Connect with us

West

Blue state customers flock to Idaho gun store to find 'a little bit of freedom,' owner says

Published

on

Blue state customers flock to Idaho gun store to find 'a little bit of freedom,' owner says

This story is the fourth in a series examining the mass-migration of West Coast residents to Idaho. Read parts one, two and three.

POST FALLS, Idaho — The parking lot outside North Idaho Arms was quiet early one Saturday morning, but owner Bryan Zielinski soon expected it to fill with cars, many of them bearing Washington plates.

Most customers only travel 30 minutes or so from Washington’s eastern cities. But on weekends, Zielinski says some make the five-hour drive from the Seattle area to buy magazines and other accessories outlawed in their own state.

“We’re seeing people wanting to make the drive solely just to experience a little bit of freedom, the freedom that they lost in Washington,” Zielinski said.

Bryan Zielinski holds a rifle in his Post Falls gun store on April 27, 2024. He opened North Idaho Arms about three months ago, not long after his family relocated to the Gem State from neighboring Washington. (Hannah Ray Lambert/Fox News Digital)

Advertisement

THIS BLUE STATE’S AGENDA IGNORES THE CONSTITUTION TO ‘GET RID OF GUNS’: STORE MANAGER

Zielinski was a lifelong Washingtonian until last June and previously managed a large gun store in Bellevue. He advocated against the state’s increasingly restrictive gun control laws but to no avail, and he finally moved his family to North Idaho.

“Some of the most restrictive gun control in the United States is now in western Washington,” he said. “And that all happened in the space of less than three years.”

Washington’s crackdown on gun rights

Democrats spent years trying to ban magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds, Zielinski said. Then Democratic Attorney General Bob Ferguson, now a candidate for governor, spearheaded a ban that relied on the Consumer Protection Act, a state law meant to protect residents from “unfair or deceptive” business practices.

In 2022, Washington lawmakers outlawed the manufacture, import, distribution and sale of high-capacity magazines, but not possession itself. The next year, they passed a similar ban on the sale or import of “assault weapons” — primarily semi-automatic rifles — and many of the parts used to build them, arguing such measures were critical to preventing mass shootings.

Advertisement

“Assault weapons” were used in about 25% of mass shootings, according to The Violence Project, a database supported by the National Institute of Justice that analyzed mass shootings in the U.S. from 1966 to early 2020. The project chronicles mass shootings in which four or more victims were murdered with firearms in a public location.

A 2022 poll suggested a majority of Washington residents supported a ban on “assault weapons,” a label often applied to semi-automatic rifles like AR-15s and AK-47s. Washington lawmakers outlawed the sale and import of such firearms the next year. (Ramiro Vargas/Fox News Digital)

WASHINGTON GOVERNOR’S RACE LOSES TWO BOB FERGUSONS AFTER ATTORNEY GENERAL BOB FERGUSON ISSUES LEGAL THREATS

Washington has had eight such shootings since 1966, according to The Violence Project, the majority of which involved handguns. But semi-automatic rifles have been used in other killings in the state, including the 2016 shooting at a Mukilteo house party. Three people were killed in the mass shooting that drove Ferguson to advocate for the ban.

The Zielinski family packed up and moved to North Idaho last June, less than two months after Washington Gov. Jay Inslee signed the assault weapons ban into law.

Advertisement

“I really got to see how bad things were starting to get,” Zielinski said. “We finally reached a crescendo.”

Zielinski opened his own gun store just a five-minute drive across the border from Washington. He spoke to Fox News Digital while sitting in front of a wall of semi-automatic rifles that are now illegal to make, purchase or sell in his former home state.

WATCH MORE FOX NEWS DIGITAL ORIGINALS HERE

He can’t sell the banned guns themselves to Washington residents because they require extra processes like a background check and would need to be transferred to a licensed dealer in Washington. But when it comes to replacement parts or magazines, Zielinski says he doesn’t “card anybody for anything unless there’s a serial number on it.”

“We follow all federal laws. We follow all Idaho state laws,” he said. “But it is legal in Idaho to buy certain things as an adult that maybe you can’t buy in Washington.”

Advertisement

Similarly, Idaho plates are a common sight outside marijuana dispensaries on the Washington side of the border. No one is stopping Idahoans from buying pre-rolls or gummies that are banned in their home state, Zielinski said.

“At the end of the day, it’s on the consumer to make sure they’re not breaking the laws of their home state,” he said.

Learning from Washington’s ‘mistakes,’ and safeguarding Idaho against ‘liberal mindset’

Gun stores were abuzz this spring in Washington as they awaited a possible injunction against the state’s magazine ban. The attorney general had sued a business for continuing to sell magazines after the ban took effect, and the store challenged the law’s constitutionality.

In Post Falls, Zielinski took dozens of pre-orders, packaged them and got them ready to ship.

“The commitment to the customer was that the minute the injunction happens that we were going to get into Washington legally, import those boxes and get those mailed out,” he said.

Advertisement

Bryan Zielinski and his family moved to Idaho last year seeking more freedom and greater Second Amendment protections.  (Hannah Ray Lambert/Fox News Digital)

SEATTLE-AREA OFFICIALS WANT ‘NO LOCKS, NO CELLS’ FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS AMID RISE IN TEEN CRIME

On April 8, a judge ruled the ban violates both the U.S. and Washington state constitutions. The attorney general secured an emergency order from the state Supreme Court 88 minutes later, keeping the ban in place.

Zielinski shipped 147 boxes of magazines during that window.

“I know that we have some happy customers because we’ve heard from all of them,” he said.

Advertisement

He said he is still invested in Washington’s Second Amendment future because some of his friends and family members remain “behind the Iron Curtain over there.”

“But the main thing is, I’ve learned from the mistakes of Washington on how we’re going to safeguard Idaho,” he said. “So if I can work to help Washington and now help Idaho into the future as well, it’s kind of a win-win.”

Right now, “gun laws are great in Idaho,” he said. 

It’s one of nearly 30 states with constitutional concealed carry, has no laws regulating high-capacity magazines or semi-automatic rifles, and even allows residents to own a machine gun as long as it’s registered.

Bryan Zielinski can’t sell semi-automatic rifles or other banned guns to Washington residents, but he said he doesn’t check anyone’s ID when it comes to parts or magazines. “I am selling products that are 100% legal to adults in the state of Idaho,” he said. (Hannah Ray Lambert/Fox News Digital)

Advertisement

But Zielinski wants to see Idaho’s legislators make it illegal for the state to use the Consumer Protection Act to stifle the Second Amendment. And he said he’d like to see more unification in the state’s GOP which, like its national counterpart, has become increasingly fractured.

“If we can safeguard Idaho against this liberal mindset,” he said, “I think we could be the beacon that other conservative states see and go, ‘We want to be more like Idaho.’”

Click here to hear more from Zielinski.

Ramiro Vargas contributed to the accompanying video.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

West

Tarot influencer’s claims in Idaho college murders case spark courtroom reckoning

Published

on

Tarot influencer’s claims in Idaho college murders case spark courtroom reckoning

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A federal jury in Boise awarded $10 million to a University of Idaho professor after finding a Texas TikToker financially liable for spreading false claims that linked her to the 2022 stabbing deaths of four college students.

The decision came Friday in U.S. District Court in the case of Scofield v. Guillard. Jurors awarded $7.5 million in punitive damages and $2.5 million in compensatory damages, according to court records and reporting by the Idaho Statesman.

Professor Rebecca Scofield, who chairs the university’s history department, filed suit in December 2022 against Houston resident Ashley Guillard. The lawsuit stemmed from a series of TikTok videos in which Guillard alleged, without evidence, that Scofield had a romantic relationship with one of the victims and arranged the killings.

The victims, Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, were stabbed to death in a rental home near campus in Moscow, Idaho, on Nov. 13, 2022. The crime drew nationwide attention and left the campus community reeling.

Advertisement

Ashley Guillard posted TikTok videos falsely linking a University of Idaho professor to the Idaho college murders, leading to a defamation lawsuit. (TikTok/ashleyisinthebookoflife4)

LISTEN TO THE NEW ‘CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO’ PODCAST

Authorities later arrested Bryan Kohberger, a criminology doctoral student at nearby Washington State University at the time. He ultimately pleaded guilty in a deal that spared him the death penalty and is now serving four consecutive life sentences in an Idaho state prison.

In a statement to Fox News Digital following the verdict, Scofield expressed gratitude to the jury and said she hopes to close a painful chapter.

“I want to thank the jury for their time and attention to this case. The judge had already ruled as a matter of law that the statements were false. The $10 million verdict reinforces the judge’s decision and sends the clear message that false statements online have consequences in the real world for real people and are unacceptable in our community,” Scofield said.

Advertisement

BRYAN KOHBERGER FIGHTS $27K RESTITUTION FOR VICTIMS’ FAMILIES WHILE TAKING MONEY BEHIND BARS

University of Idaho students from left to right: Ethan Chapin, 20; Xana Kernodle, 20; Madison Mogen, 21; and Kaylee Goncalves, 21. All four were stabbed to death in an off-campus rental home in Moscow, Idaho, on Nov. 13, 2022. (Jazzmin Kernodle via AP/Instagram/ @kayleegoncalves)

“The murders of the four students on November 13, 2022, was the darkest chapter in our university’s history. Today’s decision shows that respect and care should always be granted to victims during these tragedies. I am hopeful that this difficult chapter in my life is over, and I can return to a more normal life with my family and the wonderful Moscow community.”

Court filings show that in June 2024, Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge Raymond Patricco determined that Guillard’s statements were legally defamatory, leaving only the question of monetary damages for a jury to decide.

According to the complaint, Guillard began posting videos in late November 2022 claiming Scofield had secretly been involved with one of the students and had “ordered” the killings. The lawsuit states Scofield had never met any of the victims and was out of state when the murders occurred.

Advertisement

IDAHO MURDER VICTIMS’ FAMILIES EXPRESS OUTRAGE AFTER CRIME SCENE PHOTOS ACCIDENTALLY RELEASED

People lay flowers and pay respects at the University of Idaho on Tuesday, November 15, 2022. Four students were murdered in Moscow, Idaho over the weekend. (Derek Shook for Fox News Digital)

The filing further alleges that Guillard continued publishing the accusations even after receiving cease-and-desist letters and after police publicly indicated Scofield was not connected to the crime.

At the time, Guillard’s TikTok account had garnered more than 100,000 followers, with some of the videos receiving millions of interactions, according to court documents.

Scofield’s legal team argued the statements amounted to defamation because they accused her of criminal conduct and professional misconduct that could jeopardize her academic career.

Advertisement

During the damages trial, Scofield described the emotional toll of seeing her name associated with the murders online, according to the Idaho Statesman. Jurors deliberated for less than two hours before returning their verdict, the outlet reported.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Guillard, who represented herself in court, has maintained that her statements were expressions of belief tied to tarot card readings, according to courtroom coverage.

It was not immediately known whether she intends to appeal. Fox News Digital has reached out to Guillard for comment.

Stepheny Price covers crime, including missing persons, homicides and migrant crime. Send story tips to stepheny.price@fox.com.

Advertisement

Related Article

Google hit with lawsuit over AI 'hallucinations' linking conservative activist to child abuse claims

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

5 teens, 3 adults arrested in San Francisco double stabbing at Dolores Park

Published

on

5 teens, 3 adults arrested in San Francisco double stabbing at Dolores Park



Three adults and five juveniles were arrested after two people were stabbed on Wednesday at San Francisco’s Dolores Park, police said.

The San Francisco Police Department said officers responded at about 4:50 p.m. to a report of a group of people fighting at the park. On the way there, the officers were notified that there was a possible stabbing, police said.

When officers arrived, they found two men with stab wounds, and the officers began first aid before medics arrived. Both men were taken to the hospital, one with life-threatening injuries, police said.

Advertisement

Officers searched the area around the park and detained eight people; they were all arrested after investigators developed probable cause, police said. The adults were identified as 18-year-old Fernando Moreno Hernandez, 18-year-old David Paz, and 19-year-old Yeferson Mondragon-Ortiz. Each was booked into the San Francisco County Jail.

The five teenagers were taken and booked into the city’s Juvenile Justice Center.

All suspects were charged with attempted murder, conspiracy, assault likely to produce great bodily injury, and assault with a deadly weapon.  

Police said the case was still under active investigation, and anyone with information was asked to contact the department at 415-575-4444, or send a text to TIP411 and begin the message with SFPD.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Ranking the Broncos free agent needs on offense

Published

on

Ranking the Broncos free agent needs on offense


NFL Free Agency opens up on Wednesday, with the legal tampering period beginning on Monday. The top free agents usually all commit to a team during that period, so be ready to rock and roll to start next week.

I figured now would be a good time to do a little discussion around the Denver Broncos and where we think their top priorities should be on offense when free agency kicks off.

Broncos top FA needs on offense

Tim Lynch: For free agency, I’d say running back and tight end are the highest on my wish list.

Advertisement

I’d say pay big for a top free agent running back and ensure you have a monster two-headed backfield next season. They need a superior run-blocking tight end and, if they move on from Evan Engram, a pass-catcher too.

Christopher Hart: I agree with Tim. Those are the biggest needs for the offense. Getting a top-notch running back and a tight end capable of playing inline to replace Adam Trautman is a must. The two players I advocated a few weeks ago were running back Travis Etienne and tight end Cade Otton. Both would be fantastic additions and help take Denver’s offense to the next level in 2026.

Scotty Payne: Playmaker is the top and biggest need. That includes a RB, TE, and/or WR in that order.

Need to improve the run game regardless, need some sort of production out of the TEs as well as improved blocking, and if they can get a true WR1, that would be great too.

Ross Allen: I think we’re all in agreement.

Advertisement

Getting someone who can be the dominant running back and have RJ Harvey serve that glamorous “joker” role would be huge for this offense. And given that they also don’t have a legitimate playmaker at the receiving position hurts them. A TE or WR can fill that role.

Sadaraine: The #1 need for the Broncos on offense is a top-notch running back. I will be blown away if the Broncos don’t sign a top-tier free agent running back to upgrade the offense (and no, J.K. Dobbins wouldn’t be that guy…not with his injury history).

There’s a significant gap in need after that until we start talking about tight ends and receivers. I think we’re more likely to see more money spent on a tight end than a receiver, but this offense could use both to be sure.

Ian St. Clair: Not to beat a dead horse, but running back is the biggest need and priority for this team when free agency starts. Having a consistent and effective running game will make Nix and the offense exponentially better. It will make the team better. After running back, the Broncos need to figure out their tight end.

Adam Malnati: Give Bo a weapon. I don’t care which position. Yes, RB is a need. Yes, TE is a need (thanks a lot Evan Engram). Still, a weapon would be nice.

Advertisement

Predictably, we’re all heavily keyed in on running back and tight end. That was a big part of our free agent profile coverage too and for good reason. There have been many rumors around Denver looking to target both positions next week and where there is smoke there is usually fire.

The question really becomes: go big or go affordable? With the championship window open, I’m leaning go big on premium play-maker positions this offseason.

Where do you stand on this discussion? Give us your top free agent needs on offense and how you hope the Broncos address them next week.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending