Connect with us

Northeast

New Hampshire sent message, but it wasn't about Haley, Trump, Phillips or DeSantis

Published

on

New Hampshire sent message, but it wasn't about Haley, Trump, Phillips or DeSantis

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus get unlimited access to thousands of articles, videos and more with your free account!

Please enter a valid email address.

By entering your email, you are agreeing to Fox News Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

I learned something Tuesday night as I came to realize that somehow, in the very strange place we call New Hampshire, anything can happen.

Advertisement

Nothing that I expected came to pass in the primary there, and like a loser at the racetrack tearing up tickets, I shook my head in stern consternation.

But something gave me pause because this column that you are reading was supposed to be a requiem for the New Hampshire primary, and it still might be, but, suddenly, I’m not so sure.

HALEY LIVES TO FIGHT ANOTHER DAY AGAINST TRUMP, BUT FACES ‘CHALLENGING ROAD’ AHEAD IN GOP PRESIDENTIAL RACE

The Democrats may never vote first in New Hampshire again, and GOP primaries may not be enough to sustain its storied position, but even this down at the heel iteration of the event offered some important surprises.

As I outlined in earlier columns here, there was no juice this time in the Granite State, the circus did not come to town, this was the consensus of everyone I talked to, lifelong residents whose memories stretched to Truman and Muskie said so. 

Advertisement

But for Republicans there were two possibilities, either Trump would knock Haley out with a blow out, or she would stay close and live to fight on. 

The results from the voters were right down the middle, you’d need instant replay review to splice the difference between a big Trump win and a Haley moral victory.

There is a fluidity about the New Hampshire primary that courts surprises and game changers, in 1972 it was Ed Muskie’s emotional breakdown, in 2024 it was Ron DeSantis’ surprise move to drop out less than 72 hours before voting started. 

FOX NEWS LEADS CABLE COVERAGE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMARY, CRUSHES CNN AND MSNBC’S COMBINED PRIMETIME VIEWERSHIP

That decision profoundly changed expectations, with DeSantis in, the conventional wisdom was that Haley needed to get within single digits of Trump, with the Florida governor out, and the two person race a reality, as Haley predicted, the 11 point deficit by which she lost punched her ticket to South Carolina.

Advertisement

That is what the New Hampshire Primary does and why it may have redeemed itself as the rightful first primary in the nation.

There was never a particularly good reason why New Hampshire should go first, the best is probably that it is small enough for residents to kick the candidates’ tires, but it’s not the only small state.

And traditions do go by the wayside over time, but the potential loss of New Hampshire’s primary status feels like more than a loss of mere trappings, it feels like it would break a connection to our past.

CBS NEWS ANCHOR ADMITS NO ONE HE TALKED TO OUTSIDE NH GROCERY STORE IS ‘FEELING GOOD ABOUT ECONOMY’

The New Hampshire primary creates beautiful weirdness like Vermin Supreme, who has been running for president here since 1992, wearing a rubber boot on his head with a platform of free ponies and time travel. He is a local legend.

Advertisement

He and many others are part of a unique fanfare and pageantry, one in which this year former Senator Scott Brown’s rock band headlined a political event, and all of it is in celebration of one very important and very American idea, the joy of voting.

The potential erasure of the New Hampshire primary would not be the only political norm we have lost of late.

Consider the likelihood that neither of the two candidates in the general election will have participated in a single primary debate, consider further the bizarre but real possibility that there will be no debates between Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

RAMASWAMY: HALEY SHOULD DROP OUT FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY, AS OBSERVERS SAY SHE’S STILL ‘ALIVE AND KICKING’

Meanwhile, and in large part thanks to Covid, we no longer have election day, we have election weeks or months in which early voting is the norm, not the exception.

Advertisement

We can’t say we weren’t warned, this is all part of that new normal we were promised.

So here we are, the Democrats all but canceled the New Hampshire primary, there won’t be any debates, oh, and the presumptive GOP nominee is under 91 indictments and might be banned from the ballot in several states.

Also, nobody seems to want a rematch between Biden and Trump but somehow it is as inevitable as the sunrise.

The basic infrastructure and style of American presidential elections is transforming before our eyes.

All of this should make us consider comments last year from Klaus Schwab at the World Economic Forum in which he wondered whether we even still need elections.

Advertisement

“…since the next step could be to go into prescriptive mode, which means you do not even have to have elections anymore because you can already predict,” Schwab asked an expert in AI adding, “Because we know what the result will be. Can you imagine such a world?”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

When Americans envision the end of elections, or the end of our democratic republic, we tend to imagine bold proclamations, or military coups, but what if that isn’t how it happens?

What if it is a slow erosion of tradition, of participation, what if the holy hijinx of American elections is replaced by a cold analytics, giving us the leadership we didn’t even know we wanted?

This is why we need the New Hampshire primary, debates, a celebratory election day, and to avoid any plans coming out of the WEF like the plague.

Advertisement

Andy Warhol said that in the future everyone will have 15 minutes of fame, New Hampshire says that every 4 years anybody can have 15 minutes to try to become president, and some of them do.

As one local put it to me, “The spirit of the New Hampshire primary is stronger than the quality of the candidates in 2024.” I sincerely hope this is true because we continue to lose so many traditions in this post-COVID world, this awful new normal.

We need the New Hampshire primary, it is part of who we are, and once again, in 2024 the people of that great state showed why, this primary season is only moving on to South Carolina because they decided that it should.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DAVID MARCUS

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pittsburg, PA

Record number of peregrine falcons counted in Allegheny County

Published

on

Record number of peregrine falcons counted in Allegheny County



In the early 1960s, the peregrine falcon population declined so sharply that the raptors weren’t even nesting in Pennsylvania. But now, the National Aviary says a record number have been counted in Allegheny County.

Advertisement

The National Aviary says six peregrine falcons were recorded in the county during the annual Audubon Christmas Bird Count. The nation’s longest-running citizen science project collects data on bird populations for ornithologists, the aviary says. It also plays a role in guiding conservation action, like what was needed to bring peregrine falcons back from the brink of extinction. 

Because of the use of DDT, peregrine falcons were no longer nesting in the state of Pennsylvania by the early 1960s, the aviary said. But after the harmful pesticide, which negatively affects reproduction rates in birds, was banned in 1972, conservation efforts have helped the peregrine falcon rebound. It was removed from the federal endangered species list in 1999 and Pennsylvania’s list in 2021. 

The record number of peregrine falcons in Allegheny County is thanks in part to the nest on top of Pitt’s Cathedral of Learning in Oakland. For the past two years, biologists with the Pennsylvania Game Commission have banded chicks born in the nest. Three were banded last year, and two the year before that. 

People can watch Carla and Ecco raise their family in the nest on a livestream camera run by the National Aviary. Carla laid her first egg of the breeding season on March 16 last year, so the aviary says the start of another season isn’t too far away. 

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Lawmakers again push to restore Shore Line East service to 2019 levels

Published

on

Lawmakers again push to restore Shore Line East service to 2019 levels


Connecticut lawmakers are again looking to restore Shore Line East rail service to its pre‑pandemic levels, a proposal that could add about 90 more trains per week.

Lawmakers are also weighing a separate cost‑saving proposal to shift the line from electric rail cars back to diesel.

The plan comes as ridership remains well below 2019 numbers, though state data shows those numbers have begun to climb.

The Department of Transportation provided the General Assembly’s transportation committee with the following data:

Advertisement
  • 132 trains per week today versus 222 trains per week in 2019, according to the CTDOT commissioner.
  • In 2019, most weekday SLE trains traveled between New Haven Union Station and Old Saybrook. This allowed SLE to operate with only five train sets in the morning and four train sets in the afternoon.
  • It should be noted that 2019 SLE service levels were very different due to constrained infrastructure; 2019 service levels had a reduced number of SLE trains serving New London (13 trains per day Monday through Friday, as opposed to 20 today), while other stations had increased service (36 trains per day Monday through Friday, as opposed to 20 today).

“2019 levels beyond Old Saybrook to New London would require more crews and more train sets than were used in 2019, requiring significantly more financial resources,” the department wrote in its written testimony.

The department said the governor’s FY2027 budget does not include funding for a full restoration. In other words, even if the legislature requires additional trains, the funds are not included in the current financial plan.

Governor Lamont said on Monday to remember that the state subsidizes the line more than any other rail right now.

“There’s not as much demand as there are for some of the other rail services in other parts of the state, so that’s the balance we’re trying to get right,” Lamont said.

At a public hearing on Monday, concerns about the line’s reliability and schedule were a central focus in the testimony.

“We’re making the line less attractive, some would say. The schedules are very, very difficult to manage,” said Sen. Christine Cohen of Guilford, the co-chair of the committee.

Advertisement

The current schedule for eastbound morning commuters is difficult. The train either arrives in New London just after 7 a.m. or after 9 a.m.

“So obviously not really … conducive to a typical workday,” Cohen said.

Cohen, who represents communities along the line, said she continues to reintroduce the bill to expand service year after year, pushing the state to do more with the line.

She thanked the department for the work it was able to do with the recent funding to establish a through train to Stamford.

“What do we need to do, and what are the challenges that you face in terms of expansion at this time?” Cohen asked.

Advertisement

Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto responded that the biggest hurdle is the cost of labor and access fees to Amtrak, which owns the territory.

“The cost to provide rail service is very expensive,” Eucalitto said.

He said CTDOT knows the current schedule is “not ideal,” but the economics of a work-from-home society are difficult.

“People expect 100% of the trains that they had in 2019, but they only want to take it two days a week,” Eucalitto said.

Asked about the eastbound schedule, the commissioner explained Shore Line East still operates on a model that sends trains toward New Haven in the morning rather than toward New London.

Advertisement

Changing that would require more equipment, more crews, and a second morning operations base, as well as negotiations with Amtrak, which owns the tracks.

Amtrak is “protecting their slots to be able to run increased Northeast Regional service as well as increased Acela service,” Eucallito said. “They’re going to look at us and question, ‘Well, how does that impact our need for Amtrak services?’ They’ll never give you an answer upfront, it’s always: ‘show us a proposal and then they’ll respond to it.’”

Cohen, who chairs the Transportation Committee, touted how a successful Shoreline East benefits the environment, development along the line, and reduces I-95 congestion.

“We need to start talking about how much money this costs us and think about all of the ancillary benefits,” Cohen said during the hearing.

Cohen said there is multi-state support for extending the line into Rhode Island.

Advertisement

“We will need some federal dollars. But as you say, there are other businesses up the line in New London,” Cohen said. “We’ve got Electric Boat. We’ve got Pfizer up that way. If we can get those employees on the transit line, we’re all the better for it.”

Rider advocates said the issue is familiar.

“I’d rather see solutions, and not things that are holding it back,” said Susan Feaster, founder of the Shore Line East Riders’ Advocacy Group.

She said she worries the line is facing a transit death spiral, with reduced service leading to lower ridership and falling fare revenue.

“They have to give us the money,” Feaster said. “It shouldn’t have to be profitable.”

Advertisement

Like other train lines across the country, Shore Line East relies on subsidies.

“We’re not asking for everything to be done overnight, but just incrementally,” Feaster said.

The line received $5 million two years ago, which increased service levels.

The proposal comes as the state reviews whether to return to diesel rail cars that are more than 30 years old.

The state says the switch would save about $9 million, but riders have said it would worsen the passenger experience.

Advertisement

NBC Connecticut asked Cohen whether she’ll ask DOT to reverse that proposal.

“I really want to,” Cohen said. “I appreciate what CTDOT was trying to do in terms of not cutting service as a result of trying to find savings elsewhere. This isn’t the way to do it.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Arizona Sen. Gallego endorses Maine Senate hopeful Graham Platner

Published

on

Arizona Sen. Gallego endorses Maine Senate hopeful Graham Platner


PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — Maine Democrat Graham Platner has picked up another high-profile endorsement in his bid to flip a key Senate seat blue, marking another sign of the oyster farmer and combat veteran’s political resiliency even as he continues to face controversy throughout his campaign.

Arizona Democrat Ruben Gallego announced Monday that he was backing Platner, saying that the first-time candidate “reflects the grit and independence that defines Maine.”

“Graham Platner is the kind of fighter Maine hasn’t seen in a long time, someone who tells you exactly what he thinks, doesn’t owe anything to the special interests, and wakes up every day thinking about working families,” said Gallego, who won a Senate seat in Arizona in 2024 by more than 2 points while Trump carried the state by nearly 6 points.

Platner has previously been endorsed by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, and New Mexico Sen. Martin Heinrich, a Democrat.

Advertisement

However, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has endorsed Platner’s main opponent, Maine Gov. Janet Mills.

Both Platner, 41, and Mills, 78, are hoping to unseat Republican Sen. Susan Collins, 73, a five-term incumbent who announced last month that she was running for another term. A victory in Maine is crucial for Democrats’ efforts to take back control of the Senate. The Democratic Party needs to net four seats to retake the Senate majority, and they are aiming to do that in Maine, North Carolina, Alaska and Ohio.

READ MORE: Maine’s Graham Platner thinks voters will overlook his past to support a new type of candidate

Platner has gained traction with his anti-establishment image and economic equality message. He’s pressed forward despite controversies over old social media posts and a tattoo resembling a Nazi symbol, which he recently had covered up.

Gallego is among the Democrats named as possible 2028 presidential contenders. Last fall, he stumped in New Jersey, Virginia and Florida, where he campaigned for Democrats who went on to win their elections.

Advertisement

“I have an immense amount of respect for him and I’m looking forward to joining him as a fellow Marine and combat infantryman in the U.S. Senate,” Platner said in a statement.

Kruesi reported from Providence, Rhode Island.

A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy.

Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue.


Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending