It might be tougher to get into one among California’s most prestigious universities after the state’s highest court docket on Thursday declined to reverse a lower-court ruling that capped enrollment on the College of California, Berkeley, at 2020-21 ranges.

The choice by the Supreme Court docket of California left in place a ruling issued final August that ordered the college to freeze scholar enrollment at 42,347.

The choice was the results of a authorized battle with a residents’ group, Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods, that had accused the college of failing to offer sufficient on-campus housing whereas on the similar time admitting excessive numbers of scholars, lots of them from different states or international locations.

College officers stated on Thursday that, on account of a brand new evaluation that concluded that they wanted to incorporate of their head rely tons of of scholars who could be learning overseas or in Washington, the college must reduce in-person enrollment by no less than 2,500 college students within the fall of 2022.

College officers had beforehand stated that U.C. Berkeley, already one of many nation’s most selective establishments, would have 3,050 fewer seats for incoming first-year college students and switch college students than it had deliberate for the autumn of 2022.

Usually, U.C. Berkeley stated, it provides admission to about 21,000 first-year and switch college students, and about 9,500 of them enroll. College officers emphasised that the choice didn’t imply that acceptance letters must be rescinded.

To melt the blow of the enrollment freeze, they stated, no less than 1,500 undergraduates shall be provided one among two choices. One group shall be requested to check as online-only college students within the fall and can then be allowed to attend in individual in January 2023. A second group shall be provided deferred enrollment to start attending in individual in January 2023.

All instructed, officers stated, they may have the ability to scale back the variety of college students who received’t be allowed to enroll in any respect to about 400. However the college nonetheless described these choices as “removed from superb” as a result of they might deny deserving college students “a full, wealthy in-person expertise beginning within the fall when all of their classmates enroll.”

“We nonetheless know that is going to be a really disappointing end result for these 1000’s of scholars, however we’re doing our greatest beneath the phrases of an unprecedented court docket choice,” Dan Mogulof, a college spokesman, stated on Thursday.

College officers stated they have been additionally pursuing state legislative options “that would deal with the numerous impacts of the decrease court docket’s ruling on enrollment choices at U.C. Berkeley and different campuses.”

Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods stated on Thursday that whereas it was happy that the State Supreme Court docket had maintained enforcement of the enrollment freeze, “we’d prefer to guarantee deserving California highschool college students that we’re as dissatisfied as they’re that U.C. has tried to make use of them as pawns in U.C.’s makes an attempt to keep away from mitigating the impacts from the huge enrollment will increase over the previous few years.”

“We have now provided many occasions to settle our case in trade for U.C. Berkeley’s settlement to a legally binding dedication to extend housing earlier than they enhance enrollment,” the group stated in a press release. “We have now been rebuffed each time.”

Phil Bokovoy, the group’s president, stated that since 2005, U.C. Berkeley had admitted 14,000 college students however had offered only one,600 beds. That, he stated, has prompted college students to hunt housing in Berkeley’s neighborhoods, the place they’ve moved into residences that have been as soon as rent-controlled, displacing low-income and middle-income residents.

He stated the housing scarcity had created “a large quantity of homelessness in Berkeley.” The residents’ group stated it was attempting to keep away from a housing disaster just like the one on the College of California, Santa Barbara, the place college students have needed to sleep in vehicles or motels.

Final August, Choose Brad Seligman of the Superior Court docket of Alameda County agreed with the group that the college had “continued to extend and rapidly exceeded” its enrollment projections.

He additionally stated the college couldn’t go ahead with the Higher Hearst Challenge, a plan for brand new housing and tutorial area for college members, postdoctoral researchers and graduate college students.

Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods sued the college in 2019 to cease the mission as a result of it stated the college had not offered sufficient info or assurances about how the mission would alleviate the housing disaster or have an effect on visitors, noise and different environmental issues.

In its assertion on Thursday, Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods stated it agreed with a dissent by Affiliate Justice Goodwin H. Liu of the Supreme Court docket of California, who instructed that the events might interact in negotiations or mediation to settle their dispute.

“Certainly, given the stakes on all sides, it’s laborious to consider a case the place a negotiated settlement appears extra crucial for the nice of the area people and our state,” Justice Liu wrote. He added, “It isn’t too late to discover a resolution that mitigates the area people’s environmental issues with out leaving 3,050 of our younger folks behind.”

College officers stated they weren’t capable of conform to Mr. Bokovoy’s demand for an enrollment cap, partly as a result of enrollment will not be decided by U.C. Berkeley, however by the College of California Board of Regents and the Legislature, which has referred to as on the state’s public universities to just accept extra college students from California.

Mr. Mogulof stated beforehand that the college’s efforts to construct extra housing had additionally been stymied by lawsuits from neighborhood teams, a improvement he described as “ironic.”

Maria Cramer contributed reporting.