Connect with us

World

We asked 13 MEPs why they voted no to condemn Russia’s war in Ukraine

Published

on

We asked 13 MEPs why they voted no to condemn Russia’s war in Ukraine

From a TV display above the plenary of the European Parliament on Tuesday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy made an impassioned name for Europe to show that it supported his invaded nation.

Earlier, parliamentarians had stood at their desks applauding Ukraine and sporting blue and yellow flags. Exterior the parliament, Ukrainians and their supporters maintained a loud vigil.

Sat at a desk sporting a t-shirt, Zelenskyy’s speech was so shifting that even the parliament’s translator was choked with tears. After a debate, MEPs had been then requested to vote on a decision that known as on Russia to stop the violence and condemned the warfare Vladimir Putin had began.

An enormous majority – 637 MEPs – from the far left to the far proper, from Romania to Portugal to Finland, united and voted sure.

Mick Wallace voted no.

Advertisement

“A lot of the decision is essential and crucial,” Wallace instructed Euronews on Wednesday.

“It accurately condemns Russian aggression and requires humanitarian help for Ukraine and Ukrainian refugees. These are phrases we wholeheartedly help.”

However a lot of it, Wallace mentioned, was not. It known as for the strengthening of NATO’s ahead army presence, a dramatic improve in defence spending and the strengthening of the European pillar inside NATO. It requires the substitute of Russian with American oil, extracted by way of fracking.

“We sought to take away these parts from the decision, however the majority within the European Parliament has voted to maintain them. We are actually requested to vote on the textual content as a complete, which incorporates these provisions. We’re against warfare, and we’re against this decision.”

Wallace wasn’t alone in opposing the decision on Tuesday, six others from the parliament’s Left group additionally voted no: Clare Daly, Özlem Demirel, Sandra Pereira, João Pimenta Lopes, Martin Schirdewan, Miguel City Crespo.

Advertisement

However equally, it was not a celebration platform, French MEP Manon Aubry, and co-chair of the Left, was one of many sponsors of the invoice.

Aubry instructed Euronews that six amendments to the invoice that “considerably improved the textual content”, together with including the decision for a direct ceasefire, higher involvement for the United Nations and OSCE and calling for refugees to be welcomed, had been added after an intervention from the Left.

“I co-signed the preliminary textual content and voted the ultimate textual content as co-chair of the group as a result of I needed to ship a transparent political message denouncing Putin’s irresponsible aggression and supporting the Ukrainian folks,” she mentioned.

“Different delegations determined to abstain or vote in opposition to the textual content as a result of they needed to insist on the danger of a worldwide warfare on the continent if the EU enters the vicious circle of army escalation.”

Irish MEP Daly mentioned she voted in opposition to the decision as a result of it requires rising weapons provide to Ukraine, one thing that can “solely make the scenario worse”.

Advertisement

“The one approach by which the battle will be ended is thru peace talks and negotiation. Throwing in additional weapons into the scenario merely places petrol on the fireplace,” Daly instructed Euronews.

“It’s actually regrettable that NATO and the US and the EU should not supporting the thought of an internationally brokered peace settlement. That is the one resolution. Paradoxically it’s only the Chinese language placing this ahead now, however that is the one approach.”

German MEP Demirel additionally instructed Euronews that the decision would solely “pour oil on the fireplace” of the battle, and accused European Fee President Ursula Von der Leyen of utilizing the scenario – together with Zelenskyy’s speech – of an excuse to push ahead a wider agenda: reworking the EU “right into a tangible and highly effective army union,” she mentioned.

“I feel it’s cynical to abuse the struggling of the Ukrainians for one thing like this. The peoples in Ukraine, of Europe and the world wish to stay in peace and social safety.”

Spanish MEP Crespo mentioned that whereas he “completely condemned Putin’s invasion of Ukraine”, the decision would solely escalate the scenario. “Confronted with two giants placing on the desk an increasing number of weapons, extra missiles and starting to threaten with nuclear weapons, the one approach out is to demand to go all of the methods to peace. In any other case, it’ll solely result in loss of life and destruction,” he mentioned.

