Connect with us

Culture

The case for Aaron Judge, Juan Soto as MLB’s greatest offensive duo since Ruth-Gehrig

Published

on

The case for Aaron Judge, Juan Soto as MLB’s greatest offensive duo since Ruth-Gehrig

Sometimes it takes a while before it hits us what we’re watching.

One minute, we’re just doing what we do, tuning into baseball in 2024. The next, it begins to dawn on us. We’re witnessing something special.

Then we ask: Just how special? Next thing we know, we’ve taken a trip back in time, to that place where legends dwell. And that’s where Aaron Judge and Juan Soto have taken us.

It never feels comfortable to do what we’re about to do. But we’re about to do it anyway. As they near the finish line of an astonishing season in the modern-day incarnation of Yankee Stadium, Judge and Soto are connecting the dots to a very different incarnation of Yankee Stadium.

Is it OK to argue this? That we’re watching the 21st-century version of the two most prodigious and productive teammates who ever played baseball? Can we really connect those dots, from Judge and Soto to Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig? I think we can.

Advertisement

They’re not the same — in many ways. I get that. Ruth and Gehrig were all-time behemoths, cranking out seasons we’ll never see again. I get that, too. But am I crazy to make this comp? I don’t think I am. I’m not alone.

“I think you’re on firm ground,” said STATS Perform’s Steve Hirdt, one of baseball’s most prominent and all-knowing historical minds.

“Just the fact that you’re contemplating it might answer your question,” said Buck Showalter, former manager of two New York baseball teams, the Yankees and Mets. “And the fact that it’s so interesting to contemplate is the beauty of baseball. You’ve just described the beauty of baseball — that we can ask those questions and compare guys from different eras.”

We’re about to make that comparison in all sorts of ways. You’ll have fun thinking about it. I promise. But you should also know that not everyone who got dragged into this project agrees with its premise. Of course they don’t.

“Here’s where it’s crazy,” said Bob Costas, whose perspective, as baseball’s foremost broadcaster/historian/poet laureate, was invaluable, even if we didn’t find ourselves in the same lane. “Obviously, Ruth and Gehrig did it together for a sustained period of time. And for Judge and Soto, this is just the first year. It could be the only year. So right there, the whole comparison would break down.”

Advertisement

OK then! But I never went into this under the illusion that one year of historic 2024 domination equals the incomparable nine-season run of Ruth and Gehrig.

I just think we should recognize that what we’ve watched, over these last six months, is the two best offensive seasons, side by side, by any two teammates, in most of our lifetimes. Here’s why.

The thing that separates Judge and Soto


Aaron Judge and Juan Soto have had plenty to celebrate this season. (Wendell Cruz / USA Today / Imagn Images)

I can hear you off in the distance. You have some names for me. You have some thoughts for me. I can guess the names of other famous duos that are swirling in your head.

Roger Maris/Mickey Mantle … Henry Aaron/Eddie Mathews … Willie Mays/Willie McCovey/Orlando Cepeda … Gehrig/Joe DiMaggio … David Ortiz/Manny Ramirez … Johnny Bench/Joe Morgan … Ken Griffey Jr./A-Rod.

There are more. Shout ’em out. Drop them in the comments section. I hear you. I’m open to any and all of them. I can just assure you I checked out every one of these — and lots more.

Advertisement

How Judge and Soto are different from all those great duos? It’s the combination of power and on-base skills that makes them unlike any other set of teammates you can name.

I went way, way back in time. There is no other teammate tag team that has hit this many balls over the fence, done this much extra-base damage, created this many runs, walked this many times, reached base this many times or seen this many pitches … at the same time, in the same season. Other than one pair:

Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig.

Now let’s document that for you. Facts are always good!

The homers/walks daily double

Judge and Soto rank 1-2 in all of baseball in walks. They rank first and third in the American League in homers, with Soto (40) close behind Baltimore’s Anthony Santander (43) for the No. 2 slot after Judge. Home runs and walks often go together in modern baseball. But to have two teammates overpowering the sport in both — together — is probably more rare than you think.

Advertisement

I asked my friends from STATS Perform to dig into this, and lots more, for this piece.

Teammates in top 3 in BB and HR in their league, AL/NL history

 YEAR TEAMMATES

2024 

Judge/Soto

1931

Advertisement

Ruth/Gehrig

1930 

Ruth/Gehrig

1927

Ruth/Gehrig

Advertisement

(Source: STATS Perform)

They’re 1-2 in everything!


Aaron Judge leads the majors in home runs, RBIs, walks, on-base percentage, slugging percentage and OPS. (Wendell Cruz / USA Today / Imagn Images)

OK, Bobby Witt Jr. and Shohei Ohtani also play baseball. So it’s not quite true that Judge and Soto rank first/second in MLB in every category. But it’s close.

Heading into Thursday, the day of The Ohtani Game and also the day Soto banged up his knee, Soto and Judge owned the leaderboard in a set of categories that measure greatness across a wide spectrum of skills.

1st/2nd in MLB in OBP — Ruth and Gehrig did that only once, in 1930.

1st/2nd in MLB in OPS* — Ruth and Gehrig did that three times, in 1927-30-31.

Advertisement

(*Update: Ohtani’s three-homer, five-extra-base-hit, 6-for-6 eruption Thursday blew up the MLB leader lists in many ways. One of those ways was, he moved past Soto to second in MLB in OPS. But Judge and Soto still rank 1-2 in the AL. Now back to our regularly scheduled programming.)

1st/2nd in MLB in times reaching base — Ruth and Gehrig did that four times, in 1927-28-30-31.

1st/2nd in MLB in walks — Ruth and Gehrig did that only once, in 1927.

1st/2nd in MLB in Win Probability Added — Ruth and Gehrig finished 1-2 in that “clutchiness” metric four times, in 1926-27-28-31. No AL teammates have done it since.

I acknowledge that other sets of teammates have finished 1-2 in some of these categories in the years since Ruth and Gehrig. Not many, but it’s happened. STATS did that math for us.

Advertisement

In OBP, there was Mickey Cochrane/Jimmie Foxx for the 1933 A’s, Ken Singleton/Ron Fairly for the 1973 Expos, Wade Boggs/Mike Greenwell for the 1988 Red Sox.

In walks, there was Joey Votto/Shin-Soo Choo for the 2013 Reds, Boggs/Dwight Evans for the 1986 Red Sox and Eddie Stanky/Augie Galan for the 1945 Dodgers.

There’s a slightly longer list, six duos long, in most times reaching base, with Joe Morgan/Pete Rose doing that twice.

But here’s why Judge and Soto belong in an orbit all their own: Because all those other guys showed up only on that list. Whereas Judge and Soto dominate every list. It’s just one more reason they keep pointing us back to Ruth and Gehrig. And guess what? We’re not done!

Production and patience

Have you checked out the bases on balls leaders lately? It’s unreal.

Advertisement

Judge — 129
Soto — 125

After them comes Kyle Schwarber … at 102! And no other player in the majors has more than 78 walks … meaning Judge and Soto both have about a 50-walk lead over the next-most-patient walk-grinders. Really?

Then there’s the RBI leaderboard, which shows Judge leading the league with 138. That’s 26 more than anyone else in the AL. Crazy. You’ll find Soto in the next group, as one of just six other AL hitters over 100, with 104. Now here’s why we mention that.

Teammates in history with 120+ BB and 100+ RBI

Judge/Soto

Advertisement

End of list

But what if we lower the bar to 115 walks for players in the 154-game era? That seems fair. So let’s do that — and only one other duo shows up from that era. Guess who?

Ruth/Gehrig, 1931

The OPS+ standard

Next up, it’s OPS+, Baseball Reference’s definitive metric for evaluating hitters’ seasons across all eras. If we don’t count the 60-game pandemic year, only two sets of teammates have ever had an OPS+ of 177 or better, side by side, over any full season. Yup! Those two:

Judge/Soto, 2024
Ruth/Gehrig, five times

Advertisement

(Source: Baseball Reference / Stathead)

The 600 Times On Base Club

With seven days left in this season, Judge and Soto have reached base a ridiculous 603 times combined — 314 by Judge, 289 by Soto. So welcome to the 600 Times on Base Club. Not surprisingly, that club has slightly fewer members than, say, your high school’s TikTok Club.

TEAMMATES FINISHING 1-2 AND COMBINING FOR 600 TIMES ON BASE*

Ruth/Gehrig, four times
Ted Williams/Johnny Pesky, 1947
Pete Rose/Joe Morgan, 1975
Wade Boggs/Mike Greenwell, 1988

(Source: STATS Perform; *modern era, 1901-2024)

Advertisement

But if Soto reaches base only one more time, he and Judge will do more than merely join this club. They’ll also be the first set of AL teammates to reach base at least 290 times apiece since … (how’d you guess?) Ruth and Gehrig.

Hold on, though. There’s more. Remember that all those visits to the basepaths have been accompanied by many, many baseballs soaring toward the bleacher creatures. So how about this!

TEAMMATES WITH 40+ HR AND 285+ TIMES ON BASE APIECE 

Judge/Soto, 2024
Ruth/Gehrig, three times

The long walks home


Juan Soto has racked up 125 walks, second only to Aaron Judge’s 129, even though he hits in front of the most dangerous hitter in baseball. (Michael Chow / The Arizona Republic / Imagn Images)

OK, just one more. Did you know Ruth and Gehrig never had a season in which they walked 120 times apiece? (Gehrig’s biggest walk years all came — here’s a shocker — when Ruth was gone or hurt.)

Advertisement

But here’s the Ruth/Gehrig walks tidbit that’s even more unfortunate: Because the intentional walk didn’t become an official stat until 1955, we can’t truly know how often Ruth was pitched around with Gehrig lurking behind him.

We know this, though: Nobody is pitching around Soto to get to Judge. Yet, amazingly, Soto still has piled up 125 walks — only one of them intentional. And that puts him in rare territory.

120+ walks, no more than 1 INT BB*

YEAR  HITTER  BB INT BB

2024 

Juan Soto 

Advertisement

125

1

1976

Jim Wynn  

127

Advertisement

1

1960 

Eddie Yost

125

1

Advertisement

1959

Eddie Yost

135

1

 (*Since 1955, when INT BB became an official stat)
(Source: Lee Sinins’ Complete Baseball Encyclopedia)

Advertisement

But Wynn and Yost weren’t hitting in front of anyone remotely similar to Aaron Judge. So that’s what made the one intentional walk Soto was issued — by the White Sox, on Aug. 15 — such massive news. Well, that and the fact that it led to Judge’s 300th career homer about four seconds later.

How often, I wondered, had any other hitter been intentionally walked to get to a man who would lead MLB in homers, RBIs and OPS that season? Baseball Reference’s Katie Sharp took a look.

Before Soto, only one man — in the 70 seasons where intentional walks were an official stat — ever had that happen. That was Will Clark, hitting in front of Kevin Mitchell, for the 1989 Giants. Except Mitchell was so un-Judge-like, it happened 11 times that season.

But what about the years before intentional walks were officially recorded? Baseball Reference and Retrosheet have tried to track them. So when was the last time it happened in that era? Ha. Thanks for asking. It was (who else) …

Babe Ruth … to get to Lou Gehrig … (in the first inning) … on Aug. 12, 1934. (And how’d that work out? The Red Sox got a bases-loaded double play out of it.)

Advertisement

I could do this all day long. But why do I have a feeling you’re catching on to where the numbers take us? So let’s do this another way. Let’s hear from the unlucky American Leaguers who have to face these dudes. Not surprisingly, they have some tales to tell.

What it’s like to manage against them

We begin with the Rays’ Kevin Cash, who got to experience this thrill ride 13 times this season.

“Discipline and damage,” Cash said. “They’re elite at both of them. I mean, Juan Soto is just not going to swing at a pitch that he doesn’t want to swing at. And Judge — anything he swings at has a chance of traveling 400 feet. They’re amazing. What they do is unbelievable.”

What it’s like to game plan against them

For this section, we spoke to an AL executive whose team ran into the Judge and Soto Show recently — and did not enjoy every minute of it.

“I think what’s probably most underappreciated in this,” he said, “is that everybody agrees that Soto is an all-time talent. And he’s having one of the better seasons of his career. And Judge has an OPS 150 points higher than him! It’s something like a 1.150 OPS to 1.000. Which means the difference between Judge and Soto is roughly the difference between Soto and Frankie Lindor (who ranks 22nd).

Advertisement

“So the magnitude of the greatness of Judge makes it impossible to just say, ‘We’ll let somebody else beat us beside Soto.’ Because if you don’t get Soto out — and he never chases, he walks all the time, and he just runs an at-bat in a way that’s so unique to the league. It’s like he’s in control of every pitch, even though he’s the hitter. And that is a really unique thing. It feels like he has the ball when the at-bat starts.

“And knowing that Judge is on deck — and he’s just staring at you, like this cartoonish figure in the on-deck circle who is leading the free world in offense — it makes it really hard. In some ways, it’s like they’re in 1997 playing offense, and everybody else is in 2024.”

What it’s like to pitch to them

Rays starter Ryan Pepiot actually used the word, “fun.” I wasn’t expecting that one. But why the heck not tell yourself what Pepiot tells his inner self — that “it’s a fun test. Every time you go out there to face those guys, you’re facing two of the best in the league, and show if your stuff really does play, right?”

Right! Let’s go with that. Now listen to him describe his most memorable battles with both of these guys, starting with his duel with Judge in a July 9 game in Tampa Bay.

“Judge hammers any fastball you can throw,” Pepiot said. “I think I threw him one fastball in three at-bats, and he absolutely crushed it, 113 miles an hour. It was just a single to right. But as I threw it, I was like, I didn’t get that up enough. … But you don’t realize how tall he is over the box. So that pitch would be up for anybody else. Just with him, it’s hard to get it all the way up there. So I was like: That ball flew past me. By the time I could get my head around, it was already in right field.”

Advertisement

Soto, meanwhile, took Pepiot deep last September, when Pepiot was still a Dodger and Soto was still a Padre. But in July, Pepiot struck out Soto. And just as you’d expect, Pepiot remembered everything about that sequence.

“I got Soto this year, and he ‘shuffled’ me (with the famed Soto Shuffle) on the pitch before,” Pepiot said with a laugh. “But I got him on the next pitch. I threw him a changeup, and he swung through it. But I threw him a heater the pitch before, and he ‘shuffled’ me. Normally, most of the time, you don’t see it. You’re getting the ball back, and you don’t see it. But I saw that one, and I was like: ‘You can’t really do that.’ But he’s done it to me plenty of times.”

What it’s like to manage them

Aaron Boone didn’t quite want to go there. He knows he’s managing two guys who are unlike just about anyone who has ever played baseball together. But the best since Ruth and Gehrig? If that meant Boone was Miller Huggins, the Yankees manager made the clear decision it was time to hedge this bet — but just barely.

“Yeah, I think when you try and put into context their season … it’s a short list of historic great duos,” Boone told The Athletic’s Brandon Kuty last week. “That’s Ruth-Gehrig. That’s Mantle-Maris. That’s (Big) Papi-(Manny) Ramirez. I’m sure there’s others. But I think they’re absolutely right in that conversation. Especially in the hitting environment today — to have two guys that are just, wow.”

So what do you say? I’ve furnished you with all the numbers that got us into this discussion. I’ve delivered direct quotes from the combatants. I even punctuated them with a “wow.” I feel like I proved this case. But have I?

Advertisement

The jury speaks


Case closed? (Wendell Cruz / USA Today / Imagn Images)

I turned to our jury members. They were mostly with me.

Steve Hirdt had only one reservation: “Obviously, I’d have to put Gehrig and Ruth in 1927 above what Judge and Soto have done,” he said … with good reason! But I’m not arguing that this Judge/Soto Show is superior to any Ruth/Gehrig season — only that it’s fair to use the expression: best since … So he’s in.

Cash and the AL executive I spoke with had zero problem with this premise. They didn’t particularly want to compare themselves with Connie Mack, trying to outfox those Yankees behemoths. But they get where I’m going with this.

“In any era that you put these guys in, they would stand out as generationally talented,” the exec said, “both in what they’re doing today and the track record. So when you talk about comparing them with Ruth and Gehrig, you could roll your eyes if it was somebody who was a flash in the pan, that we didn’t know.

“But these guys already have the credentials. They were on Hall of Fame tracks before. And now they’ve converged — to hit second and third for the New York Yankees.”

Advertisement

Bingo. So I only had to convince one holdout — Bob Costas.

I chipped away. I asked: What about the Yankee Factor? How can you not at least compare them when they’re all Yankees? He was good with that comp (mostly).

“Well, the Yankee factor is inevitable,” he conceded, “because it’s still called Yankee Stadium. And the monuments to Ruth and Gehrig are within sight. Judge is standing right in front of them.”

Except there’s a hole in that Yankee Factor argument. And Costas, naturally, didn’t miss it.

“But even though Judge is well on his way,” he said, “to being a truly historic player … it’s very, very difficult to compare anyone’s aura and impact in legend to Ruth, because he reinvented the game.”

Advertisement

Once again, though, I’m not arguing that! Have I said once that Judge is better — or projects a more sweeping aura — than Babe Ruth? Never!

I’d be happy to suggest that Judge is “Ruthian” — especially by 2024 standards. He has reached 60 homers once. He is chasing it again. He wears pinstripes. He’s larger than life. Sounds pretty Ruthian to me. I thought I could sense Costas beginning to come around.

“The very fact,” he said, “that these comparisons come up — that it occurs to us, and that you’ve got the backdrop of Yankee Stadium, the pinstripes, Yankees history, Judge’s standing already. … He’s the comp to Ruth. It may be a bit of a reach for Soto to be the comp to Gehrig. But for one year, this year? Maybe. And if Soto stays and they sustain it, maybe the comparison becomes valid, difficult as it is to compare across the years.”


The Judge-Soto comp with Ruth and Gehrig? Not everyone was completely convinced.  (MPI / Getty Images)

I should have rested my case right there. Oops. Costas kept going — and that didn’t turn out well for my presentation to the jury.

“But what we know for a fact,” he continued, “is that Ruth and Gehrig are firmly set in baseball legend — not because of one year or even two or three years, but because of a sustained run where they defined what it is to have a murderers’ row. …

Advertisement

“So if you look at this as like 1927, (Ruth and Gehrig) are in the midst of a legendary, sustained run — that literally, they are part of baseball lore, to the point where someone who doesn’t follow baseball knows who Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig are. There’s a movie that your grandmother liked about Lou Gehrig and the luckiest-man speech.”

Oh yeah. I know all about it. And with Judge and Soto — all right, I get it. No major motion pictures. Not even a “30 for 30” (yet). They’re not legends. They’re not part of a legendary team. There has been no legendary, sustained run — not by them or a franchise that hasn’t played a World Series game for 15 years. Good points!

However … have I ever tried to argue they were legends? No. Have I ever talked about sustained runs? No! Heck, I conceded many paragraphs ago that I was talking only about what Judge and Soto have done this year. And if we just stick to that one-year stuff, we haven’t seen anything like this since … well, you know.

So ultimately, Costas was willing to nudge himself about half an inch in my direction. I’ll take it.

“I certainly feel comfortable,” he said, “if I were writing the story, with saying they’ve put themselves in the discussion with such legendary duos. And if they sustain this for a few more years, then we’re looking at Ruth/Gehrig territory.”

Advertisement

All right then. Now … I’m resting my case. They’re in the discussion. We’ve had that discussion. And the evidence is overwhelming. I don’t know what the future of Judge and Soto looks like. I just know what 2024 looks like.

I think it looks kind of like two pinstriped mashers from nine decades ago.

Maybe you’re with me. Maybe you’re not. But just think about it — because that, as Buck Showalter said, is the beauty of baseball.

(Top image: Meech Robinson / The Athletic. Ruth and Gehrig: Bettmann / Contributor / Getty Images; Judge and Soto, center: Julio Aguilar / Getty Images; Judge and Soto, right: Rob Tringali / MLB Photos via Getty Images) 

Advertisement

Culture

What Happens When We Die? This Wallace Stevens Poem Has Thoughts.

Published

on

What Happens When We Die? This Wallace Stevens Poem Has Thoughts.

Advertisement

Whatever you do, don’t think of a bird.

Now: What kind of bird are you not thinking about? A pigeon? A bald eagle? Something more poetic, like a skylark or a nightingale? In any case, would you say that this bird you aren’t thinking about is real?

Before you answer, read this poem, which is quite literally about not thinking of a bird.

Advertisement

Human consciousness is full of riddles. Neuroscientists, philosophers and dorm-room stoners argue continually about what it is and whether it even exists. For Wallace Stevens, the experience of having a mind was a perpetual source of wonder, puzzlement and delight — perfectly ordinary and utterly transcendent at the same time. He explored the mysteries and pleasures of consciousness in countless poems over the course of his long poetic career. It was arguably his great theme.

Stevens was born in 1879 and published his first book, “Harmonium,” in 1923, making him something of a late bloomer among American modernists. For much of his adult life, he worked as an executive for the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, rising to the rank of vice president. He viewed insurance less as a day job to support his poetry than as a parallel vocation. He pursued both activities with quiet diligence, spending his days at the office and composing poems in his head as he walked to and from work.

Advertisement

Wallace Stevens in 1950.

Advertisement

Walter Sanders/The LIFE Picture Collection, via Shutterstock

As a young man, Stevens dreamed of traveling to Europe, though he never crossed the Atlantic. In middle age he made regular trips to Florida, and his poems are frequently infused with ideas of Paris and Rome and memories of Key West. Others partake of the stringent beauty of New England. But the landscapes he explores, wintry or tropical, provincial or cosmopolitan, are above all mental landscapes, created by and in the imagination.

Are those worlds real?

Advertisement

Let’s return to the palm tree and its avian inhabitant, in that tranquil Key West sunset of the mind.

Until then, we find consolation in fangles.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Culture

Wil Wheaton Discusses ‘Stand By Me’ and Narrating ‘The Body’ Audiobook

Published

on

Wil Wheaton Discusses ‘Stand By Me’ and Narrating ‘The Body’ Audiobook

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

When the director Rob Reiner cast his leads in the 1986 film “Stand by Me,” he looked for young actors who were as close as possible to the personalities of the four children they’d be playing. There was the wise beyond his years kid from a rough family (River Phoenix), the slightly dim worrywart (Jerry O’Connell), the cutup with a temper (Corey Feldman) and the sensitive, bookish boy.

Advertisement

Wil Wheaton was perfect for that last one, Gordie Lachance, a doe-eyed child who is ignored by his family in favor of his late older brother. Now, 40 years later, he’s traveling the country to attend anniversary screenings of the film, alongside O’Connell and Feldman, which has thrown him back into the turmoil that he felt as an adolescent.

Wheaton has channeled those emotions and his on-set memories into his latest project: narrating a new audiobook version of “The Body,” the 1982 Stephen King novella on which the film was based.

Advertisement

“I like there to be a freshness, a discovery and an immediacy to my narration,” Wheaton said. He recorded “The Body” in his home studio in California. Alex Welsh for The New York Times

A few years ago, Wheaton started to float the idea of returning to the story that gave him his big break — that of a quartet of boys in 1959 Oregon, in their last days before high school, setting out to find a classmate’s dead body. “I’ve been telling the story of ‘Stand By Me’ since I was 12 years old,” he said.

Advertisement

But this time was different. Wheaton, who has narrated dozens of audiobooks, including Andy Weir’s “The Martian” and Ernest Cline’s “Ready Player One,” says he has come to enjoy narration more than screen acting. “I’m safe, I’m in the booth, nobody’s looking at me and I can just tell you a story.”

The fact that he, an older man looking back on his younger years, is narrating a story about an older man looking back on his younger years, is not lost on Wheaton. King’s original story is bathed in nostalgia. Coming to terms with death and loss is one of its primary themes.

Two days after appearing on stage at the Academy Awards as part of a tribute to Reiner — who was murdered in 2025 alongside his wife, Michele — Wheaton got on the phone to talk about recording the audiobook, reliving his favorite scenes from the film and reexamining a quintessential story of childhood loss through the lens of his own.

Advertisement

This interview has been edited and condensed.

“I felt really close to him, and my memory of him.”

Advertisement

Wheaton on channeling a co-star’s performance.

There’s this wonderful scene in “Stand By Me.” Gordie and Chris are walking down the tracks talking about junior high. Chris is telling Gordie, “I wish to hell I was your dad, because I care about you, and he obviously doesn’t.”

Advertisement

It’s just so honest and direct, in a way that kids talk to each other that adults don’t. And I think that one of the reasons that really sticks with people, and that piece really lands on a lot of audiences, and has for 40 years, is, just too many people have been Gordie in that scene.

That scene is virtually word for word taken from the text of the book. And when I was narrating that, I made a deliberate choice to do my best to recreate what River did in that scene.

“The Body” Read by Wil Wheaton

Advertisement

“You’re just a kid,

Gordie–”

Advertisement

“I wish to fuck

I was your father!”

he said angrily.

“You wouldn’t go around

talking about takin those stupid shop courses

Advertisement

if I was!

It’s like

God gave you something,

all those stories

you can make up,

Advertisement

and He said:

This is what we got for you, kid.

Try not to lose it.

But kids lose everything

unless somebody looks out for them

Advertisement

and if your folks

are too fucked up to do it

then maybe I ought to.”

I watched that scene a couple of times because I really wanted — I don’t know why it was so important to me to — well, I know: because I loved him, and I miss him. And I wanted to bring him into this as best as I could, right?

Advertisement

So I was reading that scene, and the words are identical to the script. And I had this very powerful flashback to being on the train tracks that day in Cottage Grove, Oregon. And I could see River standing next to them. They’re shooting my side of the scene and there’s River, right next to the camera, doing his off-camera dialogue, and there’s the sound guy, and there’s the boom operator. There’s my key light.

I could hear and feel it. It was the weirdest thing. It’s like I was right back there.

Advertisement

I was able to really take in the emotional memory of being Gordie in all of those scenes. So when I was narrating him and I’m me and I’m old with all of this experience, I just drew on what I remembered from being that little boy and what I remember of those friendships and what they meant to me and what they mean to me today.

“Rob gave me a gift. Rob gave me a career.”

Advertisement

Wheaton recalls the “Stand By Me” director’s way with kids on set, as well as his recent Oscars tribute.

Rob really encouraged us to be kids.

Jerry tells the most amazing story about that scene, where we were all sitting around, and doing our bit, and he improvised. He was just goofing around — we were just playing — and he said something about spitting water at the fat kid.

Advertisement

We get to the end of the scene, and he hears Rob. Rob comes around from behind the thing, and he goes, “Jerry!” And Jerry thinks, “Oh no, I’m in trouble. I’m in trouble because I improvised, and I’m not supposed to improvise.”

The context for Jerry is that he had been told by the adults in his life, “Sit on your hands and shut up. Stop trying to be a cutup. Stop trying to be funny. Stop disrupting people. Just be quiet.” And Jerry thinks, “Oh my God. I didn’t shut up. I’m in trouble. I’m gonna get fired.”

Advertisement

Rob leans in to all of us, and Rob says, “Hey, guys, do you see that? More of that. Do that!”

Rob Reiner in 1985, directing the child actors of “Stand By Me,” including Wil Wheaton, at left. Columbia/Kobal, via Shutterstock

Advertisement

The whole time when you’re a kid actor, you’re just around all these adults who are constantly telling you to grow up. They’re mad that you’re being a kid. Rob just created an environment where not only was it supported that we would be kids — and have fun, and follow those kid instincts and do what was natural — it was expected. It was encouraged. We were supposed to do it.

“The Body” Read by Wil Wheaton

Advertisement

They chanted together:

“I don’t shut up,

I grow up.

And when I look at you

Advertisement

I throw up.”

“Then your mother goes around the corner

and licks it up,”

I said,

Advertisement

and hauled ass out of there,

giving them the finger over my shoulder as I went.

I never had any friends later on

like the ones I had when I was twelve.

Jesus,

Advertisement

did you?

When we were at the Oscars, I looked at Jerry. And we looked at this remarkable assemblage of the most amazingly talented, beautiful artists and storytellers. We looked around, and Jerry leans down, and he said, “We all got our start with Rob Reiner. He trusted every single one of us.”

Advertisement

Jerry O’Connell and Wheaton joined more than a dozen actors from Reiner’s films to honor the slain director at the Academy Awards on March 15, 2026. Kevin Winter/Getty Images

And to stand there for him, when I really thought that I would be standing with him to talk about this stuff — it was a lot.

Advertisement

“I was really really really excited — like jumping up and down.”

The scene Wheaton was most looking forward to narrating: the tale of Lard Ass Hogan.

Advertisement

I was so excited to narrate it. It’s a great story! It’s a funny story. It’s such a lovely break — it’s an emotional and tonal shift from what’s happening in the movie.

I know this as a writer: You work to increase and release tension throughout a narrative, and Stephen King uses humor really effectively to release that tension. But it also raises the stakes, because we have these moments of joy and these moments of things being very silly in the midst of a lot of intensity. ​​

That’s why the story of Lard Ass Hogan is so fun for me to tell. Because in the middle of that, we stop to do something that’s very, very fun, and very silly and very celebratory.

Advertisement

“The Body” Read by Wil Wheaton

“Will you shut up

Advertisement

and let him tell it?”

Teddy hollered.

Vern blinked.

“Sure.

Advertisement

Yeah.

Okay.”

“Go on, Gordie,”

Chris said.

Advertisement

“It’s not really much—”

“Naw,

we don’t expect much

Advertisement

from a wet end like you,”

Teddy said,

“but tell it anyway.”

I cleared my throat.

Advertisement

“So anyway.

It’s Pioneer Days,

and on the last night

they have these three big events.

There’s an egg-roll for the little kids

Advertisement

and a sack-race for kids that are like eight or nine,

and then there’s the pie-eating contest.

And the main guy of the story

is this fat kid nobody likes

named Davie Hogan.”

Advertisement

When I narrate this story — whenever there is a moment of levity or humor, whenever there are those brief little moments that are the seasoning of the meal that makes it all so real and relatable — yes, it was very important to me to capture those moments.

I’m shifting in my chair, so I can feel each of those characters. It’s something that doesn’t exist in live action. It doesn’t exist in any other media.

Advertisement

“I feel the loss.”

Wheaton remembers River Phoenix.

Advertisement

The novella “The Body” is very much about Gordie remembering Chris. It’s darker, and it’s more painful, than the movie is.

I’ve been watching the movie on this tour and seeing River a lot. I remember him as a 14- and 15-year-old kid who just seemed so much older, and so much more experienced and so much wiser than me, and I’m only a year younger than him.

What hurts me now, and what I really felt when I was narrating this, is knowing what River was going through then. We didn’t know. I still don’t know the extent of how he was mistreated, but I know that he was. I know that adults failed him. That he should have been protected in every way that matters. And he just wasn’t.

Advertisement

And I, like Gordie, remember a boy who was loving. So loving, and generous and cared deeply about everyone around him, all the time. Who deserved to live a full life. Who had so much to offer the world. And it’s so unfair that he’s gone and taken from us. I had to go through a decades-long grieving process to come to terms with him dying.

“The Body” Read by Wil Wheaton

Advertisement

Near the end

of 1971,

Chris

went into a Chicken Delight

Advertisement

in Portland

to get a three-piece Snack Bucket.

Just ahead of him,

two men started arguing

about which one had been first in line.

Advertisement

One of them pulled a knife.

Chris,

who had always been the best of us

at making peace,

stepped between them

Advertisement

and was stabbed in the throat.

The man with the knife had spent time in four different institutions;

he had been released from Shawshank State Prison

only the week before.

Chris died almost instantly.

Advertisement

It is a privilege that I was allowed to tell this story. I get to tell Gordie Lachance’s story as originally imagined by Stephen King, with all of the experience of having lived my whole adult life with the memory of spending three months in Gordie Lachance’s skin.

Continue Reading

Culture

Do You Know the Comics That Inspired These TV Adventures?

Published

on

Do You Know the Comics That Inspired These TV Adventures?

Welcome to Great Adaptations, the Book Review’s regular multiple-choice quiz about printed works that have gone on to find new life as movies, television shows, theatrical productions and more. This week’s challenge highlights offbeat television shows that began as comic books. Just tap or click your answers to the five questions below. And scroll down after you finish the last question for links to the comics and their screen versions.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending