Connect with us

News

Starmer warned he cannot sidestep Brussels in bid to reset UK-EU relations

Published

on

Starmer warned he cannot sidestep Brussels in bid to reset UK-EU relations

Sir Keir Starmer cannot sidestep Brussels as he seeks to improve the UK’s post-Brexit ties with the EU, officials in the bloc have warned after the British prime minister’s trips to Berlin and Paris.

In the last few days Starmer met German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and French President Emmanuel Macron in the latest flurry of diplomacy with EU leaders since he entered Downing Street last month.

During the two-day tour he talked up his proposed UK-EU “reset” and emphasised his desire for “a closer relationship on a number of fronts, including the economy, including defence, including exchanges”.

However, he also reiterated his red lines on Brexit, which include no UK re-entry to the EU single market or customs union, or the return of free movement.

Within the bounds of these strictures, EU diplomats said there was little scope to improve ties with the UK.

Advertisement

EU member states had some “wriggle room” to allow easier access for British workers and students and industrial collaboration, one diplomat said.

“But you can only get a reset by going to Brussels. The red lines haven’t changed. Something needs to give on the UK side if it wants to restore the relationship,” they added.

The UK is aiming to negotiate a new bilateral treaty with Germany by early 2025 © Clemens Bilan/ EPA/Shutterstock

The UK’s attempts this week to talk up the breadth and depth of a new bilateral treaty being negotiated with Germany, which both sides hope to finalise by early 2025, raised eyebrows in the EU.

German officials dismissed a suggestion by Downing Street that the two nations would discuss “market access” as part of the treaty, highlighting how the single market and trade were EU competencies, not national ones.

One said the treaty would not change anything covered by the EU-UK post-Brexit deals.

Advertisement

“A visit to Germany is not a game-changer,” said one EU official, adding: “There’s a huge focus on the bilateral dimension between the UK and Germany or France, but the EU is composed of 27 states and of course the sole interlocutor if you want to reset relations is not Berlin, Paris, Rome or Tallinn — it’s Brussels.”

The official said it was “very good news” the UK was pitching a “reboot” of relations with the EU, but repeated the bloc’s line that any British proposals that threatened to jeopardise the single market would be “tricky” to take forward.

People with faces painted with EU and unions flags
The EU’s main ask from the UK is a youth mobility scheme © Wiktor Szymanowicz/Alamy

Starmer is expected to meet European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen before the end of the year.

The EU’s main ambition regarding the UK is a youth mobility scheme, with a proposal made by the bloc in April. It also wants Britain to rejoin the Erasmus student exchange programme to allow its citizens to study in the UK more cheaply.

The EU’s offer this spring elicited a cold response from Labour officials, then in opposition, who said they viewed youth mobility as synonymous with free movement. But some Labour figures, including London mayor Sadiq Khan, are pushing for a deal.

This week Starmer said he has “no plans” to negotiate a formal youth mobility scheme, but did not explicitly rule out launching talks on one in future.

Advertisement

The previous UK Conservative government offered bilateral mobility deals to several states including Germany, which prompted the commission to table the EU-wide proposal. Officials do not rule out some member states being able to go it alone if EU-wide progress proves impossible.

One of the Starmer government’s priorities is a new UK-EU security pact “to strengthen co-operation on the threats we face”.

The EU views the current informal co-operation between the bloc and the UK on defence and security as working well — with co-ordination on sanctions, Ukraine and China taking place via the G7, Nato and other forums.

However, EU officials said the bloc would be amenable to formalising a more structured dialogue, as it does with the US.

Following years of tensions under the Conservatives, the new Starmer government believes there is mileage in overhauling the tone of UK-EU relations and has criticised the “botched” Brexit deal negotiated by former prime minister Boris Johnson.

Advertisement

Starmer said after meeting Macron on Thursday that the pair had discussed “the wider reset” with the EU, as well as developments in Ukraine and the Middle East, plus bilateral trade, illegal migration and security issues.

The British prime minister described “growing the economy” as the “number one mission” of the UK-EU reboot.

Anand Menon, director of the UK in a Changing Europe think-tank, said Starmer’s warmer rhetoric on UK-EU relations was “desirable” and would genuinely “smooth the wheels of diplomacy” by making it easier for politicians and officials on both sides to work together.

But he added the UK and the EU were playing a “defensive” game and it was too early to see how it could lead to “substantive” change in the relationship.

Ahead of the UK election, Labour’s specific demands regarding the EU included a veterinary deal, an agreement on the mutual recognition of professional qualifications, and greater ease for UK artists to tour within the bloc — proposals which were criticised as underwhelming.

Advertisement

Labour’s demands were “massively unambitious” and of “trivial” economic scale, Menon said, but “despite that, they might be quite hard to get”.

News

US Colleges received more than $5 billion in foreign gifts, contracts in 2025

Published

on

US Colleges received more than  billion in foreign gifts, contracts in 2025

The top 10 countries that gave contracts and gifts to U.S. colleges and universities as of December 16, 2025.

Screenshot by NPR/The U.S. Department of Education


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Screenshot by NPR/The U.S. Department of Education

U.S. colleges received more than 5 billion dollars in reportable foreign gifts and contracts in 2025, according to a new website from the U.S. Education Department. The release is part of a push by the Trump administration to make foreign influence in colleges and universities more transparent.

Among the biggest recipients, the data show, are Carnegie Mellon University, Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Stanford University.

Qatar was the largest foreign source of funds to schools, making up more than 20% — or about 1.1 billion. Other sources include the United Kingdom, China, Switzerland and Japan.

Advertisement

In a statement, Education Secretary Linda McMahon said the data provide “unprecedented visibility into funding” from countries that threaten “America’s national security.”

Under existing federal law, institutions are required to report gifts or contracts from foreign entities above $250,000. But Republicans have long raised underreporting as an issue of national security — pushing for more reporting and more transparency.

Since the start of President Trump’s second term, the administration has investigated Harvard University and the University of California, Berkeley, for allegedly underreporting their foreign gifts.

Ian Oxnevad, a senior fellow at the National Association of Scholars, a conservative advocacy organization, called the release of the new information a “step in the right direction.”

He said the data brings welcome transparency to the sometimes murky world of foreign gifts to U.S. colleges. This data sheds light on “specific countries, what universities they donate to, and the amounts.

Advertisement

Among the significant revelations, he noted, are that “Qatar and China are among the top countries that donate to our universities, and not our allies or neighbors.”

The new website includes data on what McMahon called “countries of concern,” including China, Russia and Iran. Harvard, New York University and MIT top the list of schools getting money from those countries.

It’s important, Oxnevad said, given the role that universities such as Harvard and other Ivy League schools play in shaping public policy, to be aware that they’re “getting such heavy foreign funds.”

Universities have said they are in compliance with the law.

“MIT research on campus, regardless of funding source, is open and publishable,” the university said in a statement. “We follow all federal laws in accepting and reporting any such gifts or contracts.”

Advertisement

The American Council on Education, a member organization that represents and advocates for colleges and universities, echoed that sentiment.

“This demonstrates that our institutions are doing a good job reporting this information,” says Sarah Spreitzer, vice president and chief of staff at ACE.

Both Spreitzer and Oxnevad pointed out limitations in the data on the website, including a lack of details or an ability to compare years and see trends over time. Both were critical of the government’s tracking and reporting of this information under past administrations.

But Spreitzer added that some of the information, without more context or detail, is misleading, or at best dated.

“I worry that [the administration] is trying to send a message to taxpayers that our institutions are taking a lot of money from foreign donors,” says Spreitzer. “We are all for more transparency.”

Advertisement

Her concern though, she said, is how the Trump administration will use this data in its continuing attacks on higher education.

Continue Reading

News

Video: F.A.A. Said to Have Closed El Paso Airspace Over Military’s Use of Anti-Drone Technology

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Said to Have Closed El Paso Airspace Over Military’s Use of Anti-Drone Technology

new video loaded: F.A.A. Said to Have Closed El Paso Airspace Over Military’s Use of Anti-Drone Technology

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Said to Have Closed El Paso Airspace Over Military’s Use of Anti-Drone Technology

The Federal Aviation Administration lifted an order to ground all flights at El Paso International Airport on Wednesday. The order was initially issued on Tuesday night. The Trump administration claimed a drone incursion caused the El Paso airspace closure. But people briefed on the situation said it was because of the military’s use of anti-drone technology.

“You cannot restrict airspace over a major city without coordinating with the city, the airport, the hospitals, the community leadership. That failure to communicate is unacceptable.” “The information coming from the administration does not add up, and it’s not the information that I was able to gather overnight and this morning. There was not a threat, and — which is why the F.A.A. lifted this restriction so quickly.”

Advertisement
The Federal Aviation Administration lifted an order to ground all flights at El Paso International Airport on Wednesday. The order was initially issued on Tuesday night. The Trump administration claimed a drone incursion caused the El Paso airspace closure. But people briefed on the situation said it was because of the military’s use of anti-drone technology.

By Jorge Mitssunaga

February 11, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Trump-Netanyahu meeting ends with no agreement on Iran strategy

Published

on

Trump-Netanyahu meeting ends with no agreement on Iran strategy

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Donald Trump said he “insisted” US talks with Iran should continue in a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday that concluded with no agreement on the strategy towards Tehran.

In a Truth Social post on Wednesday afternoon, Trump said he told the Israeli leader that his “preference” was to reach a pact with Iran on its nuclear programme even as Washington continues to weigh new military strikes against the Islamic republic.

Trump wrote: “There was nothing definitive reached other than I insisted that negotiations with Iran continue to see whether or not a Deal can be consummated. If it can, I let the Prime Minister know that will be a preference. If it cannot, we will just have to see what the outcome will be.”

Advertisement

After the meeting, Netanyahu’s office issued a brief statement on X, saying the two men had spoken about the “negotiations with Iran, Gaza and regional developments”. It added the prime minister had “emphasised the security needs of the state of Israel in the context of the negotiations and the two leaders agreed on continued co-ordination and the close contact between them”.

Ahead of the meeting with Netanyahu, Trump told Axios news on Tuesday that he was “thinking” about deploying a second aircraft carrier to the Middle East. This would be in addition to the Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group, which was sent to the region last month as part of a build-up of the American military presence in the Middle East in preparation for a potential strike on Iran.

When Washington attacked three main Iranian nuclear facilities last June, the US had two aircraft-carrier strike groups positioned in the region.

The US currently has 10 ships in the region, including the Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier — with dozens of fighter aircraft and thousands of troops on board — in the Arabian Sea. The Pentagon has also deployed two destroyers to the Mediterranean as well as sending more fighter jets and bolstering air defences in the Middle East.

Trump is widely expected to order the USS George HW Bush aircraft carrier to join the Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group in the Middle East. The George HW Bush is off the coast of Florida undergoing training exercises, according to the US Navy.

Advertisement

The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday reported the Pentagon has told an aircraft carrier strike group to prepare to deploy to the Middle East and that a deployment order could come within hours.

The navy said it could not speak to future operations and the Pentagon said it had no information. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Two incidents occurred last week between the US and Iran in Middle Eastern waters. American forces shot down an Iranian drone as it approached the Abraham Lincoln. Separately, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps threatened to board and seize a US-flagged tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, prompting an American warship to respond.

Additional reporting by Neri Zilber in Tel Aviv

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending