Connect with us

Entertainment

After court, Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s careers face another trial | CNN

Published

on

After court, Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s careers face another trial | CNN



CNN
 — 

After six weeks of testimony in a defamation trial that has aired the nice, dangerous and the very ugly of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s former relationship, the case is now within the palms of the jury.

Regardless of the verdicts in Depp’s $50 million go well with and Heard’s $100 million countersuit, one thing else is true: The destiny of their respective careers might be determined within the court docket of public opinion, in line with Hollywood insiders.

CNN spoke with six leisure trade specialists for this story, a few of whom spoke on background to guard skilled relationships.

Whether or not honest or unfair, the wave of help Depp has obtained on social media in the course of the trial – particularly on Tik-Tok – could serve him nicely going ahead, one veteran publicist who has identified Depp for years informed CNN.

Advertisement

“I wasn’t positive what to anticipate earlier than he took the stand and if something, I imagine this has accomplished nothing however assist his public picture,” the supply mentioned.

One other high Hollywood publicist, who hasn’t labored with both Depp or Heard, mentioned neither of their photographs have fared nicely.

“Each are extremely dysfunctional. Cash is poisonous and greed destroys. Nobody wins right here,” this publicist mentioned.

Depp and Heard paint one another as abusers in trial testimonies

Advertisement

Naturally, there are hurdles for each actors to beat as soon as their authorized battle ends.

Heard testified that Depp was verbally and bodily abusive. She additionally accused Depp of sexual violence throughout their relationship.

Depp claimed a number of occasions on the stand that he has by no means struck a girl, denied Heard’s allegation of sexual battery and known as himself a sufferer of home abuse by Heard, which she denies.

Depp and Heard met in 2009 on the set of their movie “The Rum Diary” and have been married from 2015-2016 earlier than divorcing

Advertisement

Pictures in addition to audio and video recordings painted an image of two individuals in a relationship with what was characterised as “mutual abuse” by Laurel Anderson, a scientific psychologist who labored with Depp and Heard in 2015 as their marriage counselor, in testimony performed on April 14. (For example how contentious this trial has been, the witness’s use of the time period itself has spurred criticism.)

Leisure agent Darryl Marshak thinks movie studios may – at the very least, initially – be hesitant to have interaction with the actors entangled in an argument that has performed out so publicly.

“Robert Downey Jr. gained an Academy Award after which aired his private enterprise out on this planet and folks sort of recoiled,” mentioned Marshak, who has beforehand represented stars like Leonardo DiCaprio and Hillary Swank. “I believe Hollywood is an odd place. While you air your soiled laundry in entrance of the machine, the executives, all of the folks that make the components transfer, they type of recoil from a sizzling flame.”

Depp claims a 2018 op-ed by Heard by which she described herself as “a public determine representing home abuse” defamed him. He has starred in two movies for the reason that op-ed, which didn’t point out him by identify, “Ready for the Barbarians” and “Minamata,” each unbiased movies.

‘Each phrase of it’s true’: Heard speaks on op-ed after break in defamation trial

Advertisement

Heard, whose countersuit claims she was defamed by an legal professional for Depp who known as her abuse allegations a “hoax,” will seem within the sequel to “Aquaman,” scheduled for launch in 2023.

Marshak believes Depp’s “unbelievable expertise” will assist him return to film screens.

“Hollywood can be forgiving and because it strikes ahead and this factor stops airing and Johnny is ready to transfer fluidly again into the enterprise. I believe he’ll reemerge once more,” he mentioned. “Hollywood is a fickle place.”

Advertisement

The courtroom efficiency by the authorized groups for Depp and Heard – a live-streamed trial watched by thousands and thousands – might also form trade perspective on the 2 stars.

“Globally, individuals have seemingly grow to be polarized by the trial, we now have watched this unfold within the press previous to its fruits within the courtroom, ” Amanda Okay. Ruisi, Founder & President AKR Public Relations & AKR Ventures, informed CNN.

Ruisi believes Depp’s representatives have been more practical.

“Mr. Depp’s authorized and strategic communications group have accomplished an unbelievable job in delivering a constant message within the courtroom and all through the media, which I imagine has helped corral the help from his fan base.”

Not that Depp’s supporters wanted the nudge. The scales of social media justice are closely tipped in his favor, a lot in order that the imbalance has prompted headlines pondering the explanation behind it. One author for The Reduce requested, “Here’s a girl recounting, in agonizing element, how a particularly well-known man allegedly abused her. Why, in 2022, achieve this many individuals appear to hate her for it?”

Advertisement

Sociologist Nicole Bedera provided a couple of theories – each on Twitter and in an article for Harpers Bazaar – about why each feminine survivors of home abuse and many ladies interval have appeared to help Depp.

“It may be scary– and for victims, re-traumatizing – for girls to empathize with an abuse survivor. If violence actually *is* in every single place and if it *feels* like it will possibly occur to anybody, then plenty of ladies will begin to fear that they are going to be subsequent,” she wrote. “So is it shocking that plenty of ladies are coming to Depp’s protection? No. Under no circumstances.”

Heard has had her supporters, however notably fewer vocal ones than Depp – each within the leisure enterprise and in and across the courthouse.

Heard’s former co-star David Krumholtz has come to her protection publicly, actress Ellen Barkin testified for her protection group and comic Kathy Griffin, who wrote in response to a pre-trial Tweet from Heard, “I’m eager about you and sending all of the love.”

For 2 working actors, the query as soon as court docket is adjourned is will producers ship them scripts as reliably as onlookers have been sending Tweets?

Advertisement

The crux of each Heard and Depp’s lawsuits relaxation in claims that their careers – particularly their futures in respective movie franchises – have been adversely affected.

Throughout the previous a number of weeks of testimony, Depp’s group has tried to show that Depp, who portrayed Jack Sparrow in 5 movies, was dropped from a possible sixth movie within the “Pirates of the Caribbean” franchise attributable to Heard’s op-ed.

Jerry Bruckheimer, who produced the “Pirates of the Caribbean” movies, informed The Instances that “the long run is but to be determined,” relating to Depp’s involvement in a doable subsequent installment.

The producer mentioned that the artistic group is “creating two ‘Pirates’ scripts” – one that may doubtlessly have Margot Robbie because the lead and “one with out” Robbie.

Advertisement

The final movie was 2017’s “Pirates of the Caribbean: Lifeless Males Inform No Tales.”

In a taped deposition performed for the court docket, Depp’s former agent, Christian Carino, who started representing Depp in October 2016 and even represented Depp and Heard on the similar time, testified that he believed accusations of home violence made by Heard towards Depp price the actor a paycheck that may have been price tens of thousands and thousands of {dollars}.

And when an legal professional for Heard pressed Carino on different points Depp could have had whereas engaged on earlier “Pirates” movies, he dismissed them.

“I’m conscious of him being tardy however he’s been tardy on all the pieces his whole life,” Carino mentioned. “I believe it’s troublesome to everyone, however everybody has discovered find out how to produce a movie to cope with it.”

Different witnesses noticed his habits as extra detrimental.

Advertisement

Tracey Jacobs, who testified in a recorded deposition and represented Depp for 30 years as his expertise agent earlier than being terminated, mentioned as a witness that she was sincere with Depp that exhibiting up late persistently to units and his habits, together with drug and alcohol use, was hurting his profession.

“His star had dimmed attributable to it getting more durable to get him jobs given the popularity that he’d acquired attributable to his lateness and different issues,” Jacobs testified. “Folks have been speaking and the query was on the market about his habits.”

A Hollywood director, who hasn’t labored with Depp however has met him, informed CNN that he doesn’t assume Depp will ever helm one other main franchise.

“I imagine that Johnny Depp will be capable to be solid in numerous unbiased movies as a result of he nonetheless has vital identify worth and there’s an viewers for him, nonetheless the studios might be extra cautious due to insurance coverage causes and due to the potential to cease safety and they might be extra involved about public backlash versus smaller unbiased firms,” he mentioned.

Jason Momoa and Amber Heard in 2018's

In the case of Heard, the director believes the eye across the trial hasn’t helped her picture.

Advertisement

At present, there’s a petition to have Heard dropped from the upcoming “Aquaman” sequel, which has already been filmed and is in post-production. (CNN and Warner Bros. are each a part of Warner Bros. Discovery.)

That probably gained’t occur. However Walter Hamada, the pinnacle of DC Movies, which produced “Aquaman,” testified that the artistic group had considerations about Heard resuming her function within the franchise over a scarcity of chemistry with co-star Jason Momoa.