Advertisement

Schirdewan responded by way of a spokesperson with an announcement by the German Die Linke delegation, which mentioned that though it condemned Russia’s invasions as a “blatant breach of worldwide regulation”, it was in opposition to sending arms to Ukraine.

“The supposed supply of deadly tools to the Ukrainian military price 450 million euros finally means the ultimate departure from the frequent place of the EU arms export directives, which prohibit arms exports to warfare and disaster zones. These arms exports are a breach of taboo in European international coverage,” it mentioned.

‘An imperialist warfare’

Some who had been in opposition to the decision, nevertheless, went additional.

In an announcement, two of the non-aligned members of the parliament who voted no, Kostas Papadakis and Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos mentioned that the Communist Get together of Greece (KKE) condemned “the imperialist warfare, which is the results of the imperialist competitors for spheres of affect and wealth-producing sources that the decision enhances, as it’s shifting within the harmful path of escalating the imperialist competitors with EU-NATO army tools and sanctions.

“Condemning capitalist Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is mixed with condemning the US-NATO-EU warfare crimes in opposition to the peoples of Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Libya. Peoples shouldn’t select an imperialist.”

Advertisement

Lopes and Pereira, who responded to Euronews by way of a spokesperson, echoed that view.

Of their assertion, the Portuguese Communist Get together members accused the European Union and NATO of supporting a coup d’etat in Ukraine in 2014, described the Russian invasion as a “army intervention” and echoed the Kremlin’s line that Ukraine was managed by fascist forces. It accused NATO and the EU – though, notably, not Moscow – of “war-mongering”.

Wallace, in the meantime, instructed Euronews that his voting report on the difficulty to be misrepresented, and whereas he voted in opposition to the decision, he and fellow Irish MEP Daly had persistently condemned warfare, wherever it was.

“We’ll proceed to oppose each Russian aggression and the militarisation of Europe, which aren’t within the pursuits of Ukrainians, Russians, Europeans, or anybody else,” he mentioned.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

UK imposes sanctions on Isabel dos Santos, Ukrainian oligarch Firtash

Published

on

UK imposes sanctions on Isabel dos Santos, Ukrainian oligarch Firtash

The measures are a part of the Labour government tightening Britain’s anti-corruption sanctions regime.

The United Kingdom has barred Angolan billionaire Isabel dos Santos and Ukrainian oligarch Dmytro Firtash and frozen their UK assets, the government announced, in what it said was part of a new crackdown on “dirty money”.

The measures on Thursday were the first step in tightening Britain’s anti-corruption sanctions regime as promised in July’s election, the Labour government said.

“These unscrupulous individuals selfishly deprive their fellow citizens of much-needed funding for education, healthcare and infrastructure – for their own enrichment,” Foreign Secretary David Lammy said in a statement.

Dos Santos, whose father Jose Eduardo dos Santos served as Angola’s president for 38 years until 2017, is Africa’s first female billionaire and has faced corruption accusations in Angola and elsewhere for years. She denies the allegations and says she is the target of a long-running political vendetta.

Advertisement

She was sanctioned by the United States in 2021 for “involvement in significant corruption” and is barred from entering the country.

Britain said dos Santos abused her positions at Angolan state oil firm Sonangol and telecoms company Unitel to embezzle at least 350 million pounds ($440m).

Dos Santos lost an appeal to overturn an order freezing up to 580 million pounds of her assets in September as part of a lawsuit at London’s High Court brought by Unitel. Global police agency Interpol has issued a red notice for her.

In a statement cited by the Reuters news agency, dos Santos said that the British sanctions were “incorrect and unjustified”.

“I was not given the opportunity to defend myself against these allegations,” she said. “I intend to appeal and I hope that the United Kingdom will give me the opportunity to present my evidence.”

Advertisement
Dmytro Firtash, one of Ukraine’s most influential oligarchs, at a trial in Vienna, Austria [File: Samuel Kubani/AFP]

Firtash is wanted by Ukrainian and US authorities on suspicion of embezzling nearly $500m involving Ukraine’s gas transit system. He says the charges are without legal foundation.

He is currently in Austria fighting extradition to the US.

In June 2021, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed a decree imposing sanctions on Firtash, including the freezing of his assets and withdrawal of licences from his companies, after accusing him of selling titanium products to Russian military companies.

Britain said Firtash had extracted “hundreds of millions of pounds from Ukraine through corruption”, and hidden tens of millions of pounds of ill-gotten gains in the UK property market alone.

Britain also sanctioned his wife Lada Firtash, who it said held UK assets on his behalf including the site of the old Brompton Road rail station of the London Underground.

Advertisement

Latvian businessman and politician Aivars Lembergs, who was put on a US sanctions list in 2019 for alleged corruption, was also sanctioned, as was his daughter Liga Lemberga. The British government said Lembergs had “abused his political position to commit bribery and launder money.”

Lammy said the penalties were the start of a crackdown.

“I committed to taking on kleptocrats and the dirty money that empowers them when I became foreign secretary, and these sanctions mark the first step in delivering this ambition,” he said.

Continue Reading

World

‘A Complete Unknown’ First Reactions Praise ‘Shockingly Moving’ Bob Dylan Biopic: Timothée Chalamet’s Performance Is a ‘True Tour De Force’

Published

on

‘A Complete Unknown’ First Reactions Praise ‘Shockingly Moving’ Bob Dylan Biopic: Timothée Chalamet’s Performance Is a ‘True Tour De Force’

The first reactions to Timothée Chalamet‘s “A Complete Unknown” have started rolling in on social media ahead of the Bob Dylan biopic’s Christmas release date, with members of the press praising Chalamet, Monica Barbaro and more for their performances in the film.

“Timothée Chalamet slides into Bob Dylan with an effortless yet focused determination. Fearless in some hypnotic moments,” Variety‘s senior awards editor Clayton Davis wrote on X. “For me, it’s Monica Barbaro and Elle Fanning that anchor the story of an illusive, mysterious man that remains in that sphere. James Mangold helms with confidence, with gorgeous sets and costumes. Much respect to one of the best to do it.”

Film critic Scott Menzel said Chalamet “delivers the performance of the year,” adding: “A true tour-de-force where Chalamet is never seen. Chalamet’s performance is not just about the voice and look but rather all of the little nuances and mannerisms that he perfectly brings to his life in his portrayal of Bob Dylan. Great supporting performances too from Monica Barbaro as Joan Baez and Edward Norton as Pete Seeger.”

While the reactions to “A Complete Unknown” have been mostly positive so far, the biopic received some negative responses, including Los Angeles film critic Ryan Swen, who used some Dylan lyrics to describe his reaction: “It’s vile and deceitful — it’s cruel and it’s mean. Ugliest thing that you have ever seen.”

The Playlist’s Gregory Ellwood, meanwhile, called the film “superb” and “shockingly moving,” adding: “Chalamet is fantastic. Monica Barbaro is incredible. We need a Joan Baez spin off movie.”

Advertisement

From Searchlight Pictures and director James Mangold (“Walk the Line”), “A Complete Unknown” follows a young Dylan as he arrives in New York in the early 1960s. The film tracks the music legend as he becomes a fixture in the Greenwich Village folk scene and befriends people like Joan Baez (played by Barbaro) and Pete Seeger (Edward Norton). The film ends after Dylan straps on an electric guitar at Newport Folk Festival in 1965, playing “Like a Rolling Stone” and revolutionizing the genre.

Speaking to Variety back in July, when the first trailer for the film was released, a dozen Dylan experts expressed cautious optimism toward “A Complete Unknown,” praising Chalamet’s performance of “A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall.”

“A Complete Unknown” is written by Mangold and Jay Cocks, and based on Elijah Wald’s 2015 book “Dylan Goes Electric!” The rest of the cast includes Boyd Holbrook as Johnny Cash, P. J. Byrne as Harold Leventhal, Scoot McNairy as Woody Guthrie, Dan Fogler as Albert Grossman and Will Harrison as Bob Neuwirth, among others. The film is produced by Fred Berger, Alex Heineman, Peter Jaysen, Bob Bookman, Alan Gasmer, Jeff Rosen, Chalamet and Mangold.

Check out more first reactions below.

“Wow, #ACompleteUnknown. Timothée Chalamet’s performance in this is superior. James Mangold and his entire team pull off a technical feat from sound, editing, costume, cinematography to production design, down to the subtleties of makeup and hair. Loved it.” — Jazz Tangcay (@jazzt)

Advertisement

“#ACompleteUnknown is absolutely incredible. Clocks in at nearly 2.5 hrs but flies by. The musical performances are perfectly placed, the story is captivating. Timothée Chalamet, Monica Barbaro, Elle Fanning, and Edward Norton all deliver unforgettable performances. I’m in awe.” — Tessa Smith (@MamasGeeky)

“A COMPLETE UNKNOWN looks and sounds great, a standard biopic that truly comes alive when its iconic characters make passionate music together. Timothée Chalamet is well-cast but Monica Barbaro and Edward Norton steal the show as Joan Baez and Pete Seeger.” — Abe Friedtanzer (@movieswithabe)

“A Complete Unknown manages to maintain tell us everything about Bob Dylan while telling us almost nothing about Bob Dylan. Some would say that was the target. The movie is ultimately about the power of the individual and talent and how what we all want can turn on a dime, repeatedly. Chalamet brings enormous power to this portrait of a man who just keeps leaving but then also keeps delivering surprises. Edward Norton’s turn is perfectly true to Seeger. Monica Barbero delivers a Baez of many facets, from fire to ice. And Elle Fanning is destined to be underrated in a complex turn as “the first NY girlfriend.” I really need to see it again to fully negotiate all that is there and all that is not there by design.” — David Poland (@DavidPoland)

“A COMPLETE UNKNOWN is a solid biopic, showing Bob Dylan as a deeply talented individual with a lack of social intelligence. Timothee Chalamet is excellent & Monica Barbaro is captivating as Joan Baez. Oscar nominatons for Best Picture, Cinematography, Sound, Costumes are possible” — Tim Gerber (@ZurrieSkate)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Russia launched intercontinental ballistic missile toward Ukraine, air force says

Published

on

Russia launched intercontinental ballistic missile toward Ukraine, air force says

Russian troops launched various missiles, reportedly including an intercontinental ballistic missile from the Astrakhan region, in an early morning attack on Ukraine on Thursday.

Ukraine’s Air Force said on its Telegram account that it destroyed six Kh-101 cruise missiles using anti-aircraft combat.

The Russian attack hit critical infrastructure in the central-eastern city of Dnipro, according to the air force.

US EMBASSY IN KYIV CLOSED WEDNESDAY AS ‘POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT AIR ATTACK’ LOOMS

A Ukrainian chaplain from the city of Dnipro Leonid conducts an evacuation from a frontline village, as local residents are urged to leave due to shelling on November 19, 2024 in the direction of Kurakhovo, Ukraine.  ((Photo by Kostiantyn Liberov/Libkos/Getty Images))

Advertisement

This comes after Ukraine fired American-supplied long-range missiles into Russia on Tuesday, marking the first time for Kyiv to do so in the 1,000 days of war – a move that was authorized by President Biden on Sunday.

UKRAINE FIRES FIRST BARRAGE OF US-MADE LONG-RANGE MISSILES INTO RUSSIA, KREMLIN SAYS

Russian President Vladimir Putin

Russian President Vladimir Putin listens to Moscow-appointed head of Russian-controlled Zaporizhzhia region of Ukraine, Yevgeny Balitsky during their meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Monday, Nov. 18, 2024. (Vyacheslav Prokofyev, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)

There are currently no reports on injuries or fatalities.

If the attack did involve an ICBM, it would mark a major escalation in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and the first time such a weapon has been used.

Advertisement

This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates.

Continue Reading

Trending