Connect with us

Education

U.C. Berkeley Must Freeze Enrollment, California Supreme Court Says

Published

on

It might be tougher to get into one among California’s most prestigious universities after the state’s highest court docket on Thursday declined to reverse a lower-court ruling that capped enrollment on the College of California, Berkeley, at 2020-21 ranges.

The choice by the Supreme Court docket of California left in place a ruling issued final August that ordered the college to freeze scholar enrollment at 42,347.

The choice was the results of a authorized battle with a residents’ group, Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods, that had accused the college of failing to offer sufficient on-campus housing whereas on the similar time admitting excessive numbers of scholars, lots of them from different states or international locations.

College officers stated on Thursday that, on account of a brand new evaluation that concluded that they wanted to incorporate of their head rely tons of of scholars who could be learning overseas or in Washington, the college must reduce in-person enrollment by no less than 2,500 college students within the fall of 2022.

College officers had beforehand stated that U.C. Berkeley, already one of many nation’s most selective establishments, would have 3,050 fewer seats for incoming first-year college students and switch college students than it had deliberate for the autumn of 2022.

Advertisement

Usually, U.C. Berkeley stated, it provides admission to about 21,000 first-year and switch college students, and about 9,500 of them enroll. College officers emphasised that the choice didn’t imply that acceptance letters must be rescinded.

To melt the blow of the enrollment freeze, they stated, no less than 1,500 undergraduates shall be provided one among two choices. One group shall be requested to check as online-only college students within the fall and can then be allowed to attend in individual in January 2023. A second group shall be provided deferred enrollment to start attending in individual in January 2023.

All instructed, officers stated, they may have the ability to scale back the variety of college students who received’t be allowed to enroll in any respect to about 400. However the college nonetheless described these choices as “removed from superb” as a result of they might deny deserving college students “a full, wealthy in-person expertise beginning within the fall when all of their classmates enroll.”

“We nonetheless know that is going to be a really disappointing end result for these 1000’s of scholars, however we’re doing our greatest beneath the phrases of an unprecedented court docket choice,” Dan Mogulof, a college spokesman, stated on Thursday.

College officers stated they have been additionally pursuing state legislative options “that would deal with the numerous impacts of the decrease court docket’s ruling on enrollment choices at U.C. Berkeley and different campuses.”

Advertisement

Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods stated on Thursday that whereas it was happy that the State Supreme Court docket had maintained enforcement of the enrollment freeze, “we’d prefer to guarantee deserving California highschool college students that we’re as dissatisfied as they’re that U.C. has tried to make use of them as pawns in U.C.’s makes an attempt to keep away from mitigating the impacts from the huge enrollment will increase over the previous few years.”

“We have now provided many occasions to settle our case in trade for U.C. Berkeley’s settlement to a legally binding dedication to extend housing earlier than they enhance enrollment,” the group stated in a press release. “We have now been rebuffed each time.”

Phil Bokovoy, the group’s president, stated that since 2005, U.C. Berkeley had admitted 14,000 college students however had offered only one,600 beds. That, he stated, has prompted college students to hunt housing in Berkeley’s neighborhoods, the place they’ve moved into residences that have been as soon as rent-controlled, displacing low-income and middle-income residents.

He stated the housing scarcity had created “a large quantity of homelessness in Berkeley.” The residents’ group stated it was attempting to keep away from a housing disaster just like the one on the College of California, Santa Barbara, the place college students have needed to sleep in vehicles or motels.

Final August, Choose Brad Seligman of the Superior Court docket of Alameda County agreed with the group that the college had “continued to extend and rapidly exceeded” its enrollment projections.

Advertisement

He additionally stated the college couldn’t go ahead with the Higher Hearst Challenge, a plan for brand new housing and tutorial area for college members, postdoctoral researchers and graduate college students.

Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods sued the college in 2019 to cease the mission as a result of it stated the college had not offered sufficient info or assurances about how the mission would alleviate the housing disaster or have an effect on visitors, noise and different environmental issues.

In its assertion on Thursday, Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods stated it agreed with a dissent by Affiliate Justice Goodwin H. Liu of the Supreme Court docket of California, who instructed that the events might interact in negotiations or mediation to settle their dispute.

“Certainly, given the stakes on all sides, it’s laborious to consider a case the place a negotiated settlement appears extra crucial for the nice of the area people and our state,” Justice Liu wrote. He added, “It isn’t too late to discover a resolution that mitigates the area people’s environmental issues with out leaving 3,050 of our younger folks behind.”

College officers stated they weren’t capable of conform to Mr. Bokovoy’s demand for an enrollment cap, partly as a result of enrollment will not be decided by U.C. Berkeley, however by the College of California Board of Regents and the Legislature, which has referred to as on the state’s public universities to just accept extra college students from California.

Advertisement

Mr. Mogulof stated beforehand that the college’s efforts to construct extra housing had additionally been stymied by lawsuits from neighborhood teams, a improvement he described as “ironic.”

Maria Cramer contributed reporting.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Education

Video: Protesters Scuffle With Police During Pomona College Commencement

Published

on

Video: Protesters Scuffle With Police During Pomona College Commencement

new video loaded: Protesters Scuffle With Police During Pomona College Commencement

transcript

transcript

Protesters Scuffle With Police During Pomona College Commencement

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators tried to block access to Pomona College’s graduation ceremony on Sunday.

[chanting in call and response] Not another nickel, not another dime. No more money for Israel’s crime. Resistance is justified when people are occupied.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in U.S.

Continue Reading

Education

Video: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

Published

on

Video: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

new video loaded: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

transcript

transcript

Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

Police officers arrested 33 pro-Palestinian protesters and cleared a tent encampment on the campus of George Washingon University.

“The Metropolitan Police Department. If you are currently on George Washington University property, you are in violation of D.C. Code 22-3302, unlawful entry on property.” “Back up, dude, back up. You’re going to get locked up tonight — back up.” “Free, free Palestine.” “What the [expletive] are you doing?” [expletives] “I can’t stop — [expletives].”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Israel-Hamas War

Continue Reading

Education

How Counterprotesters at U.C.L.A. Provoked Violence, Unchecked for Hours

Published

on

How Counterprotesters at U.C.L.A. Provoked Violence, Unchecked for Hours

A satellite image of the UCLA campus.

On Tuesday night, violence erupted at an encampment that pro-Palestinian protesters had set up on April 25.

The image is annotated to show the extent of the pro-Palestinian encampment, which takes up the width of the plaza between Powell Library and Royce Hall.

Advertisement

The clashes began after counterprotesters tried to dismantle the encampment’s barricade. Pro-Palestinian protesters rushed to rebuild it, and violence ensued.

Arrows denote pro-Israeli counterprotesters moving towards the barricade at the edge of the encampment. Arrows show pro-Palestinian counterprotesters moving up against the same barricade.

Police arrived hours later, but they did not intervene immediately.

Advertisement

An arrow denotes police arriving from the same direction as the counterprotesters and moving towards the barricade.

A New York Times examination of more than 100 videos from clashes at the University of California, Los Angeles, found that violence ebbed and flowed for nearly five hours, mostly with little or no police intervention. The violence had been instigated by dozens of people who are seen in videos counterprotesting the encampment.

Advertisement

The videos showed counterprotesters attacking students in the pro-Palestinian encampment for several hours, including beating them with sticks, using chemical sprays and launching fireworks as weapons. As of Friday, no arrests had been made in connection with the attack.

To build a timeline of the events that night, The Times analyzed two livestreams, along with social media videos captured by journalists and witnesses.

The melee began when a group of counterprotesters started tearing away metal barriers that had been in place to cordon off pro-Palestinian protesters. Hours earlier, U.C.L.A. officials had declared the encampment illegal.

Security personnel hired by the university are seen in yellow vests standing to the side throughout the incident. A university spokesperson declined to comment on the security staff’s response.

Mel Buer/The Real News Network

Advertisement

It is not clear how the counterprotest was organized or what allegiances people committing the violence had. The videos show many of the counterprotesters were wearing pro-Israel slogans on their clothing. Some counterprotesters blared music, including Israel’s national anthem, a Hebrew children’s song and “Harbu Darbu,” an Israeli song about the Israel Defense Forces’ campaign in Gaza.

As counterprotesters tossed away metal barricades, one of them was seen trying to strike a person near the encampment, and another threw a piece of wood into it — some of the first signs of violence.

Attacks on the encampment continued for nearly three hours before police arrived.

Counterprotesters shot fireworks toward the encampment at least six times, according to videos analyzed by The Times. One of them went off inside, causing protesters to scream. Another exploded at the edge of the encampment. One was thrown in the direction of a group of protesters who were carrying an injured person out of the encampment.

Advertisement

Mel Buer/The Real News Network

Some counterprotesters sprayed chemicals both into the encampment and directly at people’s faces.

Sean Beckner-Carmitchel via Reuters

Advertisement

At times, counterprotesters swarmed individuals — sometimes a group descended on a single person. They could be seen punching, kicking and attacking people with makeshift weapons, including sticks, traffic cones and wooden boards.

StringersHub via Associated Press, Sergio Olmos/Calmatters

In one video, protesters sheltering inside the encampment can be heard yelling, “Do not engage! Hold the line!”

In some instances, protesters in the encampment are seen fighting back, using chemical spray on counterprotesters trying to tear down barricades or swiping at them with sticks.

Advertisement

Except for a brief attempt to capture a loudspeaker used by counterprotesters, and water bottles being tossed out of the encampment, none of the videos analyzed by The Times show any clear instance of encampment protesters initiating confrontations with counterprotesters beyond defending the barricades.

Shortly before 1 a.m. — more than two hours after the violence erupted — a spokesperson with the mayor’s office posted a statement that said U.C.L.A officials had called the Los Angeles Police Department for help and they were responding “immediately.”

Officers from a separate law enforcement agency — the California Highway Patrol — began assembling nearby, at about 1:45 a.m. Riot police with the L.A.P.D. joined them a few minutes later. Counterprotesters applauded their arrival, chanting “U.S.A., U.S.A., U.S.A.!”

Just four minutes after the officers arrived, counterprotesters attacked a man standing dozens of feet from the officers.

Twenty minutes after police arrive, a video shows a counterprotester spraying a chemical toward the encampment during a scuffle over a metal barricade. Another counterprotester can be seen punching someone in the head near the encampment after swinging a plank at barricades.

Advertisement

Fifteen minutes later, while those in the encampment chanted “Free, free Palestine,” counterprotesters organized a rush toward the barricades. During the rush, a counterprotester pulls away a metal barricade from a woman, yelling “You stand no chance, old lady.”

Throughout the intermittent violence, officers were captured on video standing about 300 feet away from the area for roughly an hour, without stepping in.

It was not until 2:42 a.m. that officers began to move toward the encampment, after which counterprotesters dispersed and the night’s violence between the two camps mostly subsided.

The L.A.P.D. and the California Highway Patrol did not answer questions from The Times about their responses on Tuesday night, deferring to U.C.L.A.

While declining to answer specific questions, a university spokesperson provided a statement to The Times from Mary Osako, U.C.L.A.’s vice chancellor of strategic communications: “We are carefully examining our security processes from that night and are grateful to U.C. President Michael Drake for also calling for an investigation. We are grateful that the fire department and medical personnel were on the scene that night.”

Advertisement

L.A.P.D. officers were seen putting on protective gear and walking toward the barricade around 2:50 a.m. They stood in between the encampment and the counterprotest group, and the counterprotesters began dispersing.

While police continued to stand outside the encampment, a video filmed at 3:32 a.m. shows a man who was walking away from the scene being attacked by a counterprotester, then dragged and pummeled by others. An editor at the U.C.L.A. student newspaper, the Daily Bruin, told The Times the man was a journalist at the paper, and that they were walking with other student journalists who had been covering the violence. The editor said she had also been punched and sprayed in the eyes with a chemical.

On Wednesday, U.C.L.A.’s chancellor, Gene Block, issued a statement calling the actions by “instigators” who attacked the encampment unacceptable. A spokesperson for California Gov. Gavin Newsom criticized campus law enforcement’s delayed response and said it demands answers.

Los Angeles Jewish and Muslim organizations also condemned the attacks. Hussam Ayloush, the director of the Greater Los Angeles Area office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, called on the California attorney general to investigate the lack of police response. The Jewish Federation Los Angeles blamed U.C.L.A. officials for creating an unsafe environment over months and said the officials had “been systemically slow to respond when law enforcement is desperately needed.”

Fifteen people were reportedly injured in the attack, according to a letter sent by the president of the University of California system to the board of regents.

Advertisement

The night after the attack began, law enforcement warned pro-Palestinian demonstrators to leave the encampment or be arrested. By early Thursday morning, police had dismantled the encampment and arrested more than 200 people from the encampment.

Continue Reading

Trending