Connect with us

West

Activist sportswear brand sues Colorado, accuses state of censoring its message

Published

on

Activist sportswear brand sues Colorado, accuses state of censoring its message

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

EXCLUSIVE: The women’s activist sportswear brand XX-XY Athletics is suing the state of Colorado over a recent state law that the company claims would interfere with its ability to market its message. 

The lawsuit takes aim at the state for passing a law called HB25-1312 and amending the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, which defines “gender expression” to include “chosen name” and “how an individual chooses to be addressed.” The laws state Coloradans have a right to access “public accommodations and advertising” that are free of discrimination on that basis. 

The company’s lawsuit claims that the state’s new legislation would make it illegal for the brand to carry out certain viral marketing campaign techniques it has used since launching last year.

Advertisement

“XX-XY Athletics, in their advertising, customer interactions, and elsewhere, to refer to transgender-identifying individuals with their given names or with biologically accurate language. XX-XY Athletics can no longer speak the truth in pursuit of its mission. XX-XY Athletics can no longer call men, men,” the lawsuit states. 

“Even worse, the Act coerces the company to speak against its principles and alter the meaning of its core message. If XX-XY Athletics refuses, the company faces cease-and-desist orders, expensive investigations, hearings, and civil and criminal penalties.” 

Colorado Attorney General Philip J. Weiser’s office has declined to comment on the lawsuit to Fox News Digital. 

XX-XY Athletics founder Jennifer Sey provided a statement to Fox News Digital insisting that the law would hinder her company’s marketing strategies and the overall movement to oppose trans athletes in girls and women’s sports. 

“What is happening in Colorado is a threat to anyone who speaks the truth about biological reality and who stands up for the rights of women and girls. XX-XY Athletics communicates often and broadly on the reality that men and women are different and our mission as a brand is to empower female athletes to also speak up and protect women’s sports,” Sey wrote. 

Advertisement

“Laws like this in Colorado force Coloradans to adhere to an ideology that is in violation of actual truth. They want to silence anyone who disagrees. We are filing this lawsuit to fight for our — and every Coloradan’s – right to free speech.”

COLORADO SCHOOL DISTRICT SUING STATE OVER POLICY THAT ALLOWS TRANS ATHLETES IN GIRLS SPORTS

People wave a Transgender Pride flag as they attend the 2023 LA Pride Parade on June 11, 2023 in Hollywood, California. (ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images)

Sey’s brand has regularly used its social media platforms to bring attention to instances of biological males competing in girls and women’s sports around the country, while promoting XX-XY Athletics merchandise. The company also produces original commercials that feature its brand ambassadors, and some of those include references to trans athletes being “men” or “boys.” 

Colorado is already facing a lawsuit from one of its own school districts over the state’s laws requiring schools to allow biologically male transgender athletes to compete in girls sports.

Advertisement

School District 49 (D49) in El Paso County, Colorado, filed its lawsuit against the state after passing a localized rule that banned trans athletes from girls sports at its schools earlier in May. That lawsuit cites “increasing tension between Title IX obligations and the state system that requires discrimination against female student-athletes,” according to documents obtained by Fox News Digital.

“Knowing that the approved policy would generate opposition and potentially trigger legal challenges, D49 filed a pre-enforcement action in the Colorado District of the federal court system seeking declaratory and injunctive relief,” the school district said.

The lawsuit does not come in response to a specific incident of a trans athlete competing in the district. Instead, it’s a response to the state’s sweeping policies conflicting with the school’s obligation to abide by federal law, specifically Title IX.

“Political culture is far out of balance on gender issues. Our lawsuit seeks a rational correction to excessive accommodations,” D49 Superinterdent Peter Hilts told Fox News Digital. “Our state athletic association simultaneously advocates equity and discrimination. We asked them to resolve that discrepancy, and they declined, so we were compelled to pursue a legal ruling.”

Advertisement

Jennifer Sey founed XX-XY Athletics in March 2024. The message of the name of the brand “is that there is empirical truth. Biology is true,” she said. (XX-XY Athletics)

Students in the state can compete in either gender category if they inform their school in writing that their gender identity differs from their sex assigned at birth. CHSAA requires schools to do a confidential evaluation, and all forms of documentation are voluntary. There are also no medical or legal requirements stated.

Weiser’s office responded to that lawsuit in a statement provided to Fox News Digital. 

“The attorney general is committed to defending Colorado’s anti-discrimination laws. The attorney general’s office has no further comment on this ongoing litigation,” the statement said.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement



Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wyoming

Wyoming Downs, 307 Horse Racing invest $180M in new facilities in Laramie, Uinta counties

Published

on

Wyoming Downs, 307 Horse Racing invest 0M in new facilities in Laramie, Uinta counties





Wyoming Downs, 307 Horse Racing invest $180M in new facilities in Laramie, Uinta counties – County 17





















Advertisement




Advertisement




Skip to content

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

After attempts to report vandalism, San Francisco homeowner gets graffiti notice from city

Published

on

After attempts to report vandalism, San Francisco homeowner gets graffiti notice from city


SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — A San Francisco man says months of reporting graffiti and vandalism in his Mission District neighborhood yielded little response from the city – until he received a notice blaming him for a small graffiti tag on a fire hydrant connected to his home.

Michael, who asked that his last name not be used, told ABC7 Eyewitness News that he has spent the past year alerting the city to vandalism near his home. He said he has called 311, contacted San Francisco police, emailed city leaders and even tweeted Mayor Daniel Lurie, but mostly received automated or generic replies.

“Obviously, we would have taken care of it had we noticed. But it’s like this tiny little thing,” Michael said, referring to the graffiti notice issued by the city.

The notice came from the San Francisco Department of Public Works, citing graffiti on a fire hydrant connected to his property. Michael said receiving it felt insulting after repeated attempts to get help addressing larger issues in the neighborhood.

Advertisement

“We feel like had those guys responded a little bit faster or like actually taking our emails seriously. Then this wouldn’t be there,” he said.

MORE: Oakland Chinatown businesses say they’re getting fined thousands for graffiti on their own property

Michael said what upset him most was what he saw as unequal accountability.

“I was particularly upset about is that they’re pointing out our problems without resolving theirs first. Like, don’t be hypocritical. Yeah,” he said.

In response to ABC7’s inquiry, the Department of Public Works provided the following statement in part:

Advertisement

“In this case, Public Works received a complaint about graffiti on the property and by law we were compelled to respond. We issued the property owner a corrective notice – not a citation – for a small graffiti tag, with 30 days to remove it.”

Michael acknowledged that he is aware of the city’s graffiti abatement program but said he believes the root issue goes beyond cleanup.

MORE: Community rallies to restore new 50-foot-long mural vandalized after SF’s Great Highway closure

“Realistically, like they have to deal with the drug crisis. That’s the core issue. Like it’s there’s nothing that’s more important in my opinion,” he said.

Walking through nearby blocks, Michael pointed out remnants of encampments and alleged drug dealing sites. He said the issue is personal, adding that his own family has struggled with substance abuse.

Advertisement

“If you deal with the people who are actively dealing and selling drugs on our street, then everything will go away,” he said.

As he noted a boarded-up property across the street that he said has attracted squatters, a neighbor agreed the situation has become unmanageable.

Michael said he supports Mayor Lurie and the administration’s approach overall but worries some neighborhoods are being overlooked.

“We are all paying property taxes. We are all contributing to the city. We all deserve the same level of respect and like I think cleanliness and just like the same level of service from the city and it just seems like they’re just, I don’t know, like relegating the problem into a one area,” he said.

Full statement from Department of Public Works:

Advertisement

“We hear this resident’s frustration, and we want to be clear: Our first path is to work with property owners, not against them.
In this case, Public Works received a complaint about graffiti on the property and by law we were compelled to respond.
We issued the property owner a corrective notice – not a citation – for a small graffiti tag, with 30 days to remove it. That’s intentional. We build in that window specifically to give property owners time and flexibility to address the violation. We also provide them contact information should they have any questions.
Property owners who are repeatedly targeted with graffiti vandalism can cite that as a hardship and we will take it into account. In this case, Public Works has not received an email or call from this property owner.
We also want to note that this complaint was submitted through Solve SF, a new AI-powered platform that allows the public to report issues of concern. Launched in January, the third-party platform provides people with another option in addition to the City’s 311 customer service operation to flag concerns. We encourage residents to report graffiti tags to keep our city clean and free of blight. It is important to remove tags quickly to deter more tags.
By City code, graffiti removal on private property is the responsibility of the property owner but there is an exception. San Francisco Public Works operates a Graffiti Abatement Opt-In Pilot Program that allows eligible property owners in commercial corridors to have graffiti removed from their property at no cost to them. Unfortunately, this particular property is not eligible for the opt- in program because it does not fall into the eligibility map.
For property owners experiencing repeated tagging, we recommend a few practical steps in addition to opting into our program: installing motion-activated lighting and security cameras, which can deter vandalism and support enforcement efforts.
Property owners on commercial corridors can learn more and submit an interest form on our website https://sfpublicworks.org/services/graffiti-opt-in
We want to resolve this quickly and we’re committed to working with this resident to do so.”

Copyright © 2026 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Avalanche vs. Wild NHL playoff schedule

Published

on

Avalanche vs. Wild NHL playoff schedule


The Colorado Avalanche will face the Minnesota Wild in the second round of the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Here’s the schedule and how to watch each game as the Avs continue their 2026 playoff run starting Sunday at Ball Arena.

Avs vs. Wild playoff schedule

Game 1: 7 p.m. Sunday, May 3, Minnesota at Colorado, TNT, truTV, HBO MAX
Game 2: TBD, Minnesota at Colorado
Game 3: TBD, Colorado at Minnesota
Game 4: TBD, Colorado at Minnesota
Game 5*: TBD, Minnesota at Colorado
Game 6*: TBD, Colorado at Minnesota
Game 7*: TBD, Minnesota at Colorado

*If necessary

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending