Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Maneater Review: A Silly Shark Attack Movie

Published

on

Maneater Review: A Silly Shark Attack Movie

Jaws is a good film (perhaps the best film ever made, in the event you’re Quentin Tarantino). There had been so-called ‘shark films’ earlier than it (from The White Dying in 1936 to Shark! in 1969), and even one masterpiece (Blue Water, White Dying from 1971), but it surely was Jaws that appeared to popularize the idea. There have been a number of this 12 months alone, together with the beautiful good The Reef: Stalked, and now there’s Maneater, from author/director Justin Lee. Sadly, this movie falls into the identical lure as many others, misunderstanding what made Jaws so nice.

It might be argued that Jaws wasn’t even a ‘shark film’ in any respect; the shark in Steven Spielberg’s movie was solely on-screen for 4 minutes, and when it was, it was often a fairly apparent animatronic machine. No, it was suspenseful route, minimalist music, and nice characters grounded inside a decent script that made Jaws nice, not the shark. Maneater forgets this solely, producing a reasonably hole movie because of this. It’s, nonetheless, nearly ‘so dangerous it is good,’ from the utter silliness of some scenes and the cheapness of the CGI shark, to some comically questionable cinematic selections. Maneater just isn’t an important film; it could be an important ingesting sport, although.

MOVIEWEB VIDEO OF THE DAY

Advertisement

Maneater is a Foolish Shark Film

The opening of Maneater is indicative of simply how ridiculous this movie is. The movie begins with a scuba diver submerged in some cavernous depths earlier than the display turns crimson and CGI enamel chomp about; the title somberly seems in the dead of night waters as muffled screams are heard. Then, similar to that, a jarring edit takes viewers on a sunny, island-hopping montage set to summery pop music. All of it all of a sudden appears like a business for a cruise line, extra Intercourse on the Seashore than blood within the water.

Associated: Why Are Shark Motion pictures Having Such a Massive Second?

Maneater tends to do that rather a lot. There are quite a few different shark assaults all through the film to various levels of effectiveness, they usually at all times appear to smash reduce into some shiny, completely satisfied ambiance (as evidenced by track titles like Chill, Island Breeze, and Shza Woo). The omnipresent music within the film abruptly shifts to one thing playful and jaunty to accompany half-naked our bodies, as if the soundtrack is experiencing bursts of industrial quality serotonin at common intervals. Suffice it to say, Maneater is tonally bizarre and inconsistent, however once more, nearly humorous because of this.

Advertisement

The Ridiculous Characters of Maneater

The movie’s characters are most distinguishable by the truth that they’ve completely different names; two of them even have multiple syllable. Jessie (Nicky Whelan), nonetheless, will get an added piece of character improvement, as she’s just lately misplaced a long-term relationship, and so her bikini is black, and he or she smiles rather less. Her mates have ‘dragged her’ alongside for a phenomenal tropical getaway, steered via crystalline waters towards what passes for a abandoned island within the twenty first century. Everybody does a stable, environment friendly job right here (particularly a sarcastic and snarky Shane West), however on the finish of the day, they’re written as shark bait.

Associated: Unique: Nicky Whelan on the Making of her Upcoming Shark Assault Film Maneater

Advertisement

In the meantime, an island resident is mourning the lack of his daughter by the hands (fins?) of an important white shark. That is Harlan, who’s a deeply southern man residing on this pacific paradise for some cause, and who’s performed by nation music singer and Movie star Apprentice contestant Hint Adkins (of such hits as Honky Tonk Badonkadonk). Harlan goes out on the water searching for vengeance, strapping belts of ammo to his chest and sporting a cowboy hat with shark enamel glued to the brim. It is all performed very straight, but it surely’s laughable, and hopefully, that is the purpose. Harlan’s trajectory is related with Jessie’s, tied collectively by blood and CGI (although the shark is supposedly mechanical in some sequences; it is truthfully troublesome to inform).


There is not rather more to the plot than this — a sorority-like group of individuals (who’re too outdated to be in faculty) partying on an island, a speed-boating nation music star searching for vengeance in opposition to a shark, and occasional CGI footage of an important white flopping about and consuming folks.

The virtually iconic Jeff Fahey reveals up for about six minutes as Professor Hoffman, a relatively thankless position as a shark skilled that primarily permits Maneater to audit a university class and voice doubtful strains like, “The species of the nice white has evaded scientists for years.” Surely, they’re studied incessantly.

Advertisement

Maneater is Hopefully Intentionally Daft

Once more, although, it is fairly secure to say that no one was decided to make excessive artwork or a masterpiece of suspense right here. In contrast to severe, tense, and good movies with sharks resembling The Shallows or Open Water, Maneater appears self-aware sufficient to know simply how foolish it’s and lean into it. It appears like a SyFy made-for-TV film (in fact, this shark has no tornadoes). Somebody actually says, “What are we, chopped liver?” with a straight face on this movie, and it even paraphrases the well-known Jaws line, “We’re gonna want a much bigger boat.”


This can be a film the place dangerous CGI animals are shot point-blank within the head — it is ridiculous, and hopefully knowingly so. The movie is rarely gripping or scary sufficient to ever distract from the silliness of its scenes, making it oddly extra enjoyable to placed on with some mates for fun. Maneater feels just like the sort of film {that a} group of buddies would drink to, doing their greatest Thriller Science Theater impersonations as they snort via awkward sequences and over-the-top moments. Hopefully, the movie is laughing together with them.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Devil’s Double Next Level Movie Review: Trapped in a punchline purgatory

Published

on

Devil’s Double Next Level Movie Review: Trapped in a punchline purgatory
Devil’s Double Next Level Movie Synopsis: A film reviewer gets trapped inside a movie by its vengeful director and must survive its deadly plot, controlled by a magical diary, to escape.

Devil’s Double Next Level Movie Review: If you’ve ever wondered what it would feel like to be trapped inside a YouTube comments section that somehow gained sentience and a film budget, DD Next Level offers a vivid, if not entirely welcome, simulation. Our guide through this experience is Kissa 47 (Santhanam), a film reviewer who wields ‘bro’ with the frequency of a machine gun, leaving the audience more shell-shocked by his vocabulary than by any on-screen jump scare. He and his entourage find themselves at an early screening for a film by the ominously named director Hitchcock Irudhayaraj (Selvaraghavan). The cinema itself looks like it was designed by someone with a personal vendetta against film critics, and before you can say “plot device,” Kissa and co. are unceremoniously zapped into the movie.

Now, the golden rule of logic-optional cinema is that if you’re going to play fast and loose with the plot, you’d better compensate with a relentless barrage of laughs. DD Next Level seems to have misplaced this memo somewhere between the script revisions. For a film headlined by Santhanam, a comedian usually capable of eliciting chuckles with ease, the actual laugh-out-loud moments are surprisingly sparse. Sadly, the movie relies too much on toilet humor and other easy jokes, which are just unfunny. The narrative, such as it is, bounces between settings – a cruise ship here, a mystical resort island there (think a cut-price White Lotus) – but the comedic spark remains stubbornly unlit.

The film leans heavily into the meta pool, with characters constantly winking at the camera about the filmmaking process, the nature of movie reviews, and the very fabric of their cinematic prison. A dash of self-awareness can be a delightful spice, but DD Next Level practically empties the whole jar into the pot. There are only so many times characters can exclaim, “Gosh, we’re in a movie!” before it transitions from clever to “yes, we gathered.” The excessive self-awareness kills the magic.

Santhanam himself, usually a whirlwind of comedic energy, feels somewhat constrained by dialogue that seldom lands a knockout punch, often defaulting to an endless stream of bros. One of the film’s more pleasant surprises is Mottai Rajendran’s Veenpechu Babu. His bewildered interactions, especially with Gautham Menon’s deadpan investigative officer (who communicates primarily in English to Rajendran’s blissfully ignorant nods), manage to mine some genuine humor. GVM, too, is in on the meta-joke, playing a version of his real-life persona, though like much of the self-referential humor, its success rate is variable. Meanwhile, the female characters are largely tasked with the thankless job of looking perpetually distressed, fulfilling the “scared ladies in a scary movie” trope with little room for nuance. It feels a bit like a Sundar C film sans the glamour and the usual masala.

Advertisement

On a technical level, the film isn’t without merit; the set designs are reasonably imaginative, and the VFX are competent. But these polished visuals serve as mere window dressing for a comedic structure that feels decidedly shaky. When the most memorable parts of your comedy are the awkward silences where the jokes were supposed to be, it’s a clear sign that the script might have needed a few more levels of refinement.

Written By: Abhinav Subramanian

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Classic Film Review: ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ is a Lesson in Redemption | InSession Film

Published

on

Classic Film Review: ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ is a Lesson in Redemption | InSession Film

Director: George Miller
Writers: George Miller, Brendan McCarthy, Nick Lathouris
Stars: Tom Hardy, Charlize Theron, Nicholas Hoult

Synopsis: In a post-apocalyptic wasteland, a woman rebels against a tyrannical ruler in search for her homeland with the aid of a group of female prisoners, a psychotic worshipper and a drifter named Max.


“As the world fell, each of us in our own way was broken. It was hard to know who was more crazy: me, or everyone else.” No better words describe the world of the Wasteland, a place plagued by war and famine and the complete collapse of society. In this world, the rules are clear: there are none. Survivors will do what they must to make it another day, even as fanatics and those establishing power across the Wasteland oppress more and more desperate people just wanting a morsel of what’s left. After an initial look into this destabilization in 1979’s Mad Max and a display of the monstrous nature of humanity, director George Miller expanded the Wasteland across its sequels The Road Warrior and Beyond Thunderdome. Each movie showcased the best and worst of people, and the sickly approaches they would take to see the next day.

In Mad Max: Fury Road, this insidiousness is explored through the warlord Immortan Joe (Hugh Keays-Byrne), who controls the supply of water in the Wasteland and gives very little to the thirsty, starved people below his Citadel. He has established himself as a divine being with a cultish following that hangs on his every word. His brethren, the War Boys, are malnourished and brainwashed men and women who live on ‘blood bags’ (people with enough blood still to ‘donate’ so the War Boys can keep going) and drive in Immortan’s name by worshipping him and honoring their ‘god,’ the V8 engine. When going after enemies and factions that may threaten them, they are willing to give their lives in the Immortan’s name, hoping to be ‘witnessed’ and ride to Valhalla to join the heroes of all time.

Advertisement

Like every movie in the series, this rule is eventually challenged by someone who decides they have had enough. In Fury Road, that’s Furiosa (Charlize Theron), a War Rig driver hauling cargo who decides to drive off-road, with the Immortan realizing quickly that Furiosa is also driving with his harem of wives (Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, Zoe Kravitz, Courtney Eaton, Riley Keough), and gives chase to her with his War Boys, like Nux (Nicholas Hoult), who hope to catch her and find favor in the Immortan’s eyes. And much like his involvement in the previous installments, Max (Tom Hardy) is in the middle of the action, as a blood bag to Nux at first and then driving along with Furiosa looking for a paradise within the ruins of the Wasteland.

All of this leads into one of the best action movies of the 21st century and, by extension, one of the finest ever made, with an ample amount of solid characterization, terrific dialogue that’s endlessly quotable, and phenomenal direction from Miller. Once Furiosa drives the War Rig out of the Citadel limits and towards Gas Town, the movie refuses to relent, even for a second. Powered by Tom Holkenborg’s thunderous score that is even personified in the movie in parts by the thrashing of the Doof Warrior’s flamethrowing guitar, Fury Road moves from one incredible setpiece to the next, from a chase where they battle the Buzzards, a rival faction, to one of the most visually spectacular sandstorms ever put to film, two brilliant canyon runs, and a tense nighttime sequence as the War Rig moves through a swamp. With the combination of John Seale’s incredible cinematography and fantastic visual effects, Fury Road soars as an action spectacle.

Yet throughout it all, the movie never forgets its characters, who are given ample development as the world around them goes to an even lower depth of hell. Everyone is broken, and trying to find some form of redemption and absolution for the things they have witnessed or the mistakes they have made, and wanting to be better people despite the world telling them they can’t. From Max’s tortured psyche due to his past failures to save everyone to Furiosa’s shattered past and lost family waiting to be found, to the wives of the Immortan Joe who find themselves at the precipice of a life with no shackles and futures that aren’t relegated to being child bearers for the warlord, and even Nux, a War Boy realizing his pursuit for Valhalla is more than pleasing a man who cares little for everyone else; the storytelling creates an emotional journey for them that by the time the credits roll, leaves audiences with a new set of favorites in the franchise.

Mad Max: Fury Road | Cast, Awards, Charlize Theron, & Description |  Britannica

10 years later, it’s no surprise that Mad Max: Fury Road has achieved the status it has in the pantheon of action cinema. A relentless two hours crescendos in a magnificent final chase in the other direction, with some of the finest stunt work and vehicular carnage of the century, giving every character a chance to shine and be a prominent part of the rampage, even incorporating that guitarist on a rig just powering everything with a crew of drummers behind him, and with a fascinating character piece that followed with 2024’s Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga, it creates a picture perfect arc for the character as well. In the end, it rides eternal, shiny and chrome.

Grade: A+

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie review: “Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning' still thrills after slow start – UPI.com

Published

on

Movie review: “Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning' still thrills after slow start – UPI.com

1 of 5 | Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) hangs on in “Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning,” in theaters May 23. Photo courtesy of Paramount Pictures

LOS ANGELES, May 14 (UPI) — Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning, in theaters May 23, delivers on the level of the franchise’s most recent films once it gets going. It does, however, have the slowest start of all eight Mission: Impossible movies.

In 2023’s Dead Reckoning, Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) took on the villainous Gabriel (Esai Morales) to retrieve the key that unlocks the source code of the rogue artificial intelligence known as The Entity. Final Reckoning opens two months later, with Ethan unsure what to do with such power.

As The Entity holds hostage all of cyberspace and the world’s electronics, including military weapons, there is a deadline before the AI will control the world. That is, if Ethan doesn’t stop it first.

The plan to destroy The Entity requires Ethan’s teammates, hackers Luther (Ving Rhames) and Benji (Simon Pegg), pickpocket Grace (Hayley Atwell) and Gabriel’s turncoat assassin Paris (Pom Klementieff). The mission is complicated by U.S. President Sloane (Angela Bassett) sending agents to recover The Entity’s controls for U.S. purposes, which Ethan knows will backfire.

Advertisement

The missions live up to the movie’s title by devising ways to keep making the task harder for Ethan. For example, he’s already diving to crushing depths to activate computers in a sunken submarine when the sub rolls towards an abyss.

Not only does this add another ticking clock to his task, but the water level rotates around Ethan and causes missiles to fall and shift, blocking his path and exit route.

The climax, which has already been shared during the film’s publicity, features Ethan hanging from a propeller plane. The scene is more than just a spectacle — writer/director Christopher McQuarrie and co-writer Erik Jendresen craft a sequence that justifies the stunt and continues to build as the pilot attempts many different ways to shake Ethan.

Final Reckoning does play the same trick one too many times, where Ethan’s team goes to meet someone and finds someone else waiting for them. The second and third iterations lack surprise, but the interlopers at least complicate Ethan’s plan, necessitating some fun improvisation.

Leading up to such sequences, this Mission: Impossible unfortunately becomes tedious and repetitive. The problem could easily be solved by cutting 40 minutes out of the film — which would still leave it at over two hours long.

Advertisement

Final Reckoning recapping Dead Reckoning is the least of these worries, as it gets handled before the title sequence, which admittedly comes some 20 minutes in. What does become redundant are long sequences of Ethan walking through a war room looking at models as the DEFCON clock ticks down to The Entity’s takeover.

Ethan explains to Gabriel, then to the President, then to Admiral Neely (Hannah Waddingham), how dangerous The Entity is. There’s buildup and then there’s just wallowing, and this leans towards the latter.

He keeps warning that The Entity expects them to act a certain way and advising they should instead surprise the AI. He says it enough times that the audience has surely caught on, if not The Entity itself.

Furthermore, The Final Reckoning becomes the most convoluted of all the Mission: Impossibles, which is no small feat, by connecting the plot to all seven previous films. It is an odd choice in a series predicated on standalone entries, and a mistake also recently criticized in the James Bond films starring Daniel Craig.

Bringing back some characters from previous entries is fun and gives them satisfying character arcs to imagine in the time between films, while others concoct unimportant connections. Just let some people be new characters.

Advertisement

For example, tying in The Entity with the Rabbit’s Foot from Mission: Impossible III is wholly unnecessary. The Rabbit’s Foot was one of that director J.J. Abrams’ trademark unanswered mysteries, so saying now that it was a component of The Entity adds little to the current film.

The pieces of The Entity could be any Maguffin. Making Ethan feel responsible for it just forces more spurious connections. Ethan was going to stop The Entity anyway, whether he indirectly helped build it or not.

This is not to criticize the scenes explaining the missions, which effectively establish the impossible tasks at hand. Those scenes are not included in the superfluous 40 minutes of exposition.

Potentially interesting threads are also abandoned, such as a doomsday cult that worships The Entity but never becomes a factor in the mission.

When the screen expands to fill the entire IMAX frame, rest assured the show is about to start — and it is worth it. The unfortunate issue is that it happens about 80 minutes into the film, not including a few earlier IMAX shots of The Entity’s core. The submarine is the first proper IMAX action scene.

Advertisement

During the intense scenes, the film has a sense of humor about its own tropes of deadlines and cutting wires. It’s only when it’s taking itself seriously that it drags.

Gabriel becomes more of a mustache twirling, cackling villain in this film. It’s motivated by his loss in Dead Reckoning but still a drastic shift, though the film has a sense of humor about his behavior too.

The second half of Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning makes up for earlier mission failures, and this level of craftsmanship is still worth experiencing. Otherwise, the script problems would be unacceptable.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending