Connect with us

San Diego, CA

Clairemont residents concerned over 12-unit bonus ADU project

Published

on

Clairemont residents concerned over 12-unit bonus ADU project


SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) – Clairemont residents are pushing back against a proposed ADU development that includes a dozen units on one property. Similar projects have popped up across the city under San Diego’s “bonus ADU” program.

Residents on Shoshoni Avenue say the city needs to balance the need for housing with the character and safety of neighborhoods.

This particular development at 4602 Shoshoni Avenue would include the main house, converting the garage into an ADU, and then five two-story structures with 10 ADUs in the backyard.

“If this thing goes up, our neighborhood will completely change forever,” said Michelle Schroeder, a resident on the street of 30 years.

Advertisement

The neighborhood is predominantly one-story single-family homes and the street itself is a narrow cul-de-sac. There would be no requirements to provide parking for the development. Congestion on the street and ability for emergency vehicles to reach houses on the street are some concerns being raised.

“Our safety is big time. The City needs to come out and do some research here,” said Kevin Morefield who lives next door to the property in question.

The large lot lends the space for developers to take advantage of the city’s bonus ADU program. For every one “affordable” ADU, they can build an additional ADU. The maximum amount allowed is determined by zoning and space on the property.

“When they built Genesee Avenue and Chateau Drive, they backfilled my backyard, this backyard, all the way down and if you go look just halfway down Genesee, you’ll see it starting to crumble,” said Morefield.

Morefield’s family has been at the property since 1955 and says the land may not even be safe to build on based on the backfill.

Advertisement

However because housing is so needed, the City of San Diego says as long as these types of projects comply with ADU regulations, state and local law requires approval.

“The inspectors are really going to have to take their care with signing the permit because if something happens there in the future, it’s going to be their problem not just the developer, not just the owner of the land,” said Mike Schroeder.

“We’ve been fighting for four years is to get the council to come back and take a look at what they’ve done,” said Paul Krueger, volunteer with nonprofit Neighbors for a Better San Diego.

The nonprofit has been tracking these projects closely. To date, the City says it’s approved about 130 density bonus projects, creating 255 “affordable” ADUs.

“One of the biggest failures of this program. They wrote the law to allow to qualify as a moderate-income unit, which means a single person with $89,000 a year is who they’re pegging the rent in the affordable unit,” Krueger said.

Advertisement

These neighbors are now calling on Mayor Todd Gloria and councilmembers to take action.

“Start listening to us. I want them to stop this project and come look at it for themselves,” said Michelle Schroeder.

Councilmember Jennifer Campbell represents the Clairemont area. Her office provided a statement that reads:

“I share the concerns that many residents have expressed about whether our communities can support the increased density that these bonus ADU projects may bring. I am apprehensive about how the increase in density could impact our neighborhoods and place strain on our existing infrastructure and services. I have always opposed changes to parking requirements, especially in places where the public transportation infrastructure is not currently able to serve every resident. I will continue to work on ways to mitigate the impacts of increased density on our neighborhoods, while still meeting the community’s need for more housing.”

The City says the project is currently still in review. The mayor’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement

A lawyer for developers SDRE Homebuyers said they plan to issue a formal statement in the future, but could not answer questions in time for this report.



Source link

San Diego, CA

San Diego Unified School Board member’s dog poisoned in Sorrento Valley backyard

Published

on

San Diego Unified School Board member’s dog poisoned in Sorrento Valley backyard


A member of the San Diego Unified School Board says someone poisoned her dog in her Sorrento Valley backyard last week.

Sabrina Bazzo says she found her golden retriever Bruno chewing on meat laced with poison and metal hooks on Dec. 12. Two handfuls of it were thrown into her backyard.

There are plenty of playthings in Bruno’s backyard, but nothing as dangerous as what the 2-and-a-half-year-old dog found that afternoon.

“When I first saw it, I was just so shocked, I couldn’t believe it,” Bazzo said.

Advertisement

She keeps what is left of two fistfuls of shredded meat tied up with string in her refrigerator.

“It had these blue-like crystals in there and these metal pieces, like metal hooks. That’s when I like freaked out,” Bazzo said.

Within 20 minutes of swallowing that poisonous bait, she brought Bruno to the animal hospital, where they induced vomiting. No further medical treatment was necessary, but timing was everything. Bazzo says had it taken longer, the outcome could have been much worse.

“The vet said if animals take in enough, a decent amount, there is nothing they can do,” Bazzo said.

Like all pets, Bruno is special, but for more reasons than the obvious. Bruno was just a puppy when he became part of the Bazzo family. It happened when her husband David was diagnosed with stage 4 brain cancer. Her husband died last June.

Advertisement

“Now that he’s actually gone, I have Bruno here with me. He has been very comforting for the family,” Bazzo said.

Three months after her husband’s death, Bazzo received a letter in the mail. It was typed in bold red letters. It read, “Please shut your (expletive) dog up with all the barking day and night.”

“It was during a difficult time for us that makes this that much more sad. We never leave him unsupervised, just being outside on his own,“ Bazzo said.

She suspects the author of the letter is also behind the poison food thrown in her backyard.

In part of an email, San Diego Humane Society spokesperson Nina Thompson wrote: “San Diego Humane Society’s Humane Law Enforcement is currently investigating a recent incident of suspected animal cruelty. We are working diligently to investigate all leads.”

Advertisement

What was once a safe retreat designed and maintained by her late husband while still alive, now, seems more like a trap.

“To now feel like someone is watching me or knows my dog is in the backyard and wants to do him harm, it’s scary,” Bazzo said.

Bazzo says until she finds out who did this, she can’t be sure whether this has anything to do with her position on the school board or her dog.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Guest Column: The black hole in the center of Poway

Published

on

Guest Column: The black hole in the center of Poway


Those of us who live near the City of Poway Town Center have experienced and continue to see a development project that has languished for over five years and now clearly can be defined as blight. 

It is a “black hole” that is anchored in the center of the city near the intersection of Poway and Community roads, one block from City Hall. The project is adjacent to the Poway shopping center plaza, a Section 8 apartment complex and the Poway Bernardo Mortuary.

Those of us who live in central Poway have this visual blight, which consists of a partially constructed vacant multistory building and an unfinished tiered underground parking structure. This incomplete project was approved by the City Council in 2018 as a mixed-use development project.

It sits on a one-and-a-half-acre infill site and was originally permitted for 53 residential units, a 40,000-square-foot commercial space, a 20,025-square-foot fitness center and a two-tiered underground parking structure.

Advertisement

Over the last five years it has transitioned through three different developers and multiple permit amendments. The current and final amended project is a significantly scaled-down project. It would take someone with a bachelor’s degree in city and urban planning to read the permit amendments and comprehend what the final project will consist of if and when it is completed.

Those of us who live in or near the Town Center district are aware the Poway Road Specific Plan was approved with City Council commitment that high-density development would be well planned and would consist of “efficient high-density development.”

A blighted development project that has not been completed and has remained vacant and unfinished for five years is not keeping with the Specific Plan. This project is a blemish on central Poway. The City Council has not implemented solutions to complete this unfinished project.

Further, other development projects in the same corridor have as a matter of practice during their construction phases posted signage on their respective construction fencing, advertising what the project consists of and when it is estimated to be completed. The “black hole” has no such signage on its construction fencing and the general public has no idea what this project consists of or when it will be completed.

Direct attempts and meetings to obtain information from previous and current city representatives have resulted in finger-pointing at the developer. Two developers have already walked away from this project and the third and current developer is under contract with a local general contractor.

Advertisement

The City Council approved, conditioned and permitted this project. I have to think that if this project was located in the “Farm” development area and stood half developed and vacant for over five years there would be a different level of urgency by the council to finding a solution to correct this unsightly development project.

The council has failed those of us who live in and near the Poway Town Center corridor. Stop blaming the developer and get this failed project completed.

Locke is a 22-year U.S. Marine Corp veteran and a longtime Poway resident. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Frustrated teachers walk out of SBUSD meeting that decided to close Central Elementary

Published

on

Frustrated teachers walk out of SBUSD meeting that decided to close Central Elementary


Frustrations boiled over at Wednesday night’s South Bay Union School District meeting. Parents and teachers are upset that the district is going to shut down Central Elementary and possibly two others at a later time.

At one point in the meeting, teachers got so upset that they walked out. It came after the school board voted unanimously to approve an interim superintendent’s pay package for nearly $18,500 a month.

That payday comes at time when teachers rallied outside the meeting because they might strike since they’ve  been in contract negotiations for more than a year.

The board also voted unanimously to close Central Elementary at the end of this school year. Berry and Sunnyslope Elementary schools could close as well, at a later time. But that’ll be based on a review of enrollment and financial data going forward.

Advertisement

The district says declining enrollment and declining revenues are major problems and factors in its decision. It says keeping under enrolled schools open would increase maintenance costs, stretch limited resources and hamper the ability to deliver equitable services across all schools.

But teachers and parents say paying the interim superintendent that amount of money shows it’s a matter of allocation and priorities.

Hinting that district leaders are being scrooges, a group of teachers took a page out of “A Christmas Carol” and dressed as ghosts.

“By closing these doors, you destroyed the heart of community. Families see no future, pack their cars and  leave behind empty houses and desolate streets,” one teacher said.

While only Central is closing this year, Sunnyslope could close at the end of the 2028-2029 school year. Berry could close at the end of the 2031-2032 school year.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending