Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie Review | Musical ‘Mean Girls’ retains irreverent fun of 2004 flick

Published

on

Movie Review | Musical ‘Mean Girls’ retains irreverent fun of 2004 flick

Knowing that the movie adaptation of the stage musical version of “Mean Girls” — a song-infused, Tony Award-nominated take on the 2004 teen-movie favorite that made its Broadway debut in 2018 — originally was planned to debut on Paramount+ before being moved to a theatrical release this week, the worry was it would be what we might call a “streaming-quality” affair.

Now, having seen it, we suspect Paramount Pictures executives believed it simply too strong not to be shown in auditoriums initially.

Don’t get us wrong — this movie musical is only “so fetch.” It loses a bit of its momentum in its second half, but overall it’s a joyous and energetic affair, an impressive first feature from directors Samantha Jayne and Arturo Perez Jr., one that retains what made the original “Mean Girls” work while also celebrating it.

Of course, the first name associated with “Mean Girls” is that of Tina Fey, who based the screenplay for the meme-generating 2004 film from Rosalind Wiseman’s 2002 book “Queen Bees and Wannabes” and played the supporting role of high school math teacher Ms. Norbury. She penned an updated screenplay for this 20th-anniversary happening and reprises her role — as does fellow “Saturday Night Live” alum Tim Meadows as Mr. Duvall, the school principal.

And in the role that helped make Lindsay Lohan a teen idol, Cady Heron, is Angourie Rice, probably still best known for her portrayal of Betty Brant in the “Spider-Man: Homecoming” trilogy.

Advertisement
Avantika, Renee Rapp, Bebe Wood and Angourie Rice appear in a scene from the new musical version of “Mean Girls.” (Jojo Whilden photo/Courtesy of Paramount Pictures)

We meet the  highly intelligent Cady in Kenya, where she has spent years being homeschooled by her environmental scientist mom (Jenna Fischer of “The Office”) but is now set to move to the United States and go to school with other teens. She is subsequently thrilled to be there, at least until bumping into and thus irritating another girl — during a vibrant musical number that portends how Jayne and Perez will use a movie camera to keep this “Mean Girls” kinetic — and then finding no welcoming faces in the cafeteria at lunch.

Worried the new girl has escaped to a bathroom stall to do drugs or have “a toilet baby,” social outcast pals Janis (Auli’i Cravalho, the voice of the titular character in “Moana”) and Damian (Jaquel Spivey) invite her to come back and sit with them. They give her the lowdown on all the school’s cliques — most importantly “The Plastics,” consisting of blond queen bee Regina George (Reneé Rapp) and her subordinates, the desperate-to-please Gretchen (Bebe Wood, “Love, Victor”) and the delightfully dopey Karen (Avantika).

Wait, what’s this?!? Regina takes an interest in Cady and offers her a weeklong trial of sitting with them, Obvi, Cady will, like, have to follow their rules — pink on Wednesdays, sweatpants ONLY on Fridays, etc.

This thrills Janis, who long has wanted to exact revenge on her one-time pal Regina and recruits Cady as a spy. Cady goes along with the plan but seems to have only so much interest in hurting Regina — that is until Cady develops a major crush on Regina’s ex-boyfriend Aaron Samuels (Christopher Briney, “The Summer I Turned Pretty”) and then watches as Regina lures him back to her after learning of her supposed friend’s feelings for him.

We’ll say no more, even though we suspect many who watch the new film will be quite familiar with the vixen-like contours of Cady’s story arc from there.

Advertisement

Angourie Rice stars as Cady Heron, flanked here by Bebe Wood, left, as Gretchen Wieners, and Avantika, as Karen Shetty, in a scene from “Mean Girls.” (Courtesy of Paramount Pictures)

Rice, whose credits also include 2018’s “The Nice Guys” and, more recently, the Apple TV+ limited series “The Last Thing He Told Me,” proves to be a fine choice for Cady. In her hands, the character is relatable even when not at her most admirable.

Similarly, we love to loathe Regina in the hands of Rapp, who took over the role on Broadway and has a solo music career, so she obviously can handle the movie’s musical requirements.

And while Avantika, who has starred in Indian films, earns several laughs as the well-meaning but brain-dead Karen, it is Spivey who could be brought up on charges for repeated scene-stealing. As Damian — who is, as Janis puts it in the loving way only a friend could, “almost too gay to function” — the actor best known for the theater production “A Strange Loop” — is endlessly enjoyable in his movie debut.

The movie brings over many of the musical numbers from the stage show, with lyrics by Nell Benjamin and music by Jeff Richmond, husband of Fey. This is an area where “Mean Girls” falls down a bit, as the songs are more of the serve-the-story variety and less the quality of tunes that would have you humming them for days. We’ll note that the movie includes two new songs — “What Ifs,” the aforementioned number during which Cady arrives at the school, and “Not My Fault,” a single featuring Rapp and Megan Thee Stallion that plays with the closing credits.

Advertisement

This second “Mean Girls” undoubtedly will stream in the relatively near future on Paramount+, so should you simply wait or hop in for a ride to the nearest theater?

To borrow the warm words of one Regina George, “Get in, loser!”

“Mean Girls” is rated PG-13 for sexual material, strong language, and teen drinking. Runtime: 1 hour, 45 minutes.

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Film reviews: ‘Marty Supreme’ and ‘Is This Thing On?’

Published

on

Film reviews: ‘Marty Supreme’ and ‘Is This Thing On?’

‘Marty Supreme’

Directed by Josh Safdie (R)

★★★★

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Not Without Hope movie review (2025) | Roger Ebert

Published

on

Not Without Hope movie review (2025) | Roger Ebert

Joe Carnahan was a sagacious choice to co-write and direct the engrossing and visceral survival thriller “Not Without Hope,” given Carnahan’s track record of delivering gripping and gritty actioners, including early, stylish crime thrillers such as “Narc” (2002) and “Smokin’ Aces” (2006), and the absolutely badass and bonkers Liam Neeson v Giant Wolves epic “The Grey” (2011).

Based on the non-fiction book of the same name, “Not Without Hope” plunges us into the stormy waters of the Gulf of Mexico for the majority of the film, and delivers a breathtaking and harrowing dramatic re-creation of the 2009 accident that left four friends, including two NFL players, clinging to their single-engine boat and fighting for their lives. The survival-at-sea story here is a familiar one, told in films such as “White Squall,” “The Perfect Storm,” and “Adrift,” and the screenplay by Carnahan and E. Nicholas Mariani leans into well-worn tropes and, at times, features cliché-ridden dialogue. Still, this is a well-paced and powerful work, thanks to the strong performances by the ensemble cast, some well-placed moments of character introspection, and the documentary-style, water-level camerawork by Juanmi Azpiroz.

Zachary Levi (the TV series “Chuck,” the “Shazam!” movies) is best known for comedy and light action roles. Still, he delivers solid, straightforward, and effective dramatic work as Nick Schuyler, a personal trainer who helps his friends Marquis Cooper (Quentin Plair) and Corey Smith (Terrence Terrell), two journeyman NFL players, get ready for another season. When their pal Will Bleakley (Marshall Cook) shows up at a barbecue and announces he has just been laid off from his financial firm, he’s invited to join the trio the next morning on a day-trip fishing trip from Clearwater, FL., into the Gulf of Mexico. (The casting is a bit curious, as the four lead actors are 10-20 years older than the ages of the real-life individuals they’re playing — but all four are in great shape, and we believe them as big, strong, physically and emotionally tough guys.)

We can see the longtime bond between these four in the early going, though we don’t learn much about their respective stories before the fishing trip. Kudos Carnahan and the studio for delivering a film that earns its R rating, primarily for language and intense action; the main characters are jocks and former jocks, and they speak with the casual, profanity-laced banter favored by many an athlete. (Will, describing the sandwiches he’s made for the group: “I got 20 f*cking PB&Js, and 20 f*cking turkey and cheese.”) There’s no sugarcoating the way these guys talk—and the horrors they wind up facing on the seas.

The boat is about 70 miles off the coast of Clearwater when the anchor gets stuck, and the plan to thrust the boat forward to dislodge it backfires, resulting in the vessel capsizing and the men being thrown overboard. Making matters worse, their cell phones were all sealed away in a plastic bag in the cabin, and a ferocious storm was approaching. With title cards ticking off the timeline (“13 Hours Lost at Sea,” “20 Hours Lost at Sea,” “42 Hours Lost at Sea”), we toggle back and forth between the men frantically trying to turn over the boat, keep warm, signal faraway ships, battling hunger and thirst, and the dramas unfolding on land. Floriana Lima as Nick’s fiancée, Paula, and Jessica Blackmore as Coop’s wife, Rebekah, do fine work in the obligatory Wait-by-the-Phone roles.

Advertisement

It’s terrific to see JoBeth Williams still lighting up the screen some 40 years after her “Big Chill” and “Poltergeist” days, delivering powerful work as Nick’s mother, Marcia, who refuses to believe her son is gone even as the odds of survival dwindle with each passing hour. Josh Duhamel also excels in the role of the real-life Captain Timothy Close, who oversaw the rescue efforts from U.S. Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg. At one point, Close delivers a bone-chilling monologue about what happens when hypothermia sets in—“hallucinations, dementia, rage…eventually, it breaks your mind in half”—a point driven home when we see what’s happening to those men at sea. It’s savage and brutal, and heartbreaking.

Given this was such a highly publicized story that took place a decade and a half ago, it’s no spoiler to sadly note there was only one survivor of the accident, with the other three men lost to the sea. Each death is treated with unblinking honesty and with dignity, as when the natural sounds fade at one point, and we hear just the mournful score. With Malta standing in for the Gulf of Mexico and the actors giving everything they have while spending most of the movie in the water and soaked to the bone, “Not Without Hope” is a respectful and impactful dramatic interpretation that feels true to the real-life events.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Black Rabbit, White Rabbit’ Review: Disqualified for the Oscars, Tajikistan Drama Is an Inviting, Meandering Meta-Narrative

Published

on

‘Black Rabbit, White Rabbit’ Review: Disqualified for the Oscars, Tajikistan Drama Is an Inviting, Meandering Meta-Narrative

Selected by Tajikistan but ultimately not accepted by the Academy to compete in the Oscar international feature category, “Black Rabbit, White Rabbit” begins ambitiously, with a famous quote from playwright Anton Chekhov about setups and payoffs — about how if a gun is established in a story, it must go off. Moments later, an inviting long take involving a young man selling an antique rifle ends in farcical tragedy, signaling an equally farcical series of events that grow stranger and stranger. The film, by Iranian director Shahram Mokri, folds in on itself in intriguing (albeit protracted) ways, warping its meta-fictional boundaries until they supersede its characters, or any underlying meaning.

Still, it’s a not-altogether-uninteresting exercise in exploring the contours of storytelling, told through numerous thematically interconnected vignettes. The opening Chekhov quote, though it might draw one’s attention to minor details that end up insignificant, ensures a heightened awareness of the movie’s artifice, until the film eventually pulls back and becomes a tale of its own making. But en route to this semi-successful postmodern flourish, its character drama is enticing enough on its own, with hints of magical realism. It begins with the tale of a badly injured upper-class woman, Sara (Hasti Mohammai), discovering that her car accident has left her with the ability to communicate with household objects.

Sara’s bandages need changing, and the stench of her ointment becomes a quick window into her relationships. Her distant husband rejects her; her boisterous stepdaughter is more frank, but ultimately accepting; her gardener and handyman stays as diplomatic as he can. However, the film soon turns the gunfire payoff in its prologue into a broader setup of its own, as a delivery man shows up at Sara’s gate, insisting that she accept delivery for an object “the deceased man” has paid for.

Mokri eventually returns to this story (through a slightly tilt-shifted lens), but not before swerving headfirst into a seemingly unrelated saga of extras on a film set and a superstitious prop master, Babak (Babak Karimi), working on a shot-for-shot remake of an Iranian classic. A mix of rapid-fire Tajik, Persian and Russian dialogue creates dilemma upon dilemma when Babak’s ID goes missing, preventing him from being able to thoroughly check the prop ammunition for an assassination scene.

Danger begins to loom — a recent Alec Baldwin case even warrants a mention on-screen — as the notion of faulty firearms yanks Chekhov’s wisdom front and center once more, transforming it from a writing tip into a phantasmagorical inevitability. In keeping with the previous story, the props even communicate with each other (through subtitles) and begin gossiping about what might come to pass.

Advertisement

After establishing these narrative parameters through unbroken, fluid shots filmed at a sardonic distance, Mokri soon begins playing mischievous temporal games. He finds worthwhile excuses to revisit scenes from either different angles or with a slightly altered aesthetic approach — with more proximity and intimacy — in order to highlight new elements of his mise-en-scène. What’s “real” and “fictional,” even within the movie’s visual parlance, begins to blur in surreal ways, largely pivoting around Babak simply trying to do his job. However, the more this tale engorges through melodic, snaking takes, the more it circles around a central point, rather than approaching it.

The film’s own expanse becomes philosophically limiting, even though it remains an object of curiosity. When it’s all said and done, the playfulness on display in “Black Rabbit, White Rabbit” is quite remarkable, even if the story’s contorting framework seldom amounts to much, beyond drawing attention to itself. It’s cinema about cinema in a manner that, on one hand, lives on the surface, but on the other hand, invites you to explore its texture in ways few other movies do.

Continue Reading

Trending