He additionally mentioned the studio by no means deliberate to painting Heard as a co-lead within the second movie and that Heard’s function was not lowered within the forthcoming movie, titled “Aquaman the Misplaced Kingdom.”

No matter choice the jury renders, Juda Engelmayer, founding father of Herald PR, who has represented celebrities like disgraced producer Harvey Weinstein, informed CNN that Depp’s time in court docket – which included quirky, meme-able moments involving doodling and jelly beans – has bolstered his picture.

“His testimony, whether or not true or an act has brought on a resurgence of followers who missed him,” he mentioned. “For his popularity and profession, studios see he nonetheless has a fan base,” he mentioned.

Advertisement

‘I knew it was improper’: Amber Heard testifies in defamation trial

As for Heard, whose profession was much less established than Depp’s when their relationship and troubling accusations started, that’s more durable to say, in line with sources.

Virtually a decade in the past, earlier than the drama with Depp got here to gentle, Heard informed Self-importance Honest she was up for the ebbs and flows of an performing profession.

Advertisement

“Do you assume you’d have pursued it for those who knew it was gonna be this a lot of a circus?” Heard was requested in a 2013 interview.

“Completely,” Heard responded. “I like very a lot the battle that you just’re continually…you’re continually put in a state of battle or flight. It’s a relentless battle. So I don’t know if I might have it every other approach.”

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

This Jennifer Lopez Movie Has a 22% Rating on Rotten Tomatoes—But It's One of My Favorite Films of All Time

Published

on

This Jennifer Lopez Movie Has a 22% Rating on Rotten Tomatoes—But It's One of My Favorite Films of All Time

Enough is one of my favorite movies of all-time, and I’m sticking beside it.

Since its debut in 2002, I have probably seen this J-Lo thriller at least 25 times…maybe more. It’s truly one of those movies I have never gotten tired of, and I thought everybody was in agreement—until I saw the 22 percent Rotten Tomatoes rating. WTF?! This has to be a mistake, right? No, Enough truly wasn’t liked by viewers and critics…especially when it premiered.

And if you don’t believe me, here’s a lovely 2002 review from Roger Ebert that shows exactly what I’m talking about: “Enough is a nasty item masquerading as a feminist revenge picture. It’s a step or two above I Spit On Your Grave, but uses the same structure, in which a man victimizes a woman for the first half of the film, and then the woman turns the tables in an extended sequence of graphic violence. It’s surprising to see a director like Michael Apted and an actress like Jennifer Lopez associated with such tacky material.”

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Dennis Prager sets talk-radio return following a severe spinal cord injury

Published

on

Dennis Prager sets talk-radio return following a severe spinal cord injury

Dennis Prager, the conservative talk radio host who has been off the air since suffering a debilitating fall in November, will return in June.

Prager, whose nationally syndicated show aired locally from noon to 3 p.m. on AM 870 the Answer before his injury, will come back to host the third hour of that time slot starting June 3, Salem Media announced last week.

“I’m really feeling much better, as you can hear,” the author of “The Rational Bible” said in a voice recording played during a March 7 health-update video featuring son David Prager and Prager University Chief Executive Marissa Streit. “My voice is practically normal, which is really exciting, because I intend to go back on radio. … And my beloved son — one of my beloved sons — my beloved son David is here with me and I can’t tell you how much he has done for me. … OK everybody, looking forward to being with you often.”

At the time that recording was played, Dennis Prager was 15 weeks post-injury. Before his fall, he’d had spinal fusion surgery that resulted in a “pretty stiff situation” with his back, Streit said in a Feb. 14 video update. He hit his head when he fell but suffered no brain injury, she said.

The spinal cord was another story. “It was not severed, but it was injured, and was injured at the top of his spinal cord, at the area of C3 and C4 that also controls his diaphragm,” Streit said, noting that Prager could not move below his shoulders at the time.

Advertisement

“He is talking a lot to people in the rehab facility that he’s at right now,” David Prager, chief development officer for Prager U, said in the same February video. Nonprofit Prager U bills itself as a creator of “free educational content promoting American values.” “He’s all there. He’s 100% there. When you hear him on the radio, you’ll say he hasn’t skipped a beat.”

Dennis Prager is still undergoing “extensive” rehab, Salem Media said in its release.

“Dennis may have some physical limitations at the moment, but his wit, wisdom, insights and passion are as strong and as clear as ever and we are delighted at his spirit and resolve to return to his audience,” Phil Boyce, Salem’s senior vice president of spoken word, said in the release. “We want Dennis to remain a part of the Salem family and want his millions of loyal fans to continue to hear his voice.”

When Prager returns to radio, it won’t be on the exact same show that he left. Salem Media announced last week that “The Charlie Kirk Show,” hosted by the founder of the conservative Turning Point USA student movement, will take over Prager’s affiliate stations — including 870 AM — beginning next Monday.

“Affiliates of Charlie will continue to get the Kirk show with no interruption, and affiliates of Dennis will soon get Charlie Kirk as a strong and able replacement,” Boyce said in the release. The two men had been broadcasting live at the same time of day before Prager fell.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review – Snow White

Published

on

Disney’s “Snow White” is the latest live-action remake of one of the studio’s animated classics. In this case, it’s perhaps the biggest “classic” of all, as 1937’s “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” was the first full-length animated feature in American history, and in 2008 was named the greatest animated film of all time by the American Film Institute. The film’s historical significance is undeniable, but frankly I don’t think it holds up as entertainment. Advancements in both animation and sound recording technology have left that movie in the dust, not to mention that Disney writes their princesses with more complexity these days. So maybe a remake that smooths out some of the rougher edges of the past isn’t a terrible idea. But this movie goes in some directions that are definitely a terrible idea.

The story of course hits all the familiar beats. Princess Snow White (Rachel Zegler) is the stepdaughter of the Evil Queen (Gal Gadot), who seized control of her kingdom with underhanded tactics. The queen seeks constant validation of her beauty from a Magic Mirror (Patrick Page), until one day when the mirror declares Snow White to be “fairer” than she. The queen freaks out and orders her Huntsman (Ansu Kabia) to take Snow White into the woods and eliminate her. The Huntsman instead affords Snow White the opportunity to escape, and she flees deep into the woods, where she stumbles upon the home of (and I’ll use the Disney spelling) The Seven Dwarfs. She becomes an ally to miners Sneezy, Sleepy, Happy, Grumpy, Dopey, Doc, and Bashful, and she helps them straighten up their cottage as she tries to figure out what to do next. Perhaps the answer lies with the band of loveable bandits led by the charismatic Jonathan (Andrew Burnap) on the outskirts of the woods.

Unlike other Disney remakes (looking at you, “Lion King”), there are some strong deviations here from the original film. Zegler’s Snow White cares deeply about the kingdom’s subjects, and we see her pay attention to their stories and needs whenever possible. She takes a more active role in overthrowing the queen, and the third act will be unrecognizable to anyone with the original ending stuck in their heads. There are even new songs, with Zegler’s “Waiting on a Wish” fitting seamlessly into the Disney songbook along other female empowerment anthems like “Let It Go.” The queen herself gets a song, and Gadot wickedly chews the scenery with “All Is Fair.”

The film pulls my opinion in two opposite directions. On one hand, there’s Zegler’s performance as Snow White, bringing much-needed life and passion to a character that had previously been dismissed as one of the more useless waifs in the Disney catalogue. I’ll also throw a compliment toward Burnap, playing a better-developed love interest than the unbranded, uninspired prince from 1937. I have to recommend the film based on these elements, right? But then there are the dwarfs. These hideous CGI monstrosities from the depths of the uncanny valley are offensive, not just in the sense that actual dwarf actors could have been cast in these parts (six of the seven voice actors are not dwarves), but offensive to anyone with working eyes. I can’t recommend the film based on these elements, right?

I’m going to give “Snow White” the mildest of recommendations just because my expectations were so low going in. There’s been no end of bad publicity surrounding the races, heights, and political stances of the film’s cast, and these live-action remakes have a sour reputation for being lazy retreads of beloved animated properties. I was ready to declare this movie the worst of 2025. Instead I got a valiant, vibrant adaptation that I would sooner watch again for entertainment than the 1937 version. It isn’t perfect, and I completely understand why someone would consider the dwarfs to be deal-breakers for the entire film. But thanks mostly to Zegler, I saw enough Disney magic in the film to give it a pass.

Advertisement

Grade: B-

“Snow White” is rated PG for violence, some peril, thematic elements and brief rude humor. Its running time is 109 minutes.


Contact Bob Garver at rrg251@nyu.edu.

Continue Reading

Trending