Connect with us

Utah

Discrepancies, high rejection rate found in Utah County voting

Published

on

Discrepancies, high rejection rate found in Utah County voting


SALT LAKE CITY — Utah’s Elections Office has found vote discrepancies in Utah County because of a novel in-person voting method, and a high rate of rejected signatures on by mail ballots in the county’s June 25 primary election, their newly released report shows.

The report from the Lieutenant Governor’s Office outlines that at least 19 more ballots were cast than people who signed in to in-person polling locations across Utah county during the Primary.

The discrepancies, the report states, were because of the use of an in-person voting method unique to Utah County implemented by County Clerk, Aaron Davidson called “Fast Cast” that may have allowed voters to turn in more than one ballot.

“The fast cast voting process as implemented in the 2024 primary election lacked key statutory controls and created an environment where fraudulent and/or unauthorized ballots were cast,” the report states.

Advertisement

“We don’t know for a fact that those were fraudulent, but we can’t prove that they weren’t,” Lt. Gov’s Deputy Elections Director Shelly Jackson said.

The review also found other concerning problems, namely that ballot signatures on by-mail ballots were rejected at a rate higher than the statewide average and five times higher than the 2023 primary election.

“I definitely think there was an unnecessary barrier to voting,” Jackson said of the rate at which those signatures were rejected.

Jackson was part of a team of four who reviewed Utah County’s elections and visited the office one week after the primary, July 2.

Davidson’s response

Davidson has told the office, as noted in the report, that voters were properly checked in at the polling locations but did not get their vote histories recorded due to “confusion with poll worker training.” Jackson confirmed that is how Davidson explained what happened.

Advertisement

Davidson also explained to KSL TV why he implemented Fast Cast.

“In-person voting is the most safe and secure way to cast a ballot and make sure it gets counted,” Davidson said. “The fast cast method maintains the verification of showing up in person, showing your ID, signing the poll pad, but not having to wait in line for the next available voting booth.”

“For every ballot that’s cast in person the Clerk’s office does not have to go through the complex very subjective signature verification process which carries a risk of that ballot having to go through the cure process,” he said.

What is “fast cast” voting?

Fast Cast allows voters to fill out their ballots at home and take it to a polling location, but instead of signing their ballot envelope and dropping it off, voters scan it directly into a special tabulation machine after showing their ID at a polling location.

Davidson has been vocal about his distaste for the United States Postal Service to return ballots, pushing voters instead to use dropboxes or to vote in person.

Advertisement

In mid-July, after Washington and Iron counties encountered problems with late postmarks, Davidson wrote on X, “The US Postal Service is no longer verifiable as safe and secure.” Earlier this year, he also shifted the county away from paying for return postage on mail-in ballots.

According to the report, the fast cast system in Lehi, Pleasant Grove and early in-person county polling places had the issues with more ballots cast than voters who checked in.

“This means that 19 votes may have been cast without a voter showing ID or having their signature checked and reviewed by poll workers at the polling location,” the report states.

“Due to the inherent lack of controls in ‘fast cast’ voting and the subsequent noncompliance of Utah election law, the Utah County Clerk’s Office must either abandon the ‘fast cast’ voting method or make significant modifications to bring it into compliance with state code,” the report recommends.

A ‘key security feature disabled’

The reason the tabulation machines allowed for possible fraud, the report states, is because a “key security feature was disabled” in order for these tabulators to read the mail-in ballots.

Advertisement

While Jackson couldn’t discuss the specifics of that safeguard, she said that the tabulation machines were programmed to accept by-mail ballots as opposed to in-person ballots. When a voter votes in person, there is a ballot with a different type of marking on it. That prevents the voter from voting both a by mail and an in person ballot.

“Disabling this would allow for any ballot to be read, creating the potential for multiple ballots to be scanned in by a single voter,” the report states.

“I think any time that you take away safeguards, it is it is a serious matter,” Jackson said. “The machine did have to have that safety feature turned off in order to accept the by-mail ballot versus in-person ballot.”

In total, the report examined 10 polling locations across the county and all but one location had mismatched vote totals with ballots cast.

“‘Fast Cast’ was presented as a way to expedite ballot processing because voters would present ID when submitting their ballot, therefore signature verification would not be performed. However, Utah County still experiences significant delays in ballot processing,” the report states.

Advertisement

It also warns that the fast cast method could create long lines during the general election.

Davidson said the county is already implementing recommendations from the report, including an “overhaul of Fast Cast Voting, weekly trainings on signature verification and improvements to reconciliation procedures.”

High rate of signatures rejected

According to the report, Jackson and the staff also found a high rate of rejected signatures on ballots that were actually valid Utah voters.

“County signature rates were higher than the statewide average and more than five times higher than the 2023 primary election rejection rate,” the report states.

This appears to have led to unnecessary cure letters sent to voters to fix their signatures. The report does not say whether these voters actually returned those cure letters, but anyone who didn’t, wouldn’t have had their vote counted.

Advertisement

One county staff member who was audited during the visit had 25% of the signatures they reviewed rejected, according to the report. It notes that while proper verification is important, staff were “too stringent” with rejecting signatures.

Utah law requires a 1% audit of signature verifications to make sure that ballots cast are actually a registered Utah voter. The report notes that the clerk’s office management acknowledged these high rejection rates during the audit, but “no remedial action was taken.”

“Care must be taken to verify that each vote was cast by the required registered voter, but undue and unnecessary burdens should not be placed on voters,” the report states.

Key findings

In all, the report issued five total findings and subsequent recommendations for Davidson’s office to fix related to in-person voting before November. They are as follows:

  • The office did not reconcile the number of voters who checked in at a polling location with the number of ballots cast. Henderson’s office requires this must be done and reviewed for accuracy during the canvass. The report states reconciliation should happen multiple times throughout the day.
  • Fast Cast lacked “key statutory controls and created an environment for fraudulent voting.” It bans the method unless key changes are made to make it compliant with state law.
  • Some of the staff were too stringent on signature verifications. The office must review signature verification guidelines and implement those.
  • Utah County under-utilized the 1% signature audits to provide additional training. The office must review and implement audit policy.
  • Utah County has grainy and unclear images of signatures on file. The office should begin updating signatures they have on file.

The report notes that despite the issues raised, Henderson’s office remains “committed to the success of the Utah County Clerk’s Office and staff” and is ready to help implement the changes.

The report notes that each method of voting — in person, dropboxes, and the mail — should be made “accessible and secure” for voters. Jackson also said that Utah County has been receptive to the changes.

Advertisement

“We don’t anticipate these problems to be repeated,” she said.



Source link

Utah

A battle over public use of paths into a northern Utah mountain escalates

Published

on

A battle over public use of paths into a northern Utah mountain escalates


Clarkston • Curtis Godfrey has spent his entire 72 years in Clarkston, a small northern Utah farming town of about 750 people, tucked by the western slopes of Clarkston Mountain.

As a boy, Godfrey said he often roamed the mountain trails on horseback and hiked through Winter Canyon, a rugged landscape familiar to generations of families in his hometown.

Over the years, he returned with his children — and later with Boy Scout troops — clearing brush and helping maintain the narrow paths that wind up the mountain’s steep slopes.

“My first few times going up there were always on a horse. We’d have them shuttling the ponies and the first time I went up, I was like 10, 12 years old, and I was bareback on one of those,” Godfrey said, laughing at the memory. “It was just me, my brother, and some friends.”

Advertisement

The mountains form the western edge of Cache Valley along the Utah–Idaho border, part of the Malad Range and crowned by the 8,200-foot Gunsight Peak. The ridge is a patchwork of U.S. Forest Service land and private parcels.

But access to those mountains has become the center of a legal battle after a private landowner started blocking off access to paths that lead into the foothills.

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) “No trespassing” signs, a surveillance camera and a gate across the road in Winter Canyon near Clarkston on Friday, Feb. 6, 2026.

Scott Shriber, who owns an 800-acre ranch at the base of the ridge near Gunsight Peak, says the routes now in question are private trails crossing his land, not public county roads.

He put up “No trespassing” signs, cameras and fencing around his property — and the paths leading into the mountains.

Advertisement

However, Godfrey and other residents say for decades, the paths have been used to access public lands on Clarkston Mountain — through Winter Canyon, Elbow Canyon, Green Canyon, Old Canyon and New Quigley Canyon.

(Christopher Cherrington | The Salt Lake Tribune)

Cache County Executive George Daines said the dispute reflects a broader tension playing out across Utah, where long-standing recreational use is increasingly colliding with changing land ownership and shifting interpretations of public access law.

How the case is resolved, he said, could influence how Cache County — and other communities across the state — handle similar conflicts in the future.

“It’s an ongoing problem all up and down the state,” Daines said. “Landowner buys land that’s on the foothills of the mountains and wants to restrain citizens from going through the foothills to the mountains that are public.”

Advertisement

Tensions flare in Winter Canyon

The dispute has turned into dueling lawsuits in the Utah’s First District Court in Logan.

In 2024, Shriber and his company, Winter Canyon Ranch LLC, sued Cache County over the contested routes.

In response, a group of residents formed Clarkston Mountain Conservation, a nonprofit advocating for continued public access, and filed a separate suit against the landowner alongside BlueRibbon Coalition, an Idaho-based national nonprofit that pushes for recreational access to public lands.

The debate escalated in November, when a BlueRibbon Coalition member riding a dirt bike along the path leading into Winter Canyon was stopped by Shriber and three other men.

Shriber is seen in a video with a gun strapped to his chest as he spoke to the man. Both Shriber and the man called the Cache County Sheriff’s Office, according to a probable cause statement. Shriber was arrested on suspicion of unlawful detention, but no charges appear in court records.

Advertisement

The man recorded the encounter and provided the video to the BlueRibbon Coalition, which provided it to The Salt Lake Tribune with the faces blurred.

In December, Cache County Sheriff Chad Jensen said in a statement that motorized vehicles are not permitted on the routes, and access is allowed only by walking, hiking, biking or horseback while litigation is ongoing.

“Please note that any movement off the designated roads may be considered trespassing,” Jensen said. “We do not want a violent incident due to a trespassing issue.”

Daines, the county executive, said the question of whether — and how — the routes are open to the public during the litigation has caused confusion on both sides, and the issue will likely head back to court for clarification.

Advertisement

A dispute over access

If the routes are blocked off by the ranch, BlueRibbon Executive Director Ben Burr said, public access into the mountain would be cut off.

“If he succeeds at this, he will be land-locking the public almost entirely out of high-value recreation public land that’s otherwise owned by the Forest Service and should be there, available for all of us to go use and enjoy,” Burr said. “We won’t be able to because we can no longer use the long-standing county roads that have been getting us up there for forever.”

Since the 1860s, Burr said, settlers and residents have accessed the slopes through the contested routes for gathering wood, livestock grazing, hunting and travel. Over time, he said, the paths were also used for recreation, including dirt bikes and ATVs.

“Some of these roads were there before the private property deeds were even created,” Burr said. “The community there has been using those trails continuously since they’ve been settled.”

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) “No trespassing” signs and fencing in New Quigley Canyon near Clarkston on Friday, Feb. 6, 2026.

Advertisement

Until 2023, the private land on the mountain was held by families who had owned it for generations, some dating back before 1900, according to Winter Canyon Ranch’s complaint.

That year, the complaint says, Shriber purchased several adjacent parcels near Gunsight Peak, established Winter Canyon Ranch, and became the primary private landowner, holding seven parcels.

Shriber’s attorney, Bruce Baird, said the disputed routes were never legal public roads.

“There’s a state statute that says if the public has used a road for 10 continuous years, it’s dedicated as a highway,” Baird said. “There’s no evidence that the public has used these trails as a road, basically at all.”

Baird said that while residents may have used the routes for hiking, horseback riding and dirt biking, that kind of use doesn’t qualify the paths as public “highways” under Utah law.

Advertisement

He said the statute applies to roads used for standard vehicle travel, not narrow trails used primarily for recreation.

Residents and advocacy groups counter that the routes have long been mapped and labeled by the county as public roads, which Burr said is reflected in the warranty deed noting the sale excluded county roads.

Decades of continuous use, he said, have created public rights-of-way under Utah law.

Ben Burt, who has lived in Clarkston for more than a decade, said he respects Shriber’s rights as a property owner but believes the trails should remain open to the public.

Burt said many live in rural areas “because we care about our property.”

Advertisement

“We want to have a say about our property. So we understand that this guy wants to be able to develop on his property,” Burt said. “It’s not right for them to be able to cut off complete access to that federal land. That’s the difference.”

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) Dueling lawsuits over trail access into Clarkston Mountain could influence similar disputes across the state, Cache County’s top executive says.

For many in Cache Valley, Burt said, access to trails in their own backyard is part of the lifestyle that draws them to the area.

Godfrey, the Clarkston resident who grew up with the trails, said protecting access isn’t just about recreation — it’s about preserving decades of family tradition. The trails carry memories of childhood horseback rides, hunting trips, scouting outings and long summer hikes — experiences he hopes to share with his grandchildren.

“I have a bunch of grandkids. They’re getting older, too, but I haven’t had them up there, but I want to; I want them to be able to go,” he said. “That’s one of my concerns, is the things that I’ve enjoyed growing up, and the scouting and taking my family up there, if he gets his way, we won’t be able to do that.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

BYU football player charged with rape in southern Utah case

Published

on

BYU football player charged with rape in southern Utah case


Parker Trent Kingston, 21, is currently being held at the Washington County jail without bail.

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) BYU Cougars wide receiver Parker Kingston (11) runs the ball as BYU hosts TCU, NCAA football in Provo on Saturday, Nov. 15, 2025.

A Brigham Young University football standout has been arrested and is being charged with rape stemming from allegations in southern Utah.

Parker Trent Kingston, 21, will face a first-degree felony rape charge, according to a statement posted online Wednesday by the Washington County Attorney’s Office.

According to the statement, a then-20-year-old woman told officers at a southern Utah hospital that she had been sexually assaulted by Kingston on Feb. 23, 2025, in St. George.

Advertisement

Detectives with the St. George Police Department, the statement says, gathered evidence and spoke to “other witnesses.”

Kingston is now in custody, being held at the Washington County jail without bail. Jail records confirm that. But charges against Kingston have not officially shown up in the court system as of Wednesday evening.

The county attorney’s office could not be immediately reached Wednesday after business hours.

The office’s statement says Kingston has an initial appearance set in court for Friday at 1:30 p.m.

“The Washington County Attorney’s Office takes allegations of sexual assault seriously,” the statement adds. It also asks any members of the public with information to call 435-301-7100.

Advertisement

Kingston is a senior wide receiver for the BYU Cougars. The school also confirmed the arrest.

“BYU became aware today of the arrest of Parker Kingston,” BYU said in a statement. “The university takes any allegation very seriously, and will cooperate with law enforcement. Due to federal and university privacy laws and practices for students, the university will not be able to provide additional comment.”

The charges against Kingston come less than a year after BYU’s team was rocked by allegations against its former quarterback.

Jake Retzlaff was accused of sex assault in a civil lawsuit. That case was later dismissed after Retzlaff and the woman who filed the suit came to a resolution.

But the allegations led to Retzlaff leaving the team, as he was facing a seven-game suspension from the university for breaking the school’s Honor Code. BYU, owned and operated by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, has strict rules that prohibit, among other things, premarital sex.

Advertisement

Retzlaff later transferred for a spot on the roster at Tulane.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Millions of records about Utah children and state hospital patients have not been kept private, auditor finds

Published

on

Millions of records about Utah children and state hospital patients have not been kept private, auditor finds


Utah Auditor Tina Cannon’s office began a probe into the state’s health agency after a whistleblower complaint.

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) The Utah State Hospital campus is pictured on Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024, next to the Wasatch mountains in Provo. An audit found the health records of over 10,000 patients who have received care there have not been adequately kept private.

More than two million people’s sensitive case records — related to child welfare in Utah and psychiatric treatments at the Utah State Hospital — have not been adequately protected and are easily accessible to over 2,000 employees, according to a report published Tuesday.

After a whistleblower reached out to a hotline run by Utah Auditor Tina Cannon’s office, it began looking into how the state’s health agency is handling access to the records.

“The deficiencies we uncovered at the Department of Health and Human Services represent a critical failure to protect the privacy of families, individuals and our most vulnerable, Utah’s children,” Cannon said in a statement Tuesday.

Advertisement

Utah’s Division of Child and Family Services holds approximately six million records related to 2,020,726 individuals in its information system. The documents include caseworkers’ notes and detail foster care, adoption, child abuse and neglect cases.

The information system for the Utah State Hospital currently contains health records for 10,587 patients.

Auditors found there are almost no limits on viewing those records for the employees who have accounts to use those databases.

“Users are expected to determine for themselves what range of viewing access is appropriate,” the auditor’s office noted. “There are no automated or proactive mechanisms to flag or prevent inappropriate access.”

Currently, 1,222 state employees have access to the DCFS information system. In addition to DHHS social workers, they include representatives from the Utah Office of Guardian ad Litem, which provides legal representation for children who have been abused or neglected; the Utah Psychotropic Oversight Panel, which oversees mental health medications for children in the state’s custody; and the Utah attorney general’s office.

Advertisement

The Utah State Hospital’s information system is accessible to 823 DHHS employees.

All of them have unfettered access to the health records of the 340 patients currently staying at the hospital. And although discharged patients’ records are “soft locked” after 60 days, users can still view them immediately by merely submitting a comment, according to the audit.

Allowing improper access to sensitive information entrusted to the state raises the risk of privacy violations, increased emotional trauma and reputational harm, Cannon’s office wrote.

It also warned that a single compromised account could expose entire databases to bad actors, noting the information “is highly valuable on the dark web.”

DHHS staffers have a low level of awareness about privacy policies and generally did not know how to report violations, the report said.

Advertisement

Employees on the Information Privacy and Security team keep records about policy violations in personal files, rather than using a centralized repository, it said.

And some use the terms “incident” and “breach” interchangeably — a mistake that could make it more difficult to identify and follow laws around responding to a large-scale data breach.

The auditors office did not conduct a full privacy audit, in an effort to secure the databases as quickly as possible and to avoid further jeopardizing confidentiality. Instead, it interviewed 21 employees about metrics and the health agency’s policies.

Responses from DHHS included with the audit outline plans to fix the problems identified, and it has already taken action on some issues.

Tuesday’s report comes less than two weeks after legislative auditors presented findings that DCFS workers had endangered thousands of Utah children by not adhering to deadlines and other policies. Both legislative staffers and Cannon will discuss their respective audits Wednesday morning in front of the Legislature’s Social Services Appropriations Committee, which makes recommendations on DHHS’s budget.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending