Connect with us

Washington

Advice | Carolyn Hax: Last therapist said cold-calling her office was ‘weird.’ Now what?

Published

on

Advice | Carolyn Hax: Last therapist said cold-calling her office was ‘weird.’ Now what?


Adapted from an online discussion.

Dear Carolyn: I’m working up my nerve to seek therapy. Your “What is therapy like?” column really helped. I would like a reality check on one thing.

I’m lucky enough to have insurance. The last time I sought therapy, I did what my friends suggested and called a therapist who was near me and on my insurance plan, and I asked her if she was taking new patients.

She said she was open to new patients, but — did I know someone who was a client of hers? Because if I didn’t, if I was just calling her out of the blue, well, “that’s kind of weird.”

Advertisement

I did end up having a few sessions with her. Long story long, it was not good. I ended up feeling a lot worse and found it impossible to start trying to find someone else to talk to.

Was that a weird way to find a therapist? Should I be going about this a different way? The only person I know who’s local to me and in therapy is my 24-year-old. Their therapist is absolutely wonderful — my spouse and I helped our kiddo find her when kiddo was a teenager — but I’m hesitant to see her because I’m worried about boundaries. Plus, I think she’s not on our plan anymore and money is definitely an issue.

50-something Female: 1. The weirdest thing about the first therapist was her uncalled-for comment. Not okay at all.

2. It is okay to rule out a therapist for saying something to make you uncomfortable like that. Live and learn. Either speak up about it first — “Making this call was difficult for me, and saying I did something ‘weird’ is not helpful” — or just decline to make an appointment and restart your search. Fit really matters.

3. It can be helpful to get a therapist recommendation from someone you trust — friend, doctor, school counselor, clergy — but, no, looking up someone through your insurance is not “weird.” The baseline thing to expect from a provider is a supportive welcome to their practice. Yeesh. And finding someone is hard!

Advertisement

4. I doubt your child’s wonderful therapist would even agree to treat you, given the potential conflict of interest. But you can ask her for names of other therapists she respects. Then see if any are in your plan, and voilà.

But still say “no thanks” if one of those recommended therapists says something to put you off. Finding that good fit — therapist, friends, career, neighborhood, partner, pants — is rarely a quick process and rarely not worth the effort.

· I’m a therapist, and I get at least a dozen such calls and emails every week. They’re not weird or unusual; people are directed my way by their insurance company listings, by web searches (notably the Psychology Today website) or by taking notice of the little sign with my name on it outside my office door.

The fact is, the ranks of therapists include a percentage of less-than-capable individuals, same as auto mechanics, financial advisers, lawyers or [insert your favorite example here]. If you feel a need to talk with someone, stick with it until you find someone with whom you’re comfortable.

· The therapist who called cold-calling weird is … weird.

Advertisement



Source link

Washington

Police finish DoorDash delivery after arresting driver in New Jersey

Published

on

Police finish DoorDash delivery after arresting driver in New Jersey


WASHINGTON TWP., N.J. — Officers in Washington Township, said they finished a DoorDash food delivery after arresting the driver who had warrants out for his arrest.

Body camera video shows officers stepping in to deliver the food themselves, a move the department in southern New Jersey later shared on its Facebook page.

“I thought something happened. Oh my God, I got so scared,” said the customer when she answered the door.

The DoorDash customer, seen on police body cam video, was instantly relieved and appreciative upon learning why officers were at her door.

Advertisement

“Arrested your driver, but, yeah, we delivered your food,” one of the officers said.

It turns out a Washington Township police officer stopped the DoorDash driver during routine patrols in front of a high school over the weekend.

“He made a stop on it for a violation,” said Washington Township Police Chief Patrick Gurcsik.

But then, Chief Gurcsik said the officer learned the driver had warrants out for his arrest in another county.

“He made the officers aware that he had two DoorDash meals in the car that he was in the middle of delivering,” Gurcsik said.

Advertisement

The officers went from cuffing the driver to ringing a doorbell to finish his delivery.

“I never heard of anything like that in the South Jersey area. It’s sort of a first for us here in Washington Township, definitely,” Gurcsik said.

Police finish DoorDash delivery after arresting driver in New Jersey

It’s happened in other places, too, including in New Mexico last summer, when a motorcycle cop delivered someone’s Chick-fil-A order after arresting the driver.

“Hello, sir, got your DoorDash. Oh, thank you,” the officer said. “He’s a good kid, give him five stars. He just didn’t take care of a simple insurance ticket.”

Advertisement

And officers over in Arizona made a similar arrest during a traffic stop and were seen on body camera finishing the delivery.

“Your GrubHub, still delivered your pizza,” the officer said.

“We definitely serve the community in more ways than one,” Gurcsik said.

Copyright © 2026 WPVI-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Holdout Democrats leave WA House support for income tax in doubt

Published

on

Holdout Democrats leave WA House support for income tax in doubt


The votes weren’t there yet late Wednesday for Democrats’ income tax bill in the Washington state House.Democratic members are withholding support for the proposed income tax on millionaires, saying they want to see if a new version of the controversial legislation, possibly due out Thursday, will satisfy their concerns.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Bill strengthening Washington child sex abuse material laws focuses on consciousness, AI

Published

on

Bill strengthening Washington child sex abuse material laws focuses on consciousness, AI


A bill aimed at tightening Washington’s laws on child sex abuse material is headed to Gov. Bob Ferguson’s desk after clearing the Legislature unanimously.

King County Prosecuting Attorney Leesa Manion said 2ESSB 5105 passed the House unanimously Tuesday night after the Senate unanimously approved it on Jan. 28, 2026.

SEE ALSO | Washington exempts clergy from reporting abuse learned in confession after settlement

Manion called the measure one of her public safety legislative priorities.

Advertisement

“People who peddle in the misery of sexually abused children must be held accountable,” Manion said. “I am grateful for the work of Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Laura Harmon – both in prosecuting these cases and advocating for these legal fixes – and Senators Tina Orwall and Manka Dhingra for championing this legislation.”

Manion’s office said the current state law has gaps that can prevent prosecutors from holding offenders accountable in some cases.

Under current law, prosecutors cannot charge defendants for creating images of child sex abuse unless the child victim was conscious or knew they were being recorded.

The office also said that possessing sexually explicit fabricated (AI) images of non-identifiable minors is not considered child sex abuse material under Washington law.

The bill would update RCW 9.68A.040 to remove the requirement that a child be aware of an abusive recording. It would also update the definition of child sex abuse material to include fabricated (AI) images of non-identifiable minors.

Advertisement

The legislation would also increase the statute of limitations to 10 years for depiction crimes. Manion’s office said the current statute of limitations is three years, and argued that because the images can remain online indefinitely, victims can be re-traumatized for decades.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending