which in fact is one cause we invented them.

Thor: Love and Thunder
Rated PG-13 for superhero violence. Working time: 2 hours 5 minutes. In theaters.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Max’ movie review: A fiery Sudeep drives this high-octane action thriller

Published

on

‘Max’ movie review: A fiery Sudeep drives this high-octane action thriller

Sudeep in ‘Max’.
| Photo Credit: Special Arrangement

Inspector Arjun Mahakshay a.k.a Max takes charge unofficially a day before his suspension ends. A huge blunder inside the station puts Max against powerful men, who come for his life. As he is faced with the improbable task of saving his colleagues and coming out unscathed from the problem, the daring cop pauses to prepare a cup of tea.

Director Vijay Kartikeyaa’s debut project is driven by a protagonist who keeps you guessing about his next move. Even if Max aims to provide unhinged ‘masala’ entertainment, the movie’s leading man isn’t a one-note character. Since the events unfold during one night, and he has limited time to cross a series of hurdles, Max puts his sharp brain to quick use. And once he enters the risky zone of facing the criminals head-on, he unleashes the beast inside him.

Max (Kannada)

Director: Vijay Kartikeyaa

Cast: Sudeep, Varalaxmi Sarathkumar, Ilavarasu, Uggram Manju

Runtime: 132 minutes

Advertisement

Storyline: A day before reporting for duty after a two-month suspension, inspector Arjun Mahakshay faces an unexpected situation. Can he save the day?

Max is a celebration of Sudeep, who oozes style in his aggressive portrayal of an all-conquering officer. If you saw him as a subdued yet classy cop carrying a deep pain within him in Vikrant Rona (2022), Sudeep cuts loose in Max to cater to his fans, who were hungry for ‘mass’ moments involving their favourite star.

The one-man show is great fun to watch to an extent. Director Vijay scripts an old-school world where the hero emerges as the ultimate saviour of distressed people. However, as a whole, Max leaves you wanting more as you expect the protagonist to face the heat of a mighty antagonist.

Sunil, essaying the main villain, is undone by a toothless character. Varalaxmi Sarathkumar’s character of a cop with a negative shade shows promise early on but gets fizzled out eventually as she fails to make any difference to the plot. Right from the beginning, it’s apparent that both the characters are bracing for an inevitable onslaught from Max.  

It’s also quite shocking how Max has an almost incompetent team. When they aren’t blindly following the instructions from Max, the junior-level officers are scared and clueless. Ilavarasu, playing an experienced officer, delivers a measured performance. The rest of the cast, including Uggram Manju, Samyuktha Hornad, Sukrutha Wagale and Vijay Chendur, are too loud in their respective portrayals.

Advertisement

One can’t blame the actors as their characters are designed to artificially amp up the tension. With a highly dramatic plot in hand, the director’s decision to showcase stronger emotions than what’s necessary dents the film.

ALSO READ:‘UI’ movie review: Upendra’s political commentary is a one-of-a-kind experience despite its flaws

The core idea of Max might remind you of Lokesh Kanagaraj’s Kaithi (2019). With so much happening in a short span of time, it’s tough to emotionally invest in the proceedings. On the other hand, Max’s racy screenplay keeps you curious about the events on screen. A superb fusion of Chethan D Souza’s action choreography and Ajaneesh Lokanath’s ensures an adrenaline-pumping experience.

Max is a star vehicle with admirable experiments from the makers. With Vikrant Rona and Max, Sudeep has deviated from traditional commercial films. The big stars of Kannada cinema are seeking change, and that’s a good sign.

Max is currently running in theatres.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Barroz Twitter Review: Is Mohanlal’s directorial debut with the fantasy film worth a watch? Check out these 11 tweets to know

Published

on

Barroz Twitter Review: Is Mohanlal’s directorial debut with the fantasy film worth a watch? Check out these 11 tweets to know

Mollywood icon, Mohanlal has now ventured into the director’s chair and his directorial debut film Barroz has made its theatrical release today, December 25, 2024. The Malayalam fantasy movie, within hours of release, has gotten some vivid reviews from fans, who have highlighted their opinions on social media.

Well, it seems that Barroz has received mixed opinions from some fans, who have significantly highlighted how the film has not lived up to the expectations considering it being the senior actor’s directorial debut.

Fans have expressed disappointment at the fact that the film’s storyline is weaker, and it is only the specialised use of VFX that has been pulling it all together.

On the other hand, some other fans have appreciated the impeccable acting chops of Mohanlal himself, with special mention to the excellent 3D presentation appealing to mass audiences for more than one reason.

Advertisement

There have been specific references to a few underwater scenes, which have been touted as an epitome of masterclass cinematic presentation, not to forget how it would not hit as a mass entertainer.

Check out the fans’ reviews about Barroz on Twitter:











Mohanlal has left no stone unturned when it comes to the jam-packed promotional spree for Barroz. The film’s cinematography has been done by the talented Santosh Sivan, while the musical score is handled by Mark Killian.

Coming to the plot of the film, it is said to revolve around the conquest undertaken by Barroz, the guardian of a treasure which has been hidden for over 400 years. This wealth has been trusted to only a true descendant of Da Gama. 

Advertisement

It is inspired as an adaptation of Jijo Punnoose’s novel Barroz: Guardian of D’Gama’s Treasure. However, the scenes were rewritten by Mohanlal and Thazhathupurakkal Karunakara Panicker, including characters and locations, leading to the exit of the novelist, forfeiting his credits.

Speaking of the cast of Barroz, besides Mohanlal, it stars Maya Rao West, Cesar Lorente Raton, Kallirroi Tziafeta, Daniel Caltagirone, Aadukalam Naren, Tuhin Menon  and others.

ALSO READ: Nayanthara enjoys ‘best holiday’ in Europe with Vignesh Shivan and twins; sunsets, long walks and Eiffel Tower sum up her travel diaries; PICS

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film Review: The Fire Inside – SLUG Magazine

Published

on

Film Review: The Fire Inside – SLUG Magazine

Film

The Fire Inside
Director: Rachel Morrison
Michael De Luca Productions, PASTEL
In Theaters: 12.25

I’m not a fan of combat sports in real life, yet I find that movies about them are nearly irresistible. Whether it’s Rocky, The Karate Kid, Warrior or the upcoming wrestling flick Unstoppable, the underdog who comes out swinging and bests their bigger, more experienced opponent always plays. It’s also nearly always the same movie, and that’s what makes The Fire Inside a knockout.

In this fact–based story, Claressa Shields (Ryan Destiny, A Girl Like Grace, Oracle) is a young woman from Flint, Michigan, who has one skill and one passion: boxing. Despite limited support from her family, Claressa is taken under the wing of Jason Crutchfield (Brian Tyree Henry, If Beale Street Could Talk, Godzilla vs. Kong), a coach at a local gym. As Jason becomes as much a surrogate father as a coach, Claressa trains with a ferocious determination and earns a spot on the 2012 Summer Olympic team —  Claressa “T-Rex” Shields becomes the first American woman to take home the gold in the sport at age 16. From there, Claressa goes from being a poor inner city kid with nothing to … a poor inner city kid with a gold medal overnight.  There are no endorsement deals, no professional career and seemingly no new worlds to conquer. As Claressa fights discouragement, she must find a path to lead her beyond a one time victory into a lasting better life.

Advertisement

Rachel Morrison, the first woman to be nominated for an Academy Award for her work on Black Panther, makes a strong directorial debut, coming out swinging. She’s ably assisted by a terrific script by Barry Jenkins (Moonlight). The Fire Inside transcends the tropes of the genre by reaching the rush of climactic fight and then daring not to end there, instead delving into the reality that in Shields’  life, one triumph in the sports world doesn’t change your circumstances, especially for an uncouth young woman with no interest in playing the public relations game and selling a softer, more traditionally feminine image. We’ve heard the cliche “this isn’t just a movie about sports, it’s about life,” but such a candid look at a life-changing moment that does nothing to change your life, and learning how to face this, was something refreshingly new and honest. The often bleak and at times stunningly beautiful cinematography by Rina Yang, along with the stirring score by Tamar-kali, lift the sensory experience and go a long way to making this one a winner. 

Destiny shows potential as a breakout star, commanding the screen as effortlessly as Claressa commands the ring. Henry is the highlight of any film he’s in, and The Fire Inside is no exception, with his grounded performance keeping the film moving along and setting the tone for a story about learning that you can still lean on others while you’re believing in yourself. The sizzling chemistry between these two actors drives a poignant and entertaining story to a satisfying and believable conclusion that’s not the one you’re expecting.

The Fire Inside is a breath of fresh air in a genre that far too often settles for stale and dank. It provides enough inspirational warmth to fulfill its duties as an uplifting sports movie, but its got the stamina and the drive to go a few extra rounds and push its own limits. Unlike most boxing films, this champ doesn’t pull any punches. –Patrick Gibbs

Read more film reviews here:
Film Review: A Complete Unknown
Film Review: Babygirl 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending