Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘It’s a Wonderful Knife’ Is a Big Lump of Coal

Published

on

‘It’s a Wonderful Knife’ Is a Big Lump of Coal

The title of It’s a Wonderful Knife (in theaters Nov. 10) doubles as the film’s elevator pitch: It’s Frank Capra’s classic of Yuletide magnanimity, reimagined as a holly-bedecked horror flick. Easily enough said and sold, but actually following through on the snappy logline proves more convoluted than in the recent ready-made slasherfications of Groundhog Day (Happy Death Day), Freaky Friday (Freaky), and Back to the Future (Totally Killer).

A masked assassin stalks the snow-blanketed hamlet of Angel Falls, and when he strikes at a house party on Christmas Eve area teen Winnie (Jane Widdop) gets the drop on him with a pair of jumper cables and a car battery. As dictated by the code of Scooby-Doo, the culprit is the grabby developer (Justin Long) with the displeasing Joel Osteen dentures, and he’s dispatched in short order.

One year later, however, Winnie’s not feeling all that jolly. Her workaholic dad (Joel McHale) gifts her annoying brother (Aiden Howard) a car while she’s stuck with an insulting monogrammed scale. Then she catches her beau doing mistletoe-type things with another girl. While staring at the aurora borealis—at this time of year, in this part of the country?—she wishes she’d never been born, and finds herself in a still-terrorized town that makes Pottersville look like Pleasantville.

Courtesy of RLJE Films and Shudder

Advertisement

That’s about a half-hour of wind-up in an 87-minute movie, and neither scribe Michael Kennedy nor director Tyler MacIntyre (currently having an eventful month as a cowriter of Five Nights at Freddy’s) do much to make merry with the premise they’ve worked so hard to gift-wrap for us. Drably photographed, leadenly unfunny, and flimsily assembled, this seasonal trinket has a white-elephant disposability liable to send viewers rummaging for a receipt.

Following the tiresome, obligatory adjustment period during which Winnie wonders why nobody’s recognized her since right around the time she willed herself out of being, she gains her Clarence—a parallel explicitly stated with dialogue, for anyone stumped by the title’s seeming non sequitur—in social outcast Bernie (Jess McLeod). Via the freeze-dried bantering of YA lit, they go from unlikely partners to besties to could-it-be-something-more, one strand in a queer streak that also extends to Winnie’s with-it aunts and OnlyFans-trawling brother.

The spirit of updated inclusivity fits right in with the subversive revisionism inherent in spattering a Christian observance with arterial spray, though Kennedy and MacIntyre also hold fast to Capra’s warming wholesomeness. The preordained finale taps into the same catharsis of redemptive second chances linking Scrooge, The Grinch, and George Bailey. It’s just that in Winnie’s case, the true meaning of Christmas amounts to ditching your suck-ass boyfriend to hook up with the cute, misunderstood girl who can see the real you.

The contrast between rosy-cheeked sentimentality and violence sharpened to an icicle’s point could’ve been played for big laughs, or at least laughs bigger than Winnie’s repeated reaction of “Seriously?!” to shocking sights. (Anna and the Apocalypse had a better handle on this bit, going all in on chipper holiday dissonance with its upbeat, zombie-strewn musical numbers.) Like the latest It Toy cleared off the shelves, charm is in short supply for this film; there’s no texture or character to its cheapness, the rickety DIY gumption of low-budget genre filmmaking replaced by a stifling digital sterility starved for light and pops of color. Even a pair of scenes at unsupervised ragers lack any sort of festive charge, as if to illustrate the difference between a party and a bunch of people standing in a room while music plays. If all this is meant as a riff on the thinness and Kinkadean hideousness of mass-produced Hallmark originals, the self-awareness fell off the sled somewhere along the way to Grandmother’s house.

In search of a resolution to tie a ribbon on everything, MacIntyre and Kennedy get bogged down in metaphysical horse pucky that doesn’t really make sense—though, to be fair, neither does the ending of It’s a Wonderful Life. Capra waved away the logistics with high-proof pathos, and glossed over the fact that Bailey’s life had not materially improved through the uplifting powers of populist camaraderie. So long as we’ve got our health and our loved ones, we’ll muddle through somehow—the same chestnut cracked by our hero as she comes to appreciate the one cool girl in her town. Remember, Winnie: No man is a failure who has a crush that likes them back.

Advertisement
A photo including Hana Huggins in Tyler MacIntyre’s “It’s a Wonderful Knife.”

Courtesy of RLJE Films and Shudder

But a moral skirting the maudlin must be duly earned, otherwise it’ll feel as grafted-on as the romance used here to implant a heart in a film more taken with the structuring device than the soul of its main inspiration. Anyone can borrow a setup famed for extracting tears around this time of year, and deviously turn it on its head. Doubling back to actually pull it off takes a Christmas miracle.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

'Kenda' movie review: Intense drama with an allegorical twist

Published

on

'Kenda' movie review: Intense drama with an allegorical twist

Sahadev Kelvadi’s ‘Kenda’ is set against the gritty backdrop of the late 1990s and early 2000s, the film plunges into the turbulent world of a young man adrift. Unemployed and without direction, he finds himself entangled in a complex web of crime and politics. As he navigates this treacherous landscape, he must confront the dark and primal desires that lurk within, threatening to consume him. Will he find redemption or succumb to the shadows that haunt him?

Protagonist Keshava’s (B V Bharath) humdrum existence is disrupted when he crosses paths with Narasimha Shastry (Vinod Ravindran), a leader with a hidden political agenda. Behind the façade of a respected newspaper owner, Shastry harbors a duplicitous nature, his words and actions a stark contrast.

Once he takes the fateful step, there’s no turning back, and Keshava’s fate becomes inextricably linked to the consequences of his choices.

At its core, Kenda is a powerful allegory for the eternal struggle to find purpose and authenticity in a chaotic world. The film also masterfully deconstructs the toxic effects of rigid masculinity, revealing the impact it has on individuals and society as a whole.

The film is a scathing critique of the establishment’s failures. Delving deeper, it masterfully explores the complex and often blurred lines between crime and politics, revealing the toxic symbiosis that can exist between the two.

Advertisement

This film draws inspiration from the likes of Albert Camus, Theatre of the Absurd and the French New Wave movement.

As a result, the film’s dialogue is infused with rich philosophical and literary references.

‘Kenda’ stands out for its grounded and realistic depiction of characters and the crime world, remarkably achieved without relying on explicit violence or gore.

While the first half of the film unfolds at a leisurely, the narrative gears up significantly in the second half. Ritwik Kaikini’s soft-rock soundtrack deserves a mention, so does the performance of lead artistes.

While ‘Kenda’ may have some minor flaws, that can be overlooked, the film meets the expectations.

Advertisement

Produced by Roopa Rao (‘Gantumoote’ fame). The film received an award for direction at Dada Saheb Phalke Film Festival. 

Published 26 July 2024, 20:13 IST

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

'Deadpool & Wolverine' movie review: Fox's last dance, Deadpool & Wolverine bromance

Published

on

'Deadpool & Wolverine' movie review: Fox's last dance, Deadpool & Wolverine bromance

Superhero fatigue is real. With no good movies recently, Marvel has lost its course. But brace yourselves — straight from 20th Century Fox, sorry, Disney — a hero makes his grand MCU entrance. He’s the messiah, the merc with a mouth; he is… The Marvel Jesus. Buckle up, peanut, because this isn’t your average cape-and-tights movie — or is it?

Directed by Shawn Levy (‘Free Guy’), this third instalment is a hot mess —kind of like Wade Wilson himself on a bad hair day. Just as the world’s falling apart (again), the Time Variance Authority’s Paradox (Matthew Macfyden) recruits him to put his timeline out of its misery. Deadpool refuses and drags the worst variant of the Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) out of retirement to help stop this crazy scheme. They are sent to the ‘Void’ — yes, the same one from ‘Loki’ season one, episode five, now ruled by Cassandra Nova (Emma Corrin), Professor Charles Xavier’s evil twin.

The film takes you on a wild ride with surprise appearances from the Fox Universe. The plot is a bit shaky with jokes that sometimes fall flat, but it’s saved by some really cool action sequences, with slow-motion effects set to popular ’90s tunes. It’s a fun, if messy, farewell to the Fox universe, offering a peek at what mutant battles might look like in the MCU — and it doesn’t look too bad. Ryan Reynolds keeps it lively with his snappy humour, and Hugh Jackman proves yet again why he’s the ultimate Wolverine, leaving us with a touching montage of his ‘X-Men’ moments during the end credits.

So, does this Marvel messiah live up to the hype? Well, yes and no. Deadpool doesn’t exactly ace it. He’s the irritating but quirky hero we didn’t even know we needed, flipping the MCU on its head and turning multiversal crises into comedy gold. Marvel dug deep into the Fox universe, like scraping the last bits of chicken from a biryani pot.

The movie might do well at the box office, but they really need to sort out their timelines (pun intended) before they kick off the Mutant Saga.

Advertisement

Published 26 July 2024, 20:20 IST

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

What If Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway Had a Mother-Off, and We All Lost?

Published

on

What If Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway Had a Mother-Off, and We All Lost?

The strange case of Mothers’ Instinct.
Photo: Neon

There’s a new movie starring Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway out this week, which is normally the sort of thing you’d expect to have heard about. But, after its release in the U.K. months ago, Mothers’ Instinct is slipping into U.S. theaters with as little splash as an Olympic diver nailing a triple somersault tuck. The film, a thriller directed by Benoît Delhomme, is getting the treatment typically reserved for a disaster, which is a shame, because I’ve been dying to discuss it with someone, and that’s hard when no one has any idea what you’re on about. Mothers’ Instinct is, indeed, pretty terrible, and not in the so-bad-it’s-good sense, and yet there’s something strangely moving about it. It’s a poignant example of how what looks like rich material to actors can turn out to be lousy material for audiences. Mothers’ Instinct is a remake of a 2018 Belgian film adapted from a novel by Barbara Abel, and watching it, you can appreciate exactly why these two major actors signed on to star in it. Funnily enough, those same qualities go a long way toward explaining why the movie doesn’t work.

Mothers’ Instinct isn’t camp, but it’s close enough that if you squint, you can almost see a version of the film that tips into something broader. Of course, if you squint, you wouldn’t be able to appreciate how immaculately Chastain and Hathaway are costumed. They look incredible — not like two 1960s housewives, which is what they’re playing, so much as two people who keep switching outfits because they can’t decide what to wear to the high-end Mad Men–themed party they’re headed to later. As Alice, Chastain is styled like a Hitchcock blonde in pin-curled ash updos and cardigan sets, while as Alice’s neighbor and friend Céline, Hathaway is given a Jackie O. look that involves a shoulder-length bouffant, pillbox hats, and gloves. They’re cosplayers in a gorgeous, airless setting, adjoining houses on a street that might as well be floating in space, the husbands (played by Anders Danielsen Lie and Josh Charles) vanishing to work for long stretches. The artificiality of this intensely manicured re-creation isn’t to any particular end, which gives the whole movie the air of a Don’t Worry Darling situation in which no one ever wakes up to the twist, instead sleepwalking through a stylized dream of Americana.

Advertisement

In fact, while Alice is restless over having given up her job as a journalist to take care of her son Theo (Eamon O’Connell), and Céline gets ostracized by the community after the death of her son, Max (Baylen D. Bielitz), Mothers’ Instinct isn’t actually all that interested in the pressures of living under a repressive 1960s patriarchy. Instead, it’s about another time-tested theme, one that’s best summed up as: Bitches be crazy. The perfect sheen of its surfaces — Delhomme, who’s making his directorial debut, is a cinematographer who started his career with The Scent of Green Papaya and has since worked with everyone from Tsai Ming-liang to Anton Corbijn — is paired with a score that shrieks unease from the opening scene, in which Céline is thrown a surprise birthday party. The source of this suspense isn’t revealed until later, after Max takes an unintended swan dive off the porch and the women’s friendship is threatened by grief, guilt, and suspicion. Is Céline in mourning, or does she actually irrationally blame Alice for what happened while developing an alarming fixation on Theo? Is Alice right to be suspicious of her bestie, who’s unable to have another baby, or is she being paranoid because the mental illness that previously resulted in her hospitalization has returned? Is it odd that two feminist actors jumped to participate in a film that traffics so freely in unexamined stereotypes about women and hysteria?

Not, it seems, when the opportunities to stare coldly into space or look on in glassy betrayal are this good. I’m not trying to sound snide here — the characters in Mothers’ Instinct have no convincing inner lives at all, but the exterior work of the actors playing them is choice stuff. When Alice and Céline are getting along, Chastain and Hathaway nuzzle together supportively like long-necked swans. When things start to go south, Chastain opts for an aloof distance with stricken eyes, while Hathaway prefers a labored smile that drops as soon as she’s alone. Theirs is a brittle-off no one can win, but both try their hardest anyway. The effort reaches its crescendo at Max’s funeral, where Hathaway’s enormous eyes glimmer through the barrier of a black lace veil and Chastain tilts her face up so that the elegant tracks of past tears can gleam in the light. The scene ends with Céline collapsing in anguish while Alice rushes her tantrumming child out of the church, an explosion of drama that would be so much more effective if the movie had left any room for modulation instead of starting at 10 and staying there. Mothers’ Instinct gets much sillier before it ends, but given how little it establishes as its baseline tone, it doesn’t feel fair to say it goes off the rails. Rather, as Hathaway stares brokenly into the dark and Chastain tears apart her nightstand drawer in panic, what comes to mind is how great a set of GIFs this movie will make someday. That’s not much, but I guess it’s something?

See All

Continue Reading

Trending