Technology
Microsoft crosses privacy line few expected
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
For years, we’ve been told that encryption is the gold standard for digital privacy. If data is encrypted, it is supposed to be locked away from hackers, companies and governments alike. That assumption just took a hit.
In a federal investigation tied to alleged COVID-19 unemployment fraud in Guam, a U.S. territory where federal law applies, Microsoft confirmed it provided law enforcement with BitLocker recovery keys. Those keys allowed investigators to unlock encrypted data on multiple laptops.
This is one of the clearest public examples to date of Microsoft providing BitLocker recovery keys to authorities as part of a criminal investigation. While the warrant itself may have been lawful, the implications stretch far beyond one investigation. For everyday Americans, this is a clear signal that “encrypted” does not always mean “inaccessible.”
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.
HACKERS ABUSE GOOGLE CLOUD TO SEND TRUSTED PHISHING EMAILS
In the Guam investigation, Microsoft provided BitLocker recovery keys that allowed law enforcement to unlock encrypted laptops. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
What happened in the Guam BitLocker case?
Federal investigators believed three Windows laptops held evidence tied to an alleged scheme involving pandemic unemployment funds. The devices were protected with BitLocker, Microsoft’s built-in disk encryption tool enabled by default on many modern Windows PCs. BitLocker works by scrambling all data on a hard drive so it cannot be read without a recovery key.
Users can store that key themselves, but Microsoft also encourages backing it up to a Microsoft account for convenience. In this case, that convenience mattered. When served with a valid search warrant, Microsoft provided the recovery keys to investigators. That allowed full access to the data stored on the devices. Microsoft says it receives roughly 20 such requests per year and can only comply when users have chosen to store their keys in the cloud.
We reached out to Microsoft for comment, but did not hear back before our deadline.
How Microsoft was able to unlock encrypted data
According to John Ackerly, CEO and co-founder of Virtru and a former White House technology advisor, the problem is not encryption itself. The real issue is who controls the keys. He begins by explaining how convenience can quietly shift control. “Microsoft commonly recommends that users back up BitLocker recovery keys to a Microsoft account for convenience. That choice means Microsoft may retain the technical ability to unlock a customer’s device. When a third party holds both encrypted data and the keys required to decrypt it, control is no longer exclusive.”
Once a provider has the ability to unlock data, that power rarely stays theoretical. “When systems are built so that providers can be compelled to unlock customer data, lawful access becomes a standing feature. It is important to remember that encryption does not distinguish between authorized and unauthorized access. Any system designed to be unlocked on demand will eventually be unlocked by unintended parties.”
Ackerly then points out that this outcome is not inevitable. Other companies have made different architectural choices. “Other large technology companies have demonstrated that a different approach is possible. Apple has designed systems that limit its own ability to access customer data, even when doing so would ease compliance with government demands. Google offers client-side encryption models that allow users to retain exclusive control of encryption keys. These companies still comply with the law, but when they do not hold the keys, they cannot unlock the data. That is not obstruction. It is a design choice.”
Finally, he argues that Microsoft still has room to change course. “Microsoft has an opportunity to address this by making customer-controlled keys the default and by designing recovery mechanisms that do not place decryption authority in Microsoft’s hands. True personal data sovereignty requires systems that make compelled access technically impossible, not merely contractually discouraged.”
In short, Microsoft could comply because it had the technical ability to do so. That single design decision is what turned encrypted data into accessible data.
“With BitLocker, customers can choose to store their encryption keys locally, in a location inaccessible to Microsoft, or in Microsoft’s consumer cloud services,” a Microsoft spokesperson told CyberGuy in a statement. “We recognize that some customers prefer Microsoft’s cloud storage, so we can help recover their encryption key if needed. While key recovery offers convenience, it also carries a risk of unwanted access, so Microsoft believes customers are in the best position to decide whether to use key escrow and how to manage their keys.”
WHY CLICKING THE WRONG COPILOT LINK COULD PUT YOUR DATA AT RISK
When companies hold encryption keys, lawful requests can unlock far more data than most people expect. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
Why this matters for data privacy
This case has reignited a long-running debate over lawful access versus systemic risk. Ackerly warns that centralized control has a long and troubling history. “We have seen the consequences of this design pattern for more than two decades. From the Equifax breach, which exposed the financial identities of nearly half the U.S. population, to repeated leaks of sensitive communications and health data during the COVID era, the pattern is consistent: centralized systems that retain control over customer data become systemic points of failure. These incidents are not anomalies. They reflect a persistent architectural flaw.”
When companies hold the keys, they become targets. That includes hackers, foreign governments and legal demands from agencies like the FBI. Once a capability exists, it rarely goes unused.
How other tech giants handle encryption differently
Apple has designed systems, such as Advanced Data Protection, where it cannot access certain encrypted user data even when served with government requests. Google offers client-side encryption for some services, primarily in enterprise environments, where encryption keys remain under the customer’s control. These companies still comply with the law, but in those cases, they do not possess the technical means to unlock the data. That distinction matters. As encryption experts often note, you cannot hand over what you do not have.
What we can do to protect our privacy
The good news is that personal privacy is not gone. The bad news is that it now requires intention. Small choices matter more than most people realize. Ackerly says the starting point is understanding control. “The main takeaway for everyday users is simple: if you don’t control your encryption keys, you don’t fully control your data.”
That control begins with knowing where your keys are stored. “The first step is understanding where your encryption keys live. If they’re stored in the cloud with your provider, your data can be accessed without your knowledge.”
Once keys live outside your control, access becomes possible without your consent. That is why the way data is encrypted matters just as much as whether it is encrypted. “Consumers should look for tools and services that encrypt data before it reaches the cloud — that way, it is impossible for your provider to hand over your data. They don’t have the keys.” Defaults are another hidden risk. Many people never change them. “Users should also look to avoid default settings designed for convenience. Default settings matter, and when convenience is the default, most individuals will unknowingly trade control for ease of use.”
When encryption is designed so that even the provider cannot access the data, the balance shifts back to the individual. “When data is encrypted in a way that even the provider can’t access, it stays private — even if a third party comes asking. By holding your own encryption keys, you’re eliminating the possibility of the provider sharing your data.” Ackerly says the lesson is simple but often ignored. “The lesson is straightforward: you cannot outsource responsibility for your sensitive data and assume that third parties will always act in your best interest. Encryption only fulfills its purpose when the data owner is the sole party capable of unlocking it.” Privacy still exists. It just no longer comes by default.
700CREDIT DATA BREACH EXPOSES SSNS OF 5.8M CONSUMERS
Reviewing default security and backup settings can help you keep control of your private data. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
Practical steps you can take today
You do not need to be a security expert to protect your data. A few practical checks can go a long way.
1) Start by checking where your encryption keys live
Many people do not realize that their devices quietly back up recovery keys to the cloud. On a Windows PC, sign in to your Microsoft account and look under device security or recovery key settings. Seeing a BitLocker recovery key listed online means it is stored with Microsoft.
For other encrypted services, such as Apple iCloud backups or Google Drive, open your account security dashboard and review encryption or recovery options. Focus on settings tied to recovery keys, backup encryption, or account-based access. When those keys are linked to an online account, your provider may be able to access them. The goal is simple. Know whether your keys live with you or with a company.
2) Avoid cloud-based key backups unless you truly need them
Cloud backups are designed for convenience, not privacy. If possible, store recovery keys offline. That can mean saving them to a USB drive, printing them and storing them in a safe place, or using encrypted hardware you control. The exact method matters less than who has access. If a company does not have your keys, it cannot be forced to turn them over.
3) Choose services that encrypt data before it reaches the cloud
Not all encryption works the same way, even if companies use similar language. Look for services that advertise end-to-end or client-side encryption, such as Signal for messages, or Apple’s Advanced Data Protection option for iCloud backups. These services encrypt your data on your device before it is uploaded, which means the provider cannot read it or unlock it later. Here is a simple rule of thumb. If a service can reset your password and restore all your data without your involvement, it likely holds the encryption keys. That also means it could be forced to hand over access. When encryption happens on your device first, providers cannot unlock your data because they never had the keys to begin with. That design choice blocks third-party access by default.
4) Review default security settings on every new device
Default settings usually favor convenience. That can mean easier recovery, faster syncing and weaker privacy. Take five minutes after setup and lock down the basics.
iPhone: tighten iCloud and account recovery
Turn on Advanced Data Protection for iCloud (strongest iCloud protection)
- Open Settings
- Tap your name
- Tap iCloud
- Scroll down and tap Advanced Data Protection
- Tap Turn On Advanced Data Protection
- Follow the prompts to set up Account Recovery options, like a Recovery Contact or Recovery Key
Review iCloud Backup
- Open Settings
- Tap your name
- Tap iCloud
- Tap iCloud Backup
- Decide if you want it on or off, based on your privacy comfort level
Strengthen your Apple ID security
- Open Settings
- Tap your name
- Tap Sign-In & Security
- Make sure Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) is turned on and review trusted phone numbers and devices
- Review trusted phone numbers and devices
Android: lock your Google account and backups
Review and control device backup
Settings may vary depending on your Android phone’s manufacturer.
- Open Settings
- Tap Google
- Tap Backup (or All services then Backup)
- Tap Manage backup
- Choose what backs up and confirm which Google account stores it
NEW ANDROID MALWARE CAN EMPTY YOUR BANK ACCOUNT IN SECONDS
Strengthen your screen lock, since it protects the device itself
Settings may vary depending on your Android phone’s manufacturer.
- Open Settings
- Tap Security or Security & privacy
- Set a strong PIN or password
- Turn on biometrics if you want, but keep the PIN strong either way
Secure your Google account
Settings may vary depending on your Android phone’s manufacturer.
- Open Settings
- Tap Google
- Tap Manage your Google Account
- Go to Security
- Turn on 2-Step Verification and review recent security activity
Mac: enable FileVault and review iCloud settings
Turn on FileVault disk encryption
- Click the Apple menu
- Select System Settings
- Click Privacy & Security
- Scroll down and click FileVault
- Click Turn On
- Save your recovery method securely
Review iCloud syncing
- Open System Settings
- Click your name
- Click iCloud
- Review what apps and data types sync
- Turn off anything you do not want stored in the cloud
Windows PC: check BitLocker and where the recovery key is stored
Confirm BitLocker status and settings
- Open Settings
- Go to Privacy & security
- Tap Device encryption or BitLocker (wording varies by device)
Check whether your BitLocker recovery key is stored in your Microsoft account
- Go to your Microsoft account page
- Open Devices
- Select your PC
- Look for Manage recovery keys or a BitLocker recovery key entry
- If you see a key listed online, it means the key is stored with Microsoft. That is why Microsoft was able to provide keys in the Guam case.
If your account can recover everything with a few clicks, a third party might be able to recover it too. Convenience can be helpful, but it can also widen access.
5) Treat convenience features as privacy tradeoffs
Every shortcut comes with a cost. Before enabling a feature that promises easy recovery or quick access, pause and ask one question. If I lose control of this account, who else gains access? If the answer includes a company or third party, decide whether the convenience is worth it.
These steps are not extreme or technical. They are everyday habits. In a world where lawful access can quietly become routine access, small choices now can protect your privacy later.
Strengthen protection beyond encryption
Encryption controls who can access your data, but it does not stop every real-world threat. Once data is exposed, different protections matter.
Strong antivirus software adds device-level protection
Strong antivirus software helps block malware, spyware and credential-stealing attacks that can bypass privacy settings altogether. Even encrypted devices are vulnerable if malicious software gains control before encryption comes into play.
The best way to safeguard yourself from malicious links that install malware, potentially accessing your private information, is to have strong antivirus software installed on all your devices. This protection can also alert you to phishing emails and ransomware scams, keeping your personal information and digital assets safe.
Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android and iOS devices at Cyberguy.com
An identity theft protection service helps when exposure turns into fraud
If personal data is accessed, sold, or misused, identity protection services can monitor for suspicious activity, alert you early and help lock down accounts before damage spreads. Identity Theft companies can monitor personal information like your Social Security Number (SSN), phone number and email address, and alert you if it is being sold on the dark web or being used to open an account. They can also assist you in freezing your bank and credit card accounts to prevent further unauthorized use by criminals.
See my tips and best picks on how to protect yourself from identity theft at Cyberguy.com.
Kurt’s key takeaways
Microsoft’s decision to comply with the BitLocker warrant may have been legal. That doesn’t make it harmless. This case exposes a hard truth about modern encryption. Privacy depends less on the math and more on how systems are built. When companies hold the keys, the risk falls on the rest of us.
Do you trust tech companies to protect your encrypted data, or do you think that responsibility should fall entirely on you? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Technology
YouTube’s mobile app finally lets you share timestamped videos
YouTube is making some changes that might affect how you share videos from the mobile app. From the app, you can finally share videos from a specific timestamp, which will make it easier to point someone to a part of a video you might want them to see while you’re on your phone. However, this change will replace the Clips feature that lets you make a shareable clip from a video.
You’ll still be able to watch any Clips that you’ve already made. But moving forward, “the ability to set an end time or include a custom description when sharing will no longer be available,” YouTube says. The company notes that while clipping is “important way for creators to reach new audiences,” it says that “a number of third-party tools with advanced clipping features and authorized creator programs are now available to do this across different video platforms.”
The company originally introduced the Clips feature in 2021.
Technology
Meta employee accused of accessing private images
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
When you upload a photo to Facebook, you expect it to stay private unless you decide otherwise. That expectation just took a hit after a former employee of Meta was accused of accessing thousands of private images.
According to details confirmed by the company, the London-based employee allegedly created a program to bypass internal safeguards. Investigators say this may have allowed access to about 30,000 private Facebook images that were not meant to be viewed.
The individual is now under criminal investigation and is out on bail as authorities continue to review the case. Here’s how investigators say the access may have happened.
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com, trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
META SMART GLASSES PRIVACY CONCERNS GROW
A former Meta employee is accused of accessing thousands of private Facebook images, raising new concerns about how user data is protected. (Fabian Sommer/picture alliance via Getty Images)
How the Meta employee allegedly accessed private images
Authorities believe the employee may have written a script to get around Meta’s internal detection systems. In simple terms, the system that should flag unusual behavior may not have caught the activity right away. This detail matters because large tech platforms rely on monitoring tools to detect suspicious access patterns. When those checks are bypassed, it raises questions about how internal access is controlled.
The investigation is being handled by the cybercrime unit of the Metropolitan Police in London. At the same time, security experts often point out that insider threats are difficult to eliminate. Even strong systems can be tested when someone inside the company misuses access.
What Meta says about the employee investigation
Meta says it discovered the improper access more than a year ago and took action after identifying the issue.
“Protecting user data is our top priority,” a Meta spokesperson told CyberGuy. “After discovering improper access by an employee over a year ago, we immediately terminated the individual, notified users, referred the matter to law enforcement and enhanced our security measures. We are cooperating with the ongoing investigation.”
Legal risks in the Meta private images case
Data protection experts say cases like this often come down to both intent and safeguards. If an employee accesses personal data without authorization, that can lead to criminal charges under data protection and computer misuse laws. However, the company’s responsibility depends on the protections it had in place. If proper safeguards existed, the focus usually remains on the individual.
If not, regulators may consider penalties or legal claims against the company. The Information Commissioner’s Office, the U.K.’s data privacy watchdog, has acknowledged the incident. The agency stressed that social media users should be able to trust how their personal information is handled.
Why the Meta investigation is drawing attention now
This case is unfolding at a time when scrutiny of major tech platforms is already high. Recent legal challenges have raised broader concerns about how companies protect users and manage risk. That context adds weight to this investigation. It reflects a larger conversation about privacy and accountability in the tech industry. As more people rely on digital platforms, expectations of data protection continue to rise. Incidents like this tend to reinforce those concerns.
META REPORTEDLY BUILDING AN AI VERSION OF MARK ZUCKERBERG TO INTERACT WITH COMPANY EMPLOYEES
Mark Zuckerberg walks through the U.S. Capitol after a meeting on March 26, 2026. Investigators in London say a former Meta employee may have used a script to bypass safeguards and view about 30,000 private Facebook images. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Simple ways to protect your private photos
Even though this case involves an insider, there are still simple steps you can take to better protect your photos and limit who can see them.
1) Check your Facebook privacy settings
You cannot control what happens inside a company, but you can limit how much of your personal content is exposed. Start by reviewing your Facebook privacy settings.
(Settings may vary depending on device and app version)
Mobile (iPhone/Android):
Facebook: Menu > Settings & privacy > Settings > Audience and visibility > Posts > Who can see your future posts > select Friends (or a custom audience) > Save
Desktop (Mac/PC):
Facebook: Profile picture (top right) > Settings & privacy > Settings > Audience and visibility section > Posts > Who can see your future posts > select Friends (or a custom audience) > Done
2) Review older photos and albums
Next, go through older photos and albums. Many people forget that photos shared years ago may still be visible under outdated settings.
(Settings may vary depending on device and app version)
Mobile (iPhone/Android):
Facebook: Menu > Settings & privacy > Settings > Audience and visibility > Posts > Limit who can see past posts > Limit who can see past posts > Limit past posts > confirm
Desktop (Mac/PC):
Facebook: Profile picture > Settings & privacy > Settings > Audience and visibility section > Posts > Limit who can see past posts > Limit past posts > confirm
And check individual albums:
Mobile (iPhone/Android):
Facebook: Go to your profile > Photos > Albums > select an album > tap Edit (top right) > Who can see this? > choose who can see it > Done
Desktop (Mac/PC):
Facebook: click your name on the left > Photos > Albums > select an album > click the three dots > Edit album > choose who can see it > Done
Not all albums can be changed, and some system albums have limited privacy options.
3) Be careful what you upload
It also helps to limit what you upload in the first place. Sensitive images, documents or anything you would not want widely seen may be better kept off social platforms entirely.
META AI EDITS YOUR CAMERA ROLL FOR BETTER FACEBOOK POSTS
Authorities are investigating whether a former Meta employee improperly accessed private Facebook photos that users never intended to share. (Gabby Jones/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
4) Turn on account activity alerts and two-factor authentication
You can also enable alerts for unusual account activity. While this case involves an insider, account alerts still help you spot unauthorized access to your own profile. You can also turn on two-factor authentication (2FA) to add another layer of protection to your account.
How to turn on account activity alerts
(Settings may vary depending on device and app version)
Mobile (iPhone/Android):
Facebook: Menu > Settings & privacy > Settings > Accounts Center > Password and security > Security Checkup > review and complete recommended security steps
Desktop (Mac/PC):
Facebook: Profile picture (top right) > Settings & privacy > Settings > Accounts Center > Password and security > Security Checkup > review and complete recommended security steps
How to turn on two-factor authentication
(Settings may vary depending on device and app version)
Mobile (iPhone/Android):
Facebook: Menu > Settings & privacy > Settings > Password and security > Two-factor authentication > choose text message or authentication app > follow prompts
Desktop (Mac/PC):
Facebook: Profile picture > Settings & privacy > Settings > Password and security > Two-factor authentication > choose text message or authentication app > follow prompts
5) Check third-party app access
Take a few minutes to review which apps have access to your Facebook account. Third-party apps can sometimes hold more access than you expect.
(Settings may vary depending on device and app version)
Mobile (iPhone/Android):
Facebook: Menu > Settings & privacy > Settings > Apps and websites > Active > tap an app > Remove
Desktop (Mac/PC):
Facebook: Profile picture (top right) > Settings & privacy > Settings > Apps and websites > Active > click an app > Remove
If you don’t see any apps listed or options like “Active,” it likely means you don’t have any connected apps to review.
What this means to you
If you use Facebook or similar platforms, this situation highlights something many people overlook. Even with strong safeguards, insider access still exists. Employees often need certain permissions to keep systems running. That creates a level of trust between users and the company.
When that trust is broken, it can feel personal. At the same time, there are still steps you can take on your end. Reviewing your privacy settings, limiting what you share and enabling security features can reduce how much of your content is exposed. It also shows why detection and response matter.
In this case, Meta says it identified the issue, removed the employee and notified users. Those steps can limit damage, but they do not erase the concern. The bigger takeaway is that privacy depends on both technology and human behavior. Systems can reduce risk, but they cannot remove it completely.
Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?
Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com
Kurt’s key takeaways
This case is still under investigation, and no final legal outcome has been announced. Even so, it highlights a risk many people rarely think about. Most privacy conversations focus on hackers. This situation is different. It shows how access from inside a company can create its own set of risks. Meta says it acted quickly by removing the employee, notifying users and strengthening its systems. Those steps matter, but they also show how much trust users place in the platforms they use every day. The reality is simple. Once you upload something online, you are trusting more than just the technology behind it.
If someone inside a company can access private data, how much control do you really have over what you share online? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Technology
Govee’s new LED Lightwall comes with its own self-standing frame
Govee has announced an upgraded version of its hanging Curtain Lights Pro that can instead be used nearly anywhere you have access to an outlet or large battery. At $449.99, Govee’s new Lightwall is more than twice as expensive as the $199.99 Curtain Lights Pro, but comes with more LEDs in a denser array and a self-standing aluminum frame that can be assembled in 10 to 15 minutes without the need for any tools.
When hung from its stand the Lightwall measures 7.9 feet wide and 5.3 feet tall and features 1,536 color-changing LEDs spaced about 1.96 inches apart in a 48 x 32 grid. It’s water-resistant, and with the ability to refresh at up to 35fps the Lightwall almost sounds like it could be used as a personal backyard Jumbotron, but it’s not designed for watching TV or movies.
The Lightwall instead connects to Govee’s Home app where you can select from over 200 preset scenes and simple animations, choose from 10 different music modes that generate lighting patterns matched to beats, or synchronize its colors to other Govee lighting products to create a cohesive mood.
The app can also use AI to create custom animated GIFs from simple text prompts, or you can take matters into your own hands and create custom designs by sketching in the app with your finger and stacking up to 30 layers of doodles. The Lightwall is smart home compatible and supports Matter, too, so in addition to managing it through Govee’s app you can control it using voice commands through smart devices with Google Assistant or Amazon Alexa.
-
Ohio3 days ago‘Little Rascals’ star Bug Hall arrested in Ohio
-
Georgia1 week agoGeorgia House Special Runoff Election 2026 Live Results
-
Arkansas7 days agoArkansas TV meteorologist Melinda Mayo retires after nearly four decades on air
-
Austin, TX1 week agoABC Kite Fest Returns to Austin for Annual Celebration – Austin Today
-
Politics2 days agoDem fundraising giant in the hot seat as GOP lawmakers demand answers over dodged subpoena
-
Politics5 days agoTrump blasts Spanberger ahead of Virginia meetings, says state faces tax base exodus like New York, California
-
Health1 week agoWoman discovers missing nose ring traveled to her lungs, causing month-long cough
-
San Francisco, CA5 days agoPresident Trump terminates Presidio Trust