Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ review: Fun buddy comedy stands apart from MCU

Published

on

‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ review: Fun buddy comedy stands apart from MCU

After years of development hell, Ryan Reynolds got his passion project made in the shape of 2016’s Deadpool, in which the Canadian actor played the Merc with a Mouth who likes to break the fourth wall and say something funny and filled with profanity. Released at a time when the superhero movie was thriving, the Tim Miller-directed Deadpool was essentially a parody of the genre, and yet instead of killing it like Blazing Saddles killed the western genre, it only enhanced the superhero boom and Deadpool himself was getting his own franchise. In this current age where the superhero craze might be fading, does Ryan Reynolds once again playing his most iconic role stay relevant?

It has been six years since Deadpool 2 and with the acquisition of 21st Century Fox by Disney, there was a possibility that Deadpool would be integrated with the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Now back with his R-rated attitude intact, the long-awaited Deadpool & Wolverine seems to be about Wade Wilson going through an existential crisis as whether or not his role as the wisecracking mercenary matters. That crisis is put to the test when the Time Variance Authority pulls Deadpool from his quiet life and sets him on a mission to save his universe, partnering with a reluctant Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) from another universe in the process.

Along with the return of Reynolds as Deadpool, you also have the return of Hugh Jackman in arguably his most iconic role; certainly the role that made him a movie star back in 2000, when the first X-Men movie was released and launched the reemergence of superhero movies. After 2017’s Logan, it felt like the perfect send-off for Jackman’s Wolverine and though this movie tries to have its cake and eat it by not attempting to trample the legacy of James Mangold’s brilliant deconstruction film, there is that sense that Jackman can’t seem to let go of the character.

Advertisement

That said, Reynolds and Jackman are a great double act in their title roles, where one is the straight man and the other is the funny guy, and you probably guess which is which. Although Reynolds’ recent career has been about playing roles that are very similar to Wade Wilson, when he is actually playing Deadpool, you are reminded why he was perfectly cast in that role, even if not everyone is on board with his brand of humor.

As for Jackman, finally rocking the “yellow spandex” in Deadpool & Wolverine that we robbed from all those years, he too reminds why he is perfectly cast as Wolverine whose no-bullshit persona is a nice contrast with Reynolds’ carefree performance. It may not reach the heights of Logan, but if Jackman is to retire from this role after this, it would be a good note to end on.

Advertisement

Since Deadpool & Wolverine is built upon the buddy dynamic between its two leads, what is the movie’s place in the MCU? Well, apart from the TVA from the Loki TV series, this doesn’t leave much of an impact with this well-established shared universe and is actually about looking back at the past.

In a similar vein to Spider-Man: No Way Home, the movie is about nostalgia over a particular period of superhero cinema, specifically in this case when Fox produced their own line-up of Marvel movies, not just the X-Men franchise. With this constant look-back at a studio which is personified here like The Statue of Liberty in Planet of the Apes, there is an over-indulgence of cameos, some of which are delightful and others remind you why the Fox era was a rather maligned time.

Advertisement

Directed by Shawn Levy who co-wrote the Deadpool & Wolverine with Reynolds, Rhett Reese, Paul Wernick, and Zeb Wells, the movie tries to achieve a lot and like the two leads, they got lost in the chaos. Amidst the heavy amount of gore and comedy, as well as a tone that is just as flippant as Deadpool himself, the plot is too paper-thin to give the emotional weight, which is about the eponymous leads becoming heroes as a way of redeeming their past mistakes.

As for Emma Corrin who shines as the main villain Cassandra Nova who can literally get under your skin, there aren’t enough scenes with her, considering she has to share some of the villainy with Matthew Macfadyen’s Mr. Paradox; if only Cassandra was a villain in one of the X-Men movies.

'Deadpool & Wolverine' review: Fun buddy comedy stands apart from MCU

‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ review: Fun buddy comedy stands apart from MCU

Deadpool & Wolverine

Despite the Marvel Studios logo at the beginning, Deadpool & Wolverine has no interest in its role in the MCU except for the occasional joke. As the weakest of the three Deadpool movies, it still works largely as a fun R-rated buddy comedy that showcases the strong chemistry between the two leads.

Advertisement

Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman own this movie!

From the meta-humor and the gory action, it has everything you want in a Deadpool movie…

…even if the movie itself is overblown with the amount of cameos and plot machinations, that there isn’t much of an emotional angle.

Very little impact on the MCU, which is probably for the best.

Not enough Cassandra Nova.

Advertisement

Join the AIPT Patreon

Want to take our relationship to the next level? Become a patron today to gain access to exclusive perks, such as:

  • ❌ Remove all ads on the website
  • 💬 Join our Discord community, where we chat about the latest news and releases from everything we cover on AIPT
  • 📗 Access to our monthly book club
  • 📦 Get a physical trade paperback shipped to you every month
  • 💥 And more!

Sign up today

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

'Kenda' movie review: Intense drama with an allegorical twist

Published

on

'Kenda' movie review: Intense drama with an allegorical twist

Sahadev Kelvadi’s ‘Kenda’ is set against the gritty backdrop of the late 1990s and early 2000s, the film plunges into the turbulent world of a young man adrift. Unemployed and without direction, he finds himself entangled in a complex web of crime and politics. As he navigates this treacherous landscape, he must confront the dark and primal desires that lurk within, threatening to consume him. Will he find redemption or succumb to the shadows that haunt him?

Protagonist Keshava’s (B V Bharath) humdrum existence is disrupted when he crosses paths with Narasimha Shastry (Vinod Ravindran), a leader with a hidden political agenda. Behind the façade of a respected newspaper owner, Shastry harbors a duplicitous nature, his words and actions a stark contrast.

Once he takes the fateful step, there’s no turning back, and Keshava’s fate becomes inextricably linked to the consequences of his choices.

At its core, Kenda is a powerful allegory for the eternal struggle to find purpose and authenticity in a chaotic world. The film also masterfully deconstructs the toxic effects of rigid masculinity, revealing the impact it has on individuals and society as a whole.

The film is a scathing critique of the establishment’s failures. Delving deeper, it masterfully explores the complex and often blurred lines between crime and politics, revealing the toxic symbiosis that can exist between the two.

Advertisement

This film draws inspiration from the likes of Albert Camus, Theatre of the Absurd and the French New Wave movement.

As a result, the film’s dialogue is infused with rich philosophical and literary references.

‘Kenda’ stands out for its grounded and realistic depiction of characters and the crime world, remarkably achieved without relying on explicit violence or gore.

While the first half of the film unfolds at a leisurely, the narrative gears up significantly in the second half. Ritwik Kaikini’s soft-rock soundtrack deserves a mention, so does the performance of lead artistes.

While ‘Kenda’ may have some minor flaws, that can be overlooked, the film meets the expectations.

Advertisement

Produced by Roopa Rao (‘Gantumoote’ fame). The film received an award for direction at Dada Saheb Phalke Film Festival. 

Published 26 July 2024, 20:13 IST

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

'Deadpool & Wolverine' movie review: Fox's last dance, Deadpool & Wolverine bromance

Published

on

'Deadpool & Wolverine' movie review: Fox's last dance, Deadpool & Wolverine bromance

Superhero fatigue is real. With no good movies recently, Marvel has lost its course. But brace yourselves — straight from 20th Century Fox, sorry, Disney — a hero makes his grand MCU entrance. He’s the messiah, the merc with a mouth; he is… The Marvel Jesus. Buckle up, peanut, because this isn’t your average cape-and-tights movie — or is it?

Directed by Shawn Levy (‘Free Guy’), this third instalment is a hot mess —kind of like Wade Wilson himself on a bad hair day. Just as the world’s falling apart (again), the Time Variance Authority’s Paradox (Matthew Macfyden) recruits him to put his timeline out of its misery. Deadpool refuses and drags the worst variant of the Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) out of retirement to help stop this crazy scheme. They are sent to the ‘Void’ — yes, the same one from ‘Loki’ season one, episode five, now ruled by Cassandra Nova (Emma Corrin), Professor Charles Xavier’s evil twin.

The film takes you on a wild ride with surprise appearances from the Fox Universe. The plot is a bit shaky with jokes that sometimes fall flat, but it’s saved by some really cool action sequences, with slow-motion effects set to popular ’90s tunes. It’s a fun, if messy, farewell to the Fox universe, offering a peek at what mutant battles might look like in the MCU — and it doesn’t look too bad. Ryan Reynolds keeps it lively with his snappy humour, and Hugh Jackman proves yet again why he’s the ultimate Wolverine, leaving us with a touching montage of his ‘X-Men’ moments during the end credits.

So, does this Marvel messiah live up to the hype? Well, yes and no. Deadpool doesn’t exactly ace it. He’s the irritating but quirky hero we didn’t even know we needed, flipping the MCU on its head and turning multiversal crises into comedy gold. Marvel dug deep into the Fox universe, like scraping the last bits of chicken from a biryani pot.

The movie might do well at the box office, but they really need to sort out their timelines (pun intended) before they kick off the Mutant Saga.

Advertisement

Published 26 July 2024, 20:20 IST

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

What If Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway Had a Mother-Off, and We All Lost?

Published

on

What If Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway Had a Mother-Off, and We All Lost?

The strange case of Mothers’ Instinct.
Photo: Neon

There’s a new movie starring Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway out this week, which is normally the sort of thing you’d expect to have heard about. But, after its release in the U.K. months ago, Mothers’ Instinct is slipping into U.S. theaters with as little splash as an Olympic diver nailing a triple somersault tuck. The film, a thriller directed by Benoît Delhomme, is getting the treatment typically reserved for a disaster, which is a shame, because I’ve been dying to discuss it with someone, and that’s hard when no one has any idea what you’re on about. Mothers’ Instinct is, indeed, pretty terrible, and not in the so-bad-it’s-good sense, and yet there’s something strangely moving about it. It’s a poignant example of how what looks like rich material to actors can turn out to be lousy material for audiences. Mothers’ Instinct is a remake of a 2018 Belgian film adapted from a novel by Barbara Abel, and watching it, you can appreciate exactly why these two major actors signed on to star in it. Funnily enough, those same qualities go a long way toward explaining why the movie doesn’t work.

Mothers’ Instinct isn’t camp, but it’s close enough that if you squint, you can almost see a version of the film that tips into something broader. Of course, if you squint, you wouldn’t be able to appreciate how immaculately Chastain and Hathaway are costumed. They look incredible — not like two 1960s housewives, which is what they’re playing, so much as two people who keep switching outfits because they can’t decide what to wear to the high-end Mad Men–themed party they’re headed to later. As Alice, Chastain is styled like a Hitchcock blonde in pin-curled ash updos and cardigan sets, while as Alice’s neighbor and friend Céline, Hathaway is given a Jackie O. look that involves a shoulder-length bouffant, pillbox hats, and gloves. They’re cosplayers in a gorgeous, airless setting, adjoining houses on a street that might as well be floating in space, the husbands (played by Anders Danielsen Lie and Josh Charles) vanishing to work for long stretches. The artificiality of this intensely manicured re-creation isn’t to any particular end, which gives the whole movie the air of a Don’t Worry Darling situation in which no one ever wakes up to the twist, instead sleepwalking through a stylized dream of Americana.

Advertisement

In fact, while Alice is restless over having given up her job as a journalist to take care of her son Theo (Eamon O’Connell), and Céline gets ostracized by the community after the death of her son, Max (Baylen D. Bielitz), Mothers’ Instinct isn’t actually all that interested in the pressures of living under a repressive 1960s patriarchy. Instead, it’s about another time-tested theme, one that’s best summed up as: Bitches be crazy. The perfect sheen of its surfaces — Delhomme, who’s making his directorial debut, is a cinematographer who started his career with The Scent of Green Papaya and has since worked with everyone from Tsai Ming-liang to Anton Corbijn — is paired with a score that shrieks unease from the opening scene, in which Céline is thrown a surprise birthday party. The source of this suspense isn’t revealed until later, after Max takes an unintended swan dive off the porch and the women’s friendship is threatened by grief, guilt, and suspicion. Is Céline in mourning, or does she actually irrationally blame Alice for what happened while developing an alarming fixation on Theo? Is Alice right to be suspicious of her bestie, who’s unable to have another baby, or is she being paranoid because the mental illness that previously resulted in her hospitalization has returned? Is it odd that two feminist actors jumped to participate in a film that traffics so freely in unexamined stereotypes about women and hysteria?

Not, it seems, when the opportunities to stare coldly into space or look on in glassy betrayal are this good. I’m not trying to sound snide here — the characters in Mothers’ Instinct have no convincing inner lives at all, but the exterior work of the actors playing them is choice stuff. When Alice and Céline are getting along, Chastain and Hathaway nuzzle together supportively like long-necked swans. When things start to go south, Chastain opts for an aloof distance with stricken eyes, while Hathaway prefers a labored smile that drops as soon as she’s alone. Theirs is a brittle-off no one can win, but both try their hardest anyway. The effort reaches its crescendo at Max’s funeral, where Hathaway’s enormous eyes glimmer through the barrier of a black lace veil and Chastain tilts her face up so that the elegant tracks of past tears can gleam in the light. The scene ends with Céline collapsing in anguish while Alice rushes her tantrumming child out of the church, an explosion of drama that would be so much more effective if the movie had left any room for modulation instead of starting at 10 and staying there. Mothers’ Instinct gets much sillier before it ends, but given how little it establishes as its baseline tone, it doesn’t feel fair to say it goes off the rails. Rather, as Hathaway stares brokenly into the dark and Chastain tears apart her nightstand drawer in panic, what comes to mind is how great a set of GIFs this movie will make someday. That’s not much, but I guess it’s something?

See All

Continue Reading

Trending