Connect with us

Crypto

Billionaires Are Deciding to Sell This Popular Cryptocurrency | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Billionaires Are Deciding to Sell This Popular Cryptocurrency | The Motley Fool

The new spot Ethereum ETFs are having trouble gaining traction. Should you be concerned?

The good news for Ethereum (ETH 1.77%) investors is that the world’s second-most-popular cryptocurrency is still up a modest 6% for the year. The bad news, though, is that the price of Ethereum is down nearly 25% over the past three months. Moreover, Ethereum is significantly underperforming Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC), which is up 50% for the year.

As a result, billionaire fund managers appear to be selling off their positions in Ethereum, signaling that a recovery may not be happening anytime soon. So if billionaires are deciding to sell this popular cryptocurrency, should you?

The spot Ethereum ETFs

The key catalyst for Ethereum was supposed to be the launch of the new spot Ethereum ETFs at the end of July. Just as the launch of the new Bitcoin ETFs in January led to a surge in the price of Bitcoin at the beginning of the year, the new Ethereum ETFs were supposed to lead to a surge in the price of Ethereum over the final months of the year.

In fact, some analysts thought that as much as $4.8 billion could flow into these ETFs by the end of the year. But these types of inflows simply have not materialized. For example, the two largest of the new spot Ethereum ETFs — the iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA 4.19%) and the Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH 4.10%) — have collectively brought in just $1.5 billion in new money.

Advertisement

That’s well off the pace required to hit the target goal, with just over two months to go until the end of the year. While it’s too early to say that the new spot Ethereum ETFs have been a disappointment, that seems to be the growing consensus.

Investor outflows out of Ethereum

The spot Ethereum ETFs are still too new for there to be a complete list of institutions buying them, but some preliminary 13F data from the SEC is starting to trickle in. And there just doesn’t seem to be a lot of robust buying from billionaire fund managers. Of the nearly 25 institutions that have reported buying the new ETFs as of Oct. 4, only two have made purchases of $1 million or more.

Image source: Getty Images.

In fact, the big story over the past two months has been the extent of investor outflows from the new spot Ethereum ETFs. That made sense in August, when the crypto market experienced a “flash crash” and investors panicked. But we shouldn’t still be seeing outflows in October. 

But that’s exactly what appears to be happening. On Oct. 1, for example, the Fidelity Ethereum Fund saw nearly $25 million in outflows, its highest daily total ever. Some crypto traders have even suggested that Ethereum might fall 10%-15% lower if these investor outflows don’t stop.

Advertisement

And if you look at numbers from CoinShares, which tracks institutional buying of different cryptocurrencies, the picture appears to be much the same. Every week, CoinShares puts out a digital assets report, showing flows into and out of popular cryptocurrencies, based on the holdings of large institutional investors. And in six of the past seven weeks, there have been net outflows for Ethereum. During one week in September, for example, nearly $100 million flowed out of Ethereum.

Why are billionaires selling?

So why are billionaire investors deciding to sell Ethereum? The easiest answer is that these investors simply don’t see the same upside potential with Ethereum that they see with Bitcoin.

Another answer could be that these investors do not see the same diversification benefits with Ethereum. Once you hold Bitcoin in your portfolio, do you really need to hold Ethereum to get exposure to the crypto asset class?

Moreover, Bitcoin is seen as a potential “risk off” asset, giving investors a potential hedge against inflation and economic downturn. In contrast, Ethereum is seen as primarily a “risk on” asset. As long as investors have serious concerns about the future direction of the U.S. economy, Ethereum may have a hard time gaining any traction.

Should you buy Ethereum?

If the smart money is deciding to sell Ethereum, you should obviously take notice, especially given that investor inflows into other cryptocurrencies appear to be recovering. Bitcoin inflows seem to be on the mend, as are those of Solana (CRYPTO: SOL), the leading Ethereum competitor.

Advertisement

At the end of the day, it comes down to whether you are buying for the short term or the long term. If your investment horizon is 12 months or less, it probably makes sense to pump the brakes on Ethereum. But if it’s much longer, there’s still a case to be made for buying Ethereum, which remains a best-in-class cryptocurrency with a stellar track record of delivering massive returns to investors.

Dominic Basulto has positions in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

Residents question proposed crypto mining center

Published

on

Residents question proposed crypto mining center

STARKVILLE – Potentially higher utility bills and sound pollution topped the list of concerns raised by six residents who addressed the board of aldermen Tuesday about a cryptocurrency mining facility proposed for Industrial Park Road.

Vice Mayor Roy Perkins, who represents Ward 6, said he has fielded similar concerns from constituents following the board’s June 12 work session, during which members heard a presentation about the potential project.

“I know these things need to have full accountability, full transparency and different things,” Perkins said. “… Well you can rest assured the vice mayor is going to be on assignment. I’m going to do my part. I’m not going to do anything that’s going to negatively impact this community.”

The proposed facility would be a specialized type of data center designed to mine cryptocurrency, a digital currency that operates independently of government-backed financial systems. It is stored in digital wallets and fluctuates in value.

Advertisement

Mining facilities use specialized computers that draw large energy loads to secure the digital transactions that take place. The center proposed in Starkville would be much smaller than “hyperscale data centers” that store and process data for large tech companies.

Utility usage topped the concerns of most residents with Pam Jones, the first to speak, set the tone.

“I understand that this is on a smaller scale than the hyper-scale facilities, and I just wanted to be sure that we had ordinances in place that will count the noise, especially at night and that there will be water and power management,” Jones said.

Other residents took issue with what they see as a lack of transparency around the proposed project.

“I was quite disappointed to learn (the mining facility) was not an agenda item today,” said Eadie Keenan, a Ward 7 resident. “… Quite frankly, I have more questions than can fit in three minutes.”

Advertisement

Tiffany Womack, another Starkville resident, echoed Kennan’s concerns, adding utility usage and market volatility to her own list of issues.

“If (the center was) to go bankrupt or something like that, would that possibly fall back on the responsibility of Starkville citizens?” Womack asked.

Mayor Lynn Spruill did not answer each question individually, instead encouraging those with questions to watch the June 12 presentation. Due to the project’s early stage, she noted the board does not yet know answers to all the questions raised during Tuesday’s meeting.

“I brought (the center) to the board as an opportunity for us to begin that process of learning so we are nowhere near making a decision,” Spruill said. “Which is why it isn’t on the agenda and won’t be on the agenda for some time.”

Spruill said the proposed center is currently going through the staff vetting process. Once the process is complete, staff will make a recommendation to the board on whether to pursue the center. At that time, Spruill expects to be able to answer residents’ remaining questions.

Advertisement

Spruill said transparency is important to her and the board while going through the process of vetting the mining center.

“Nothing is being hidden. It’s all out there for everybody to see, and we’ll make decisions based on facts not on Facebook craziness,” Spruill said. “… We want facts, and we want all decisions to be made with facts. And so hopefully that will put some of your concerns (to rest), at least to the extent that this is nowhere near something that will be on the agenda.”

Quality, in-depth journalism is essential to a healthy community. The Dispatch brings you the most complete reporting and insightful commentary in the Golden Triangle, but we need your help to continue our efforts. In the past week, our reporters have posted 24 articles to cdispatch.com. Please consider subscribing to our website for only $2.30 per week to help support local journalism and our community.

Advertisement

Quality, in-depth journalism is essential to a healthy community. The Dispatch brings you the most complete reporting and insightful commentary in the Golden Triangle, but we need your help to continue our efforts. In the past week, our reporters have posted 24 articles to cdispatch.com. Please consider subscribing to our website for only $2.30 per week to help support local journalism and our community.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Jim Rickards Asked Robert Kiyosaki to Read One Manuscript, Then His View of Global Finance Changed

Published

on

Jim Rickards Asked Robert Kiyosaki to Read One Manuscript, Then His View of Global Finance Changed

Key Takeaways

Why Did One Manuscript Change Robert Kiyosaki’s View?

Robert Kiyosaki, the author of the best-selling personal finance book Rich Dad Poor Dad, said an advance manuscript of “The Entropy Trap” shared by Jim Rickards prompted him to rethink how he views global finance. Rickards is an economist, lawyer, and financial commentator known for writing about currencies, debt, and systemic market risk. Kiyosaki said the early reading changed his perspective on where the financial system may be headed.

The reaction was framed around a warning about financial change. The book, written by Mickey M. Maini, “blew my mind and opened my eyes to what & why global financial change is coming,” Kiyosaki described. His comments focused on what he described as a shift in the rules behind wealth, assets, and trust.

The central claim is that wealth could move away from people relying on traditional financial assumptions. Kiyosaki asserted:

“The informed will be tomorrow’s ULTRA RICH. Todays uniformed operating by the old rules of money… will become the new poor.”

The Warning Behind the Claim

The warning centers on assets that depend on trust, including U.S. bonds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and mutual funds. Kiyosaki framed those instruments as vulnerable under the financial shift he says is coming, placing commonly held investment products at the center of the risk.

That claim is severe, but he presented it as a warning rather than a proven outcome. He also pointed to large bondholders, including Japan, saying they have already started dumping U.S. bonds. He did not provide supporting data in the statement.

The acclaimed author shared:

Advertisement

“Message from book… ‘All assets that require trust, assets that most people have… such as U.S. bonds, ETFs, mutual funds will be flushed down toilets, all over the world.’”

The broader conflict is whether traditional financial assets remain reliable under the conditions Kiyosaki described. His framing divides investors between those preparing for a changed financial system and those still operating under assumptions he says may no longer hold.

What Still Needs to Be Proven

A planned August study session could clarify the warning Kiyosaki described. He said his study team would examine the message and that Rickards may join, though the evidence behind the claims has not yet been laid out.

For now, the warning rests on Kiyosaki’s account of a manuscript that changed his view. He urged readers to prepare, writing:

“I want you to be one of the world’s new rich.”

What remains unknown is whether market data, policy moves, or investor behavior will confirm the risk he described.

His recent commentary has focused on what he describes as fragility in the global monetary system, particularly around the U.S. dollar. He has pointed to rising debt, central bank policies, and inflation as risks that could trigger a sharp market downturn.

Advertisement

Alongside those concerns, he has repeatedly highlighted bitcoin, gold, and silver as alternative stores of value. In his view, those assets may help reduce exposure to traditional financial instruments during periods of currency weakness and market turbulence.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Strategy Is No Longer Just Going to “Inoculate the Market,” Selling Crypto May Be Much More Common. Here’s What That Could Mean for the Stock | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Strategy Is No Longer Just Going to “Inoculate the Market,” Selling Crypto May Be Much More Common. Here’s What That Could Mean for the Stock | The Motley Fool

When Strategy (MSTR 0.69%) sold a modest amount of Bitcoin earlier this year, it was a noteworthy development given that the company’s business has centered around buying up as much of the cryptocurrency as it can, and vowing to never sell. And it often boasts of being the largest corporate holder of the digital currency.

The company brushed off the sale of 32 Bitcoins, with management saying it simply wanted to “inoculate the market.” Well, now it appears that Strategy is doing much more than just that, and there could be more significant cryptocurrency sales in the future.

Image source: Getty Images.

Strategy unveils a Bitcoin monetization program

On June 29, Strategy released a framework going forward that it says will “enhance liquidity, preserve long-term Bitcoin exposure, and support long-term value creation for shareholders.” Among the notable components is its Bitcoin monetization program.

Within that program, the company says it may sell some of its cryptocurrency holdings for multiple reasons, including to fund a USD reserve, fund dividends or interest expense, or to fund repurchases of digital credit securities or common stock.

Advertisement

While the company says it remains committed to Bitcoin for the long term and it’s the company’s “primary treasury reserve asset,” it’s a significant change of course for Strategy, which was previously heavily against ever selling the digital asset.

Strategy Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-0.69%) $-0.69

Current Price

$100.08

The stock is as risky and volatile as ever

Whether or not Strategy buys or sells Bitcoin doesn’t change the fact that this is a highly risky and speculative stock to own. While crypto fans may be disappointed in the company’s change in strategy, selling Bitcoin will likely not be enough to make the business any better or worse as an investment.

In just the past 12 months, the stock has plummeted a whopping 75% as volatility in digital assets has drastically weighed on its earnings, with the company incurring $12.8 billion in losses over the trailing 12 months, on revenue of $490 million.

That’s not likely to change significantly, even if Strategy offloads some of its crypto holdings, because with such a large exposure to Bitcoin, how the cryptocurrency performs will inevitably impact the company’s bottom line in a big way. This year, the leading cryptocurrency is down 28% as investor excitement around it has largely cooled off, which has proven disastrous for Strategy’s stock as well. And at this stage, there’s little reason to anticipate a recovery anytime soon.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending