Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Stream It Or Skip It: ‘My Fault’ on Amazon Prime Video, a YA Lustfest About Stepsiblings Who Can’t Control Their Desires

Published

on

Stream It Or Skip It: ‘My Fault’ on Amazon Prime Video, a YA Lustfest About Stepsiblings Who Can’t Control Their Desires

Soapy Spanish rom-dram My Fault (now streaming on Amazon Prime Video) pushes the boundaries of young adult a little closer to adult-adult, being several degrees steamier than, say, Twilight, but still cooler than the scalding cheese of something like Fifty Shades. Based on the first of a trilogy of books by Spanish-Argentine novelist Mercedes Ron, the film stars Nicole Wallace as a teenager who falls hard for her new stepbrother and makes us all really really uncomfortable about it. Seems like a problematic narrative, but maybe the movie will find a way to wiggle out of the ethical quandary the situation presents.  

MY FAULT: STREAM IT OR SKIP IT?

The Gist: She’s Noah (Wallace) and she takes no shit. Antagonize her, and she’ll slice you up. She’s very much in lash-out mode these days: Her mother Rafaella (Marta Hazas) just married a bazillionaire, so they’re moving into his gargantu-mansion, far away from Noah’s school and boyfriend and friends, and she’s not happy about it. She might be impressed with her far-beyond-fancy new home with its gates and butlers and limos, but she’ll be damned if she says anything positive about anything right now, or admit that anything ever makes her happy. “I just got here and everyone hates me already,” she laments, showing an alarming lack of self-awareness. TEENAGERS, RIGHT? Such drama.

But then she meets her new stepbrother Nick (Gabriel Guevara), who walks into the room like someone just dumped water on the coals: sizzle sizzle. They instantly “hate” each other, of course. They exchange they-doth-protest-too-much barbed banter in spite of all the blood that’s rushing to their groins. Nick is 21 and angling for entry into the Badboy Hall of Fame. Noah ends up at a party, watching shirtless Nick lick tequila off a variety of bimbos’ breasts. She ends up at another party, watching Nick street-race his Very Expensive Sports Automobile against recently incarcerated gangsta-creeps. She ends up at yet another party, watching Nick bareknuckle box chiseled brutes. We get it: He’s tough, he’s cocky, he’s violent and if you put him on a platter with some A-1 steak sauce, she’ll eat him alive.

But you’ll find Noah is full of surprises. At the street-race party, she gets behind the wheel of Nick’s Porsche and beats the main gangsta-creep, embarrassing him. See, her dad was a racecar driver, and taught her a thing or two before he ended up in jail for doing heinous things, things hinted at in recurring traumatic flashbacks. It’s a narrative timeline that tells us her dad has been incarcerated for many years now, so he apparently taught her how to drive when she was, I dunno, eight years old? I’m not so sure about the math of your narrative timeline here, Lou. Either way, we’re here now, watching Noah and Nick bicker until they finally mash face and participate in a totally hawwt scene prompting us to ponder whether or not it’s logically possible to dry hump in a pool – and the romantic temp only gets hawwter from there, considering how forbidden and secret their lusty-lust is. Meanwhile, Noah keeps getting threatening texts and notes from an anonymous antagonist, the identity of which is so obvious, even Stimpson J. Cat could figure out who it is in no time flat. Now, will this plot resolve itself in a non-ridiculous manner? NO SPOILERS, but that seems pretty much impossible.

My Fault
Photo: Amazon Studios

What Movies Will It Remind You Of?: This is teen-romance crud drafting off the likes of Like Crazy or All the Bright Places with softer-core Fifty Shades sex scenes, half-assed Fast and Furious race/party sequences and a few oogy Lolita vibes. It also recalls the After franchise.

Performance Worth Watching: I feel like Wallace and Guevara would make a convincingly magnetic couple in a movie that wasn’t so blatantly moronic. Maybe next time kids! 

Advertisement

Memorable Dialogue: This is so embarrassing, I’m cringing as I type it:

Nick: This isn’t right.

Noah: It isn’t right at all.

Nick: You’re my stepsister and you’re 17.

Noah. Then kiss me until I’m 18.

Sex and Skin: Male/female rear nudeness, some steamy sexytimes that are more suggestive than explicit and faux-artsy-fartsy and admittedly fairly hot until you realize we’re sidling up next to an uncomfortable taboo and putting our hand on its thigh.

Advertisement

Our Take: OK, whose fault is My Fault anyway wocka wocka! Is it Ron’s, for conceiving this ludicrous scenario that’s a rancid distillation of many annoying and not very good things that came before it? Is it writer/director Domingo Gonzalez for herky-jerking us around between terrible romance, terrible action and terrible family drama? Is it both of them for executing a plot whose primary component is nonsense, and vomiting forth such chunderously godawful dialogue as “You don’t need kisses, you need volcanic eruptions in your mouth”? (Maybe it comes off better in its native Spanish, but I have my doubts.) 

I rest my case. Actually, I don’t: The characters are insipid and rudimentary, crudely carved from the granite of countless hoary cliches. Noah’s traumatic backstory is trite and unconvincing; she’s characterized as a mouthy type who reads, like, actual books (Pride and Prejudice, Romeo and Juliet) and sandpapers our asses from her very first scene – she’s the world’s most petulant Austenite. And Nick, well, he’s not any of that, and that’s about it, although he has a little half-sister with diabetes (WEEP FOR HER) who exists in the soft part of his heart, although that part isn’t nearly as mushy as his brain. 

Spending time with these two and their perfunctory, color-by-numbers romance – studded with witless I-hate-you/I-wanna-eff-you banter – is annoying and excruciating even if you can temporarily ward off the distant thunder in your guts warning us to stop wanting to see them have sex (they are physically attractive human beings) in spite of how deliriously close they are to committing jailbait incest. That mighty conflict between moral reasoning and pelvic desire is enough to tie your intestines in a knot, but one thing is abundantly clear: This is an atrocious movie. 

Our Call: Oh, and it sets itself up for a sequel. Get the f— outta here. SKIP IT. 

John Serba is a freelance writer and film critic based in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

The Smile Man review: Sarath Kumar's film fails to realise its full potential

Published

on

The Smile Man review: Sarath Kumar's film fails to realise its full potential

A serial killer on the loose. The killer has a pattern – he/she brutally maims the target, leaving them with a gory smiling face. Enter a high-ranking police officer diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, who has only one year before his memory fades forever. Now, this is a story that has the potential to be developed into a high-octane thriller with twists and turns. But, does Sarath Kumar’s 150th film, The Smile Man, live up to expectations? Let’s find out!

Chidambaram Nedumaran (Sarath Kumar), a CBCID officer, is recuperating from an injury. To make matters worse, he’s been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s and has just one year left to preserve his memories. Before his injury, he was involved in the investigation of The Smile Man case. While he is trying to adapt to his new lifestyle with memory loss, a series of similar killings take place, forcing Chidambaram to reopen the case.

This time, however, Chidambaram must battle his declining health while investigating the case to unmask the killer. Why was the Smile Man case closed before his injury? Is there anything more than what meets the eye? Who is the killer, and what is their motive?

Director duo Syam and Praveen’s The Smile Man has a solid story at its core, though it might remind you of thrillers, Ratsasan and Por Thozhil. A serial killer story has a predictable template, but a film can stand out from the crowd because of the way the story and screenplay are treated. That way, The Smile Man is an illogical thriller that reeks of amateur making. The killer leaves a smiling scarred face on the victims and the pattern should ideally shock the audience. But, the poor prosthetic makeup hardly makes it look menacing.

Here’s the trailer:

Advertisement

The portrayal of journalists in The Smile Man is poor, anf the dialogue is one of the film’s biggest drawbacks. For example, the CBCID officer casually throws around words like ‘copycat killer’ without any solid basis. The reasons given are so futile that it forces you to not take the characters seriously.

The killer’s face is hidden for half of the film, and when it is eventually revealed, it fails to deliver any excitement. Similarly, the killer’s motive and his backstory are told and not shown. The justification hardly makes sense and one could spot a lot of logical loopholes.

TThe film’s music tries to evoke emotions but falls flat. Before each murder, a growl indicates what’s coming, and before the killer strikes, the music warns you. This removes the element of surprise, which is crucial to a good thriller.

Sarath Kumar is the only actor who gives his all in an attempt to salvage this poorly executed story. The rest of the performances, except for those by George Maryan and Kalaiyarasan, make little impact.

Advertisement

The Smile Man is a lost opportunity considering the potential it showed. If only the screenplay had been handled better, the film could have had a much stronger impact.

2 out of 5 stars for The Smile Man.

Published On:

Dec 27, 2024

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: “Mufasa,” everything we didn’t need to know about “The Lion King”

Published

on

Movie Review: “Mufasa,” everything we didn’t need to know about “The Lion King”

The CGI animated savannahs, rivers and rock formations of Africa are photo-real, and the animals populating it have never been more realistically rendered than they are in “Mufasa: The Lion King.”

Disney felt the need to have the lions, warthog and meercat’s lips move when they sing, which is saying something.

But let’s keep this review short and not-exactly-sweet, unlike this boardroom-ordered prequel to one of Disney’s most popular intellectual properties. “Mufasa: The Lion King” never makes the case that it’s a story that needed to be told or a movie that needed to be made.

It’s about how Mufasa got separated from his birth-parents’ pride of lions, and joined another, becoming “brothers” with the lion cub who “saved” him, but who will come to be called “Scar.”

So the object of this prequel is to show how Mufasa became Lion King and how Scar got his scar and became the bitter rival in their pride.

The “story” is framed as a “story” Rafiki the ape (John Sani) tells Simba’s cub, and that cub’s protectors/babysitters, Timon (Billy Eichner) and Pumbaa (Seth Rogen).

Advertisement

The tale is of another coming-of-age quest, with two young-lions on their own this time, paired-up, depending on each other, on the run from a pride of albino lions led by the killer Kiros (Mads Mikkelsen).

There are new songs of a far more forgettable nature than those from the animated classic “The Lion King.”

“The circle is broken,” he growls, and we believe him.

There are harrowing moments of drama in their quest, but there’s precious little humor to the movie, all of it provided by the same duo who have always been the comic relief, Timon and Pumbaa.

“We’ve been singing ‘Hakuna Matata’ since forever!”

Advertisement

“Who hasn’t?

The messaging, about taking in “strays,” and that “To be lost is to learn the way,” is weak tea.

Story failings aside, it’s not a bad movie. But “Mufasa” never lets us forget the limited-entertainment-value of the entire undertaking. Oscar winner Barry Jenkins (“Moonlight”) was hired to direct, but aside from a few voice casting decisions (Keith David, Anika Noni Rose, with Aaron Pierre and Kelvin Harrison, Jr. as Mufasa and Taka/Scar), he brings nothing to this that makes a difference.

Disney’s tech/animators telling their bosses that “Yes, we can make it look like a movie with real singing lions and bathing hippos on the veldt without using real animals or shooting on location” is no justification for showcasing that technology.

Story matters, and this one didn’t need to be told.

Advertisement

Rating: PG, some violence

Cast: The voices of Aaron Pierre, Kelvin Harrison, Jr., Tiffany Boone, John Kani, Mads Mikkelsen, Thandiwe Newton, Keith David, Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen.

Credits: Directed by Barry Jenkins, scripted by Jeff Nathanson, based on characters from Disney’s “The Lion King.” A Walt Disney release.

Running time: 1:58

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Better Man (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

Better Man (2024) – Movie Review

Better Man, 2024.

Directed by Michael Gracey.
Starring Robbie Williams, Jonno Davies, Steve Pemberton, Damon Herriman, Raechelle Banno, Alison Steadman, Kate Mulvany, Frazer Hadfield, Tom Budge, Anthony Hayes, Jake Simmance, Jesse Hyde, Liam Head, Chase Vollenweider, Rose Flanagan, Jack Sherran, Karina Banno, Asmara Feik, Leo Harvey-Elledge, Elyssia Koulouris, Frazer Hadfield, Chris Gun, Ben Hall, Kaela Daffara, and Chase Vollenweider.

SYNOPSIS:

Follow Robbie Williams’ journey from childhood, to being the youngest member of chart-topping boyband Take That, through to his unparalleled achievements as a record-breaking solo artist – all the while confronting the challenges that stratospheric fame and success can bring.

Advertisement

During a conversation exploring the possibility of a biopic, British popstar Robbie Williams told well-regarded musical director Michael Gracey that he saw himself as a monkey performing for others. That became the window into telling the story of this singer/songwriter with Better Man, a film that, as the title implies, also shows that Robbie Williams is self-aware of his flaws, mistakes, and shortcomings without being afraid to put them front and center. Yes, rather than go through the arduous casting process, Michael Gracey ran with that comment literally, making the creative choice to have the pop star played by a CGI monkey (voiced by Jonno Davies, with Robbie Williams lending his vocals.)

It’s a smart move to roll a short clip of subject and filmmaker conversing before the film starts proper, not just because other parts of the world might not be familiar with Robbie Williamss music (consistently accidentally reading it as a biopic about musician Robin Williams if you’re anything like me), but also since this is such a bold concept for a biopic that it’s helpful to get an idea of what this man looks like and the personality he puts out there before it’s all monkey business.

Going one step further, this turns out to not fall into the trappings of a flailing gimmick but ties into themes of pressures of the music industry, fame causing stunted behavior, family drama, and an unflinching portrayal of self that doesn’t smooth over any rough edges. Better Man is an invigorating biopic; a shot of adrenaline to the most overplayed, clichéd genre. After this, no one should be allowed to make biopics (at least ones about musicians) unless they have an equally creative angle or some compelling X factor behind it. Simply put, this film puts most recent offerings from the genre to shame, especially the ones that get trotted out at the end of every year as familiar awards bait.

Even though the life trajectory and story beats aren’t anything new to anyone who has ever seen a biopic about a musician before, it gets to be told with boundless imagination, typically coming from several dazzling musical sequences. Not only are they dynamic in presentation (whether it be jubilantly unfolding across the streets of London or something more melancholy regarding fatherly abandonment), but they are sometimes highwire concepts themselves; Better Man has one of the most thrilling, fantastically clever, visually stunning, and exciting takes on battling one’s demons.

The characters (including Robbie’s family, friends, lover, hell, and even Oasis) don’t interact or react to Robbie Williams as a monkey. It’s a visual treat for us (this film would fall apart without the astonishingly expressive technical wizardry from Weta, who already have proven themselves as outstanding in this field when it comes to the recent Planet of the Apes movies) but another personal, self-deprecating, honest interpretation of how Robbie saw himself during these life stages. Initially, this feels like it will end up as a missed opportunity for further creativity or humor. One of the more surprising elements here is that the filmmakers (with Michael Gracey co-writing alongside Oliver Cole and Simon Gleeson) are playing this material straight and not going for laughs. That confidence pays off, allowing a maximalist, melodramatic side to come out with sincere, absorbing emotional heft.

Advertisement

That story follows a standard rise and fall structure, with Robbie Williams finding inspiration from his initially supportive singing father (Steve Pemberton), exhibiting a relatable drive to make his grandmother (Alison Steadman proud, getting his start in boy band Take That before his insecurities and worsening substance abuse and egocentric behavior gets him kicked out, stumbling into a rocky relationship with Nicole Appleton (Raechelle Banno), and then not only finding the courage to put some meaningful lyrics out into the world through a successful solo career but managing the anxieties that come with performing in front of humongous crowds while constantly struggling with drug addiction. 

Some of those aspects feel glossed over and aren’t as explored as they possibly could have been (the film is already 135 minutes, but some of it is given a broad strokes treatment), but it’s affecting anyway due to the creativity, artistry, musical numbers, and blunt honesty enhancing those character dynamics. Better Man is a biopic that starts with a confessional about being a narcissist and having a punchable face and ends up somewhere beautifully moving that perfectly captures the essence of that title. There is also a healthy dose of Frank Sinatra here, given that he was a major source of inspiration for Robbie Williams, so let’s say he and Michael Gracey did this biopic their way, and the result is something no one should want any other way.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading

Trending